Print 37 comment(s) - last by McTardy.. on May 16 at 4:36 PM

Death of satellite LTE project essentially sealed the firm's fate

Philip Falcone, Harvard University economics grad and billionaire venture capitalist, has seen his hopes to deliver 4G satellite LTE crash and burn.  Despite his fortune, Mr. Falcone had to dig deep to scrounge up $5B USD in extra venture capital to pay for the world's largest communications satellite in history -- the 5.4 ton SkyTerra 1.

Launched in 2010, all was going glorious for Mr. Falcone and his new venture LightSquared.  Soon they had worked out a $9B USD deal with Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) to deploy a terrestrial LTE network to complement the satellite offerings.  Together the terrestrial + satellite solution was expected to dominate the LTE market when it launched sometime around 2013.

But optimism surrounding the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's conditional approval of LightSquared's satellite LTE turned to dismay when the U.S. Air Force revealed that it would interfere with an estimated 75 percent of commercial and government GPS units.

SkyTerra 1
LightSquared's doomed LTE bid involved a record-setting 5.4 ton satellite. [Image Source: Boeing Comp.]

And just in case rendering navigation useless across the continental U.S. wasn't enough of a death sentence, the SkyTerra 1 bid became an intensely politicized issue when it was revealed that LightSquared's legal team had pressured the White House chief of staff, reminding him of the millions Mr. Falcone had raised for President Barack Obama's election bid.  Many believe those donations led to a hasty conditional approval by the FCC, overlooking interference concerns.

But in the end those contributions were for naught because even the friendly Obama administration was forced to kill LightSquared's proposal.  Sprint, upset at losing a key part of the service, also terminated its contract with LightSquared.

With no terrestrial deployer, billions in debt, and a defunct multi-ton hunk of metal floating in orbit, the latest entry in this story is perhaps a predictable one -- LightSquared has filed for Chapter 11 protection in New York's Southern District Court in New York.

The bankruptcy spells dire news for hedge fund Harbinger Capital Management, as well as Mr. Falcone.  The perhaps ironically named hedge fund was a deep investor in LightSquared and joined Mr. Falcone in trying to propose stop-gap deals to placate creditors who grew increasingly unsettled in the wake of the satellite deal collapse.

Philip Falcone
The LightSquared failure is the first major defeat for venture capital whiz Phillip Falcone.
[Image Source: Jacob Kepler/Bloomberg/Getty Images]

Most of LightSquared's staff has already jumped ship, so at this point creditors may be left picking at a carcass.

LightSquared's marketing chief Frank Boulben has gone from one bankruptcy candidate to another, becoming the new chief marketing officer (CMO) for money-losing Canadian phonemaker Research in Motion, Ltd. (TSE:RIM).  CEO Sanjiv Ahuja, stepped down in February.

With the bankruptcy filing LightSquared and its ambition to become a fifth major American wireless service provider are -- for all intents and purposes -- dead.  The company's meteoric rise and bizarre fall stand as a cautionary tale to those who might wish to cut corners to establish themselves as a competitive service provider.

Source: LightSquared

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Not Surprising
By rs2 on 5/14/2012 9:02:06 PM , Rating: 4
You certainly can't expect to get approval for something that's going to interfere with 75% of the world's navigational equipment, no many how many government officials you attempt to buy.

RE: Not Surprising
By lightfoot on 5/14/12, Rating: 0
RE: Not Surprising
By Alexvrb on 5/14/2012 10:08:54 PM , Rating: 5
Not buying it. Commercial GPS hardware works exactly as designed and intended. Lightsquared tried to say that GPS manufacturers didn't adhere to 2008 DoD filtering standards. But those "standards" weren't intended for, and don't apply to, commercial units. They also weren't put in place to deal with Lightsquared's satellite.

Commercial hardware already has working filters, but they weren't intended to cope with this extremely high-powered signal at those frequencies. It was just a bad idea. It gets even worse when talking about higher-precision GPS units. Also, independent testing by the FAA indicated interference with a flight safety warning system for approaching terrain.

LTE by satellite seems counter-productive anyway, we badly need the lower latencies afforded by good terrestrial LTE networks.

RE: Not Surprising
By Souka on 5/15/2012 2:49:21 AM , Rating: 2
Why oh why did this even get launched, or even past component testing phases?

I'm a bit confused.

RE: Not Surprising
By Samus on 5/15/2012 4:52:42 AM , Rating: 2
They jumped the gun. The FCC doesn't oversee the launch phase of satellites. But any physicist at Light Squared (clearly there were none) would have told them that this thing would most definately cause chaos on the ground by saturating near the GPS spectrum, which is generally very low radiation and requires very high sensitivity.

This is sad, but not surprising. Too bad it can't be re-tooled for another spectrum without a relaunch.

RE: Not Surprising
By Souka on 5/15/2012 8:22:48 PM , Rating: 2
maybe they can point the antennas toward the moon... you know, for Newt Gingrich's moon base.... ;)

RE: Not Surprising
By Arc177 on 5/15/2012 9:21:51 AM , Rating: 5
Your statement is nonsense lightfoot. Apparently you are also light brained.

Lightsquared attempted to retask satellite designated BW for terrestrial use and adjacent to the BW used by GPS which uses an incredibly weak signal the LS was going to broadcast in that adjacent band at MANY orders of magnitude greater power than the GPS. Which will inherently flood the GPS band due to the relative power levels making it extremely difficult for all but the most robust GPS receivers to even attempt to resolve the GPS signal.

In short your comment is rubbish all around.

I say good riddance to LS and they got what they deserved. Attempting to lie cheat and steal your way around the FCC and the laws of physics is a tall order. Idiots.

RE: Not Surprising
By lightfoot on 5/15/2012 12:23:28 PM , Rating: 3
Name calling. With an argument that strong I shouldn't even debate you.

...when the U.S. Air Force revealed that it would interfere with an estimated 75 percent of commercial and government GPS units.

Why was it the US Air Force doing this?? Isn't that precisely what the FCC should have been doing? It was the government that failed here. Specifically the FCC, but GPS as a government technology should also have any needed restrictions on frequencies and power levels already in place.

Did Lightsquared try to pull a fast one? Yeah, and they have been punished. But the underlying issues at the FCC and government corruption are still there.

The FCC broke their own rules. If GPS can not operate when neighboring frequencies are used then those frequencies should be reserved and licenced to the GPS system. The FCC should NOT license those frequencies to other companies.

You are right, Lightsquared was in the wrong. But so too was the FCC and to a lesser extent the GPS technology its self.

RE: Not Surprising
By Solandri on 5/15/2012 3:57:53 PM , Rating: 3
The FCC broke their own rules. If GPS can not operate when neighboring frequencies are used then those frequencies should be reserved and licenced to the GPS system. The FCC should NOT license those frequencies to other companies.

You're completely forgetting about signal strength. This isn't like a digital TV where you tune into one channel and that's all you get. The greater the neighboring signal strength, the greater the inteference.

The FCC actually did a really good job on this one. Lightsquared's frequencies were originally licensed as satellite communications. Transmissions are highly directional and aimed upwards, with big dishes on the ground to pick up a weak signal coming from the sky. Low signal strength on the ground so little chance of interfering with GPS. The FCC licensed it for satellite comms because they knew anything stronger could potentially interfere with GPS. (If you don't understand this, I suggest you google for "signal to noise ratio".)

When Lightsquared requested they be allowed to use that band for terrestrial transmissions, I probably would've told them to take a hike. But the FCC did the pragmatic thing and said, "Well, we think it'll intefere with GPS - that's why we designated it for satellite communications in the first place. But we haven't actually tested it ourselves. So why don't we have the RF geeks at the Air Force set up a test, you bring your transmitter, and we'll see what happens?"

So they tested it, found that it interfered with GPS, and denied Lightsquared's application to use the band for terrestrial transmissions. End of story.

RE: Not Surprising
By MrBlastman on 5/15/2012 1:08:09 PM , Rating: 2
Mess with the physical constants and you will constantly be defeated. :)

Not to me
By kjboughton on 5/14/2012 11:23:39 PM , Rating: 2
...the friendly Obama administration...

Friendly to whom?

RE: Not to me
By rrburton on 5/15/2012 7:36:02 AM , Rating: 2
Homosexuals, lately

RE: Not to me
By giffdawg on 5/15/2012 8:34:07 AM , Rating: 3
Obviously to the highest bidder.

RE: Not to me
By FITCamaro on 5/15/2012 8:53:31 AM , Rating: 4
But isn't he the golden boy who promised to end lobbying, open the government to the people, and end all the worlds problems?

RE: Not to me
By leviathan05 on 5/15/2012 9:14:04 AM , Rating: 3
Yes, and he still will ... next term.

What? You don't believe him?

RE: Not to me
By Motoman on 5/15/2012 11:18:13 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah...just like every other president past, present and future.

RE: Not to me
By HoosierEngineer5 on 5/15/2012 11:37:15 AM , Rating: 2
...from Yes We Can, to No, I Can't?

RE: Not to me
By HoosierEngineer5 on 5/15/2012 11:38:29 AM , Rating: 2
Subject was,
When did the motto change...

RE: Not to me
By TSS on 5/15/2012 4:46:24 PM , Rating: 3
He promised change, things got exponentially worse.

I don't see how he failed to deliver. Obama 2012!

High Tradeoff
By Reclaimer77 on 5/14/2012 8:42:13 PM , Rating: 1
So for better coverage you would have horrible latency? Can someone explain to me how using satellites in space would lead to a workable 4G LTE solution? The point of LTE is smooth low-latency performance!

Not surprised to see Obama cronyism at work here, again. Because as a concept this seems wholly inferior to terrestrial solutions altogether.

RE: High Tradeoff
By Alexvrb on 5/14/2012 10:14:00 PM , Rating: 3
Falcone isn't the only big name in this, either. You'll note that Soros was involved big time in Harbinger and lobbied on Lightsquared's behalf.

Kudos to the Air Force and in particular Gen. Shelton for not caving to pressure and sticking to his guns!

RE: High Tradeoff
By Dr of crap on 5/15/2012 8:39:30 AM , Rating: 1
Yea, so if there was bad weather, my satellite TV goes out if there is bad t-stroms, your cell wouldn't work.

Hmmmm, just when you'd WANT it to work!

RE: High Tradeoff
By erple2 on 5/15/2012 9:57:09 AM , Rating: 2
Either way, your cell phone (that no longer works in a T-Storm) can no longer tell you where you are, at least not via GPS.

out of the fire, into the flames
By Nortel on 5/14/2012 10:40:57 PM , Rating: 3
It's a good thing RIM hired Frank Boulben as their CMO before they made yet another bad move...

Pirate Internet
By stardude692001 on 5/15/2012 6:08:47 AM , Rating: 3
So what would it take to hack the satellite and set up a pirate internet outside the bounds of earthside governments?
At least until they shot it down.

By DockScience on 5/14/2012 9:54:26 PM , Rating: 2
Falcone tried to pull a fast one.

He bought cheap satellite spectrum and got his pals in the Obama administration to wave their hands and turn it into terrestrial high power spectrum worth a fortune.

But he didn't do his homework to find out WHY that spectrum was low power satellite only in the first place.

This is not a tragedy, it's a crime that was almost pulled off.

Jason Mick = Fail
By McTardy on 5/14/12, Rating: 0
Jason Mick = Fail
By McTardy on 5/14/12, Rating: 0
Another Obama Donor Owned!
By Arsynic on 5/15/12, Rating: -1
By Ashley001 on 5/15/12, Rating: -1
Jason Mick = Fail
By McTardy on 5/14/12, Rating: -1
RE: Jason Mick = Fail
By Dorkyman on 5/15/2012 11:49:39 AM , Rating: 2
Gee whiz, McTardy, three separate posts to flame the author?

Plus expletives to show how much you really mean it?

Color me impressed.

RE: Jason Mick = Fail
By McTardy on 5/15/2012 1:38:34 PM , Rating: 1
Was only supposed be 1 post. Guess the DailyTech posting engine was having a fail moment of its own while I was commenting. Would have gone back and deleted the duplicates, but I can't.

Expletives? Yeah I gave up resorting to reason when it comes to Jason Mick and his unholy crusade to mention RIM in every single article he writes.

RE: Jason Mick = Fail
By bigboxes on 5/15/2012 9:54:36 PM , Rating: 1
I thought the same when all the talk about Palm was the rage. And yet it still happened. Why does it even bother you? Are you a RIM stockholder? I never understand why people need to defend the feelings of a corporation.

It's all lies, I tell ya!

RE: Jason Mick = Fail
By McTardy on 5/16/2012 2:39:20 AM , Rating: 2
As I've said a few times before, I'm not defending RIM or their stupid decisions over the past few years. Its expected and healthy for writers to call out a company that isn't performing up to snuff. My issue with Jason Mick is that he takes it to a level that bypasses absurd. This article isn't even about RIM, yet he finds a way to sneak it in. My point to Jason is this: bash RIM if you so choose, but stop letting it poison your other articles. And STOP citing yourself as a source!

There. I didn't use expletives that time. Let the flames begin.

RE: Jason Mick = Fail
By bigboxes on 5/16/2012 9:33:13 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe he's just adding tags to increase hits. I understand the annoyance, I don't understand the hatred. I'd just stop reading his blogs if it bothered me that much.

RE: Jason Mick = Fail
By McTardy on 5/16/2012 4:36:13 PM , Rating: 2
I have DailyTech in my RSS. Believe me if there was a "show all DailyTech posts except those from Jason Mick" I'd be the first person to sign up for it. It pops up in my RSS and gets my attention. I'll give him credit for writing about interesting topics. Unfortunately I don't realize until its too late that the article has been written by a monkey who has had his ass shaved and taught to walk backwards. By that point the damage is done and Captain Fantastic Journalist has added to his page hit count :(

"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki