backtop


Print 6 comment(s) - last by crystal clear.. on Jan 22 at 10:44 AM

Fujitsu's spin off of its semiconductor unit will cost over $90 million USD

The electronics industry is one of the most competitive markets around. Many manufacturers of electronic goods and components find that they need to team up with rival companies to be able to produce goods at affordable costs. Some makers also find that the best way to shore up profits is to cut loss generating categories from their product lines.

Sometimes cutting a loss generator doesn’t mean simply closing up the production lines, rather it can mean spinning the loss generating business off into a separate company. InformationWeek reports that Fujitsu is doing just that by spinning off its semiconductor unit.

Moving the required equipment for the spinoff to its Mie plant will cost Fujitsu about 10 billion Yen or around $93.6 million USD. Fujitsu says that the transfer of equipment is set for March of 2008 and is scheduled to be complete in the April to September 2008 time frame. Once set up, the plant will produce semiconductors using 45-nm process technology.

Fujitsu says, “Details regarding the new subsidiary to be established as a result of the spin-off are currently under consideration, and are scheduled to be announced when available.”

DailyTech reported in November that Fujitsu posted a Q2 profit that was down 62%. Fujitsu said at the time that the massive loss was mainly attributed to a new accounting practice it was using internally. Fujitsu’s executive vice president further claimed that if they had not changed accounting practices they would have reported a profit in the same quarter.

The spinoff of its semiconductor business isn’t the first attempt from Fujitsu to improve profits. DailyTech reported last week that Hitachi, Fujitsu and Toshiba were in talks on a storage joint venture.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Economics question
By amanojaku on 1/21/2008 3:31:58 PM , Rating: 2
How does spinning off a loss generating unit into a separate business make sense? I would assume the separate company would go down in flames. If the change is one of management couldn't that business operate under the parent with internal c-level staff?

In Fujitsu's case does that mean the semiconductor company is completely independent, or is there some kind of relationship?




RE: Economics question
By PandaBear on 1/21/2008 4:10:44 PM , Rating: 2
Eventually they want to sell that unit to someone like Toshiba or TSMC, basically take a one time loss and then be done with it. Another possibility may be a conflict of interest between division that can be avoided if one division is spun out. You might also attract new customer when your parent company is not your competitor (i.e. Kingston move from M-System to Toshiba after SanDisk bought M-System, Dell and HP move from ASUS after ASUS enter its own branded notebook business).


RE: Economics question
By spluurfg on 1/22/2008 4:41:10 AM , Rating: 2
Think about it from the perspective of a shareholder. Why is the company hanging on to a struggling division? The value of a stock is based on its potential to generate future earnings and distribute those earnings as dividends -- if a division is in the red, it's hurting returns to shareholders.

Better to spin off the division to an owner who specializes in turning around troubles companies. E.g. the Freescale spin-out from Motarola or the NXP spinout from Phillips. Especially if you feel that your core business is no longer in semiconductors (which everyone tried to do before the bubble). Then the company gets a cash infusion from the sale and gets rid of a loss-making division.

As for ownership, the parent company would often take a minority share in the new entity.


The survival of the fittest
By crystal clear on 1/22/2008 3:39:56 AM , Rating: 2
Huge R&D costs plus huge investment in production facilities(fabs) with acute shortage of qualified/experienced manpower in the semi conductor business has forced comapnies to team up or set up joint venutres or co develop/co produce.

Thats the only way to survive in the market at todays prices & business envoirement..

So one hears a series of announcements from all the major operators in the business on new straergies to co develop & co produce chips from 45nm to 32 nm & maybe nore.

Toshiba Corp said on Tuesday it would join a group led by International Business Machines Corp to develop system chips using 32-nanometre circuitry, as chip makers increasingly team up to cut development costs.

The alliance also comprises Advanced Micro Devices, Samsung Electronics, Singapore's Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing, STMicroelectronics, Germany's Infineon Technologies AG and privately owned U.S.-based Freescale Semiconductor Inc.

Toshiba previously signed an agreement with domestic peer NEC Electronics Corp to jointly work on 32-nanometre technology. That alliance would focus on ways to mass-produce the chips, Toshiba said.



Then you have

Toshiba and NEC Electronics, which plan to mass produce 45-nanometer or 40-nanometer chips by early 2009, had also approached Fujitsu Ltd Spokesman Etsuro Yamada declined to comment on whether or not Fujitsu would join the group, only saying that Fujitsu was considering various options.



In addition Toshiba also has an agreement to produce chips with Sony & jointly operate fabs for that purpose.
The chips were co developed with IBM mostly used in PS3.

Intel being the only company that prefers to go alone,& yes they have the money,manpower & fabs to do just that very efficiently & deliver on time.From R&D to manufacturing.

Intel itself is constantly restructoring/reorganizing its self with cost cutting measures being implemented & new cost cutting measures on the way, on a routine basis.

Intel to shut down last Silicon Valley 'fab' this year
500 JOBS TO BE AFFECTED BY SHUTDOWN OF 'FAB'
Article Launched: 01/19/2008 01:37:02 AM PST


http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8018445?IADID=Search...

Intel has fabs in Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, Massachusetts, Israel and Ireland. It also is building a manufacturing plant in China.

So this news -

Japanese electronics firm Fujitsu Ltd (6702.T: Quote, Profile, Research) said on Monday it would put its struggling semiconductor operations into a new unit, in a move that could smooth the way for partnerships with other chip makers.


http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUS...

So expect a Toshiba/NEC/ Fujitsu agreement on co development & co production etc.

Its cut throat competition with time to market very critical,& the price/performance factor playing a vital role.




RE: The survival of the fittest
By spluurfg on 1/22/2008 4:48:43 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Huge R&D costs plus huge investment in production facilities(fabs) with acute shortage of qualified/experienced manpower in the semi conductor business has forced comapnies to team up or set up joint venutres or co develop/co produce.


Really? Many technology companies simply outsource their fabrication to the big players like TSMC or UMC. Sure, you're always hearing about AMD, Intel, etc owning their own fabs, but most companies are not actually like them -- they simply save themselves the headache of constantly investing massive amounts of capital into rapidly depreciating/amortizing fabs. E.g. Nvidia and ATI.


By crystal clear on 1/22/2008 10:44:03 AM , Rating: 2
I was focusing on the companies mentioned in my comment

Yes you are right about the outsourcing,but passing on the headaches to companies like TSMC/UMC etc also comes at a price.You cannot escape the costs.

Even TSMC/UMC are also constantly investing massive amounts of capital into rapidly depreciating/amortizing fabs.

They certainly have to recover their investment by passing on the cost to you.

It all depemds - for some companies its worthwhile for others they simply prefer not to do so.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer




Latest Headlines










botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki