Source: Green Car Reports
quote: Am I the only one that sees that this car is a piece of shit? If you are delusional and you disagree with my statement, then I suggest reading a nice an objective review of the vehicle.
quote: I am sorry but 6.1s to 60 seems pretty nippy to me especially considering we are talking a four door luxury thing.
quote: Yeah, that is certainly a great review you link to. To me it's all over the place contradicting itself and what not.
quote: It really only has three rivals or four at the most if you include the Ferrari FF.
quote: the FF with it's stupid 4wd solution
quote: That "stupid" solution also allows the FF to hit 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
quote: Okay you're an idiot who knows nothing about cars. Clearly. 4wd is the ONLY way to safely harness 660HP.
quote: That "stupid" solution also allows the FF to hit 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. See ya Fisker Surf! You call 6.1s's "nippy"? For the money Fisker is asking, that's an embarrassment.
quote: Who in the hell wants to pay exotic car money to get a crappy GM turbo 4 banger?
quote: Which is why the "default" setting in the FF is non-4WD right?
quote: Lets see, shortcoming with FF's "4RM" system.
quote: Course you should keep in mind the FF starts at 300,000+.
quote: Who really cares how many cylinders the electric generator has?
quote: Every car publisher and blog is simply enamored with Ferrari's first AWD system,
quote: The Ferrari system isn't really "needed" to get the HP to the road.
quote: The constant slippage of the front gearbox also sounds... less than ideal.
quote: Hahaha, its a Shooting Brake Ferrari with AWD. Talk about Rose Colored Glasses!
quote: (BTW, The EPA Combined Cycle on the FF is expected to be in the range of 12-13 MPG based on the Euro of 15.)
quote: If I had a choice, I'd still prefer the Nissan GT-R system.
quote: This is the ultimate insult. The GT-R is okay, but come on, you've never even driven the FF. Not sure how you can even make such a claim.
quote: It's an everyday, all weather, driver!
quote: Heretic! I was talking about the AWD system, not the car it's in. It's truly revolutionary, and in typical Ferrari fashion, a cut above anything out there.
quote: Who cares about economy when you're spending $300,000 for something? I think you're missing the point. WOW Keeir, you're telling me a V12 Ferrari isn't great on gas!!?? I'm shocked!!! How could this happen?
quote: Its a poor AWD system to make a good handling car.
quote: Which is of course why it does at most 20%
quote: and only works in certain speeds.
quote: I'd prefer a car built on the current GT-R system than the FF system.
quote: You sir ... are a huge troll. All that is needed to prove it is the quote
quote: Ferrari doesn't make "poor systems". They don't make poor anything. If it's in a Ferrari, it's the best. Period. You should learn to respect your betters.
quote: The AWD cuts off at 124 MPH. Keeir, you keep trying to make this sound like a negative. But who in the hell needs AWD at 124 MPH!!!??? The fact that it disengages at such high speeds is a GOOD thing, great in fact.
quote: Why do you keep harping on this? 20% torque to the front wheels is a significant increase in overall traction. Not to mention Ferrari achieves the 20% to the front with less than 90 pounds of hardware! This is an incredible achievement! Get over yourself and look at the big picture.
quote: Its inferior AWD tech.
quote: Ferrari's are meant to be driven.
quote: I'm disturbed by your lack of adoration for anything Ferrari makes.
quote: But hey, he identified it as competition to the Fisker, not me.
quote: The Karma is not a great looking car but this just screams Panamera to me, just atrocious looking. I can't see the people who buy $100k cars buying too many of these.
quote: just atrocious looking
quote: It (especially most of the cars) was uglier than these could ever be.