backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 25 comment(s) - last by Cerberus90.. on Nov 11 at 11:02 AM

Foreign hackers have reportedly attacked computers used by White House staff, Obama, and McCain camps

Government officials publicly disclosed that computer systems used by the White House, President-elect Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain have been attacked by foreign hackers.

Not surprisingly, it seems White House computer servers were attacked by hackers operating inside of China, who were able to read unclassified e-mails written by White House staff.

"We are getting very targeted Chinese attacks so it stretches credulity that these are not directed by government-related organizations," the government official told the Financial Times.  "For a short period of time they successfully breach a wall and then you rebuild the wall...  It is not as if they have continued access.  It is constant cat and mouse."

Members of the Obama campaign believe they were targeted by hackers located in China or Russia, with the FBI reassuring the camp that political opponents were not behind the security attacks.  A "serious amount of files" were stolen after the midsummer cyber attack.  Shortly after the Obama's headquarters were attacked, McCain suffered a similar attack, blamed on an "unknown foreign entity" also responsible for stealing numerous files.

Specifically, files related to the candidates' policy proposals were stolen, which could be later used for policy negotiations with President-elect Obama.  A federal investigation has been launched into the numerous security breaches, although it's unknown how much can be done to punish the hackers if they are in a different nation.

As political tensions remain high between both nations, cyber attacks originating from China have risen over the past few years, as security experts warn of possible cyber warfare between China and the United States.  Government computers also are routinely attacked by users in eastern European nations, although it's less likely they are government approved actions.

Chinese hackers who are believed to be government-sponsored have been responsible for security breaches in England, France, Canada, the United States, and several other nations.

The possibility of data loss and theft has led the U.S. government to restrict BlackBerry and computer use while overseas, especially in China and Russia.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Regardless who it is....
By NateB on 11/10/2008 7:09:32 AM , Rating: 5
Knowledge is Power.




RE: Regardless who it is....
By Lord 666 on 11/10/2008 8:57:46 AM , Rating: 3
...And knowing is half the battle.


RE: Regardless who it is....
By TheFace on 11/10/2008 9:48:51 AM , Rating: 5
GI JOE!


RE: Regardless who it is....
By Belard on 11/10/08, Rating: 0
RE: Regardless who it is....
By Regs on 11/10/2008 10:17:25 AM , Rating: 1
fu*k yeah!


RE: Regardless who it is....
By quiksilvr on 11/10/2008 12:03:09 PM , Rating: 3
COOOOOOBRAAAAAA!!


Don't worry, be happy.
By Clauzii on 11/10/2008 7:43:44 AM , Rating: 2
"But the official stressed that the hackers had accessed only the unclassified computer network, not the more secure classified network."

They just wanted to know what the candidates had for breakfast. No need to raise defcon level yet.




RE: Don't worry, be happy.
By afkrotch on 11/10/2008 8:36:19 AM , Rating: 2
It's called OPSEC. (Operations Security). Just because it's unclassified, doesn't mean it's useless information. Examples unclassified information would be a date and time of a specific amount of troops being send to an undisclosed location. Makes for a fine place for a possible terrorist attack.

The same can be said with these computers that were hacked. Information of where they are going, security weaknesses of that location, how many security personnel will be on duty, etc. That would all be unclassified information.

SIPRNET would be a hell of a lot harder for them to hack.


RE: Don't worry, be happy.
By JonB on 11/10/2008 9:49:49 AM , Rating: 5
Once the Chinese complete building SkyNet, nobody's lunch menu will be secure.


RE: Don't worry, be happy.
By Cerberus90 on 11/11/2008 11:02:22 AM , Rating: 2
You do know that SkyNet is already a real thing.

Its a intelligence gathering sattellite IIRC.

And Cyberdyne systems is real apparently too, the article about the exo-skeleton suit is built by cyberdyne.


RE: Don't worry, be happy.
By realmp06 on 11/11/2008 12:34:38 AM , Rating: 2
I would agree SIPRNET is a lot tougher to hack! OPSEC is so important! You have no idea how much the military stresses that, especially to overseas people that currently deployed to Iraq (i.e. myself). But the chineese can't hack my network! the secret? no internet connection to it, its just a router set up with computers to share files (and ad-hoc network).


Hmmm
By shoopdeewoop on 11/10/2008 10:42:36 AM , Rating: 5
Give me some hot pockets and Xena tapes...I'll see what the Chinese are up to...




Presidents PC
By xsilver on 11/10/2008 7:39:26 AM , Rating: 5
Theres no point hacking the presidents PC at the moment. There has been nothing on that thing for the last 8 years except sesame street and instructional videos on public speaking :)

Oh and also maybe giant pictograms of world leaders.




RE: Presidents PC
By Tsuwamono on 11/10/08, Rating: -1
RE: Presidents PC
By xsilver on 11/10/08, Rating: -1
RE: Presidents PC
By Ammohunt on 11/10/08, Rating: -1
RE: Presidents PC
By Darkefire on 11/10/2008 5:25:55 PM , Rating: 2
About the public speaking bit...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck0Dle9V7FQ

Cocaine is a helluva drug.


New espionage?
By TheFace on 11/10/2008 9:58:10 AM , Rating: 2
Is this how this century is going to play out as far as spying/espionage? It's going to make Bond films much less interesting...

I wonder if the government has a network not attached to the Web? It would make sense, but it would also be extremely difficult making sure that not one computer is connected to both. Then there are always those government officials that lose their laptops..




And those guys ...
By CyberHawk on 11/10/2008 10:24:35 AM , Rating: 2
... and girls spent how much for security?

I'd say .... A LOT!

And this same government wants personal data of european citizens too .... I say no freakin' way!!!




What we need...
By conflictxinside on 11/10/2008 1:59:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
"For a short period of time they successfully breach a wall and then you rebuild the wall..."


... are some Mongolian security advisors...




By toyotabedzrock on 11/10/2008 7:09:36 PM , Rating: 2
Why don't they just set there firewalls to drop w/o response ALL traffic originating in china or russia?




I don't think it's the chinese
By estaffer on 11/10/08, Rating: -1
RE: I don't think it's the chinese
By Vikendios on 11/10/2008 8:05:19 AM , Rating: 2
And what do you think all these guys at NSA are doing all day ? There are attempting non-stop to hack into foreign govts nets, as it's their job to do.


RE: I don't think it's the chinese
By PedroDaGr8 on 11/10/2008 8:57:39 AM , Rating: 2
DO you have any clue what you are talking about? The chinese for many many years have been working at hacking various foreign governments. Now whether it is a bad thing depends on which side of the fence you are on. Personally, I think it is a valid form of spying, one in which we should and probably do engage as well. If I had to guess, I would say that we are a bit better at it as you don't here about it.


RE: I don't think it's the chinese
By PrezWeezy on 11/10/2008 2:45:09 PM , Rating: 4
Just because we don't hear about it doesn't infer superiority. The Chinese government would never admit to being breached. Ours has a responsibility to be open about it. Not that they tell us every time, but usually the story gets out. If a reporter in China had run a story similar to this they would no longer be around to run another story.


"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments









botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki