backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 298 comment(s) - last by anthony34.. on Apr 17 at 10:07 PM


2008 Toyota Highlander Hybrid

Ford Edge with HySeries Drive

Chevrolet Volt
Bush calls for a 20% reduction in gasoline usage by 2017

Many of the top auto manufacturers selling vehicles in the United States are at least attempting to reduce consumption of fossil fuels. Big names like General Motors, Ford, Toyota, and Honda have production models or prototypes that rely on hybrid, fuel cell or diesel technology to improve fuel efficiency.

President Bush wants even more progress from automakers and is pushing for even stricter fuel economy standards in the coming years.

"We have laid out a plan that will affect greenhouse gases that come from automobiles by having a mandatory fuel standard that insists on 35 -- using 35 billion gallons of alternative fuels by 2017, which will reduce our gasoline uses by 20 percent and halt the growth in greenhouse gases that emanate from automobiles," said President Bush to reporters. "In other words, there is a remedy available for Congress. And I strongly hope that they pass this remedy quickly."

The Bush administration has calculated that the costs for the auto industry would come in at $114 billion USD between 2010 and 2017 to comply -- GM's share is said to be $40 billion USD.

Outspoken GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz was quick to respond to Bush's request. Lutz figures that in order for GM to reduce overall gasoline consumption 20% by the year 2017, it would need to raise the price of its vehicles by $5,000 to $6,000 USD. Lutz also remarked that the only way to meet Bush's goal would be to make almost every vehicle a hybrid or use other more expensive technologies like ethanol-based E85, all-electric or hydrogen-fuel cell vehicles. "This technology does not come for free," said Lutz.

That being said, GM is adding hybrid technology to existing vehicles to improve fuel efficiency. The Saturn Aura Green Line promises a 30% increase in fuel economy compared to a base Aura XE and is priced at a relatively reasonable $22,695 USD including destination charge. GM has also started early production on dual-mode hybrid versions of its Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon full-size SUVs. Hybrid technology is said to increase the fuel economy of these vehicles by as much as 25%.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By 2017
By BMFPitt on 4/5/2007 3:48:53 PM , Rating: 3
I think 10 years from now when gas is $10/gal, a lot more people will be interested in hybrids.




RE: By 2017
By mark2ft on 4/5/2007 3:50:39 PM , Rating: 1
Anyone know when world fossil fuel supplies will become depleted? I think I heard something in the range of 80-100 years. Not sure though.


RE: By 2017
By aurareturn on 4/5/2007 3:52:28 PM , Rating: 2
No one knows but the estimate is around 2040.

If those giant oil companies don't bully off any major research done on alternative fuel, we'd probably have a good source of alternative fuel by now.


RE: By 2017
By arazok on 4/5/2007 4:29:07 PM , Rating: 1
I think you mean the Hubbert peak.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil

The world is not going to run out of oil in 2040. Nobody even knows when the peak will occur. Some say we are in it now. I think not.


RE: By 2017
By ATC on 4/5/2007 4:44:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I think not.

Out of curiosity, what makes you think we're not?


RE: By 2017
By arazok on 4/5/2007 10:01:22 PM , Rating: 4
Because production is still rising as we speak, and the price of oil hasn't skyrocketed.

Now, someone is going to point to $60 oil and say "Hasn't skyrocketed?", but believe me oil is still cheap in the greater scheme of things.

Peak oil means we will never pump more oil per day then we at that time. No economy will be able to grow without realizing efficiency gains, rather then burning more oil as we do now. Countries will begin fighting over existing supplies, and prices will go $120, $200, $300 a barrel or more.

Peak oil means you actually carpool to work, rather then think it's just a good thing for everyone else to do. You won't have a choice.


RE: By 2017
By psychmike123 on 4/6/2007 12:03:42 AM , Rating: 2
With respect, I disagree. As a whole, oil production in many proven fields has declined. The reason that oil production as a whole has not has been because oil companies are resorting to more and more aggressive means of extracting oil. If we're not at peak oil, we're certainly getting close. Keep in mind that oil use is growing ever faster. That means that we'll likely use up the remaining oil much, much earlier than our history would suggest.


RE: By 2017
By Zeatrix on 4/6/2007 2:53:35 AM , Rating: 2
Whether or not there is more oil is irrelevant. We have to cut the emissions now anyways! The record high carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere will cause serious disruptions to the earths ecosystem and that is why we HAVE to stop using oil.

I recognize that we can't just stop using oil right away. But we have to do as much as we can, otherwise the future will be very grim for generations to come.


RE: By 2017
By masher2 (blog) on 4/6/2007 9:49:37 AM , Rating: 2
> "The record high carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere..."

But we're nowhere near "record" levels of carbon dioxide. Current levels are about 380 ppm. In the earth's past, they were well above 3,000 ppm.


RE: By 2017
By Steve Guilliot on 4/6/2007 6:06:30 PM , Rating: 2
True.
We should temper that fact with another. When CO2 levels were that high, the planet was much hotter and mostly tropical.

We can't wait for "record" CO2 levels, so whether 380ppm is or not is academic.

No matter the view on global warming, we should reduce our dependence on the middle east for our economic sustainability. It's as simple as that.


RE: By 2017
By masher2 (blog) on 4/7/2007 5:56:51 PM , Rating: 2
> "We should temper that fact with another. When CO2 levels were that high, the planet was much hotter and mostly tropical"

Actually, during one period of extremely high CO2 levels (over 1000ppm, or triple the level they are today) the planet was locked in the coldest ice age of the past 400 past million years. Climatology is a complex business.


RE: By 2017
By Fallen Kell on 4/10/2007 10:56:09 PM , Rating: 2
> "Actually, during one period of extremely high CO2 levels (over 1000ppm, or triple the level they are today) the planet was locked in the coldest ice age of the past 400 past million years. Climatology is a complex business."

Yes, but the reason for the high CO2 at that time was due to the loss of plant life which is what converts the C02 into the oxygen that most animal life depends on.


RE: By 2017
By masher2 (blog) on 4/6/2007 9:48:29 AM , Rating: 2
> "As a whole, oil production in many proven fields has declined..."

In some yes. But overall world production of oil is still increasing....and many fields we haven't even begun to taop yet.


RE: By 2017
By rushfan2006 on 4/6/2007 10:01:19 AM , Rating: 2
lol...that's why I like masher...he has an answer all the time for all the scientific stuff. Seriously , I'm not saying that sarcastically....nor am I saying this as a bust/put down in anyway but rather as a sincere question of curiousity -- Masher are you an engineer or something or just a information junkie that reads ALOT.

Even though sometimes I've strongly disagreed with you, I've always admired your thing for posting information and a lot of the times I've doubled checked your info and it has been correct.


RE: By 2017
By masher2 (blog) on 4/6/2007 10:09:13 AM , Rating: 2
I'm a researcher for a Fortune 50 company...and I read a lot :)


RE: By 2017
By encryptkeeper on 4/6/2007 5:25:56 PM , Rating: 3
I'm sure google helps alot.


RE: By 2017
By Steve Guilliot on 4/6/2007 5:58:54 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, is there room for my lips on your ass too? Or do I need to get in line?

j/k