backtop


Print 27 comment(s) - last by lk7200.. on Mar 11 at 5:34 PM


Google is just letting the cash "pile up" according to its CEO, Eric Schmidt.  (Source: Lee Jin-man / AP)
The times are tough for some -- for others, not so much

Google is sitting on a big pile of cash while many of its competitors are burning through their cash surpluses, trying to weather the rough economy.  Many have speculated that the company is saving up to make a big acquisition.  Others hope that Google might start paying a dividend to its shareholders.  Not so, says Google's at-times outspoken CEO Eric Schmidt.

He states, "We've not really discussed a dividend payment.  At the moment our view is to let the cash pile up."

Mr. Schmidt was interviewed at the Wall Street Journal ECO:nomics conference in Santa Barbara, California.  Despite its $8.6B USD cash surplus, Mr. Schmidt said that Google would only make "very very conservative investments".

In recent weeks, Mr. Schmidt has offered up views on the state of advertising revenue that at times appeared contradictory.  Early Wednesday he remarked that the current recession would hit all forms of advertising.  In a CNBC interview later that day though, he commented that, "From my perspective it's hard to imagine why you'd see a decline (in Google's ad revenue)," noting that emerging markets like the mobile sector he believes will help Google at least break even.

Will Google's multifaceted products base help it survive better than its competitors?  Mr. Schmidt would only say, "We don't predict things like that."

The recent comments by Mr. Schmidt mark the second time in the last week that he's grabbed attention.  Early this week he likened blog-messaging site Twitter to a "poor man's e-mail."  Some have speculated that Google is considering acquiring Twitter and Mr. Schmidt's remarks are just a negotiating tactic.  When asked at the recent conference if this was a possibility, Mr. Schmidt would only say, "We admire Twitter."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Come on
By on 3/6/09, Rating: 0
RE: Come on
By knitecrow on 3/6/2009 9:16:09 AM , Rating: 4
or be like GM and burn through 8Billion in one Quarter


RE: Come on
By FliGuyRyan on 3/6/2009 9:41:19 AM , Rating: 1
And what, Bill Gates is still worth around $50 billion. He should buy Google, GM and a small country.

Seriously though, how much cash would it take to buy Google if they're holding onto an $8 billion stock pile?


RE: Come on
By jay401 on 3/6/2009 9:48:31 AM , Rating: 5
$8.6 Billion is their cash reserves, not the total value of the company.


RE: Come on
By barjebus on 3/6/2009 10:29:01 AM , Rating: 2
In terms of common stock, Google is worth 94.8 billion dollars as of this morning. I would suggest that this is rather undervalued, since Apple tends to get higher valuations than that. Back in 2007 they were valued at over 200 billion (Google) :D


RE: Come on
By TMV192 on 3/6/2009 9:36:21 AM , Rating: 2
that would be pretty interesting to buy out a small third world nation, fix up the infrastructure and show the rest of the world how to really run a country


RE: Come on
By callmeroy on 3/6/2009 9:47:19 AM , Rating: 2
I could have sworn I read a story a month ago that Apple is sitting on about 20 billion.....i could be wrong or I could have misunderstood it but yeah....I'm almost certain Apple is even in better shape than Google....


RE: Come on
By Dreifort on 3/6/2009 9:56:27 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
What kind of interest does that earn in a year?


Well, in the stock market, you're looking at about a -30% performance over past few months. They can't afford to invest the money in the curr market so I bet they hid it in a safe place. It's probably hidden in an easter egg on their website, anyone who finds it gets to keep the money!

Their stock price has gone from $380 to $300 in the past month. Maybe they can use their cash reserve to pay their share holders a dividend.... yeah, right.


RE: Come on
By Dreifort on 3/6/2009 9:58:02 AM , Rating: 2
oops, meant to say from 380 to 300 in past year.


RE: Come on
By joedish on 3/6/2009 10:24:13 AM , Rating: 2
"I better not hear about them doing any layoffs to "weather the storm" with that kind of stockpile laying around."

What a crazy statement. As a shareholder of a company, I surely don't want the company paying people that are not adding value to revenue. If revenue per employee is dropping significantly, a company just cannot burn through all their cash to keep the people on staff. If one part of the business is shrinking and those people cannot be re-purposed to growing parts, they need to reduce their costs in those parts of the business.


RE: Come on
By on 3/6/2009 11:07:57 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
As a shareholder of a company, I surely don't want the company paying people that are not adding value to revenue. If revenue per employee is dropping significantly, a company just cannot burn through all their cash to keep the people on staff.

Cold. Heartless. I bet you'd make a fine CEO. My point was maybe for once a company could do the RIGHT THING for its people, not just the right thing for the bottom line. This is the worst possible time to be doing layoffs. It just furthers the downward spiral of our economy. If the company is in the position to be able to save jobs, why not do it? Be different from all the others, be a leader not a follower. What happens when the economy bounces back? They'll just have to rehire a bunch of new people and that costs way more than keeping existing staff, that's a proven fact.


RE: Come on
By Runiteshark on 3/6/2009 10:53:34 AM , Rating: 2
They are laying off, one of my friends has until October to find a new job, which can be inside the company, or just be completely laid off.


RE: Come on
By bhieb on 3/6/2009 11:16:17 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
I better not hear about them doing any layoffs to "weather the storm" with that kind of stockpile laying around


Why not? This is an atypical liberal response. Corporations exist to make money. They pay their taxes and have no further social obligations. When we have a president that has publicly stated that he plans to increase corporate tax, what do you expect will happen. Google (or any company) is not in business to loose money, it will horde cash or cut cost just like you and I are doing given the uncertain times. If you raise corporate tax say 10% if they can keep their current profitability by cutting 10% of the labor they will, and I argue as a business person that they should.

The socialists have this idea that you can just take from the rich, and they will be fine, they can afford it. I can tell you that they won't just accept it and move on, they will adjust costs/spending to keep their standard of living. This is no different than what every other middle class person tries to do too. What is nice though is that some (not all mind you) would give far greater amounts if they had a choice in the matter. Take Gates for example look at the vast sums of money he donates to charity.

Don't get me wrong I do understand that it is not that simple, and that of course you have to tax the rich, but not because of the screw them they can afford it ideal, but rather because they are the only ones that have it. Not sure what the current stats are but at one time 95% of all IRS tax payments where made by 5% of the taxpayers. So for those that cannot see that we are already a socialist society 5% of the citizens pay for 95% of the cost to run government programs. SO maybe we should not complain so much about the wealthy, but rather be damn grateful they are here to pay for 95% of the stuff we use.

With the current sliding tax scale, I think of it as "forced charity". Which is fine because not all would step up and do the right thing, however my BIG problem is that the charity that has been chosen is the US government. Oh crap thats right those aholes are the ones that get this vast sum of money. And no matter which side is running things that is a bad thing to give your money too.


RE: Come on
By on 3/6/2009 11:52:41 AM , Rating: 2
This wasn't meant to become a diatribe on tax reform or liberal idealism. I don't recall mentioning anything about personal tax rates. My point is if the company is sitting on a boatload of cash it could surely find better things to do with it than laying people off. This recession that the entire world is in right now is being perpetuated by companies continuing to downsize, thus feeding the loop of bad news, causing unemployment to rise, which causes stock prices to fall, which causes shareholders to panic, which causes companies to cut more costs and lay off more people. If companies could reverse that trend and instead of laying off good hard working folks causing a bigger burden on the rest of the taxpayers who fund unemployment, I bet you would see this recession end pretty quickly. It only takes one brave company to make a stand. Keep your employees Google!


New to the Google suite:
By Scabies on 3/6/2009 11:53:37 AM , Rating: 5
Google Bailouts?




RE: New to the Google suite:
By PlasmaBomb on 3/8/2009 7:56:20 AM , Rating: 2
GM: I can has bailout plz google?


Time to change ad companies.
By Mitch101 on 3/6/2009 9:29:25 AM , Rating: 3
About 6 months back it seemed I noticed I was getting less per click on my sites through google ads. A month by month comparison proved that google was indeed paying less for click throughs on most of my sites. Clicks were up but pay per click costs were way down. I took one site over the Dark Side (Microsoft) and have been getting a higher click through rate since moving, more accurate page counts with respect to my logs, and slightly better pay per click average than Google Ads. Im going to say the Microsoft grass has been greener and that I may be switching more sites over to Microsoft ads if this is the case.

As for if the relevance of my site it has increased in rank and traffic yet with google ads I started pulling in less and less. Only the last month did google seem to start paying a little better rate on ads. I also did check into click rates and should have been getting a better deal. As for economy and companies paying less or taking less advertising sure but like I said certain ad areas have gone up in price yet it seems google's cut has also increased. It may be that Microsoft is able to get a better click rate or takes less overhead than google. Thought of that too. But the fact remains Grass is looking greener with Microsoft Ads.

Google might want to rethink about stockpiling cash and start giving back to some of its Adsense people. Being I do this I notice that a some other sites have moved away from google ads to various other ad sites.

Im starting to think Google has peaked and acquisitions might be the only choice to maintain their dominance but if Google keeps cutting down the little guys then well just move on to greener pastures. Until they buy us too.




RE: Time to change ad companies.
By paydirt on 3/6/2009 1:52:53 PM , Rating: 2
Interesting. Thanks for sharing that. I wonder if MSFT is running its program either _at cost_ or _at a loss_ or if they are making money with the higher payout to you and the higher click thrus...


By anotherdude on 3/6/2009 11:37:41 AM , Rating: 2
right about now. Perhaps Google is simply anticipating the obvious financial Armageddon we are in is here for a good long time and that their revenues could shrink accordingly? That's what I would be thinking.




Google is stupid
By Mithan on 3/6/09, Rating: -1
RE: Google is stupid
By callmeroy on 3/6/2009 10:48:47 AM , Rating: 2
Kinda like how you think you are smart with that statement?


RE: Google is stupid
By Donkeyshins on 3/6/2009 11:05:29 AM , Rating: 2
Don't forget the guns, ammo and gasoline there, sunshine.


RE: Google is stupid
By tehbiz on 3/6/2009 3:44:05 PM , Rating: 2
to early to bring out the tinfoil hats?


RE: Google is stupid
By GaryJohnson on 3/6/2009 10:06:28 PM , Rating: 2
No, that's to protect us from aliens.

Here's what you'll need for this particular end-of-the-world scenario:

leather jacket,
sawed-off shotgun,
aussie cattle dog,
& the last V8 interceptor


RE: Google is stupid
By ggordonliddy on 3/7/2009 1:32:57 AM , Rating: 2
The dog was delicious.


RE: Google is stupid
By dhalilahma on 3/7/2009 5:06:27 AM , Rating: 2
'If Google was smart, they would buy Gold and Farms that produce food'

What! Everyone knows Google would Tank Rush immediately!


RE: Google is stupid
By lk7200 on 3/11/09, Rating: 0
"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki