backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 33 comment(s) - last by jlips6.. on Mar 28 at 11:57 AM


A sheet of graphene is a mere atom thick and has low resistance and high mobility making it optimal for both interconnects and semiconductor applications.  (Source: University of Maryland)
New research indicates new form of carbon superior to copper for electronics

While the world of electronics has seen many changes over the years, on a hardware level it still remains very much a world of silicon and copper.  Some are looking to change that.  New research from the University of Maryland has, for the first time, quantitatively measured properties of electron conduction in sheets of graphene.

Graphene is an exotic form of carbon consisting of a single-atom thick layer of carbon atoms.  It, along with carbon nanotubes and fullerenes, has been a hot topic in recent research, but until now scientists were unable to measure exactly how well it stacks up to copper.

Resistivity, a specific measure of resistance to electrical current, is a measure of how much electron flow is impeded and certain temperatures.  An increase in temperature leads to atomic vibrations, and these wiggling atoms can collide with flowing electrons, cutting off the flow.  All material experience this phenomena to some degree, except for superconductors or theoretical-only materials at absolute zero.  However, good conductors experience less resistance with temperature to electron flow.

For graphene at room temperature, the true resistivity was shown to be 1.0 µohm-cm.  This is approximately 35 percent less than in copper, the material with the lowest known resitivity at room temperature.  Unfortunately the researchers point out that these levels are not currently reachable due to dirty graphene.

Physics professor Michael S. Fuhrer of the university's Center for Nanophysics and Advanced Materials said, "Other extrinsic sources in today's fairly dirty graphene samples add some extra resistivity to graphene, so the overall resistivity isn't quite as low as copper's at room temperature yet. However, graphene has far fewer electrons than copper, so in graphene the electrical current is carried by only a few electrons moving much faster than the electrons in copper."

Now, the goal of these researchers is to find new ways to purify graphene, so that it can eventually be used instead of copper for semiconductors.

Fuhrer closes, "We believe that this work points out the importance of these extrinsic effects, and creates a roadmap for finding better substrates for future graphene devices."

Graphene is mechanical tough, flexible, transparent, and a great conductor of heat.  The new research shows that it would make an ideal double both in transistors and in interconnects, replacing silicon and copper to form ultra-high frequency circuits.  Further, it could be ideally applied to vast amount of applications including photovoltaics, lcd panels, and sensors, all of which rely on optimal conductivity/electrical behavior.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/25/2008 5:27:55 PM , Rating: 3
Daily tech, keep up with the times. This technology break through came out more than 5 months ago. If anyone wants to, this is a little extension to the article based on the article in science news That came out in early fall 2007. (9/29/07) This is the stripped down version, as I see it.

Scientists are excited about using graphene for computer chips because In layers, it's much stronger than silicone. silicone will reach it's potential once they make the chips too thin. All circuitry is inscribed using chemical lithography, so the chip will break once they reach a certain point. However, a layer of graphene is much, much stronger than silicone, so they can make them thinner than silicone, and create faster chips. When this article came out, they were trying to make transistors, and I wouldn't be suprised if they've succeded since.
Also, graphene conducts heat extremely well, making it very easy to cool, and since it is more heat resistant to silicone, it could require less cooling. This should make anyone who enjoys overclocking or simply likes using intense programs (like games) start to take lots of interest. (If they're not interested already.)

Scientist's got so excited when they discovered they could create graphene chips easily and inexpensively. You can too. Take a pencil, sharpen it, and stick some scotch tape as smoothly as you can on the lead. (not on the tip.) Take the tape off. You should have pencil lead on the tape. That is how they make graphene chips. So complex, I know. (To get the chips off the tape they just dissolve the tape in acid.)

Graphene also has many electrical properties that are very interesting. It can increase it's resistance specifically using a magnetic field of varying power (Quantum hall effect.)It also conducts electricity unlike any other metal that we know of, moving electrons in lockstep, regardless of their power.

For the full version, click the link. Some of this stuff is beyond me, but I can understand enough to get really excited about it. Hopefully, others will feel the same.

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20070929/bob8....




RE: a little bit more info
By pnyffeler on 3/25/2008 5:42:55 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not sure your method of making graphene is quite accurate. Pencil led is comprised of graphite, which can be said to be comprised of lots of pieces of graphene. Graphene is nothing more than a large arrangement of carbon atoms in a planar sheet. Graphite is made up of huge amounts of small pieces of graphene. What the article is talking about is constructing one huge sheet of graphene that was contiguous. The only way the graphene will work is if scientists can make the graphene sheet to be formed without the inclusion of impurities (boron, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, etc.) and does not have any holes or gaps in the sheet.

The way that electricity is conducted through graphene requires the sheet to be contiguous. It's not enough just to lay down a single layer of several independent pieces of graphene. There would be conduction problems going between individual pieces of graphene. Only when the entire sheet of graphene is defect free will you see the conduction capabilities reach and exceed the levels of copper.

By the way, for all you chem geeks out there, graphene is just a huge arrangement of carbon in interconnected benzene rings. Electrical conduction occurs through the aromatic pi bonds, which is why the graphene must be bonded and without impurities.


RE: a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/25/2008 5:57:41 PM , Rating: 2
What's wrong with my method?
Of course it was simplified. And yes, you are correct, graphite is made of many sheets of graphene. Did I say otherwise? This is the basic method they use, as I previously said, according to the article. They rub the graphen with silicone-oxide crystal beforehand, and let the graphene sheets settle on the crystal afterward. If you have something useful that would clarify your harping on this, inform me.

and if what you say is true, couldn't they bond the graphene strip to another conductor in order to maintain the electrical properties of graphene over that one section?

I haven't done too much research on this, but I must say your information is fascinating. Do you have any articles or links that I can read in to? (Too lazy to get it myself lol.)


RE: a little bit more info
By nstott on 3/25/2008 9:49:17 PM , Rating: 2
"...couldn't they bond the graphene strip to another conductor in order to maintain the electrical properties of graphene over that one section?"

No because of something called contact resistance. But also, the whole point was to eliminate the other conductor to begin with...

It is possible to create a composite material with graphene as you suggest, but the properties of the composite would be different. That isn't to say that such a composite would not be useful or that there wouldn't be a cost benefit. That being said, one could probably use current carbon materials like conductive carbon black to make such a composite material at lower cost than developing composite graphene materials.


RE: a little bit more info
By nstott on 3/25/2008 10:14:07 PM , Rating: 2
Some more harping for clarity:

Silicon-oxide *crystal*?! The silicon oxide, or silica, substrate (probably a clean microscope slide) is more simply *glass*, which is not a crystal.


RE: a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/26/2008 9:40:03 AM , Rating: 2
hmm... I probably should've caught that. I was just taking quotes from the article.


RE: a little bit more info
By James Holden on 3/27/2008 7:31:22 PM , Rating: 2
It's a crystalline structure


RE: a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/25/2008 5:58:37 PM , Rating: 3
and now for the refreshing one sentence post to give your eyes a rest from the evils of long explanations.


RE: a little bit more info
By nstott on 3/25/2008 9:39:35 PM , Rating: 3
There might also be a problem with *silicone* chips warping, that is unless you meant to say *silicon*... :P

The thickness of silicon isn't really an issue since there are other manufacturing techniques that get around the issues you propose. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) allows for precisely one-,two-, three-atomic layers thick of silicon. More complicated schemes are being developed to make 3-D structures of silicon and germanium followed by selective etching to make atomically precise 3-D architectured nanodevices.

Cost of the materials and manufacturing are big issues, but an application-dependent material property can trump cost in many cases.


RE: a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/28/2008 11:57:40 AM , Rating: 2
germanium? Umm... isn't that a little/crazy expensive if you're incorporating that in to every chip?


RE: a little bit more info
By nstott on 3/25/2008 10:19:45 PM , Rating: 2
5 months ago? Graphene has been studied for over sixty years. However, the "break through" in determining the RT resistivity of "clean" graphine was reported in the literature on February 11, 2008, or a little over a month ago:

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServ...


RE: a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/26/2008 9:42:58 AM , Rating: 2
will I have to buy the article? If I'm too lazy to find this information on my own, I'm definitely too lazy to pay for an article.


RE: a little bit more info
By jlips6 on 3/26/2008 9:43:42 AM , Rating: 2
and I can't argue with you unless I know where your coming from... :(


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 3/26/2008 11:09:29 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Daily tech, keep up with the times. This technology break through came out more than 5 months ago.

But it was just recently published. We tend to not cover academic topics unless they've been peer-reviewed, especially with material sciences.


Copper's not the Best
By deadbolt2002 on 3/25/2008 6:41:32 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
For graphene at room temperature, the true resitivity was shown to be 1.0 µohm-cm. This is approximately 35 percent less than in copper, the material with the lowest known resitivity at room temperature.


Elemental Resistivity at 20 degrees C (Ohms / m)
Copper 1.7 x 10-8
Silver 1.59 x 10-8

Silver is the best natural conductor. Or at least the best natural metal as a conductor.

For years I have pondered reasons why silver hasn't replaced copper in high-speed electrical devices, as it's a better electrical AND thermal conductor, and have come up with these hypotheses: cost, corrosion resistance, and flexibility/rigidity.




RE: Copper's not the Best
By jlips6 on 3/25/2008 6:48:29 PM , Rating: 2
my great grandfather was a jewler. this is his quote. "working silver is a bitch." Jewelers do not like to work silver. It is an extremely difficult metal to work. Talk to anyone who really uses it.
What's the elemental resistivity of gold? out of curiosity. I don't think it should be used as a replacement to copper.


RE: Copper's not the Best
By nstott on 3/25/2008 9:22:44 PM , Rating: 3
Making jewelry and manufacturing electronics are not the same thing. Making a silver trace on a substrate can actually be easier than copper since copper oxidizes whereas the oxides of silver are unstable at higher temperatures. Currently, sub-micron to micron-sized particles are screen-printed and sintered to make a conductive trace. This is being replaced by inkjet printing metallic nanoparticles (NPs), an area that I have been working in. Almost all companies working in this area started with silver as a proof of principle because it is easier to make the NPs and to create printed traces from silver. Copper has issues with oxidation both in the NP synthesis and sintering of printed lines.


RE: Copper's not the Best
By FITCamaro on 3/25/2008 7:09:08 PM , Rating: 2
Uh....cost?


RE: Copper's not the Best
By jlips6 on 3/25/2008 7:20:08 PM , Rating: 2
what about it?


RE: Copper's not the Best
By dnd728 on 3/26/2008 6:08:43 PM , Rating: 2
It shouldn't cost 1 cent per CPU. Let me remind you that even copper based chips are a pretty new technology. I believe IBM made it first followed by Intel in their Pentium 4(!). It's very tricky making sure that it's all working together and with no components damaging each other - you can't just use any metal you wish.