backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 48 comment(s) - last by Adonlude.. on Sep 15 at 1:53 PM

Intel employee accessed documents while working for AMD

Intellectual property is one of the most closely guarded assets for most companies. Intellectual property is even more important in the technology industry where stolen information can give competitors a lead to market of months or even years.

Boston.com reports that a former Intel employee -- Biswahoman Pani -- has been accused of stealing top-secret files from Intel. According to Intel, Pani told his supervisor in May that he missed his wife, who worked for Intel in a California Intel facility. Pani was granted a transfer to Intel's Hudson plant on May 29. A few hours after Pani was told of the transfer, he turned in his resignation reportedly telling supervisors that he was taking a job with a hedge fund and that he would be on vacation until his last day, cited as June 11.

Intel later found out that Pani had taken a job with rival chipmaker AMD on June 2 -- more than a week before his employment at Intel ended. When Intel realized Pani had taken a job with AMD -- while still having access to an Intel provided company laptop and Intel's private corporate network -- Intel called the FBI and initiated an investigation to determine if Pani had accessed any confidential Intel files while working for AMD.

FBI Special Agent Timothy Russell said in an affidavit that in a search of Pani's home it was found that Pani had more than 100 pages of sensitive Intel documents, including drawings of future Intel processors. The information would have greatly aided AMD if turned over to the rival company.

Intel spokeswoman Claudine Mangano told Boston.com, "Intellectual property is a critical asset for Intel. We basically asked the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate activities, and we are cooperating with that investigation."

Pani has not yet been arrested, but his passport was confiscated by police. Pani has admitted to obtaining the files, but maintains he did not provide them to AMD. Pani says the files were to help his wife prepare for her new job at Intel's Hudson plant.

Russell says that there is no evidence that AMD knew what Pani was doing or aided in his actions. There is also no evidence that Pani gave the confidential Intel documents to AMD. AMD says it is cooperating fully with the investigation. Pani no longer works for AMD.

In July of 2008, a former HP VP was indicted for providing a confidential IBM document to new employers at HP in a similar case.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Spy!
By ThatNewGuy on 9/12/2008 1:58:32 PM , Rating: 5
Spah stealin' mah secrets!




RE: Spy!
By tekzor on 9/12/2008 2:04:33 PM , Rating: 5
Dispenser Down!!!


RE: Spy!
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/12/2008 2:07:03 PM , Rating: 5
Sentry Down!!!


RE: Spy!
By CloudFire on 9/12/2008 2:51:37 PM , Rating: 5
damn spies sappin' mah sentry!


RE: Spy!
By 306maxi on 9/12/08, Rating: -1
RE: Spy!
By spuddyt on 9/12/2008 7:23:44 PM , Rating: 3
wtf?


RE: Spy!
By Adonlude on 9/15/2008 1:53:47 PM , Rating: 2
Nope, TF2.


RE: Spy!
By inighthawki on 9/13/08, Rating: 0
RE: Spy!
By 306maxi on 9/15/2008 1:04:59 PM , Rating: 2
It was a random Arnie moment for which I apologise :-P


RE: Spy!
By Drexial on 9/15/2008 11:48:38 AM , Rating: 2
The spy is an engineer


RE: Spy!
By MonkeyPaw on 9/12/2008 6:55:20 PM , Rating: 3
I'm going to gut you like a cornish game hen.


RE: Spy!
By walk2k on 9/12/2008 9:57:15 PM , Rating: 2
"Listen Carl, this is a very sensitive area, and certain people would be very embarassed, if we could just keep this between us."

"What are you gonna do for me?"

"W...What do you want?"

"Can I have 50 bucks?"


Mixed feelings
By ryedizzel on 9/12/08, Rating: 0
RE: Mixed feelings
By amanojaku on 9/12/2008 2:26:51 PM , Rating: 1
I am an AMD fanatic and don't care that Intel has the best desktop processors to date. Yeah, I jumped up and down when the Athlon was kicking Intel's @$$, and I cried when the Core/Core2 platform beat my baby senseless. The thing is, any of these processors are worth having (bugs notwithstanding.)

That's besides the point. Stealing is wrong, and there's no way to justify it. If AMD is going to top Intel again then it will have to copy Intel's strategy: make the best processor, on your own talent.


RE: Mixed feelings
By Myg on 9/12/2008 4:41:29 PM , Rating: 2
So your saying all those years of free reign Intel had due to their malpractices can be called "making the best processor"?

Its like anything competetive, once you get ahead you usually stay there because everyone is behind you and thats the way it continues untill something forcefully holds you back.

AMD set this whole thing up, and it was completely wrong of them to do, they lowered themselves to intel's level to try and get a one up. This will be the end of AMD. Good riddance.


RE: Mixed feelings
By jon1003 on 9/12/2008 7:10:52 PM , Rating: 2
If AMD disappears, you can expect intel to charge $1,000 for a celeron, because they can with people having no other choices.


RE: Mixed feelings
By excrucio on 9/12/2008 8:53:27 PM , Rating: 1
They can't. If AMD was to die, they would give AMD money to stay in competition. Monopoly is illegal...at least in the US


RE: Mixed feelings
By CrimsonFrost on 9/12/2008 9:49:32 PM , Rating: 3
Actually monopoly is NOT illegal in the United States. Anti-Competitive practices are illegal, but AMD is fucking up on their own accord. No one has to bail out AMD, END OF STORY, but IBM(most likely candidate) or possibly Intel itself, definitely will. It's in everyone's best interest, including Intel to keep AMD alive and well.


RE: Mixed feelings
By cparka23 on 9/12/2008 9:16:20 PM , Rating: 2
Not AMD's style...

If AMD had anything to do with it, I think they'd try a little harder. They'd probably find a nerdy engineer working on some future microarchitecture and park a black suburban w/ tinted windows across the street from his house.

And if they wanted, they'd get a single guy early by introducing him to his future wife, a spy who poses as a hot Swedish engineering intern. She likes swimming in skin-tight attire, gymnastics, casual nudism, and stealing corporate secrets... poor bastard would never stand a chance.


RE: Mixed feelings
By mindless1 on 9/12/2008 8:11:30 PM , Rating: 2
You know this WHAT is illegal?

The only thing that seems unreasonable or suspicious so far is that the guy took the job at AMD while still employed at Intel and didn't tell anyone at the time.

Of course he'd have the intel documents at home, they didn't suggest he suddenly accessed and retrieved them at the last moment when he took the AMD job, nor have they (yet) found that he did give any to AMD.

Suspicion != guilt.


RE: Mixed feelings
By eman007 on 9/13/2008 6:31:43 AM , Rating: 2
Owned. Thought its kind of sad that AMD is trying to protect their image by laying him off like that


RE: Mixed feelings
By eman007 on 9/13/2008 6:32:11 AM , Rating: 2
*Though


that's messed up
By b534202 on 9/12/2008 2:11:20 PM , Rating: 2
Wife works for Intel, husband works for AMD. AMD can probably make the claim that Intel has access to AMD files too.




RE: that's messed up
By TheDoc9 on 9/12/2008 4:57:20 PM , Rating: 3
Who knows, but it reads more like someone at Intel wanted to make an example of this guy.


RE: that's messed up
By crystal clear on 9/13/2008 8:19:39 AM , Rating: 2
YES why not-

A huge fine + a jail term makes him & others realize that its not worth it

A huge fine + a jail term is the best punishment for these type of people,also such employee/person should be blacklisted to ensure he never works in the high tech sector.


RE: that's messed up
By wordsworm on 9/13/2008 11:22:50 PM , Rating: 2
Didn't they say that there was no evidence that he had contacted AMD with any of the information? Is it possible he had no ill motive and that he merely wanted to work at the same company as his wife? I think you got it right, Doc, that they wanted to punish a defector. How unlikely is it that someone would have documents like these at home in order to do his job? I have at home the educational program from the academy that I work at - stuff that the competing academies would like to have. If I went to work for one of them, and had these documents at home still, how would that affect me?

If he was really a spy, why would he defect at all? A spy is supposed to stay where he is, doing what he does, spying - not defect. If he was an industrial spy, he simply had to share with his wife. Furthermore, the documents found in his home - wouldn't he have taken them to his new boss at AMD? Seems by having them at home it does quite the contrary to admitting evidence against him.

Seems to me there's reasonable doubt - plenty of it enough to consider the guy innocent until proven guilty. The 'evidence' against him doesn't really seem to be there. Certainly not enough to turn his life upside down.


Mad
By Murloc on 9/12/2008 1:17:47 PM , Rating: 2
he lost the job and the face.




RE: Mad
By quiksilvr on 9/12/2008 1:18:52 PM , Rating: 5
Ain't nothing to it, gangster rap made me do it.


By crystal clear on 9/13/2008 6:44:19 AM , Rating: 2

An IT administrator scorned is not to be trusted, according to a study recently conducted by Cyber-Ark.

The security firm claims a survey conducted on 300 security professionals found a whopping 88 per cent of IT admins would steal valuable and sensitive company information if they were fired tomorrow.

Only 12 per cent said they'd leave empty handed —

or at least were smart enough not to openly admit they'd plunder sensitive data on a questionnaire.


"Our advice is to secure these privileged passwords and identities, and routinely change and manage them so that if an employee's contract is terminated, whether voluntary or not, they can't maliciously wreak havoc inside the network or vindictively steal data for competitive or financial gain," said Cyber-Ark CEO Udi Mokady.

We should note Cyber-Ark sells products that manage, log, and update privileged passwords, so swallow that incredibly high percentage with a grain of salt - or twenty. A vested-interest doesn't necessarily mean the findings are bunk, however.

Based on the average amount of barely-bottled rage we field from data center denizens, we dare say they caught the troops in a moment of vulnerable honesty. Bless them.

In other tid-bits, a quarter of the companies polled admitted to suffering from internal sabotage and security fraud in their workplace

One third said they believe industrial espionage and data leakage is occurring within their company.

But even paying the big bucks for security systems doesn't mean a thing when admins get sloppy. One third of IT admins surveyed admit to having written down privileged passwords on a post-it note.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/05/88percent_...




By crystal clear on 9/13/2008 8:56:24 AM , Rating: 2
Theft,Internal sabotage and security fraud at their workplace,
plus industrial espionage and data leakage is a major concern to every hi-tech company .


Yes that sums it all....where every employee top to down is a security risk & potential terrorist in the waiting.

"Your worst enemy is always a man of your own trade."


By JustTom on 9/13/2008 2:28:36 PM , Rating: 2
I think the numbers are high, there are ways to craft surveys to get the results you want. But not removing access to employees who leave is just plain stupid.


Confused
By Desslok on 9/12/2008 1:44:41 PM , Rating: 2
This guy missed his wife who worked in Cali and tells his manager and then Intel "grants" him a transfer to Hudson Mass.?




RE: Confused
By Desslok on 9/12/2008 1:45:54 PM , Rating: 2
Never mind, should have read further down the page.

oops.


RE: Confused
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/12/2008 1:49:14 PM , Rating: 1
Dunno man, dunno.


Intel is wrong.
By greylica on 9/12/2008 7:57:19 PM , Rating: 2
It is simple, here in Brazil and in some enterprises, certain executives, when fired or when resign, have to enter in a forced vacancy. ( 6 months to 2 years )
We name it here as "Freeze secrets time", Intel is wrong to not pay a "Freeze secrets Time" for executives that had access to sensitive data.

If proved that he, by itself is honest, and the material was not used to spy on Intel, he have the right to sue Intel for being fired from AMD.

PS: It´s the first time I see so much bad luck for a person that "finnaly" found A job faster. :)




RE: Intel is wrong.
By crystal clear on 9/13/2008 8:09:35 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
We name it here as "Freeze secrets time", Intel is wrong to not pay a "Freeze secrets Time" for executives that had access to sensitive data.


Hey "Freeze secrets time", ( 6 months to 2 years ) cost lots of money........ easily said than done

Also what does this employee do in this freeze time ? work at a pizza shop or macdonalds or work as a security guard.

Every Hi-tech company incl Intel/AMD have in their employmeee contracts - clauses specifically tackiling these issues/subjects of safe guarding company secrets.

The very fact he signs this contract he agrees to accept the above clauses,namely safe guarding/protecting company secrets plus an explicit assurance that he will not use/sell company secrets/technologies/designs for his personal gains.

Every employee is aware of this & the very fact he does break these clause,it explicitly shows his intent to steal for personal gains.


Competing companies using these stolen secrets/designs should be very heavily fined-enough to send them into bankcruptcy.

A huge fine + a jail term is the best punishment for these type of people,also such employee/person should be blacklisted to ensure he never works in the high tech sector.

A huge fine + a jail term makes him & others realize that its not worth it.

Honesty is the best policy.....there no short cuts to get rich.


RE: Intel is wrong.
By crystal clear on 9/13/2008 8:13:53 AM , Rating: 2
The last sentence shoul read-

Honesty is the best policy.....there are NO short cuts to get rich.


..greatly... aided... AMD?
By Saist on 9/13/2008 12:10:35 PM , Rating: 1
Okay. the line about "greatly aided AMD" is the line I don't understand. Intel is still years behind AMD on a direct-connection system for their processors. Hypertransport is already past revisions allowing external cables for processor intercommunication, and Intel still has nothing on the market.

Intel is still years behind AMD on power efficiencies. AMD was doing around 10watts at 1ghz back in 2005. Intel thought it was a big deal when they were getting to that point in 2007.

Intel's gone all the way back to the original Pentium to design a hardware accelerator for software graphics... Basically doing what they've been doing with graphics for years, now with just a co-processor again. Big deal, software rendering works on pretty much all processors, regardless of architecture.

Right off hand then, Intel's not doing anything that AMD could benefit from, not to mention the patent agreements and cross-licensing of technologies. Sounds more like Intel wanted an excuse to to search somebody who worked for AMD and get stuff that Intel could actually use to catch up and not be on the lagging end of technology for a change.




RE: ..greatly... aided... AMD?
By phxfreddy on 9/13/2008 2:04:28 PM , Rating: 2
its probably in anticipating business moves...

....technical information is too intricate usually to be of direct usage. It has to be where a technical move will land them in the market.


RE: ..greatly... aided... AMD?
By boogle on 9/13/2008 3:42:31 PM , Rating: 2
Spoken like a true fanboy!

I would look over your comments again, you might find them not neccesarilly... accurate.


Smart people
By Polynikes on 9/12/2008 1:40:19 PM , Rating: 4
... have the most to learn.




One Question.
By Topweasel on 9/12/2008 2:33:42 PM , Rating: 2
Pani's home, was that his wife's home as well. If she was still working for Intel wouldn't you expect to find Intel docs there.

Not to say this is messed up but what if you had a family where one worked at AMD and one at Intel without all of this back story?




RE: One Question.
By JustTom on 9/13/2008 2:25:20 PM , Rating: 2
Without knowing the specifics it is very possible that there were laws broken. The files in question might have been ones his wife would not have had access to. This is why we have trials...


I know what "secrets" were stolen....
By MDme on 9/12/2008 8:28:34 PM , Rating: 2
AMD got a copy of intel's top secret processor design for.....the Prescott

That is why Phenom has 125w TDPs and poor performance.




By StevoLincolnite on 9/12/2008 11:34:40 PM , Rating: 2
Intel and AMD both show TDP readings differently, plus don't forget about a large part of the TDP issue coming from chipsets either.

And Performance of the Phenom is "good", Just that Intels is much better at a majority of price points.


By Fenixgoon on 9/12/2008 5:26:54 PM , Rating: 2
nt




By JKflipflop98 on 9/13/2008 8:08:48 AM , Rating: 2
The ones you really have to worry about are the ones that can keep it all in their head.




By phxfreddy on 9/13/2008 2:02:33 PM , Rating: 2
Kind of burns me that if I call the FBI they'll give me the old:

"we'll be there when we're there"

but if Intel calls its:

"Yes sir.... right away sir"




"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki