backtop


Print 17 comment(s) - last by stardude692001.. on May 18 at 6:28 AM


  (Source: automotiveworld.com)
The automaker said its Facebook ads have proved to be ineffective

General Motors Co. (GM) pulled its paid advertising from Facebook only days before the social network's massive initial public offering (IPO).

GM reportedly spends about $4 billion annually on advertising worldwide. Of this $4 billion, approximately $10 million is spent on Facebook advertisements, and another $30 million on Facebook fan pages.

While Facebook ads take up a fairly small amount of GM's total amount spent on advertisements annually, the automaker says the advertising on the social network has proved to be ineffective. GM has decided to axe its $10 million spent on Facebook ads, but will keep its Facebook fan pages.

"We regularly review our overall media spend and make adjustments as needed," said Greg Martin, a GM spokesman. "This happens as a regular course of business and it's not unusual for us to move our spending around various media outlets -- especially with the growth of multiple social and digital media outlets.

"In terms of Facebook specifically, while we currently do not plan to continue with advertising, we remain committed to an aggressive content strategy through all of our products and brands, as it continues to be a very effective tool for engaging with our customers."

Experts say that GM could be having troubles gaining business from its Facebook ads because its customers are older and do not have as much of a presence on the social network.

Many wondered if GM's decision, which came only three days before Facebook's $104 billion IPO, would affect investor's view of the social network at a crucial time. Facebook is expected to price its shares on Thursday and begin trading under the ticker "FB" on Friday. 

While other automakers may see benefits to advertising with Facebook, The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Google ads are more effective than Facebook ads. Facebook's clickthrough rate was 0.051 percent in 2010 while Google's was 0.4 percent. Clickthrough rates are the number of times users click on ads.

This sort of information could really put a damper on Facebook's upcoming IPO this week. Other potential impediments on Facebook’s plate include the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) probe into the social networks $1 billion Instagram acquisition, which aims to increase Facebook's mobile usage, since the company's amended S-1 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday mentioned that Facebook revenue will decline as more user's access the site from mobile devices instead of PCs.

Sources: The Detroit News, The Wall Street Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

correction
By chromal on 5/16/2012 1:59:41 PM , Rating: 5
Facebook is ineffective. In fact, Facebook is a steaming pile of crap. Notice the lack of double-quotes around any of that, because is actually very true.




RE: correction
By kleinma on 5/16/2012 2:35:47 PM , Rating: 4
Facebook will go the way of the Dodo, AOL, and MySpace soon enough. Once people start to realize they are cattle whos privacy is being raped in order for zuck to pad his pockets, they will hopefully figure out that they are the batteries that run the facebook machine. They offer a mediocre social platform that doesn't cost money, it just costs privacy.


RE: correction
By FaceMaster on 5/16/2012 2:42:27 PM , Rating: 2
Meh, I don't care, I can keep in touch with friends and relatives better than any previous generation has done, and for the first time ever the majority of people in the world have been on the same site! Never cared much for having to sign up to various services to keep in touch with everybody.

Of course people are going to think it's all some kind of conspiracy.


RE: correction
By JediJeb on 5/16/2012 3:06:57 PM , Rating: 2
I keep up with my family and friends the old fashioned way, it's called Facetime :)


RE: correction
By spamreader1 on 5/16/2012 5:10:42 PM , Rating: 5
I chose the older easy way, I don't keep up with them.


RE: correction
By Bonesdad on 5/16/2012 11:12:24 PM , Rating: 2
better than any previous generation has done...didn't know they measured this type of data historically. And I doubt that it's true...most previous generations lived with their family's, or at least in the same town as their family. With the crap that is continually posted on Facebook, I honestly wonder what the h*** people find so fascinating.


RE: correction
By TSS on 5/16/2012 2:46:59 PM , Rating: 5
Hah. Facebook will die because of the same reasons those platforms you named died.

Not because people "woke up". Because something better came along. Easyer to use, less annoying to encounter.

If you name those, you've got to name the original social network, Geocities. And the only reason that became popular, is because before geocities the only way to make a website was to learn actual HTML code. Then geocities introduced some simple tools that could do the same, only in a basic form. But basic is better then nothing, so even i had a geocities website.

Facebook is just the ultimate continuation, where a standardized template and powerfull but simple tools allows you to make an "individual website", but within certain restrictions (like no annoying background music) to keep it looking "professional".

If i'd had to wager any guess, the next "facebook" will be a social network who will allow much easyer creation of actual media, rather then just collecting and sharing that media. Basically facebook meets youtube & fraps.


FB is for occupyers
By vision33r on 5/16/2012 4:24:29 PM , Rating: 1
Most of those Occupy movement folks are on FB posting the next rallies. These are also anti-corporation, it's no wonder the ads are not working. I have not clicked on any ads except freebies that give me free ice cream or drinks.




RE: FB is for occupyers
By jimbojimbo on 5/16/2012 6:17:16 PM , Rating: 2
I've never clicked on an ad on FB. They're all "Meet single ladies near you" type ads so I just ignore them. I usually assume most sites posting tacky ads like that are full of malware or swindlers. Now I'm on Gmail all the time and I have to say I've clicked on many ads because they were web sites that I could potentially be interested in. In fact I have AdBlock set to show me ads in my Gmail because they could be of interest.


RE: FB is for occupyers
By FITCamaro on 5/17/2012 7:42:01 AM , Rating: 3
If you'd stop looking at porn, the singles ads would go away. ;)


RE: FB is for occupyers
By stardude692001 on 5/18/2012 6:28:43 AM , Rating: 2
yeah and I bet if he stopped breathing his allergies would go away.

But seriously who buys a car because of an add. Either you research and find what you want or some slick haired slime ball in a cheap suit sells you whatever makes him the most money.


RE: FB is for occupyers
By mindless1 on 5/17/2012 12:31:37 PM , Rating: 2
Being anti-corp doesn't really work when it comes to potential car buyers unless you know of a non-corp making desirable vehicles? They gotta drive /something/


RE: FB is for occupyers
By stardude692001 on 5/18/2012 6:25:06 AM , Rating: 2
not if they live in major cities. I have had a car since I was 17 but I hear some people in New York go their whole lives without even learning to drive.


How to waste your ad budget
By Beenthere on 5/16/2012 4:43:07 PM , Rating: 2
It took awhile but it appears that GM realized that the losers on Facebook are losers.




This speaks volumes about GM
By Natch on 5/17/2012 8:44:49 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Experts say that GM could be having troubles gaining business from its Facebook ads because its customers are older and do not have as much of a presence on the social network.


This speaks volumes about GM's recent efforts to jazz up their offerings, to try to appeal to the younger generation of car purchasers.

Perhaps GM should get rid of their boring line up of vehicles, design something people younger than 30 want to drive, THEN advertise on FB.




Newsworthy?
By mindless1 on 5/17/2012 12:33:41 PM , Rating: 2
Not so sure this is newsworthy, lots of ad campaigns try new venues then stop if it isn't producing worthwhile returns whether it be GM or some other/elsewhere.




Yup
By FITCamaro on 5/17/2012 7:42:43 AM , Rating: 1
Clearly this company is worth $100 billion dollars.

Do you at least get sharks with lasers on their frikkin foreheads?




"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki