backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 142 comment(s) - last by Chaser.. on Jun 27 at 2:33 PM


Ford's 2009 F-150 is being delayed by two months due to "market conditions".

The current Chevrolet Suburban may soldier on for a few more years due to fuel prices.

The Ford Verve concept car foreshadows the upcoming 2010 Fiesta
Domestic auto giants take drastic steps to deal with rising fuel costs.

Large vehicles are taking a serious hit with the rise in fuel prices. DailyTech reported earlier this month that Ford's F-Series was knocked off its perch as the country's best selling vehicle in May. The F-Series was dethroned by not one, but four Japanese sedans (Honda Civic and Accord, Toyota Corolla and Camry) -- this was the first time that the F-Series wasn't at the top of the monthly sales chart since late 1991.

Auto manufacturers and dealerships are fighting back with schemes promising free gas for a year or discounted pricing on future fuel expenses. Ford, for example, is offering 0% financing on nearly all of its vehicles and employee pricing on the F-Series -- presumably to help boost the truck back into sales lead for the month of June.

GM is taking a more drastic step that will affect its future product plans. The current lineup of GM full-size pickups and SUVs was scheduled to be redesigned for 2012. Due to the changing market conditions, GM has suspended plans for this move and is instead shuttling its engineers to other projects. The "other projects" in this case will be the development of more fuel efficient cars.

"We're going to leave all of our options open, but this is a direct result of the market conditions we are facing," said GM spokesman Tom Pyden.

The move is not surprising at all considering that company sales of trucks, SUVs, and full-size vans tumbled 37 percent during the month of May. To make matter worse, GM is even having trouble selling its more efficient, hybrid full-size SUVs. GM projected to sell 12,000 of its Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid and GMC Yukon Hybrid full-size SUVs during all of 2008 -- through the first five months of 2008, the company only managed to move a combined total of 1,100 vehicles.

GM is also on track to close four of its plants that produce full-size SUVs and pickups by the end of 2010. This will reduce annual production of said vehicles by 700,000 units per year. GM, however, will also boost car production by an additional 200,000 units per year to somewhat blunt the impact. "Somewhat" is the key word as GM makes three times the amount of profit for each full-size truck or SUV that is sells versus a compact or mid-size sedan.

GM isn't the only feeling the effects of the gas crunch, however. Jim Farley, Ford's group vice president of Marketing and Communications sent out an email to dealers earlier this week with regards to a two-month delay in the introduction of the all-new, 2009 Ford F-150.

"In parallel, Ford is adjusting the public introduction timing of the new 2009 Ford F-150 by approximately two months due to the industry-wide slowdown in the U.S. truck market and the need to sell down dealer inventory of the current model," said Farley. "The new F-150 now will go on sale in late fall."

With dealers having so much trouble finding buyers for the old '08 F-150, it doesn't really make sense to drop an all-new model onto dealer lots for the buyers that are looking to buy a truck.

Ford also announced that its Dearborn truck plant will be idled for much of Q3, while the line speed will be reduced for two additional full-size truck/SUV plants. A fourth plant, the Cuautitlan Assembly Plant in Mexico, will cease building full-size trucks and will ramp up production of the all-new sub-compact Ford Fiesta in 2010.

Luckily for GM and Ford, help is on the way with new car models due in the next few years. GM hopes to gain some mindshare with the American car-buying populous with the Chevrolet Volt. The vehicle is due in 2010 and can travel 40 miles on battery power alone thanks to its lithium-ion battery pack. The company is also banking on its next generation Chevrolet Cobalt to boost small car sales.

Ford on the other hand is finally coming around to embracing the idea of shared global vehicle platforms and will provide a single Focus for all global markets (Ford’s home market has been saddled with the nearly decade-old Focus platform while other markets received a second generation platform a few years ago). Ford will also bring the aforementioned Fiesta in 2010 to the U.S. to do battle with the Honda Fit and Toyota Yaris. The Fiesta will take styling cues from the Ford Verve concept car.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

No Surprise here
By theapparition on 6/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: No Surprise here
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 6/25/2008 11:47:42 AM , Rating: 3
I drive an "econobox" Mazda 3s Hatchback. How much vehicle do I need to go to run errands, may trips to the mountains/beach, or visit family?

I can seat four comfortably, five in a pinch, and the cargo area is decent. If I fold down the rear seats, I can swallow everything from La-Z-Boys to a 42" Plasma TV (both were handled with ease).

On top of that, I get around 31 - 32 MPG on the highway. If I need a big truck (on the rare occasion), I just borrow my dad's Nissan Titan Crew Cab Long Bed and pay him for the gas I use.


RE: No Surprise here
By theapparition on 6/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: No Surprise here
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 6/25/2008 12:07:11 PM , Rating: 2
"I really hope you joking here. My "big V8 gas guzzler" just averaged 31.2mpg round trip on the way to Bowling Green, KY. And that only has a measly 800hp."

Huh, are you driving a Corvette or something? B/C that's one of the only extremely high HP vehicles I can think of that can manage 30 MPG on the highway.

I have my doubts about 800HP and and 31.2 MPG though...


RE: No Surprise here
By ShapeGSX on 6/25/2008 12:09:10 PM , Rating: 2
Highway MPG is relatively easy to get.

It is city MPG that is more difficult. His mpg probably drops to 10 or less in the city.


RE: No Surprise here
By FITCamaro on 6/25/2008 12:24:12 PM , Rating: 2
Not really. 800 hp out of a Corvette isn't hard. A good turbo set up can do that. And as long as you stay off the pedal in the city it'll still probably do 15.

It all comes down to gearing and how heavy your right foot is.


RE: No Surprise here
By ShapeGSX on 6/25/2008 12:32:00 PM , Rating: 2
I suppose it would depend on how the turbo is sized and when it will spool up.

My 11 second Eclipse GSX gets around 18mpg city, but 32mpg with pure highway. I get 24mpg with mixed driving. But I have a small turbo, and it spools up quickly, which can get it into the richer part of the map.

Unfortunately, running pure highway miles for a full tank of gas realistically doesn't happen all that often.


RE: No Surprise here
By vapore0n on 6/25/2008 12:45:15 PM , Rating: 2
haha, small turbo and 11 seconds dont match.

Hell, my stock STI hits 20mpg average, and I dont get 12s.

Back to topic. Cars should advertise average MPG. I hear lots of commercials putting out #mpg.....highway.


RE: No Surprise here
By ShapeGSX on 6/25/2008 12:58:35 PM , Rating: 2
It is just a 16G turbo. It is the stock turbo from an Evo III. People have gone MUCH faster with it than I have.

Here's a video of my car running an 11.98@116. But my best is an 11.82.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJKqII6R4F4


RE: No Surprise here
By theapparition on 6/25/2008 12:59:27 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Cars should advertise average MPG. I hear lots of commercials putting out #mpg.....highway.

I agree completely. The real value should mirror the EPA's value for "combined" fuel economy.


RE: No Surprise here
By nugundam93 on 6/25/2008 1:05:32 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
aha, small turbo and 11 seconds dont match.


exactly. unless that eclipse has a lightweight composite body and nawz (ooooh yeah).

seriously, i'd like to see what the eclipse is packing. that'd be interesting.


RE: No Surprise here
By ShapeGSX on 6/25/2008 1:13:08 PM , Rating: 2
Nope, it weighs 3150lbs. Stock weight. 3320 with me in it. Gotta start working out more. ;)


RE: No Surprise here
By FITCamaro on 6/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: No Surprise here
By 67STANG on 6/25/2008 2:02:18 PM , Rating: 1
My carbureted 67 mustang has 512hp, naturally aspirated. It does about 16 city and 28 highway. Of course, that's with the Overdrive 5spd. I just swapped in.

A C6 vette weighs in at over 3,100 lbs, while my stang weighs in at 2,642 lbs. with driver and full tank of gas-- verified at the track.

I have a VERY hard time believing an 800hp corvette that weighs over 3,000 lbs. can get 30+ hwy mpg. Engines are vacuums for all practical purposes, and forced induction (ie-turbos) require more fuel to go along with the compressed air from the turbo as opposed to no turbo.

My guess is that either to Corvette doesn't get 30+MPG (a STOCK vette only gets 26 hwy mpg...) or that it doesn't have 800 hp.-- or both, which is most likely.


RE: No Surprise here
By Spuke on 6/25/2008 3:23:28 PM , Rating: 2
Your not in boost all the time so it's quite believable that a 800hp vette can still get 30 mpg.


RE: No Surprise here
By FITCamaro on 6/25/2008 3:50:54 PM , Rating: 2
Stock Vette's are rated at 29 mpg. My dad's 3800lb Trans Am gets 27 mpg highway. And many C5-C6 Vette owners with the 6-speed manual report 30+ mpg. It's because the T56 has a 6th gear of .5 which lets the engine run at around 1800 rpm at 80 mph. A typical 4 cylinder usually runs around 3000 rpm. Your mustang probably runs around 2300-2500 with a .75 5th gear (guessing). Not to mention the Vette is just a little more aerodynamic than your 67 Mustang.

So yes its possible and happening. I've seen a supercharged Vette getting 35 mpg on the highway. He doesn't run the same tune on the highway as the track but still. And you can't compare a carbureted engine with an FI one. Yes you can get good mileage with a carburetor. But you can get better with FI.

At 16 city and 28 highway, you have nothing to be complaining about though.