backtop


Print 14 comment(s) - last by jlips6.. on Mar 5 at 12:54 PM

Google has no firm date set for censorship to end

There are many companies that are based in America that operate abroad. Some of these companies operate in countries where citizens are not afforded the freedoms that many take for granted here in America. This is common for technology companies like Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft that operate in China and North Korea among other countries where censorship is common.

These companies are often forced at comply with laws in these foreign countries that force them to do things that would be illegal or violate freedoms of users if conducted in America. This is especially true in the internet search market in China. The Chinese government forces search giants like Google and Yahoo to censor search results making content deemed objectionable or that speaks out against the government to be removed from access by customers.

Following attacks, apparently by Chinese hackers, Google has put pressure on the Chinese government with threats that the search engine will stop censoring its search results in China. The attacks on Google occurred in mid-December. They have been linked to two schools in China. Wong pointed out that Google isn’t prepared to say who carried out the attacks against its network.

PC Magazine reports that Google has no firm timeframe for eliminating the censorship of its search results in China. Google's Nicole Wong, VP, and general counsel for the search firm said that Google's big concern is its employees in China.

Wong said, "We have many employees in the ground, some of whom are very dear colleagues of mine and so we recognize both the seriousness and both the sensitivity of the decision we're making and we want to figure out a way to get to that end … in a way that's appropriate and responsible. It's a very human issue for us."

Google doesn't come out and say it, but the feeling is that the search firm fears its Chinese employees might be held accountable if the search engine stopped the government mandated censorship of search results.

Google was the only tech firm invited to testify before a Senate subcommittee this week who agreed to testify. Wong testified in front of the subcommittee saying, "We are firm in our decision that we will not censor our search results in China and we are working toward that end."

Pressure is being put on American companies operating in countries where censorship is forced on citizens. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced censorship when she said in January, "Countries that restrict free access to information or violate the basic rights of Internet users risk walling themselves off from the progress of the next century. In the last year, we've seen a spike in threats to the free flow of information. China, Tunisia and Uzbekistan have stepped up their censorship of the Internet."

Senator Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, sent 26 letters out to various tech firms in February asking them about activities in China and urging the firms to join the Global Network Initiative (GNI). The GNI is a voluntary code of conduct for companies that operate in countries that restrict the internet. So far, only three major firms have joined the GNI including Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft.

Durbin said this week, "I'm disappointed that a year and a half after the GNI started, no new companies have joined. With a few notable exceptions, the tech industry seems unwilling to regulate itself and unwilling to engage in a dialogue with Congress."


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Really?
By bug77 on 3/3/2010 5:21:58 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
These companies are often forced at comply with laws in these foreign countries that force them to do things...


Let's get one thing straight: nobody ever held a gun to their heads to do business over there. It's mostly greed >> morals.




RE: Really?
By Micronite on 3/3/2010 6:43:48 PM , Rating: 1
Even if they did have a gun to their head, they're still not being forced.

You can simply choose to comply or die... your choice.


RE: Really?
By jlips6 on 3/5/2010 12:54:06 PM , Rating: 2
ever read Going Postal?


RE: Really?
By chick0n on 3/3/10, Rating: -1
RE: Really?
By whiskerwill on 3/3/2010 11:35:18 PM , Rating: 1
You people really should think before you type. Should Google get out of France, because of hate speech laws that make them censor results, or Germany, because they have to remove some neo-Nazi links there? Should they leave the US, because they're forced by DMCA to remove certain search results from copyright violations? Or Muslim nations which have Google filter out pornography?

Would the Chinese people be better or worse off without Google? I think the answer is pretty plain.


RE: Really?
By albus on 3/4/2010 9:13:30 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
Would the Chinese people be better or worse off without Google?


Actually,
Would Google be better or worse off without China?


RE: Really?
By AnnihilatorX on 3/4/2010 4:11:57 AM , Rating: 1
Use of the word of 'force' in this context is absolutely acceptable English though as an expression.

Are you implying that one cannot say 'my mom forced me to do the washing up' without her pointing a gun to her own son or daughter?


Tit for tat
By lowsidex2 on 3/3/2010 6:46:02 PM , Rating: 4
If the Chinese government is directly responsible for the attacks, or is turning a blind eye, our country should respond by setting up thousands of proxy servers, maybe even a satellite over their heads, and flood that country with endless porn and every other censored content they wish to keep out. Damn hypocrites.




RE: Tit for tat
By chick0n on 3/3/10, Rating: -1
RE: Tit for tat
By Smilin on 3/4/2010 3:25:32 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
If the Chinese government is directly responsible for the attacks, or is turning a blind eye


Since you're suggesting we kick off a cyberwar with China that we would lose so badly that our economy would collapse can you offer any evidence of your claims?


Congress = teh retardus.
By Smilin on 3/3/2010 3:48:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
With a few notable exceptions, the tech industry seems unwilling to regulate itself and unwilling to engage in a dialogue with Congress."


Nobody likes to engage in dialog with a retard (apologies Sarah). It gets boring quick.




RE: Congress = teh retardus.
By chagrinnin on 3/4/2010 11:56:02 PM , Rating: 2
I noticed nobody engaged in dialogue with you and thought I'd just,....uhm,...wow,...that really was quick. :P


By acase on 3/3/2010 3:34:24 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Wong pointed out that Google isn’t prepared to say who carried out the attacks against its network.


I know there has been a lot of bitching about how the news articles on here are formatted backwards, but really you should probably have put her introduction from the next paragraph before this sentence.




why only tech companies?
By AntiM on 3/3/2010 4:08:41 PM , Rating: 2
Wong said, "We have many employees in the ground..."

Huh? They're already dead?

Anyway, 90% or more of the crap we buy is made in China. We're all guilty of supporting a country that censors it's people. The big chain stores,... Walmart, Kmart, Target...
why aren't they being called to testify in congress? Why does our government seem hellbent on sending american jobs overseas and to Mexico?




"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki