backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 19 comment(s) - last by Mike Acker.. on Apr 28 at 7:03 AM

Google, a champion of internet advertising, seeks to test its hand at cell phone ads

With more and more cell phones supporting capable browsers, a logical area of expansions is the advertising market for cell phone browsers.  Most ads have trouble with cell phone browsers resolutions and are not conducive for the environment.  This is troublesome as the cell phone internet industry today is what the internet of yesterday was -- financially unfueled. 

In the early days of the internet in the 1990s, large companies sprang up promoting websites which reached massive values by only providing amorphous content and limited services.  These sites made billionaires of people like Mark Cuban, but inevitably the bubble burst and the market fell apart.

Today much of the modern internet is driven heavily by advertising, similar to the offline news industry.  If the internet is a vehicle, advertising is the fuel that drives much of it.  And these days, cell phone internet connections provide little "fuel" to the internet.  Google seeks to change that.

Google on Wednesday announced that it will be deploying small brand-image advertisements, which it is custom making.  When the site detects a cell-phone browser, it will switch to displaying these ads.  This, Google hopes, will help it conquer the vast new emerging market.

Google feels that its fate is inextricably tied to cell phones and other mobile devices as the industry continues to shift toward mobile sales and development.  The company has heavily invested in developing an OS named Android, which it hopes will help standardize the mobile phone industry.  And like most Google products, the OS will likely find a way to tie in ads for revenue.

The new system Google will be rolling out for mobile browser advertising will display images similar to those seen on PC browsers.  The images will be scaled optimally to look appropriate on the small screen.  Advertisers will pay on a per click basis, and are only allowed to link to pages optimized for mobile phones.

One key difference between Google ads on the cell phone and its PC cousin is that the cell phone variety will only display one ad per page.  Google understands that on a small display, clutter becomes an increasing issue, so it hopes that this policy will make the system friendlier and interfere with host pages less.

Alexandra Kenin, a product marketing manager, for Google Mobile Ads stated in a Google blog post that, "For advertisers, mobile image ads serve as a branding tool and have shown to have good click-through rates."

Google announced that the following countries will be receiving the special current ads, at the time of roll out: Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, the UK, and the United States.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I'd like to conquer it to!
By therealnickdanger on 4/25/2008 8:53:40 AM , Rating: 5
By removing the capability!




RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By TheSpaniard on 4/25/2008 8:57:34 AM , Rating: 4
especially when most cell phone companies charge by the kb! you will literally be paying for the add


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By flydian on 4/25/2008 5:58:21 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. Paying extra fees for the privilege of seeing ads is not my idea of fun. I guess I'll just keep distancing myself from the Google behemoth.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By rsmech on 4/26/2008 1:02:29 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe this is why Yahoo is holding out. Google seems to be screwing things up lately. They are no longer a search engine, they are a predator. If they keep this up Yahoo may find some new users.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By FITCamaro on 4/25/2008 9:31:23 AM , Rating: 1
Agreed. Newsflash to Google. We don't want ads on our cell phones. I don't want to be dialing a number and have an ad for Pizza Hut take over and start playing.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By DallasTexas on 4/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By wien on 4/25/2008 9:40:32 AM , Rating: 2
Either way, you pay. The money the advertisers waste on ads is added to the price of the products you buy. It may not feel like you're paying, but you do.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By FITCamaro on 4/25/2008 9:49:25 AM , Rating: 2
So do you support national health care too because thats free too right?

Well, its free if you're part of the 50% of the country that doesn't pay any taxes.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By Chernobyl68 on 4/25/2008 4:00:44 PM , Rating: 2
You're dreaming if you think this advertising will make it less expensive somehow for you to access the internet on your mobile phone.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By Smartless on 4/25/2008 3:33:46 PM , Rating: 2
I'm just curious but does anyone actually respond to pop-up ads? I mean I don't know a single person who has ever clicked on a pop-up ad because they were interested. Is it really that successful?
Unfortunately the Yellow book and GEICO commercials did work on me.


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By Chernobyl68 on 4/25/2008 4:01:57 PM , Rating: 2
the Orbit ones with the games are mildly diverting


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By Ananke on 4/25/2008 9:51:20 PM , Rating: 1
Just imagine - you are at Best Buy, looking to buy new 24" monitor. A cell phone may effectively identify your location and suggest elecronics related adds. Now - even better - you may type in price and review search for particular model 24" monitor, and receive targeted adds. The good thing for EVERYBODY is that so closely targeted adds are the ultimate height in cost efficiency. Thus, the advertiser will not pay several millions of blindly spread adds in newspapers, magazines, TVs, but only by clicks of already highly interested users. See the advertisement budgets of the big companies, they are scary, and every financial manager will be more than happy to reduce them and simultaneously reach better target-ability. This is the dream coming through for all CEOs in Nike, Coca-Cola, SONY etc. where brand recogniton based advertisement is most important. For the END USER, i.e. you, the benefit is that LOWER advertisement budgets correspond to lower product price. Nike's adds budget might be as well as 40-50% of the annual expense, reduction by half of that most likely will transfer as 15-20% reduction to you.
Another good thing, to have good reception by the cell phone users, this advertisement should affect the phone bills. Google and others already did many research and everything indicated that users will be OK to receive adds, if this in return lowers or makes free their cell phone plans.
Nokia already uveiled their plans for standart GPS in every phone. Why do you think, that? You are walking by Pizza Hut, it is 7-8 p.m. Friday night and your cell phones Z-z-z-z rings and shows "Tasty pizza nearby". And that cell phone you received for free /or maybe 50 bucks/ on a $5 monthly plan for unlimited data.
Whoever runs that phone and that search software will be very very rich, will have 99% of the market of global advertisement, and will never ever have any competiton. And will pay hefty income taxes making the government even happier.
At the same point that service will give your many benefits, as well as to the businesses advertising to you. It is just matter of time /and matter of less corruption/ to happen. If not - we are all keep paying Cingular several hundred dollars monthly bills, to receive essentially the same :)


RE: I'd like to conquer it to!
By Mike Acker on 4/28/2008 7:03:08 AM , Rating: 2
i'll second that

advertisers do not have the right to steal the use of our equipment and time to display their sleazy crap


What the hell?
By pxavierperez on 4/25/2008 10:08:10 AM , Rating: 2
Why do i keep getting a pop up password prompt every time i visit any pages in Daily Tech? Even previewing a post. anywhere I click on Daily Tech i get the promt.

This is what it says:

quote:
To view this page, you need to log in to area “password please” on www.google-analytics.com:80.




RE: What the hell?
By Trisagion on 4/25/2008 10:21:17 AM , Rating: 2
Damn, you must have accessed the secure area of the site where the editors store all their pr0n....

Urm, I mean test their Seagate HDDs.


when the time comes
By omnicronx on 4/25/2008 12:55:29 PM , Rating: 2
If I start getting adds on my 320x240 cell phone display, I am not going to use it. Most peoples displays are even smaller as I have a smartphone. And unless these adds cover the entire screen (horizontally atleast), what good is the point anyways, we are not going to be able to read tiny adds anyways. My cell phone already gets adds, because I can actually access non wap pages and I will tell you, I can barely tell what they are.
Who is going to follow up on an add on their cellphone anyways?




RE: when the time comes
By TheSpaniard on 4/27/2008 10:18:48 AM , Rating: 2
those of us on windows mobile are going to have to get fire-fox mobile when it comes out! and add the add-block add-on that'll show google about advertisements!


By Zensen on 4/25/2008 10:45:48 PM , Rating: 2
How is this beneficial to to the user except making google richer?

Will services become cheaper because we have this. Creating a new os to help standardise the phone industry is all well and good especially if its free but nokia, ms, sony, LG, samsung, apple will take some convincing esp with their proprietary programs. Opera is doing a good a job with their browser. surely there's an advisory board that makes internet browsing on phones a lot easier. Android OS has to do more than just do internet browsing on phones. I primarily use my phone to make calls not go on the internet. go figure!

"Google understands that on a small display, clutter becomes an increasing issue, so it hopes that this policy will make the system friendlier and interfere with host pages less."

Very Idealistic of them! but people will take advantage of this for profit.

All i need now is a mobile phone ad blocker...




No Google
By Azsen on 4/27/2008 7:26:02 PM , Rating: 2
No Google! I do NOT want ads on my cell phone. Get a clue.




“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads













botimage
Copyright 2008 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki