Print 22 comment(s) - last by Souka.. on Jul 15 at 2:12 PM

The fight against piracy enters a new phase, but no resolution in sight

Copyright groups and online file sharers are engaged in attrition warfare that has led to confusing government and ISP involvement.  The battle lines have been drawn, and internet users downloading and sharing files run the low risk of warnings and possible enforcement.

The United States government claims to have no interaction -- but supports the new six-strikes policy -- with the recently created Center for Copyright Infringement (CCI) effort between ISPs and copyright groups.  The partnership will offer a sort of copyright alert and reeducation program that has only led to confusion and uncertainty among file sharers.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) group published a short blog post that highlights some issues related to the controversial framework.

Governments in the European Union have tried to find different methods to attack piracy, but have had varying results.  Spanish file sharing sites brought to court for linking to copyrighted works recently scored a victory, which only proves the difficulty in punishing these sites.  Meanwhile, Italian ISPs are facing legal action after ignoring a ban against a torrent site.

France implemented a three-strikes system to possibly boot repeat offenders, and more than 18 million file sharers have been tracked.  However, budget and manpower issues have only led to 470,000 warnings issued to first-time copyright violators.  Just 20,000 letters were sent out as second warnings, and only 10 people are at risk of having a judge personally review their file sharing case.

The cat-and-mouse game between file sharers and copyright holders will continue for the rest of 2011, while very little is being done to reach a mutual agreement.  For example, the use of three-strikes laws have done very little to intimidate pirates to stop file sharing, while ISPs are criticized by subscribers and terrorized by copyright groups. 

Instead, BitTorrent and other peer-to-peer file sharers are getting better at masking their identities to prevent detection by watch groups.  However, the federal government has moved to domain seizures as a critical method to help fight Internet piracy, with the practice expected to accelerate.

Expect to see continued copyright group efforts against file sharers, while ISPs are also forced into turning over users rather than face court issues.  The federal government and the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have been recruited to lend an effective hand against pirates.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By icanhascpu on 7/14/2011 3:35:38 PM , Rating: 5
These dumb bastards don't get it.

Archaic sales methods will not work as well as the digital age matures. Start selling and marketing your products in a way that keeps pace with the age or be overrun by those that can. Steam is an example of how to do it right now. LEARN. Stop pissing off your consumers with non transparent DRM! IDIOTS .

RE: Stupid
By BZDTemp on 7/14/11, Rating: 0
RE: Stupid
By ShaolinSoccer on 7/14/2011 4:10:32 PM , Rating: 4
Steam is AWESOME! I can play "most" single player games offline. I buy all my games for less than $5 including the top rated games of all time. It keeps all my games updated automatically. They even let me play old games like XCOM without downloading anything extra! I just run the game from the list and it actually plays! If I'm the only person who loves Steam then screw you guys, I'm going home! >>>

RE: Stupid
By fredgiblet on 7/14/2011 8:27:20 PM , Rating: 3
I like Steam except for the part where I have to download large games over my crappy internet connection.

RE: Stupid
By Souka on 7/15/2011 2:12:40 PM , Rating: 2
other thing I dont like steam is the app is tied to my account... can't sell or trade in game toward another one.

eg... I sold my Crysis DVD games at nearly 1/2 orginal cost on eBay...then again, that was single-player stuff.

RE: Stupid
By slickr on 7/14/2011 11:08:01 PM , Rating: 4
If they want to crackdown on sharing than they need to arrest more than 1 billion people in the world and let me tell you that is impossible.

But this is more than a file sharing problem, its a fight for ideas information. I download everything, every piece of music, games, movies has been downloaded from p2p, bittorrent and file sharing websites.

Would I buy any of these? Yes, but its impossible to buy everything you download, so they need to stop count every download on the internet as $10.000 in loss.

And ever since the radio the sales of music have gone up, then came the TV and sales went up for music again, then came the tape and sales went up, than came the PC and CD format and sales went up, all the time while these music and movie companies cried foul their profits have been record braking and then came the internet and all records of profits have been broken, music, movies and games industry is the biggest its ever been in the whole history, so they know it has actually helped them, but are such evil corporate titans, with love for only money that they are going to go after 5yr kids and 90yo grannies for filesharing.

So these mega corporations having record braking profits since the internet boom should not fuck with their consumers or else. And its not like the quality of music has gone up with Biebers, britneys and gaga's stealing from techno, electro and house music genres because they lack any creativity of their own.

Long live techno, dance, house, trance, electro and other free music.

RE: Stupid
By fredgiblet on 7/14/2011 8:54:38 PM , Rating: 2
1. This should only be a problem if you're on dial-up, and you CAN play them offline.

2. This is true of everything, why should it be different for Steam?

3. A somewhat valid concern, but realistically Steam is likely to be around for a long time and if there was an issue that threatened it's existence there is likely a plan in place to remove the Steam requirement.

As for games getting too old again there's no difference from any other situation, if I try to play System Shock 1 on my current computer it won't work, period. Steam at least makes a lot of games functional on current systems, if they develop issues later, well I only paid $5 for the old games so I can't really complain.

4. True, and a valid reason not to buy brand-new games on Steam though older games whose resale value is minimal aren't really affected by it.

RE: Stupid
By Thalyn on 7/15/2011 2:08:41 AM , Rating: 1
Ironically, I consider Steam to be a reason to not purchase a game. I have, on more than one occasion, picked up a retail box, read the blurb and been ready to put down some cash until I see the words "Steam" or "Steamworks". It's why I don't own Darksiders or Duke Nukem Forever, among others.


Because it doesn't work. I'm sure for some people it does. But for me, I gave up on it entirely after three events:

1) My brother bought Half-life. His PC at the time didn't have the power to run it, mine did, so we installed it on mine for him to play it. When it came time to uninstall it I removed the Sierra Utilities (the precurser to Steam) first - and it took 6gb of my other data with it. I had an 8gb drive at the time. Not impressed, and Sierra's response was "Next time, upgrade to version before uninstalling." No apology was given.

2) My brother, not having learned his lesson, was an early adopter of Half-life 2. He bought it, installed it onto his PC, and was subsequently not allowed to play it because of its online "protection" through an early incarnation of Steam. It was only a few days later when MadockX broke the protection and released the crack that my brother could play a game he legally owned.

3) My own purchase this time. I bought Mafia II. Thoroughly enjoyed the first one, figured I'd give Steam another go. It crashed no less than twice while trying to install Steam, and again when trying to finish the Mafia II installation. This is a supposedly mature system, and it was awful.

So, no, Steam is not done right. It's perhaps a step in the right direction as far as digital distribution is concerned, but it's not right.

If they really want to curb piracy, the first thing they have to do is stop assuming that everyone is a pirate. DRM, online only multi-player, always-active connection requirements... they all have to go. Next is to start pricing according to the actual quality of the product (something which will be much easier now that they're not paying for protection methods that don't work anyway). Lastly, they just need to release something worth playing - thus worth paying for.

It won't eliminate piracy (nothing will), but if you can limit it than so much the better.

RE: Stupid
By spacemonkey211 on 7/15/2011 8:47:32 AM , Rating: 2
1) I purchased the original Half-life (still even have the disk) and never had any problems that you mentioned. I've never heard of anything like taking 6gb's of a harddrive with it. Had it in college and installed on 30+ computers for lan parties and not one problem.

2) Most steam games require a one time internet connection to unlock and decrypt the game. When Half-Life2 came out the servers were flooded and it took a few days to sort out (still happens with the release of popular games). If you had waited or just left your computer on, you wouldn't have had a problem.

3) Once again, I've never really seem steam itself crash the whole computer in recent memory. Steam has crashed, but it usually isn't it's fault (ie: memory issues, overheating, Windows problems, graphics card instability).

Also in "most" cases Steam has pushed to have the DRM removed and only have it's encryption/login system when possible. It is the content providers that enforce the DRM, not Valve. They are usually the first to remove it when they are finally allowed.

here's an idea...
By inperfectdarkness on 7/14/2011 3:36:54 PM , Rating: 5
instead of banning people from the internet for life, throttling their speeds to below 56k, or suing them for millions of dollars for every song stolen; how about we simply lower the damages people are charged with & aggressively hunt down the perpetrators?

seriously $250,000 per song is stupid. let's make it $5 per song; $30 per movie, etc. mandatory probation + court fees + fine if you're caught.

oh, and F**k the riaa, mpaa, etc.

RE: here's an idea...
By inperfectdarkness on 7/14/2011 3:38:06 PM , Rating: 5
oh, and let's stop fighting used sales. you can't sell me a $60 game if i'm not able to sell it for $30-40 when i'm done with it. same holds true with movies, music, etc.

By repatch on 7/14/2011 4:41:54 PM , Rating: 2
What a great movie...

By shabby on 7/14/2011 6:29:29 PM , Rating: 2
Do the truffle shuffle!

By darckhart on 7/14/2011 4:12:44 PM , Rating: 2
six strikes pah! it's not the ISPs job to monitor and take action. you want something done, mpaa/riaa? then cough up resources and manpower to do it yourself. you certainly gouge us enough to be able to do this.

By danobrega on 7/15/2011 11:50:28 AM , Rating: 2

"Ironically one of the original uses of patents was to authorize real piracy"

If you have time, listen to it.

By rangrangang on 7/14/11, Rating: -1
The more pirates they prosecute the better
By Beenthere on 7/14/11, Rating: -1
By Pirks on 7/14/2011 4:02:45 PM , Rating: 2
removing pirates from the streets
LOL :)))) yeah the movie pirates are right there on the streets with bums and hookers eh? :))) hahahahaha this is so funny :)))

By Aloonatic on 7/14/2011 4:03:38 PM , Rating: 2
Agree with some of what you say, but the final paragraph is just silly, IMHO.

Putting people in very expensive state sponsored accommodation (aka prison) is not good for the economy. Especially when you are locking people up for not spending a few hundred dollars on the odd movie, game or album a year, while they still go to work, earn money, pay taxes (rathter than drain them as they would do in jail) and contribute to the economy in other ways by spending their income on other goods and services.

I'm not saying that it's right that people pirate, and that they shouldn't be punished in some way, but the whole prison thing really doesn't work that well for most crimes, and I didn't even factor into the above that by hte time they come out of prison (for what is really just lazy shoplifting from home in most cases) they will probably have been educated in all sorts of other ways of breaking the law when they get back out.

Still, we all know how much DTers love to whole prison fantasy, a little too much at times me thinks. I surprised someone hasn't mentioned spending time with Big Bubba or preparing salads or something yet.

By darckhart on 7/14/2011 4:10:02 PM , Rating: 2
you're probably one of those people that blindly follow the rules because you're told to.

By Uncle on 7/14/2011 4:20:35 PM , Rating: 2
I can tell you don't run a business. Put a person in prison at 50,000 a year for stealing 100 dollars in music. Sounds reasonable.With the USA Federal and states going into receivership, lets spend more taxpayers money on kids going to prison. Everything seems to be one sided, for businesses, ever read a EULA, and the ludicrous fines for downloading. The Assholes that have caused the last two or three recessions are still receiving millions in bonuses, and your siding with those Jackals. You must be some teenybopper whos still under his mother skirt, probably still in elementary school, when you come out with such simplistic remarks.
"Everyone knows that piracy is a crime and it's going to become a felony in most places with mandatory prison time." I'm shaken in my boots little boy. Grow up.

By troysavary on 7/15/2011 6:14:16 AM , Rating: 1
Prison, in general, is a stupid idea. Lock-up should be where you are while awaiting trial, then saner sentencing carried out. If you are no danger to society, fines are a much more sensible solution. They cost nothing to have you held in a state-sponsored hotel, they actually are a source of revenue, plus they allow you to still be a productive tax-payer. Add restorative justice to that mix and it is even better.

For example, you steal from somebody? You pay back the value of what you have stolen, plus extra to re-compensate the victim for his inconvenience, and on top of that, a fine to offset the cost for police, courts, etc. Make the penalties large enough to hurt, and dock the person's pay until it is recovered.

In the case of people too dangerous to be let go, rapists, murderers, whatever, kill them. Why spend a fortune keeping these scum fed and sheltered?

"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki