Print 42 comment(s) - last by UsernameX.. on Jul 1 at 11:57 AM

Google+ is available on the Android Market and the mobile web starting today, and will be available on the App Store soon

Since Facebook's launch in 2004, it has established itself as an unrivaled social networking superpower. No one has been able to match its broad audience and number of features, but now, Google will give it a shot with a new project called Google+.

Google made the argument that existing online interactions are awkward and needs a "fix." For instance, in current instant messaging systems, someone may seem available on the list, but when you actually message them and they don't respond, you're not sure if they're away or not interested. Also, Google made mention that users mainly want to connect with certain people at certain times, but current social networking systems put everything out there at once and makes everything you say a "public performance."

To remedy these issues, Google has created Google+ which offers four key features that were created specifically for the user: Circles, Sparks, Hangouts, and Mobile. 

Circles allow users to create multiple categories of family and friends, each within their separate circle. For instance, one circle can be the family circle, another can be best friends, another can be the basketball team you play on, and so on. This allows the user to share what they want with whom they want instead of sharing everything across the board. 

Sparks is an online sharing engine that allows users in certain circles to share information based on their interests. For instance, if you have a circle of friends that are into comic books, Sparks provides relevant articles, videos and photos that give you and your circle of comic book-loving friends something to discuss and enjoy together. It allows you to "spark" a conversation. It also filters and delivers the most "contagious" content on the web, so the need for time-consuming searches is eliminated. 

Hangouts is Google+'s version of instant chat, but is a face-to-face chat instead. Google claims that instant messaging is too intrusive, and that it always disrupts someone in the middle of something. But with Hangouts, users can partake in casual meet-ups in a live multi-person video whenever they have some free time, which lets other users know that you're really there (not idle) and interested in hanging out. 

Mobile is aimed to allow users to communicate on the move. Features offered in Google+'s mobile realm are ways of marking your current location, an "Instant Upload" feature that stores photos from your phone in the cloud and allows you to decide if you want to share them on the web, and a "Huddle" feature that makes it easy for a user to use group messaging to get a group of friends together or exchange information. 

Google+ was built from the ground up to revolve around the user, and to revolutionize the social networking experience by making it more similar to how we actually communicate. Google is only calling it a project for now, and while it seems interesting enough, only time will tell if it can stand up to Facebook's level.

For instance, Facebook already has some of the features offered above, such as Facebook's Lists and Groups that acts much like Google+'s Circles. Yet Google+'s Circles offers an easy drag and drop feature that may prevail over Facebook's system. In addition, Facebook has pages of interest that users can "like" and share information regarding that topic on that page, but Facebook's pages can have thousands of users that you do not know associated with that interest page, where Google+'s Sparks allows topics to be discussed among you and your circle alone.

Of course, both networking systems have a mobile setup and video chats. They also look very much alike, according to the screenshot Business Insider provided after being invited to the new field trial. 

Google+ is available on the Android Market and the mobile web starting today, and will be available on the App Store soon. Right now, Google is conducting a field trial (hence why its called a project right now) where users can use the new features and let Google know what they think and what needs to be changed.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Pubert on 6/29/2011 11:56:22 AM , Rating: 5
Honestly, I think they need to come up with a new name. Google+ just doesn't roll off the tongue. You don't need to put Google in the name, we will know it is Google's product just by how much better it will be compared to Facebook.

RE: Google+?
By snakeInTheGrass on 6/29/2011 12:01:30 PM , Rating: 2
Better? That screenshot looks like someone took a Facebook page and stuck the Google+ logo on it.

It's a good start? (from the screenshot) - at what, copying Facebook like they copy everyone else? (Outside of their core ad business, anyway...)

RE: Google+?
By Pubert on 6/29/2011 12:06:49 PM , Rating: 2
Absolutely, I think it looks Just like Facebook, however; I think that the core ideas like the "circle" and the group chat and video chat are great Ideas.

RE: Google+?
By UsernameX on 7/1/2011 11:57:47 AM , Rating: 2
Absolutely, I think it looks Just like Facebook, however; I think that the core ideas like the "circle" and the group chat and video chat are great Ideas.

All original ideas come from copying someone else's.

RE: Google+?
By Pubert on 6/29/2011 12:09:21 PM , Rating: 2
But even if Google+ is the best idea ever, it is going to be a huge challenge to convert the millions and millions of people from Facebook to Google+. No one is going to want to delete there profile and pictures and what not.

RE: Google+?
By theapparition on 6/29/2011 12:19:07 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah absolutely. Not like people didn't do that with myspace already.....Oh, wait.

I treat Facebook like a necessary evil. I hate the idea that everyone gets linked together. I don't need to have my business associates, friends and family tied together. I want them separate. Really liking the idea behind this. Implementation is key, but I think this could be a winner.

That's the problem with "virtual" property. Once someone comes along with a better idea, you can lose half your customer base overnight. There once was a time that Myspace was the hottest property on the net and looked unstoppable. Then Facebook came in. All it takes is something better, and they'll be forgotten about too.

RE: Google+?
By Souka on 6/29/2011 7:34:34 PM , Rating: 4
Why don't they just name it Google-Spot?

Or G-Spot for short. ;)

RE: Google+?
By Lazarus Dark on 6/29/2011 9:02:12 PM , Rating: 2
I joined FB years ago but didn't like it and never used it. Until last year when I got an Android. I found it to be the best (currently available) way to share information on the go which I couldn't do on previous dumbphones. Still, I too found it just a necessary evil. Better than Myspace, but I just never liked or trusted FB, with good reason. Not to mention the FB integration with Android contacts is half-assed, I much prefer gmail for all my contacts. Myspace was replaced so quickly, I knew FB, with all its flaws, privacy issues and poor leadership, was only going to be very temporary until Google made something better. Am I as hooked in to FB as the next guy? Sure. But the rapid demise of Myspace proves, I can move on in a heartbeat.

Google has never let me down and I know thier G+ integration with Android will miles better.

RE: Google+?
By torpor on 6/29/2011 1:03:25 PM , Rating: 2
Considering all the privacy nonsense Facebook has been up to over the past few years, I would actually bet that people have been looking for a place to go.

The idea of circles is fantastic. There are parts of my online life I would not want a nosy potential employer to see, for example. (like political speech or family bickering). If I have the ability to control what is exposed where and to whom, then I'm much more likely to join.

I don't have a facebook page today for that very reason. If you knew my real name, you wouldn't find me in a google search.

This, however, I could probably deal with.

Tell you what. Be the first over there, draw your circle of friends/family in by explaining how much better than Facebook this can be, and be the solution to your problem.

RE: Google+?
By kleinma on 6/29/2011 1:24:25 PM , Rating: 4
Yeah, they should leave facebook due to privacy concerns and run to the company who's CEO said

"If You Have Something You Don't Want Anyone To Know, Maybe You Shouldn't Be Doing It"

You can tell google cares tons about your privacy. They are anti privacy. They make their money based on knowing as much information about you as possible.

RE: Google+?
By Samus on 6/29/2011 1:49:03 PM , Rating: 2
I looks like facebook, which is good (opposed to looking like MySpace...) but the circles thing adds a lot of privacy, which I like.

I haven't had a Facebook account for many years for privacy reasons.

RE: Google+?
By bplewis24 on 6/29/2011 2:01:52 PM , Rating: 1
Cool story bro

RE: Google+?
By theapparition on 6/29/2011 3:28:56 PM , Rating: 4
I'll take Google a million times over Zuckerberg & Co when it comes to privacy.

You have one quote from a Google CEO. Zuckerberg has made hundreds of anti-privacy remarks, along with company policy that automatically switch privacy settings when Facebook does an "upgrade". Not to mention, Facebooks policy on uploaded pictures is that they now are Facebook property. That's right, uploaded pictures are no longer yours. How about the story where the guy on Facebook got hit with an ad about singles in his area looking for dates, with a picture of his wife. No, she wasn't looking, just that Facebook took her uploaded pictures and sold them.

Good job being completely clueless. If you give even the slightest damn about privacy, you can't in a million years defend Facebook.

RE: Google+?
By Reclaimer77 on 6/29/2011 5:37:10 PM , Rating: 2
I'll take Google a million times over Zuckerberg & Co when it comes to privacy.

It's a social site, NOT your own personal private server. Just saying. Zuckerberg doesn't think privacy is a huge concern on a social network, where the point is to be sociable with others. Obviously many millions of users feel the same way.

This isn't a right or wrong issue, and you are trying to make it one. If you don't agree with Zuckberg's philosophy for how HIS business is ran, fine, you don't have to use it. But this attitude that Facebook is some personal privacy server reserved just for you isn't remotely realistic.

The assertion that Googles social network, which we know NO details of, will be any better or more "private" is completely unfounded.

RE: Google+?
By theapparition on 6/29/11, Rating: 0
RE: Google+?
By Reclaimer77 on 6/29/2011 6:13:19 PM , Rating: 1
And many millions voted for Obama. Just because people are dumb, doesn't mean that mass acceptance legitimizes an issue.

That's a terrible analogy. You don't have to use Facebook, obviously those tho didn't vote for Obama have to put up with him as President regardless.

I only deal with Facebook because I have to. It'll be gone in a hearbeat if Google's lives up.

You don't "have to". Nobody does. You're coming off like a hypocrite.

RE: Google+?
By Reclaimer77 on 6/29/2011 3:58:04 PM , Rating: 2
Considering all the privacy nonsense Facebook has been up to over the past few years, I would actually bet that people have been looking for a place to go.

Google makes more money off ad space sales than Facebook. If you think Facebook violates your privacy, you probably aren't going to be much happier with this.

RE: Google+?
By kleinma on 6/29/2011 4:00:26 PM , Rating: 2
Google makes more money off ad space sales than Facebook

Not according to daily tech it doesn't...

RE: Google+?
By torpor on 6/29/2011 4:59:41 PM , Rating: 2
Facebook has been a lot nastier about switching things in the middle of the night (so to speak) to get rid of your "privacy settings", and making it difficult/confusing to reassert them.

I will say, when you tell google NO, it does seem to obey. Whether it's in bot instructions or search preferences or (in the case of Android) whether or not to have location-sensing on.

I can't say that about Facebook.

No one will ever call Google an extension of the EFF, but when compared to Facebook, it looks pretty good.

RE: Google+?
By Reclaimer77 on 6/29/2011 5:29:11 PM , Rating: 2
I've never had Facebook change my privacy settings or do anything "nasty". Jesus the paranoia about Facebook on Daily Tech is so extreme sometimes. It's a social site, not your own personal private server.

RE: Google+?
By theapparition on 6/29/2011 5:46:51 PM , Rating: 2
Facebook changed privacy settings for over three-quarters of thier users. The ones that weren't changed, were the people who had thier settings most open and corresponded to the default Facebook settings.

It is quite possible that your settings were never changed, but most people DID get affected.

RE: Google+?
By Reclaimer77 on 6/29/2011 7:28:48 PM , Rating: 2
Facebook changed privacy settings for over three-quarters of thier users.

Yes and let me tell you, taking two seconds to click a few icons to re-enable your previous settings was just MURDEROUS!!

RE: Google+?
By croc on 6/29/2011 10:49:37 PM , Rating: 1
"I've never had Facebook change my privacy settings or do anything "nasty" that I know about. There, fixed your sentence... I'd never try to change your mind, not if you are happy being one of Zuckerberg's 'dumb fucks'...

RE: Google+?
By jeepga on 6/29/2011 6:09:16 PM , Rating: 2
The idea of circles is fantastic. There are parts of my online life I would not want a nosy potential employer to see, for example.

The underpinnings of this are already in Facebook. I can assign my friends into lists. You can then restrict wall posts, photos, et al. by lists or even individuals. Obviously, it's no where near as robust as what Google wants to do. But, I wouldn't be surprised if Facebook doesn't turn around and improve upon lists to accomplish the same goals.

I would love this, because I'm on Facebook as a way to stay in-touch with family and old co-workers.

RE: Google+?
By someguy123 on 6/29/2011 5:40:06 PM , Rating: 2
People jump on trends all the time. When was the last time you had someone link you to their xanga, friendster, or myspace?

Really, all google needs to do is offer a clone with a new name and people will be all over it just because it's "new". It won't be long until we see bandwagoners touting the superiority of google's facebook clone.

RE: Google+?
By swizeus on 6/29/2011 8:09:32 PM , Rating: 1
Can't Agree more with you. That is a damn facebook ripoff, even if it is just a facial ripoff. THAT IS RIPOFF

Better Name
By rickon66 on 6/29/2011 12:06:50 PM , Rating: 3

RE: Better Name
By Pubert on 6/29/2011 12:12:23 PM , Rating: 2
Copyright that name NOW Google!!!

RE: Better Name
By icanhascpu on 6/29/2011 12:49:46 PM , Rating: 3
Good Sirs, I am very sorry to inform you that I already have a patent on the GSpot.

Ladies? Good-day to you.
/wink, twirls cane & tips tophat

RE: Better Name
By kleinma on 6/29/2011 1:26:50 PM , Rating: 3
Or they could just call it "Google Narcissist" since that is essentially what all these social networks turn people into anyway.

Groups vs Circles
By Aikouka on 6/29/2011 1:13:45 PM , Rating: 2
Tiffany, I think it's a bit of a stretch to try to consider Facebook's Groups and Google+'s Circles the same thing. Groups are nothing more than what it sounds like... you essentially get a "private wall" for group members to post on, and you can leave or invite new people to said group. I actually tested it out awhile ago, because I was trying to find something on Facebook that would do what Google+'s Circles promotes.

Facebook certainly has the capability to implement something like this. You can already segregate people into different Lists, but that does nothing other than organize your chat contacts list.

RE: Groups vs Circles
By Icopoli on 6/29/2011 5:22:21 PM , Rating: 2
Google already knows everything about me, so what the hell why not.

RE: Groups vs Circles
By BSquared on 6/30/2011 12:46:32 AM , Rating: 2
Does more than organize your contacts. I've been having seperate private posts between groups of people for ages with Facebook. Every post you make you can set security for it. Click the lock icon before you post and select which groups can see your post, you can also define a default security settting/group. I'm surprised people didn't see this correlation already between Facebook and Google+ which is basically taking the functionality of Facebook and relabeling Apple marketing.

By NellyFromMA on 6/29/2011 1:16:37 PM , Rating: 3
How many different ways can Google launch an re-launch a social networking failure. They sure are persistent, but only in that 'I told you to stop calling me' kind of way.

RE: seriously...
By cmdrdredd on 6/29/2011 5:05:01 PM , Rating: 2
Facebook is integrated into the lives of many. I have businesses on my wall too. It's not going to be easy to get Google+ links posted up on every site like you see for facebook. Sure maybe it will happen but you have to get people to switch. Looking at Facebook as it is now, I don't see it happening.

By micksh on 6/29/2011 12:48:55 PM , Rating: 2
Google+ was available on market starting yesterday, not today.
Engadget wrote hands-on yesterday and it was already available.
You don't have to admit that you deliver old news, but you could try to formulate headline so there is no inaccuracy.
Google+ is available on the Android Market and the mobile web starting today

RE: Yesterday
By AmbroseAthan on 6/29/2011 1:06:39 PM , Rating: 2
It was definitely available yesterday. I was sent an invite early yesterday morning from a friend. Last night I had already downloaded the Android App and setup my profile and some of my circles.

Have only used it a short while, but I can see how it could be a good competitor to Facebook.

2nd worst trying to beat the worst?
By BugblatterIII on 6/29/2011 6:11:55 PM , Rating: 2
So the second worst company for privacy is trying to beat the worst? What could go wrong?

By joeyjojojrshabadoo on 6/29/2011 9:14:38 PM , Rating: 2
What does this article have to do with Sony or Citi. Corp?

Bart Scott Voice
By bplewis24 on 6/29/2011 1:59:32 PM , Rating: 2

By atlmann10 on 6/30/2011 11:50:04 AM , Rating: 2
From what I am hearing Justin Timberlake joined in on the buyout of Myspace. Google is loading there own social site comparable to Facebook, not to mention there are others although exponentially smaller than Facebook. This is really going the way I have been expecting for several years now. Eventually everyone will have tablets and smart phones, or a combination device and these places will be the norm for socializing and interaction for everything I think. There will be business hubs, school hubs, social hubs, retail hubs, discussion hubs, science hubs etc etc where everything is real time. The devices to a great degree exist already in the scientific and Military areas, and as usual will be available to the general consumer in a few years.

It looks great if you like facebook
By tayb on 6/29/2011 9:16:32 PM , Rating: 1
Because what I can tell from the screen shots it looks 100% exactly like facebook.

"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki