backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 68 comment(s) - last by P2S9.. on Jul 30 at 11:59 PM


Cuil Search Returns Page  (Source: DailyTech)
Cuil is pronounced like "cool"

This year marks ten years since search giant Google sprang from the shadows and quickly began to dominate the web search landscape. The search landscape ten years ago was a much different place than it is today and the search engines that were big at the time are mostly nothing but memories now.

In 1998, Alta Vista was the largest search engine according to CNN. Today, Alta Vista is a mere ghost of its former self. Google is currently in its prime and is by far the largest search engine in terms of usage. CNN says that Google holds a full 62% of the U.S. search market, dominating the top spot. A distant second place with 21% of the search market is Yahoo and bringing up a very distant third place is Microsoft with 8.5% of the search market.

Google is dominant in search and online advertising right now, but it has begun to lose some of its luster to early employees. Google has recently begun to lose key engineers and executives to other internet firms like Facebook.

CNN reports that Anna Patterson joined Google in 2004 when Google purchased a search engine that she had built to upgrade its own technology. Patterson has now left Google to start her own new search engine called Cuil-- pronounced like the word "cool." Cuil began processing its first requests today.

Patterson says that the technology behind the scenes at Cuil is much more efficient and comprehensive than the technology Google uses. Patterson says that Cuil's web index has 120 billion web pages in its index. Patterson believes that to be three times the size of Google's index according to CNN.

The exact number of pages in Google's index is unknown, last time Google reported the size of its index it held 8.2 billion pages. That number was from three years ago and a safe assumption would put the size of Google's index more than that amount today. CNN reports that Google posted a blog Friday saying it routinely scans 1 trillion web links. Not all of those links make the cut and end up in Google search results though.

The Cuil search engine looks different visually and displays search results differently than Google. The main search page is very clean and has nothing but a search box and a number showing the amount of pages in its index along with links to privacy and about pages.

The search results themselves are not provided in the familiar list of links format seen on Google and other search engines. Cuil search results are arranged in a column layout with more text and images attached to the returns.

Today, search results from Cuil provide many listings, but many of the images attached to the search returns are nothing but the familiar "X" placeholder when an image is missing. The other images attached to search returns often have nothing to do with the text of the search results or the search query originally entered.

Cuil is currently backed by $33 million in venture capital and its chances of challenging Google are slim according to Allen Weiner, an analyst for Gartner. Weiner told CNN, " Search has become as much about branding as anything else. I doubt [Cuil] will be keeping anyone at Google awake at night."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Good luck, but...
By Motoman on 7/28/2008 2:12:25 PM , Rating: 2
...I'm not sure the world needs another search engine. I use Webcrawler the most anyway, and it is basically an aggregator of all the other search engines - Culi might wind up in there and I wouldn't even notice.

However, I went to Culi and did a search...came up with a ridiculous amount of utter crap. Needs a bit of tweaking methinks...




RE: Good luck, but...
By FITCamaro on 7/28/2008 2:22:43 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah I did a search for something simple. "Patriot Missile System". The results seemed relevant but it was missing a lot of popular information sites in the first several pages. Wikipedia, howstuffworks, and others. Google's results were a lot better. Quantity over quality is not a good way to go. A lesson most Americans will hopefully someday remember....


RE: Good luck, but...
By rdeegvainl on 7/28/2008 2:29:35 PM , Rating: 2
LOL, i tried your exact same search and got NO results.


RE: Good luck, but...
By rdeegvainl on 7/28/2008 2:30:20 PM , Rating: 2
though i did get some results when i put it in quotes


RE: Good luck, but...
By Gul Westfale on 7/28/2008 2:36:36 PM , Rating: 2
i typed in "gulwestfale" expecting to find my website but it showed me forum postings on DT instead... how weird. don't they filter their results by relevance?


RE: Good luck, but...
By othercents on 7/28/2008 3:18:42 PM , Rating: 2
I went to cuil just to get a page saying "Due to overwhelming interest, our Cuil servers are running a bit hot right now. The search engine is momentarily unavailable as we add more capacity."

Other


RE: Good luck, but...
By xeddit on 7/28/2008 3:20:15 PM , Rating: 2
While it's great to have other options to search, but if basic searches result in zero matches, especially for cuil then I have a serious problem with this engine. It sucks when it can't even recognize your own site...

Perhaps I'll try again in a week.


RE: Good luck, but...
By wordsworm on 7/28/2008 6:37:20 PM , Rating: 2
I cooled 'karakuri' and got results. I liked the fact that it gave a number of categories to choose from in addition to its list. I will have to give their way of displaying the information a bit of time to sink in to figure out if I like it or not. One big downside, however, is the lack of stumble input. I really like how Stumble Upon will help me guess which pages will be best. This doesn't exist on either Yahoo or Karakuri. Also, the advanced controls on cuil sucked worse than either Yahoo or Google. Somehow I can't see either threatened by Cuil.


RE: Good luck, but...
By geddarkstorm on 7/28/2008 5:40:54 PM , Rating: 2
I got results, and they were pretty relevant. I wonder how much of this "no results" problem is due to their server overload, or they are tweaking things /really/ fast.


RE: Good luck, but...
By DM0407 on 7/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Good luck, but...
By Leirith on 7/28/2008 10:16:44 PM , Rating: 2
I just got no results due to server load. Search engines need to be reliable. I'm not going to sit there and retry over and over again when I could just use Google. Maybe I'll try again after they do a bit more work on it and increase the capacity.


RE: Good luck, but...
By akugami on 7/28/2008 3:21:49 PM , Rating: 2
Amen to that. I think the number one problem with today's search engines are the immense number of irrelevant links. Sometimes I have to dig through to the 15 to 25th page to find what I need. I usually don't go past that number.

One thing that helps is that using a browser with tabs I will run multiple similar searches and jump back and forth to see what brings up the most relevant searches between them and then refine my search from that. Bottom line is that today's web searches are mostly hit and miss. More miss than hit though.


RE: Good luck, but...
By chmilz on 7/28/2008 6:48:37 PM , Rating: 2
I searched for the city I live in, Edmonton, the capital of the Alberta, Canada, and the first page did not include a hit for the city's website, which Google listed first, as one would expect.


RE: Good luck, but...
By TennesseeTony on 7/28/2008 4:58:00 PM , Rating: 2
Bob the Builder worked fine. ;)


RE: Good luck, but...
By TennesseeTony on 7/28/2008 6:42:11 PM , Rating: 2
Ah, "fbi_eyes" doesn't return the same results as Google. Try me in ...er, I mean try it, in google.

Btw, servers are not overloaded, they just don't have any information on the subject, why else would so many searches WORK when the new Radeon cards consistently do NOT show up?


RE: Good luck, but...
By TennesseeTony on 7/28/2008 6:43:58 PM , Rating: 2
WOW. Now they have results. Making me look stupid, just like my mirror does.


RE: Good luck, but...
By mixpix on 7/28/2008 9:23:04 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah I bet if you tried to search www.culi.com it would come up with crap. You might want to try www.cuil.com


RE: Good luck, but...
By Motoman on 7/28/2008 9:44:29 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, sorry...apparently my keyboard was malfunctioning at the time ;)


Slow...