Print 27 comment(s) - last by runutz.. on Nov 14 at 2:00 PM

Pars prototype rescue drone is faster than a human lifeguard in testing

Although drones are mainly in the news these days for the militaristic aspects, they can also be used to save lives. RTS earlier this year showed off a flying drone, Pars, which is designed to help rescue drowning victims. The prototype of that flying rescue robot is now being tested at the Caspian Sea near Iran.
The drone is designed to be able to independently find drowning victims in the ocean and then drop floating rings to them. Testing of the prototype drone kicked into high gear after six students drowned in the Caspian Sea this past July.

The robot is capable of dropping floating rings to multiple drowning victims during a single “mission”. In its intended usage scenario, the drone would provide quick relief to a trouble swimmer by dropping flotation rings, thus allowing the human rescuer to swim to the scene to provide further assistance without being hindered [en route] by the rescue devices.
The flying drone can stay aloft for 10 minutes and has a maximum speed of 10 m/s. The design of the drone gives it a useful range of 4.5 km.
More importantly, the designers are touting their rescue drone as superior alternative to a human lifeguard. In recent testing, a person that was “simulating drowning” 75 meters from the coastline was rescued by a human lifeguard in 91 seconds. However, the Pars drone was able to accomplish the feat in 22 seconds.

Sources: RTS Ideas,

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Motoman on 11/12/13, Rating: 0
RE: Uhhh...
By kleinma on 11/12/2013 1:11:52 PM , Rating: 3
I don't know, why don't you call up RTS, an Iranian company whos office is in Tehran, and ask them what they think about it. That would require you to think before posting something, so I know it might be tough....

RE: Uhhh...
By Motoman on 11/12/13, Rating: 0
RE: Uhhh...
By kleinma on 11/12/2013 1:34:15 PM , Rating: 4
Yeah, because The USA has never been known to take offensive or irrational actions against even it's own people. Or even accused it's own people of conspiring with evil forces of the East to spy on them, etc.

Pull yourself together.

RE: Uhhh...
By Reclaimer77 on 11/12/2013 4:55:25 PM , Rating: 2
What's the deal with you bringing stereotypes and nationalism into this?

RE: Uhhh...
By arazok on 11/12/2013 1:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
I’ve never drowned before, but I would suspect that if I was in the process of doing so a flotation device would be all I needed to get ashore under my own power.

This is an amazing idea I had never thought of before. I’m imagining these would be good for rescuing people from fires in skyscrapers as well. Just hover up to a person and have them grab on for the ride of a lifetime.

RE: Uhhh...
By Motoman on 11/12/2013 1:15:34 PM , Rating: 2
If you're stuggling to keep your head above water for some period of time before you get your flotation device, you may be too tired to paddle back into shore after you get it.

And, you may have strayed into an area where the natural current is washing you out to sea...

Don't get me wrong - I think this is a cool concept, and obviously getting the flotation device to the swimmer is hugely important. But they're not "rescued" at that point...

RE: Uhhh...
By DanNeely on 11/12/2013 1:21:08 PM , Rating: 2
That's true; but in most cases once you have a floatation device you're also no longer on the brink of death either. This is potentially a large step forward, but to replace human life guards it would need to go from dropping simple rings to dropping something powered capable of towing someone to shore.

If it's easy enough for an untrained person to operate it could serve as a major safety upgrade for unguarded beaches. Fly a ring with a transponder out to keep the person afloat and then send a 911 call to get the local water rescue team out with a boat/etc to haul the person back in.

RE: Uhhh...
By GTVic on 11/12/2013 3:46:54 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe they could also deploy a motivational drone to give you encouragement as you struggle back to shore.

RE: Uhhh...
By kfonda on 11/13/2013 12:45:11 AM , Rating: 2
I hear the predator drone can be very motivational in such situations.

RE: Uhhh...
By Murloc on 11/12/2013 6:20:17 PM , Rating: 2
once the drowner is floating, the rescuer can swim up to him without the flotation device, so he can reach him faster, and he also has more time before the victim drowns.

RE: Uhhh...
By daboom06 on 11/12/2013 1:19:07 PM , Rating: 2
that would be quite an engineering feat, to make a quadcopter that can support someone's weight in very turbulent air (burning building). and it wouldn't be nearly as small as you'd want it to be.

RE: Uhhh...
By arazok on 11/12/2013 1:33:54 PM , Rating: 2
I can see the chalanges, but it might be possible. You just need to make it powerful enough to hold 300lbs in the air.

Or perhaps it could just bring up a rope they could tie to something and repell down. – or even a parachute - or a gas mask so they can navigate through the fire.

RE: Uhhh...
By Motoman on 11/12/2013 2:07:38 PM , Rating: 2
I can see the chalanges, but it might be possible. You just need to make it powerful enough to hold 300lbs in the air.

That might work elsewhere, but if you were going to deploy it in the US it'd probably have to be able to lift twice that weight.

Which is slightly tongue-in-cheek regarding our fatness...but also think about our litigious nature as well. Say momma's house catches fire, and the only way to save her is with the Lift-O-Matic drone. But momma's too GD fat for the drone, and it can't get her out, so she dies.

Guess how long it will take momma's kin to sue the living f%ck out of the rescue workers, the drone manufacturer, the municipality, etc. for not having made a drone that was big enough to lift momma's fat a$s out of harm's way. Because it's not momma's fault that she was so fat she couldn't fit through the door anymore - it's your fault that you didn't bring a drone the size of an Apache gunship.

RE: Uhhh...
By carniver on 11/12/2013 4:15:36 PM , Rating: 2
It'll decend faster than normal

So it won't save her butt but it'll save her.

RE: Uhhh...
By garidan on 11/13/2013 5:36:41 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, it could actually bring a rope to tie to pre-existent supporting points to carry people from one building to the near ones.
One rope for the link , another one to recover the pulley
I think it should be done immediatly.

RE: Uhhh...
By Jeffk464 on 11/12/2013 2:27:38 PM , Rating: 2
If you aren't a very proficient swimmer you have no business being in the ocean. I knew a guy who was a life guard and he said without fail it was always marginal swimmers on vacation that they had to rescue.

RE: Uhhh...
By runutz on 11/14/2013 2:00:34 PM , Rating: 2
it's hard to become "a very proficient swimmer" without going in the water, and Ocean swimming is much different than a pool or lake.

Just sayin

RE: Uhhh...
By Torgog on 11/12/2013 4:59:56 PM , Rating: 2
thus allowing the human rescuer to swim to the scene to provide further assistance without being hindered [en route] by the rescue devices.

You may have missed this.

less interesting television
By daboom06 on 11/12/2013 1:16:41 PM , Rating: 2
is it just me or would these drones drastically reduce the appeal of beach rescue tv shows?

RE: less interesting television
By troysavary on 11/12/2013 1:55:34 PM , Rating: 2
Got the hots for the Hoff?

RE: less interesting television
By kleinma on 11/12/2013 2:04:54 PM , Rating: 2
daboom06 must be German :)

By deltaend on 11/13/2013 1:44:31 PM , Rating: 2
I'm just imagining a 30lbs flotation ring falling from a height of 100ft onto my head while I was drowning. Of course, if the drone drops it too far away, I might not be able to get to it either.

Ideally, the drone could be designed to drop a flotation device from the air near the person, then drag it near the person. Once the person grabs on, the drone could tow the person to shore. If the drone needs more power, it could land on the water and convert to boat mode.

RE: Ouch!
By CubicleDilbert on 11/14/2013 9:23:57 AM , Rating: 2
The drone has not enough power to drag a person.
But it could drop the floating device which would be hooked up to a fishing line. By flying back to shore the line unwinds and the baywatch crew can simply use a fishing rod and pull the victim to shore.
That would be very feasible and Pam's new hair wouldn't even get wet. Hell, they even would have to leave their outlook platform. ;-D

Saves you from drowning
By chmilz on 11/12/2013 2:39:04 PM , Rating: 2
Also sells your biometric data to corporate interests, starts sending you deals on swimming lessons and water wings, and posts on your Facebook that you suck at swimming, with HD video and stunning action shots to flesh out the content.

Deluxe Model
By jemix on 11/12/2013 4:18:57 PM , Rating: 2
The deluxe model would include a taser/defibrillator type of device... When someone is suffering from a heart-attack, it would shoot electrically charged wires into the water near the victim to shock the heart back to life. ;)

hook them with a few positives
By superstition on 11/13/2013 12:25:43 AM , Rating: 2
Use a few positive applications of drones to try to disguise the many negative ones. Good marketing move.

“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki