backtop

Ooops! The article you requested could not be found, please navigate our site to locate the article you requested

Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
This article is terrible
By amanojaku on 1/29/2010 1:03:56 PM , Rating: 2
It goes on at great length about website knockoffs and doesn't discuss the DNS technology at all!!!




RE: This article is terrible
By RjBass on 1/29/2010 1:04:33 PM , Rating: 2
I was wondering that myself.


RE: This article is terrible
By Lord 666 on 1/29/2010 1:07:32 PM , Rating: 2
Looks like another copy/paste job from Shane. He posted an article that was verbatim to a WSJ.com, but eventually pulled it.

Counting the minutes on how long before this pile of crap is pulled.


RE: This article is terrible
By wht1986 on 1/29/2010 1:20:09 PM , Rating: 2
You're right. The word "DNS" does not even show up in this article at all. I feel like I wasted my time clicking the news link and wasted your time for reading my gripe.


Huh?
By ChrisHF on 1/29/2010 1:04:41 PM , Rating: 2
What does that have to do with DNS extensions?




Point?
By drebo on 1/29/2010 1:07:15 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry if I missed it in your article, but what did any of that have to do with DNS protocol expansion? And, what are the proposed expansions?

If you wanted to write an article about two copycat sites in China, that's fine. Just make sure to title it appropriately. I don't care about Chinese censorship, but I have a rather keen interest in DNS expansion.




"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser









botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki