backtop


Print 5 comment(s) - last by darkavatar.. on Mar 29 at 3:01 PM

Wikipedia facing new competition with with co-founder

It seems Wikipedia has become so counterproductive; one of the founders of the online encyclopedia went off and created his own, separate site.  Citizendium, created by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger, ended its pilot program on Sunday, March 25 and began its beta site the following Tuesday.

According to Times Online, the site will hold its democratic ideals while monitoring posts and making sure that they and posters are legitimate.  Contributors to the new site are required to give their real names, and experts from the various fields will be asked to fact check material that is posted.  Reliability is marked by a green tick on the website.

I consider myself a pretty consistent Wikipedia user.  And while I assume everything I'm reading is fairly accurate, I try not to take everything word for word.  Especially recently with more encounters of frauds that pretend to be scholars.  Recently a 24-year old man from Kentucky with no higher education was discovered posing as a tenured professor of religion and an expert in canon law.  He was recognized by the website administrators and users as a professional, under which he had posted false information.

There have also been other damaging cases of posts that falsely convict certain individuals as murders, such as the post about a journalist who was accused of assassinating both Kennedys and eating JFK.

Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia de facto leader, denies the unreliability of his site, saying that anonymity leads to irresponsibility and that he is unaware of the quality of the discourse on the website.

Citizendium is up and running its beta site, currently containing over 1,000 articles with over 100 contributors.

The site almost identically resembles Wikipedia in layout and the search engine is the same.  The only difference is one advertised by Sanger: that Citizendium is more accountable and reliable than Wikipedia.  If you just want to do research on any topic, I suggest sticking with Wikipedia for the moment, but if you feel you have something to offer to the encyclopedia, then give Citizendium a shot because the site very much lacks information.  Time will tell whether the site will hit or miss.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

How is this different?
By Spivonious on 3/27/2007 2:57:37 PM , Rating: 3
Just because contributors to the site have to give their real names doesn't mean the information is any more accurate.

I'm also curious who who will be taking on the daunting task of validating everything submitted.




RE: How is this different?
By cochy on 3/27/2007 3:19:11 PM , Rating: 2
Who knows. One thing is for sure. At 1,000 articles they have a lot of catching up to do. Wikipedia has tons more information, and nevermind the fraudulent information here and there, is a very good source of information. Plus they clean up bad info pretty darn quick. If I were a betting man I'd write off this Citizenadium or whatever right off the bat, just because it's not offering anything different or better.


RE: How is this different?
By someguy123 on 3/27/2007 4:39:34 PM , Rating: 3
also...citizenadium sounds so much worse than wikipedia. wiki grew by word of mouth (or typing of hand) and I just can't see something called citizenadium becoming popular especially with it only offering the same content as wikipedia.


RE: How is this different?
By darkavatar on 3/29/2007 3:01:05 PM , Rating: 2
I think it would be better to apply something like this to wikipedia, there is enough people & daily users so it should be possible to have a few people verify every edit.

But I guess this is out of the question or there wouldn't be any breakups happening right now.


By Staples on 3/27/2007 4:56:26 PM , Rating: 2
wikipedia has been around for so long and it has a well known name. Even if this is a better encyclopedia, I doubt it could ever catch up as far as content is concerned.




"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki