backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 30 comment(s) - last by SirLucius.. on Nov 27 at 4:32 PM

It looks like Samsung's streets may have a little slush problem, but some South Korean politicians don't seem to mind the corruption

Samsung is a well known name in America and abroad for dominating multiple electronics fields, manufacturing products such as speedy SSDs, high-tech TVs, and trendy cell phones.  Samsung is a South Korean company and is the nation's largest conglomerate.  It accounts for an incredible one sixth of South Korea's GDP with its 58 affiliates posting combined sales of $159 billion USD last year.

Samsung is known in South Korea by the term "chaebol", which means a family owned conglomerate.

Now if allegations from one of its former top legal executives hold true, it appears as if Samsung behaved more like a mafia family rather than a respectable business, retaining a massive slush fund with which to bribe or otherwise influence government officials.  According to Kim Yong-cheol, former top legal executive, Samsung had used its subsidiaries to create a massive slush fund with over 200 billion won ($215.8 million USD) in assets.

Samsung currently has refused to comment on the charges.

Yong-cheol states that he is determined to blow the whistle on his former employer’s illegal and improper activities. "Samsung has created a large-scale slush fund," he stated at a press conference he called.

Yong-cheol and others have accused Samsung of impropriety on a number of recent occasions.  Yong-cheol's past allegations had centered on how Samsung had routinely made a business practice of bribing prosecutors and politicians to quash investigations about dirty business dealings.

His new allegation certainly tops these previous ones, though.  He says that he personally handled documents which detailed how money was being channeled into this slush fund.  Some of the money was then used to buy artwork while some money would be withdrawn from the fund for bribery and other illicit activities.

There has been increasing concern about Samsung's relationship with South Korea's government, which seems a bit too cozy for many people's comfort.  Many top South Korean government officials have been heavily funded by Samsung and corruption is so commonplace that it makes problems in the American political system seem of the garden variety.

Not all are content to be on Samsung's payroll, though.  Last week, South Korea's parliament passed a measure to appoint an independent counsel to investigate the Samsung group.

The bill includes provisions to investigate President Roh Moo-hyun who won the public election in 2002, and allegedly used illegal contributions from Samsung during his campaign.

Unfortunately, in a show of audacity Roh, who has three months left in office, is planning on vetoing the bill.  Over the weekend he spoke publicly denying the widespread claims that he had received money as a congratulatory gift from Samsung in 2002.

Prosecutors are putting together a team of about 55 people to look into the allegations about the slush fund.

While Samsung certainly has a steely grip on South Korea's government, its actions have been at times so blatant that several of its officials have been convicted of corruption charges.  It should be intriguing to see if the Parliament's action is a sign of progress or simply a useless political gesture.

In the U.S. Samsung has been fined for price fixing its DRAM.  In Korea, Samsung also recently admitted to plagiarizing artwork from both Microsoft and Apple.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

so....
By inperfectdarkness on 11/26/2007 1:45:54 PM , Rating: 4
i'm all for policing illegal business practices, but what do you do about everything that happens in china?

samsung? whatever. i buy sanyo phones, mitsubishi tv's, and sony dvd players.




RE: so....
By JasonMick (blog) on 11/26/2007 1:49:31 PM , Rating: 2
I just bought a 25 inch mitsubishi TV at my local salvation army for $35!
It came in a wood frame that perfectly matches my living room, and it has big speakers. I used to have a tiny TV so its sweet. I'm loving it so far.

Mitsubishi FTW!

...As to China, at least they are trying...they did execute their former quality inspector over the summer for taking bribes. That seems like a pretty strong, if perhaps draconian statement against corruption. But in all seriousness, I agree there are some real problems there.


RE: so....
By othercents on 11/26/2007 2:12:38 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Mitsubishi FTW!


So who makes the display for that Mitsubishi because I don't remember Mitsubishi owning an LCD plant. They are buying their displays from someone else and installing it into their components. It is very possible they are getting them from Samsung. However I know that Samsung is having some of their displays made by smaller Chinese companies.

Other


RE: so....
By KingViper on 11/26/2007 3:32:16 PM , Rating: 3
He never said it was an LCD.


RE: so....
By DragonMaster0 on 11/26/2007 8:20:20 PM , Rating: 2
Especially in a wood frame!

Mitsubishi made their own CRTs and were used in NEC's CRT monitors. The LCDs are also NEC/Mitsubishi and if I remember correctly, NEC doesn't get it's panels from elsewhere.


RE: so....
By rcc on 11/26/2007 5:26:36 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
...As to China, at least they are trying...they did execute their former quality inspector over the summer for taking bribes. That seems like a pretty strong, if perhaps draconian statement against corruption.


Perhaps, but you have to wonder... Was he executed for his crimes? Or to prevent him from telling the world who was actually responsible?


RE: so....
By Screwballl on 11/26/2007 2:14:48 PM , Rating: 2
What happens in Seoul, stays in Seoul, as long as we get our cheap but quality products it doesn't bother me one way or the other.
At least its not cheap chinese junk


RE: so....
By mcturkey on 11/26/2007 4:30:18 PM , Rating: 2
Doesn't matter what country it comes from if it's not the US - your dollars are still leaving the country, and not being spent here in return. While we certainly get more value out of Korean products than Chinese products, it's still more imports than exports, and that's not a good long term economic plan.


RE: so....
By robinthakur on 11/27/07, Rating: -1
RE: so....
By BioHazardous on 11/27/2007 10:22:38 AM , Rating: 4
wow.. just wow.. somebody needs to grow up and get off their anti-American podium.

I think my favorite part of your rant is "If your country had the skills".

Most of the technology being manufactured by foreign countries and sold back into North America was developed in the United States.

I'd rate you down, but I felt like replying instead.

k thx.


RE: so....
By afkrotch on 11/27/2007 12:09:20 PM , Rating: 3
Ya, no kidding. Both Plasma and LCDs were invented in the US. So was OLEDs.

US tends to invent all kinds of crap. We just offload production somewhere else.


RE: so....
By rcc on 11/27/2007 1:33:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I think this unique protectionist mentality is unique to the USA in times of economic crisis.


Don't be absurd. The French have it down pat. As do many other countries.


RE: so....
By Cygni on 11/26/2007 2:21:38 PM , Rating: 1
You do know that the Mitsubishi keiretsu is one of the worst offenders when it comes to shady business practices, right? In fact, Sony isnt exactly clean either.

I havent heard much about Sanyo's practices, however. Maybe someone else knows something.


RE: so....
By littlebitstrouds on 11/26/2007 3:03:29 PM , Rating: 2
What is this a celebrity gossip magazine based on shady retouched pictures? How bout some facts. You people annoy me with the... Oh yeah this company is no good. Nowhere do you actually provide one solid fact of where this is happening. No it's much easier to make a broad statement like this about 3 different companies that you know little about other than reading a few other non-informed peoples comments written only a few posts above yours.

I hope this isn't true though about Samsung, I enjoy their products, and I hope they're playing on level playing fields.


RE: so....
By Cygni on 11/26/2007 4:44:24 PM , Rating: 1
How about you do a little research on the Mitsubishi group... start with this thing called 'Google'. That might be a good first step.


RE: so....
By littlebitstrouds on 11/26/2007 8:39:07 PM , Rating: 3
Lawyer, "Your honor that man shot my client." Judge, "Prove it" Lawyer, "No I don't have to, I just say it and it's true. He has to prove it's not. Right?"

Yeah not how the real world works.

You made three claims, back them up.


RE: so....
By theapparition on 11/27/2007 9:08:29 AM , Rating: 2
Both the prosecution and defence should research the facts before trying to argue it before a jury of peers.

Just something to think about. :-)


RE: so....
By littlebitstrouds on 11/27/2007 10:24:03 AM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty sure some guy walking up to a courtroom with such non-backed claims wouldn't even get to see a judge, let alone a jury of his peers. Otherwise our judicial system would be pretty tied up if all you had to do was claim something and you'd get a court date.


RE: so....
By SirLucius on 11/27/2007 4:32:30 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know about all of Mitsubishi Keiretsu, but there was a scandal a while back where one of the large banks in the group was engaging in deals with yakuza. A quick Google search also reveals a few sites that talk about corruption within Mitsubishi, although they are of questionable integrity.

As for Sony, even Wikipedia reveals they don't have a squeaky clean record. Now, there's nothing about slush funds, but there are several cases of Sony engaging in questionable business practices. Rootkits, fake movie reviewers, and questionable advertising are all on the list, just to name a few. Granted, these aren't the same as bribing politicians, but they've gotten Sony into some trouble.

I'm not saying all the criticism is fully justified, but both Sony and Mitsubishi have gotten into some trouble in the past.