backtop


Print 11 comment(s) - last by Regs.. on Apr 1 at 9:04 AM

Google reps say that cuts in one area doesn't mean positions aren't available in others

Last week, Google announced it would be shedding about 200 workers from its marketing and sales pool. The reason cited for cutting the jobs was that the positions overlapped with other jobs within the company and created a burden on decision making.

This wasn't the first round of layoffs to come from Google, and may not be the last before the economy improves. Despite the layoffs last week, Google is still looking to fill some positions within the company. Ironically, among the positions still available are for sales and marketing positions like the ones eliminated in the last round of layoffs.

Reuters reports that about 360 positions are available within Google right now, with about half of that number here in America. Other positions are for Google locations around the world with some spots in locations like Ireland and Australia.

Google Spokesman Matt Furman told Reuters, "Overlapping organizations in one part of the company, doesn't affect the limited need for more people in another part of the company."

Reuters reports that Google has significantly slowed its hiring in the last few quarters as cost controlling became a priority. Google added fewer than 100 new jobs in Q4 whereas it was previously growing at between 400 and 2,000 workers per quarter over the last few years.

Analyst Robert Haley from Gabelli & Co said, "I imagine they're probably shifting resources in certain areas." The firm still rates Google stock as a Buy.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

smart moves
By Moishe on 3/30/2009 1:24:25 PM , Rating: 3
A company that doesn't continually analyze and adjust for redundancy is foolish. Good is making the smart moves early and will be stronger for it.




RE: smart moves
By GeorgeH on 3/30/2009 2:00:24 PM , Rating: 2
Good = Google?

Those marketing drones should be getting a raise, not a pink slip.


RE: smart moves
By meepstone on 3/30/2009 3:43:29 PM , Rating: 2
and i bet if you were an employer you wouldnt be paying two people to do the same job


RE: smart moves
By choadenstein on 3/30/2009 4:43:59 PM , Rating: 3
Unless you were the federal government or any of the individual state governments... At least from what I can tell in my state.

Oh, or if you were trying to make a "screw in a light bulb joke"... Where, two or more people doing the same job makes it funny.


"Err, uhm,...
By nixoofta on 3/30/2009 6:52:23 PM , Rating: 2
...Hi,...I'm Rick Wagoner. Can I get an application?"




RE: "Err, uhm,...
By ThisSpaceForRent on 3/30/2009 8:53:34 PM , Rating: 3
No, no we don't need your help right now. We're still a viable company, however should we decide to run our business into the ground we'll be sure to give you a call.


RE: "Err, uhm,...
By nixoofta on 3/30/2009 10:15:07 PM , Rating: 2
"Awwww,...can you validate my stub? *sniff*"


RE: "Err, uhm,...
By nixoofta on 3/30/2009 11:03:32 PM , Rating: 2
"Sure,...yes, that's a stub and,...you're Hummer's been towed."


of course
By Screwballl on 3/31/2009 11:28:57 AM , Rating: 2
of course they are hiring...a s more companies are tightening their belts, they get rid of the "overpaid" drones and replace them with young low pay drones to do much of the same work... I have been seeing quite a few local businesses doing just this, fire the person with a family that needs the money and hire some high school kids part time for minimum wage.




RE: of course
By cornelius785 on 4/1/2009 12:14:49 AM , Rating: 2
i agree on the aspect of 'why not continue to hire?' part, but at not the part on firing the high paid to hire the newbies almost unconditionally. it only makes sense to continually thin those are not producing enough for their pay, or someone could do it for cheaper. i would expect it would depend on the job too, high school interns and college grads can't exactly go into some system integration or be a top level design for the next generation x86 processor overnight.

it almost seems like a company could find a 'jem in the rough' and get it for cheap.


RE: of course
By Regs on 4/1/2009 9:04:52 AM , Rating: 2
Most of what I see at my own company is that we're letting go all of the soldiers and hiring more overpaid generals. If it's not layoffs then it's a hiring freeze or attrition tactics. Neither one is good but I rather have lay offs. Middle managers are not going to leave their comfy jobs for something less while most of the soldiers have nothing to lose.


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki