backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 76 comment(s) - last by oTAL.. on Jul 10 at 6:40 PM

Google employees with two kids will now pay $57,000 per year for childcare

It’s not often that you hear of the internet giant Google messing up and really making people mad, yet that is exactly what has happened. The problem isn’t with one of Google’s search operations or its ad selling practices. Rather the issue at heart is daycare for the children of Google employees.

The New York Times says that two months ago Google began having a series of meetings with its employees that take advantage of the in-house daycare offered at Google headquarters. The topic of the meetings was to see how parents would feel about a massive 75% increase in the cost of its in-house daycare program.

According to reports the reaction was not good from the parents, with some openly weeping in the meetings. The 75% increase would mean that a parent with two children in Google’s daycare center would be paying out $57,000 per year in daycare expenses as opposed to the already heady $33,000 per year they paid previously.

The first response to some regarding this daycare dilemma may be to say to the parents, stop whining or get a new job. However, it is very easy to understand why the parents are so upset when the in-house daycare program was one of the benefits used to lure many of them to Google as opposed to the competition.

Google first offered its in-house daycare three years ago according to The New York Times. That time frame coincides with the return from maternity leave of Susan Wojcicki. Wojcicki is the sister-in-law of co-founder Sergey Brin and owned the garage that Google was started from.

The cause of the price increase is attributed by many at Google to Wojcicki and her support of a preschool philosophy called Reggio Emilia, which stresses allowing tots to chart their own learning path. To provide this type of day care center, Google opened a second in-house facility called The Woods with degreed teachers and nothing but the best in toys and equipment. The original in-house center was ran by a firm called Children’s Creative Learning Centers.

Reports from some of the parents at the meetings have Brin saying some pretty harsh things -- which spokespeople for Brin deny. Some parents claim that Brin told them, “This is a supply-and-demand issue.” Brin also reportedly added that Google should charge what the market would bear. The waiting list at the time the increase was made for in-house daycare was 700 employees long and it was reported to take years for spots to open.

Google’s solution to the waiting list was an astronomical fee increase for the daycare and they even began charging employees to stay on the waiting list to the tune of several hundred dollars. This caused the waiting list to dwindle to 300 employees. How did Google respond to the 300 person waiting list willing to pay $57,000 per year for childcare? It announced it would be opening a new facility with -- can you guess it -- 300 spots.

Many see this childcare issue as yet another example that Google is losing its luster and becoming just like the other Silicon Valley firms that it originally set out to be different from. The writing is on the wall now and Google has begun to feel the crunch in terms of stock prices dropping and key employees leaving what were once the greenest pastures to go to other firms like Facebook where the grass is still green.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

$57,000 a year?!?
By Hakuryu on 7/7/2008 7:46:26 PM , Rating: 1
My god, are they feeding the kids caviar and flying in spring water from Switzerland?

Sounds to me like Google is looking for another cash cow; I can't see how daycare could be that expensive, unless the operator is looking to make a big profit.

Maybe the daycare supervisors are being paid a very high wage ($100,000+), but I doubt it.




RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By Kefner on 7/7/2008 8:26:19 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure it has more to do with insurance costs.

As soon as little Billy or Susie fall and break a finger, or scrape thier knee, Google has to be prepared for a lawsuit, that, as we know, is America today. So I am sure Google has a HUGE insurance policy cover the daycare operations. That should of been reason enough to stay out of the daycare bus.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By FITCamaro on 7/7/2008 8:52:31 PM , Rating: 2
$57,000 for two kids?!?!?!?! Thats nearly my salary! What do they have like 1 daycare person to every 2 kids or something?!?!?

Christ maybe I should change careers.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By Reclaimer77 on 7/8/2008 8:47:14 AM , Rating: 1
I love when parents make their children everyone else's problem. Like cheap day care for your kid is a god given right ? Good grief what is happening to this country !

Too expensive ? Then get your own damn day care ! What about that ?? The choice looks simple to me. Pay 57,000 for awesome daycare. Or pay 1,000 for Jack the child molester who lives down the street.

57,000 might sound like a lot of money for day care. But tell me, how much money does a child cost per year ? Yeah, a lot more I'll bet. So just cause you have a job and spread your legs Google and everyone working there should subsidize your kid ? Hell no.

Google is trying to run a business after all. This idea perpetuated by the gen-X baby boomer generation that the world needs to bend over backwards to accomidate you because you got knocked up is bullcrap. Work day care is bullcrap. Maternity leave, where your out like half a year and still make as much money as your male co-workers who are busting their ass, is bullcrap.

And another thing, stop bringing your baby to R rated action/adventure movies PLEASE ! Its crying because babies don't WATCH that crap get a clue !


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By phattyboombatty on 7/8/2008 9:55:09 AM , Rating: 3
I currently pay $6,000 a year for daycare for one child at a very good daycare. For two children, the cost would be $10,000 a year.

If I was an employee at Google, I would quit my job and open up a competing daycare across the street.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By WhatAbout on 7/8/2008 10:40:31 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
If I was an employee at Google, I would quit my job and open up a competing daycare across the street.

Might have to charge $57,000/year just to pay the rent.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By Reclaimer77 on 7/8/2008 11:16:17 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
If I was an employee at Google, I would quit my job and open up a competing daycare across the street.


No. You wouldn't.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By mikecel79 on 7/8/2008 11:18:06 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
I love when parents make their children everyone else's problem. Like cheap day care for your kid is a god given right ? Good grief what is happening to this country !

No one is saying cheap day care is a god given right. The simple fact is that in this day and age in some parts of the country it's impossible to live on a single income.

quote:
So just cause you have a job and spread your legs Google and everyone working there should subsidize your kid ? Hell no.

Subsized daycare is a great idea for companies. Google and many other companies have offered subsidized daycare for years. It's called a perk. Google gets to keep it's employees working and employees get the benefit of cheaper daycare. It's a win win situation for everyone. Apparently you know nothing about having kids nor employee retention.

quote:
Maternity leave, where your out like half a year and still make as much money as your male co-workers who are busting their ass, is bullcrap.

Because a newborn just takes care of itself. It gets up every 2 hours and feeds and changes itself while you sleep soundly. It's plainly obvious that you have no idea how much work a newborn is and what a woman goes through to have a baby. Get a clue before you open your mouth.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By Chaotic42 on 7/9/2008 4:09:20 PM , Rating: 4
I'm just going to play Devil's Advocate here, mainly because your post makes you come across like a complete ass:

quote:
No one is saying cheap day care is a god given right. The simple fact is that in this day and age in some parts of the country it's impossible to live on a single income.


Then don't have kids. I can't afford a sports car, so I don't have one. I can't afford a big house, so I have a small one.

quote:

Subsized daycare is a great idea for companies. Google and many other companies have offered subsidized daycare for years. It's called a perk. Google gets to keep it's employees working and employees get the benefit of cheaper daycare. It's a win win situation for everyone. Apparently you know nothing about having kids nor employee retention.


And the other employees recieve fewer benefits. What if Google gave only Christians certain benefits? What if they only gave benefits to dog owners?

quote:

Because a newborn just takes care of itself. It gets up every 2 hours and feeds and changes itself while you sleep soundly. It's plainly obvious that you have no idea how much work a newborn is and what a woman goes through to have a baby. Get a clue before you open your mouth.

No one told you to have a kid. It was a decision that you made. Why should you get paid time off for it?


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By Reclaimer77 on 7/9/2008 6:56:32 PM , Rating: 2
^^^^^
That post was full of win.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By danrien on 7/10/2008 1:27:51 PM , Rating: 2
hold on - if you legitimately went to an employer because of a certain benefit, that, after you started working there, was stripped away or severely changed, it would upset you too. no one is expecting google to have a daycare, bu tthey originally offered a (fairly) cheap daycare as a benefit to bring in and retain employees. now the employees are upset about it, because the benefit is not really a benefit any more. i don't see a problem at all with being upset about that. if i went to work soemwhere coz of their great healthcare plan, and then the health care plan got eliminated, you can bet your ass i'd be upset about it.

-danrien


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By JustTom on 7/8/2008 11:18:39 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
57,000 might sound like a lot of money for day care. But tell me, how much money does a child cost per year ? Yeah, a lot more I'll bet.


Um, if kids cost more than 57K a year the company would be empty.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By FITCamaro on 7/8/2008 2:34:22 PM , Rating: 2
If you spend $57000 a year on your kid, then you have something mentally wrong with you. Even $33,000 a year for childcare is absurd. From what I hear, a good nanny can make good money. But its probably in the range of $50,000 a year. So unless Google has a single top notch nanny for every one or two kids they're taking care of, they're getting rich off that daycare at the old cost. At the new cost, they're laughing all the way to the bank.

And you can't tell me insurance premiums per kid they're taking care of is over $1000/month.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By masher2 (blog) on 7/9/2008 10:06:00 AM , Rating: 2
The $57K figure is for *two* kids, not one.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By FITCamaro on 7/10/2008 3:14:59 PM , Rating: 2
Still absurd.


RE: $57,000 a year?!?
By Alareth on 7/8/2008 11:33:50 AM , Rating: 2
Shockingly enough, my wife and I raised two boys with a combined total income of $33K a year.

Those numbers are absurd.


"Don't be evil"
By fxyefx on 7/7/2008 6:57:30 PM , Rating: 2
If the people in charge really feel the need to try a more "advanced" care system, why don't they just offer multiple types of service? It sounds like they already have more than one facility for it. "It's an issue of demand..." so why not increase the supply? In-house child day care isn't much of a perk for Google employees when the only service offered is very expensive - so that fewer employees want to use it.




Boo hoo
By Polynikes on 7/8/2008 12:20:43 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, those poor, overpaid google employees, who are too spoiled to allow their kids to go anywhere else for daycare. Lord knows they'll get all screwed up if they're not using that Reggio Emilia method.




Stay-at-home moms
By hellokeith on 7/7/08, Rating: -1