Print 12 comment(s) - last by CowKing.. on Jul 5 at 3:40 AM

Maine Governor John Baldacci  (Source: Recharge News)

  (Source: Windfair)
Three demonstration sites have been chosen in Maine's coastal waters

The U.S. Department of Energy recently gave the state of Maine $20 million for the advancement of deepwater offshore wind energy development, including efforts made by the University of Maine to make components for and test the wind turbines for renewable energy.

"This is where the future lies," said Maine Governor John Baldacci. "We want to become an energy generating center."

The funds were given by the Obama Administration two weeks after U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu visited the University of Maine's Advanced Structures and Composites Center on June 14. Chu was invited to the campus by Senator Susan Collins, and was able to explore the university's latest developments with wind energy production. 

As far as New England goes, Maine remains the leader in the land-based wind energy industry and plans to become the the main energy exporter to the entire region in 20 years with the help of this deepwater offshore wind energy project. 

"I am pleased that the federal government has affirmed its support for deepwater offshore wind energy potential in general, and the vital work being conducted by the University of Maine specifically," said Baldacci. "Maine is well-positioned to compete for these federal resources because of the leadership we have built over the course of the past two years on deepwater offshore wind energy development."

A group of private and government agencies have selected three sites to use for demonstration purposes of the offshore wind turbines. One will be located in southern Maine near Boon Island, another will be placed south of Boothbay Harbor near Damariscove Island, and the final wind turbine will be located south of Monhegan Island off Port Clyde

According to state regulations, two wind turbines can be placed at the first two sites for five years, and the Monhegan Island site can hold three turbines for seven years. The turbines will be anchored in 300 feet of water up to three miles from each island. 

In addition, the first two sites will be privately owned for the demonstration purposes while the Monhegan Island location will be used by 28 different companies led by Habib Dagher, who is the director of University of Maine's Advanced Structures and Composites Center. 

Baldacci's ultimate goal is to achieve the installation of 5 gigwatts by 2030, which is twice the state's energy consumption at present. According to Dagher, Maine has a wind energy potential of 149 gigawatts within 50 miles of the state's coast. 

"We are grateful for this significant level of support," said Baldacci. "The federal government is

an important partner in our efforts to grow green jobs and advance the promise of offshore wind technology."

In addition to this newly acquired $20 million, Dagher's team at the University of Maine received $8 million earlier this year from the U.S. Department of Energy to build a research center specifically for deepwater offshore wind energy development. 

The first turbines are set to be on site in 2011. At this time, the three demonstration sites will measure the potential to produce power by ocean wave energy as well. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By bubbastrangelove on 7/1/2010 12:35:32 PM , Rating: 4
I still have checks so I can't be out of money...right?

not again
By CowKing on 7/1/2010 2:05:47 PM , Rating: 4
"Deepwater"? "offshore"? "Wind"!!!!! guys this is a disaster waiting to happen. We could have a MASSIVE wind leak spread out across the ocean. We need to set up 2 or 3 relief turbines now before this spreads. Haven't we learned anything from the Great Gusts of '69?

By killerclick on 7/2/2010 9:55:05 AM , Rating: 1
This is communism! The socialist maoist Marxist atheist Muslim in the White House is trying to cram wind down Americans' throats! We want coal! We want oil! We want nuclear power! Wind power is unamerican and unpatriotic. I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK! GO BACK TO AFRICA HUSSEIN!

RE: Communism!
By CowKing on 7/5/2010 3:40:07 AM , Rating: 2
:D I saw what you did there

$20 Million dollars?
By quiksilvr on 7/1/2010 12:40:40 PM , Rating: 2
Hey Kaiser, any comment on this?
By bill4 on 7/1/10, Rating: 0
By HotFoot on 7/2/2010 4:43:57 PM , Rating: 2
Because, clearly, environmental standards are what forced people to borrow more than they could afford, or businesses to over-leverage everything trying to maximise profits at the expense of stability and long-term financial health.

In the end, environmental standards should be a savings on the economy as a whole, with less lost productivity and lower healthcare bills. But those sort of external costs are very hard to measure.

But yeah, it is a shame to see greenwashing and other fringe things attached to what can otherwise be a very sensible, conservative approach to sustainable development, clean air and water.

By Ytsejamer1 on 7/1/2010 5:01:10 PM , Rating: 2
I'm just waiting to see the environuts out protesting on behalf of the fish and seagulls about the perils of wind turbines. They're okay in other states, but not their own.

As for the State of Maine, I think it's a decent enough idea. It's not going to be the end-all, be-all for power generation, but every chance we can to try alternative and clean energy sources, should be taken...if nothing else, to learn how to do it better. Also, the state should want to make their mark in a little different way than selling potatoes.

How does this help us?
By sleepeeg3 on 7/2/2010 4:48:38 PM , Rating: 2
Wind costs 3x as much as conventional technologies - that is a fact. Do your own research and compare the costs of recently built plants, their power efficiency and lifetime replacement costs and you will see this is true. Sea based is bound to cost even more. Redistributing $20 million when unemployment is at nearly 10% for inefficient technology seems more like buying votes than helping America.

Nuclear costs are less than or on par with coal and it is a highly efficient technology. We should invest in something that is affordable and clean until these other technologies make sense.

Correction needed
By AEvangel on 7/1/10, Rating: 0
Ironic move
By YashBudini on 7/1/10, Rating: 0
a smart move
By dgingeri on 7/1/10, Rating: -1
"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki