backtop


Print 9 comment(s) - last by Mojo the Monke.. on Feb 18 at 5:04 PM

Goel is tenth insider to plead guilty for participation in the Galleon case

One of the biggest insider trading scandals in the technology world in recent years is the Galleon case where insiders at IBM and Intel leaked information to investor Raj Rajaratnam who used the information to reap millions in profits from trades. Former AMD CEO Hector Ruiz was also implicated in an insider trading case that ultimately forced Ruiz to step down from his position as the chairman of GlobalFoundries, the AMD chipmaking spin off.

New developments have surfaced in the Galleon case reports the 
New York Times. What Rajaratnam and former Intel executive Rajiv Goel didn’t know was that the FBI was listening in on their phone calls. Goel is now the tenth person to plead guilty in relation to the case after admitting that he passed insider information to Rajaratnam throughout 2007. The insider information had to do with Intel earnings reports before they were publicly released. Goel faces a maximum penalty of 25 years in prison. 

Goel said in court, "I cannot express how sorry I am for my conduct. I intend to do the right thing."

In addition to passing earnings numbers, Goel also passed information to Galleon on the Clearwire and Sprint deal that Intel intended to invest $1 billion. Part of the plea agreement in the case was Goel's agreement to work with investigators. He is set for sentencing on May 28 and is out on $750,000 bail.

Despite Goel's admission that he passed insider secrets to Rajaratnam, the Galleon head still maintains he did no wrong. Goel is reportedly the third person to plead guilty who had direct contact with Rajaratnam. In all federal authorities claim that the insider tips passed to Rajaratnam resulted in $50 million in gains for Galleon. So far, 22 people have been criminally charged or face charges by the SEC in connection with the case.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

proportionality, intensity, duration
By inperfectdarkness on 2/9/2010 1:41:43 PM , Rating: 5
the above are three things the US military cites must be considered when invoking a "right to self defense".

i contend that they are applicable to a great variety of things in life--among which sentencing should be one.

A. guy robs a convienience store & nets $500--gets $15 years in prison.

B. guy convicted of millions in ill-gotten-gains/white-collar-crime netting him several million or more.

now maybe it's just me, but i don't think guy B deserves a 15 year sentence. in fact, i think he deserves a minimum of a life sentence. and it shouldn't matter whether or not it was a first offense.

we wonder why "ethics" in the USA seem to keep going down the shitter? look no further.




By kaoken on 2/9/2010 4:56:08 PM , Rating: 2
Prison was meant for rehabilitation ( I don't believe in it) so thievery is always considered on a lesser offense.


By TSS on 2/9/2010 7:24:33 PM , Rating: 2
Hah If anything about this article shows ethics are in the crapper, it's this little tidbit:

quote:
Former Intel Exec Rajiv Goel Pleads Guilty in Insider Trading Case
quote:
He is set for sentencing on May 28 and is out on $750,000 bail.


Here you have a guy, that said "I did it", knows he's going to jail for a very long time, and then gets 3 more months of freedom for, considering what he earned with what did, a pittance.


Yup.
By Mojo the Monkey on 2/9/2010 1:28:58 PM , Rating: 2
I will never be surprised by these lawsuits. The money-making potential is too high, and passing the information is just too easy and tempting between friends. I'm glad their catching them, as they profit at the expense of the collective, uninformed market, but never surprised.




RE: Yup.
By smackababy on 2/9/2010 1:51:33 PM , Rating: 2
I don't see how these guys don't see they will get caught. I mean, higher ups at companies have to plan several months in advance to sell stock (6-8 months IIRC) so insider trading seems a bit more regulated than some other easily profitable crime like embezzlement.


RE: Yup.
By someguy123 on 2/9/2010 6:08:09 PM , Rating: 2
Probably because most of them don't get caught.


RE: Yup.
By Mojo the Monkey on 2/18/2010 5:04:20 PM , Rating: 2
Right - they dont necessarily do this with their own company, but with their golfing buddy by mutually swapping info so they both get rich off each other's insider knowledge.


New commercial?
By chagrinnin on 2/10/2010 1:15:05 AM , Rating: 2
Narrator: "Our inside traders aren't like your inside traders."

Crowd: "Bom-bom bo-bommmm"




RE: New commercial?
By Cullinaire on 2/10/2010 2:15:31 PM , Rating: 2
The marketing is actually working!

Yes!


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini




Latest Headlines
9/03/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews
September 3, 2010, 2:01 PM
NVIDIA Unveils New 400M Series GPUs
September 3, 2010, 9:01 AM
9/01/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews
September 1, 2010, 12:24 PM
8/31/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews
August 31, 2010, 12:39 PM
8/30/2010 Daily Hardware Reviews
August 30, 2010, 1:36 PM










botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki