backtop


Print 102 comment(s) - last by exanimas.. on Jun 24 at 1:37 PM

Guinness world record for most downloads in a single day could fall to Firefox 3

Starting today, users will be able to download the final version of Firefox 3. Firefox is the second most popular browser online, behind Microsoft Internet Explorer. Firefox 3 has a laundry list of new features including a promise of significantly increased performance.

Mozilla claims that Firefox 3 will be seven times faster than Internet Explorer and three or four times faster than previous versions of Firefox. Other new features include single-click bookmarking, smart location bar, and improved security features.

Firefox 3 also brings improvements in how passwords are managed, a new download manager, full page zoom and more. One other interesting thing about the pending release of Firefox 3 today is the attempt to set a world record.

The downloading of Firefox 3 via the web is being audited by the Guinness Book of World Records in an attempt to set an official record for the most number of downloads in a single day. Downloads made via FTP will not count towards the record setting attempt.

Mac users have complained that OS X versions of Firefox 3 don’t use Mac user interface and user elements. The first Firefox 3 release candidate came in May 2008 after Mozilla had released several beta versions of the browser.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By pauldovi on 6/17/2008 2:44:22 PM , Rating: 1
I use Firefox but I am not part of the Firefox Cult (close sibling to the Apple Colt), so I will enjoy pissing off the worshipers with my infidel activity.




RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Titanius on 6/17/2008 4:14:17 PM , Rating: 5
What Firefox cult? There is no Firefox cult, only a community. Apple has a cult, they continuously try to brainwash us into buying an Apple product. But Firefox is free and your decision to download and install it is also free.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By pauldovi on 6/17/2008 5:07:44 PM , Rating: 1
Firefox worshipers are just as annoying as Mac worshipers, and they are both equally plentiful.

If a Firefox worshiper sees someone using IE, they will make a comment, not unlike what Mac worshipers will say about PC users.

Both also strikingly consider themselves smarter because they use their respective product.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Polynikes on 6/17/2008 6:01:40 PM , Rating: 5
I don't see what's wrong with liking a faster, better browser.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/17/08, Rating: -1
RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By superkdogg on 6/17/2008 9:41:52 PM , Rating: 5
...with the difference being one set of consumers is actually getting a better product, while the other set is getting what they believe is a better product.

At any given price point, I can build a PC that would eat a Mac's lunch. It won't run a Mac OS, it won't look 'cute' or have a trendy name. All it will do is perform better and cost less. You know, the things that really matter in a computer.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By mikeyD95125 on 6/18/2008 3:14:04 AM , Rating: 3
What matters to people in a computer can vary wildly. I value performance and silence.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/18/08, Rating: -1
RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Reclaimer77 on 6/19/2008 7:44:52 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
This means iMac or Mac Pro. Both can stomp on most Windows PCs in terms of CPU speed, while being absolutely silent.


LOL I see your at it again man. God, your the posterchild for the Mac fanboi idiot.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/20/08, Rating: 0
RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By kelmon on 6/18/2008 7:22:54 AM , Rating: 2
Without wanting to get into this debate, the problem that you have when you build your PC is that, unless it's running OS X, it's not a Mac and that's what's important. I mean, aside from banging in a different graphics card you aren't going to be able to build a PC that runs any faster than a current Mac (desktop or laptop), and then you're stuck with Windows. Mac users prefer a Mac, and believe them to be better, because of the software more than anything else. That said, I wouldn't swap my MacBook Pro for anything else, so I have no issue with the hardware either. Building a PC is a piece of cake, but only really of any benefit if you are into gaming and I got bored of that years ago.

Basically, this is an entirely subjective debate. It can be argued that Firefox is not a better product, just as you can argue that a Mac is not a better computer than a PC. There's no definitive "is" here.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Aloonatic on 6/18/2008 9:35:30 AM , Rating: 2
I must admit, I've never used a Mac and do not know anyone who has one either.

I would love to know what OS X is like and to have a play with.

It's a shame that Apple wont release a version that can run on PC (unless I've missed something and there already is one?) so I can see what I'm missing.


By ethana2 on 6/18/2008 12:35:05 PM , Rating: 3
Borrow a mac for a few days, don't give apple your money until they do what you want (version that runs on non-apple hardware without being brutally hacked).


By jonmcc33 on 6/18/2008 2:04:00 PM , Rating: 2
I've used Mac OS X 10.5.2 and it was nothing special. I'm glad that there are ways for people to try out OS X now so that way they don't go wasting their money on a Mac. Even if Apple hacked the price in half on all their products I still wouldn't buy a Mac.

Trust me, you aren't missing anything.


By ethana2 on 6/18/2008 12:13:17 PM , Rating: 2
I'm an Ubuntu user, and you can take your blatant misinformation and shove it.

You do have a choice. Don't want to install it yourself?
www.dell.com/ubuntu


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/18/08, Rating: 0
RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Chaser on 6/18/2008 9:04:40 AM , Rating: 2
Bad anology Pirks. Firefox is free. We don't have to pay some exorberant amount of money in exchange for a reduced function airport terminal "I'm superior" logo.

But I might consider the switch if Apple would throw in the nose ring off the Apple snop selling Iphones at our local Apple Store.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/18/2008 5:13:28 PM , Rating: 1
Free product is not always the best product


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By MrPoletski on 6/19/2008 12:01:43 PM , Rating: 2
When all the products of note are free, then the best product IS the free one.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/19/2008 3:11:32 PM , Rating: 1
Thanks for noticing that Safari is also free. So you're saying Safari is the best 'cause it's free? Many Mac users think so, but many of them disagree. Some see Safari as the best not just because it's free but for many other reasons. So this is debatable.


By Chaser on 6/20/2008 8:41:58 AM , Rating: 3
Don't make me laugh. Apple jumped from the frying pan into the fire when they decided to enter the Windows world with browsers. Safari was riddled with security holes the day it was released follwed by numerous "emergency patches".

But I tried Safari for Windows. If you want an extremely limited function browser I guess it's OK. But lets be serious here that was no real release. It was more a PR stunt. Hardly anyone in the Windows world even wants that junk.

Best AND free is what is always best. But for you Pirks thats a concept you'll never experience. But then again your perfect Apple world must not be as content and blissful as you think since you feel the need to troll and post over on on PC sites. We do appreciate the flattery though.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By retrospooty on 6/18/2008 10:00:40 AM , Rating: 2
Ugh... do you ever give up?


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/18/2008 5:07:40 PM , Rating: 1
Do the Apple bashers ever give up?


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Chaser on 6/18/2008 8:51:17 AM , Rating: 2
Firefox users are pleased to have a very viable if not (in at least some ways) superior alternative.

Maybe even happier they didn't have to pay an additional $1000.00 to get it either.


RE: I think I'll wait until tomorrow!
By Pirks on 6/18/08, Rating: -1
By Bruneauinfo on 6/19/2008 9:24:39 AM , Rating: 2
there's also the 'but, i'm used to this...' phenomenon that keeps us from trying new things.


By exanimas on 6/24/2008 1:37:03 PM , Rating: 2
What Firefox Cult are you speaking of? There's no cult. Now shut up and drink your Kool-Aid once Adblock Plus is finished installing!


By mattclary on 6/17/2008 1:37:51 PM , Rating: 2
EOM




By amanojaku on 6/17/2008 1:42:10 PM , Rating: 4
Her name is Francesca Lee. There are plenty of pictures of her on her porn site.

http://florchakh.com/2007/07/16/firefox-girl-the-r...

http://www.francescasportfolio.com/home.html


By MrBlastman on 6/17/2008 1:49:31 PM , Rating: 5
Om nom nom nom nom


By daftrok on 6/17/2008 9:30:48 PM , Rating: 2
LOL that reminds me of something:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaQNmYBB77E


By Ryanman on 6/17/2008 3:08:31 PM , Rating: 4
ah, she went to the darkside it seems ; )
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k72/ryanman7/lul...


By Tsuwamono on 6/18/2008 8:41:03 AM , Rating: 2
i noticed that too.


By nugundam93 on 6/17/2008 3:17:23 PM , Rating: 2
thanks for providing the name behind the face (and more, hehe). been wondering who she is since i kept seeing that pic with the firefox chopped on her shirt.


By Goty on 6/17/2008 4:14:20 PM , Rating: 1
Why has this man not been rated up, yet?!


By amanojaku on 6/17/2008 4:30:14 PM , Rating: 5
Busy hands. Busy, busy hands...


By 16nm on 6/17/2008 8:16:45 PM , Rating: 3
Are you sure those are the same girl?

Girl one:
http://florchakh.com/2007/07/16/firefox-girl-the-r...

Girl two:
http://www.francescasportfolio.com/home.html

Girl one gets my vote!!


By B3an on 6/17/2008 10:58:01 PM , Rating: 2
Could just be younger in the first photo's. I mean they must be years old now...

Going from her website, which ISNT a porn site (just topless modelling), it appears she lives very near me in the UK :)


By achintya on 6/18/2008 5:00:51 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
her website, which ISNT a porn site (just topless modelling)


Check her biography. as well as www.francescalee.com


By Bruneauinfo on 6/19/2008 9:20:29 AM , Rating: 2
I thought the same thing. Girl version 1 is much more attractive than version 2.

well, saying 'much' is probably exaggerating a bit.


By BruceLeet on 6/17/2008 2:20:40 PM , Rating: 4
I will download FF3.

Solely for the purpose of this new ZOOM feature, let me closely examine that girls cleavage, erhm I mean see if that FF logo is in fact photoshopped.


By Fnoob on 6/17/2008 10:15:44 PM , Rating: 2
That new FF logo is the solution to global warming!

Clearly, we only need to wrap the earth with giant space fox fur! Only then will humans be free of the burden of keeping the earth warm.


In other news, Opera 9.5 was released last week
By Staples on 6/17/2008 2:12:25 PM , Rating: 1
Firefox 3 is a huge improvement over 2 but I still prefer Opera by a long shot. There were some stories here a while back about Opera being able to correctly render ACID 3 and that engine is in 9.5 which was finally released last week.




RE: In other news, Opera 9.5 was released last week
By Chaser on 6/17/2008 2:57:33 PM , Rating: 4
I've read three announcements from three sites about FF3 final going live today AND on everyone someone felt they had to crash the party by posting a plug for Opera.

I've tried all three. I.E. is the defacto "it came with it browser" that "everyone" uses.
Firefox is the "I hate I.E. browser"
Opera is, well, who cares? I've tried Opera, I found it to be the least compatible of the three. Like IE7, it doesn't have anywhere near the plug in support that FF has. No surprise since FF is driven by the open source momentum and support it has. So where does that leave Opera? Some niche market for those few that feel a browser choice is a fashion statement. meh



By Staples on 6/17/2008 4:57:25 PM , Rating: 2
Thanks for clearing that up. I noticed when I went from 9.27 to 9.5 I noticed that pages rendered faster and the one trouble site I know of (javascript) now works like it should.


RE: In other news, Opera 9.5 was released last week
By Rogie on 6/17/2008 6:37:09 PM , Rating: 3
Bashing Opera is no better than the plug for it. These are just web browsers. Nothing to get worked up over. People use different browsers for different reasons. The OP likes Opera and you like FF. Hurray.


By Chaser on 6/18/2008 8:33:52 AM , Rating: 2
Actually you don't know what my preference is. My comment is based on the title of the announcement. But for the record once FF 3 was announced I didn't feel the need to jump over to the Opera 9.5 posts and make a plugs.


By ethana2 on 6/18/2008 12:36:45 PM , Rating: 2
All I know is that Firefox 3 came with Ubuntu. ...say what?


By totallycool on 6/18/2008 4:57:12 PM , Rating: 2
By PrinceGaz on 6/17/2008 3:43:09 PM , Rating: 2
Opera has an engine which scores 100/100 in ACID3 but it fails to pass because it is too slow. I believe that engine will be used in Opera 10 (it will presumably be a lot faster by then).

Opera 9.5 scores 83/100 on my box. I upgraded from 9.27(?) a few days ago and 9.5 is definitely a bit faster still, and starts up almost instantly (my major moan about 9.27 was it took a little while to load).


By AnnihilatorX on 6/17/2008 5:57:08 PM , Rating: 2
Just checked, FF3 scores 71

http://acid3.acidtests.org/


By jonmcc33 on 6/18/2008 11:03:02 PM , Rating: 2
And IE7 on Windows Vista won't even render at all. ^_^


By Clauzii on 6/18/2008 11:53:11 PM , Rating: 2
What??? Serious?


RE: In other news, Opera 9.5 was released last week
By Belard on 6/18/2008 4:22:10 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, me too. I still like Opera the most (out of the big 3), especially with the LIX 1.5 Skin (People, please use this skin, its slick and looks great with Vista or XP-MCR).

I still can't use FireFox3, and Opera is far more customizable. Its great to add the FIND box on the new status bar - easy to find TEXT on the web page, no other browser touches Opera in their area.

Also, ever try to save a Web Page (no images, but it makes no difference) with FireFox?

1 - IE always defaults to "with images"
2 - Opera seems to remember you want with or without.
3 - Firefox screws everything up.

Here is the file names of saving a web page:
Opera: Print Story_ Denali backpackers missing for days found alive on Yahoo! News.htm

IE: Print Story Denali backpackers missing for days found alive on Yahoo! News

FireFox: denali_park_search&printer=1.htm

WTF?! On any webpage - FF still doesn't know how to read headers?! The HTML page above is a current story from Yahoo.com

Opera market share is growing. People who I show Opera to, switch to Opera - same people I've given Firefox to try out.

Opera's Speed Dial is handy, Zoom functions have been around for about 10 years, Find feature rocks, Almost 100 customizable with Icons, tool bars, side-bars... that simply kick FF to the side. I've had less problems with sites with Opera than with FF.

FireFox3 is a better browser than IE7... its not for me. The website for FireFox3 looks great and very professional.

So I still give congrats to the team.


RE: In other news, Opera 9.5 was released last week
By Chaser on 6/20/2008 8:50:41 AM , Rating: 2
But no inline spell checker? Besides some sad java scripting junk? Pretty sad for a "feature rich" browser. Even IE7 has that with IE7 Pro.

And those "Widgets"? OK Opera please go home. No browser can come even close to the add on library that Firefox has and it grows each day.


By Belard on 6/22/2008 11:32:42 PM , Rating: 2
The spellchecker is a missing feature, but there is a free downloadable module that can be added. Keep in mind that Opera is a nice 7mb download.

IE7Pro? Okay, you have to buy that? Oh its an ADD-ON that is not sanctioned by Microsoft. So that makes it COOL, yet the add-on that is linked from Opera is not?

Opera does what most people need from a browser out of the gate.

Its an opinion... I like Firefox 3, not as much as I like Opera. All 3 have their good points... well, not much for IE thou.


As of this writing
By encryptkeeper on 6/17/2008 1:43:37 PM , Rating: 2
Still not online yet. Although www.mozilla.com is nearly unresponsive so far. It was up a few hours ago. Maybe the page is being updated to reflect 3.0 as the current version instead of 2.14?




RE: As of this writing
By ChronoReverse on 6/17/2008 1:47:07 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I had to use a direct link I found on Slashdot. Hopefully that will count still.

Been running the RC already without issue and the update to 3.0 final was seamless.


RE: As of this writing
By encryptkeeper on 6/17/2008 1:49:45 PM , Rating: 2
Slashdot has 3.0 final and Mozilla's webpage doesn't have it? Odd. Do you still have the link?


RE: As of this writing
RE: As of this writing
By encryptkeeper on 6/17/2008 2:06:16 PM , Rating: 2
That's weird. When I installed from that link, and I checked the Help>Release Notes, it still says it's 3.0 RC3. Has anyone else had this problem?


RE: As of this writing
By ChronoReverse on 6/17/2008 2:10:55 PM , Rating: 2
Release Notes is a webpage which hasn't been updated. Open up About instead and you'll see 3.0


RE: As of this writing
By fake01 on 6/17/2008 2:15:50 PM , Rating: 2
What a shame. I was hoping to participate in this but now I can't. Firefox wanted to have the most downloads on the 17th. But as it stands now, here in Australia it is now 4:15AM in the morning on the 18th of June.

Firefox, you where to slow :(

On another note, can't wait to download it :D. Just hope the addons work.


RE: As of this writing
By ChronoReverse on 6/17/2008 2:16:51 PM , Rating: 2
It's the most downloads within a 24 hour period, not the 17th. It just happens to start at 10AM PST which was about an hour and half ago.


RE: As of this writing
By NotStyro on 6/17/2008 2:10:02 PM , Rating: 2
RE: As of this writing
By stephenfs on 6/17/2008 4:27:49 PM , Rating: 2
I like the world map showing downloads for each country, like the 4 people that downloaded it in Mali, or the 6 in Burkina Faso.


Can't wait
By Polynikes on 6/17/2008 1:39:52 PM , Rating: 3
As soon as I confirm all my plugins are compatible, I'm downloading it. Goodbye memory leaks!




RE: Can't wait
By BMFPitt on 6/17/2008 2:02:15 PM , Rating: 2
Same here


RE: Can't wait
By Jackattak on 6/17/08, Rating: 0
RE: Can't wait
By ChronoReverse on 6/17/2008 5:16:35 PM , Rating: 2
And you've used Firefox 3 already eh?

Actually, I'll pose the same challenge that I always do.

Tell me the webpages you frequent that gives you the memory leaks and I'll run them on my clean copy of Firefox. Perhaps you'll be the first that'll post up a set that actually does leak.


RE: Can't wait
By Jackattak on 6/17/2008 7:43:36 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, as you'll see in my post I put the term "memory leak" in quotes. There are no "memory leaks" in Firefox. It's just what the common user refers to as "memory leaks" which is actually just obscene memory usage (which I'm personally OK with...I have gobs of memory so that it can be used, not so that it sits idly by).

That all being said, it still uses an obscene amount of memory, which was what I was getting at originally, only trying (unsuccessfully I might add) to use som wit to get the point across.

:)

Peace, J


RE: Can't wait
By ChronoReverse on 6/18/2008 12:06:04 AM , Rating: 2
No, I understood that just fine but I still want your list of sites that cause "obscene memory usage" compared to IE7.


RE: Can't wait
By stubeck on 6/18/2008 6:55:23 AM , Rating: 2
You clearly don't. He said memory leaks weren't a problem. So asking him to prove memory leaks are a problem is silly.


RE: Can't wait
By ChronoReverse on 6/18/2008 11:21:41 AM , Rating: 1
No I said prove the obscene memory usage in my second post. You clearly can't read


RE: Can't wait
By japlha on 6/20/2008 11:26:57 AM , Rating: 2
Most of my plugins don't work. *sigh*


no readers?
By thornburg on 6/17/2008 1:42:28 PM , Rating: 2
20 minutes on and the only comment on this story is about the babe-pic?

C'mon, Firefox is of major importance, and it's amusing that they are trying to set an official world record.




RE: no readers?
By thornburg on 6/17/2008 1:44:11 PM , Rating: 2
Why is it that in the 20-30 seconds while I type out a reply, a whole bunch of posts appear, with older timestamps. I'm constantly being beaten to the punch by a post that wasn't visible when I cliked "reply", but has a timestamp earlier than that.


RE: no readers?
By RyuDeshi on 6/18/2008 1:10:06 AM , Rating: 2
Because when you open the page, say it's like 10am..

By the time you read/skim through the article, read/skim through the replies, you already spent about 10-30mins, and in that time, many posts are being made that don't show until you refresh the page...


RE: no readers?
By encryptkeeper on 6/17/2008 1:47:17 PM , Rating: 2
Good thing the record they're trying to break will only start after 3.0 is posted. They'd have a hard time breaking it if they just did it for the 24 hour period of June 17th, seeing as how there are just over 10 hours left.


RE: no readers?
By Clauzii on 6/18/2008 2:44:56 PM , Rating: 2
Updated from 2.0.0.14. It screwed up a few bookmarks, but nothing serious at all. Everything running smooth compared to 2.0.0.14. Starts faster, rebuilds faster and Catjing!! No more stupid memory usage. Right now I have 10 tabs open and FF3 is under the 80MB mark. I'm impressed. Used to be around 110-120 MB on my setup.

Thank You Mozilla. You got me a little longer :)


By Jackattak on 6/17/2008 3:20:33 PM , Rating: 2
Man directly after I installed FF3 crashed about 5 times just upon opening, although it seems stable now (even though I made no changes).




By ChronoReverse on 6/17/2008 3:39:32 PM , Rating: 2
Did you make a new profile? When upgrading Firefox to a major version you should always start with a new profile... or you WILL be sorry.


By Jackattak on 6/17/2008 5:12:10 PM , Rating: 2
Roger dodger, there. Ya actually it was that some of my plug-ins weren't compatible with 3.0 as of yet (AdBlock? Really?!) which I found hard to believe but hey, not every developer has time to work on free chit so waddyagonnado?

Once I disabled the (for)now-useless add-ons, I'm now running stably and happily. Only I have to see ads now which totally sucks. LMAO


By ethana2 on 6/18/2008 12:39:30 PM , Rating: 2
Works fine for me, I"m pretty sure they have an updated version of the extension.


By watkinsaj on 6/18/2008 12:39:46 PM , Rating: 2
Adblock hasn't been developed since 2006, though I'm sure it works just fine with Firefox 2 as long as the blocklists are current.

You want to use Adblock Plus, that is compatible with FF3.


Gonna get it
By DeepBlue1975 on 6/17/2008 1:53:21 PM , Rating: 2
Been trying out the RC3 for a couple of days and also the version called "minefild" (it's 64bit) and they feel vastly improved over the v2, specially from a performance standpoint. Starts up much faster on my vista64 rig, as fast as IE, and renders pages way faster than before and is more stable and responsive when you have lots of open tabs. Big gripe with the 64bit version is lack of flash support, but there the one to blame is adobe, not mozilla. I can't see flash content on 64bit IE either.

Can't wait to get the official version today. But it'll be the 32bit one, just because of the damn flash support (at least on my rig ff3 rc3 32bit is every bit as fast as the 64bit minefild 3pre, so no concern there)




RE: Gonna get it
By ajfink on 6/17/2008 2:08:13 PM , Rating: 2
I also used it through several release candidates and Minefield before that. I've been extremely impressed with it from the start. I'm glad to finally have it as my day-to-day browser!


What does faster mean?
By MykC on 6/17/2008 4:21:27 PM , Rating: 2
I don't understand, faster... like it loads up faster? It downloads things faster? I'm not sure what faster means. Like will now support multicore processing so that youtube loads up in .1 seconds instead of .2?




RE: What does faster mean?
By PWNettle on 6/20/2008 7:05:09 PM , Rating: 2
That's what I was thinking. I always have a decent PC and page rendering is always pretty much insant for me. The only browser slowdown I encounter is network hiccups/traffic.


Like a rocket ....
By HVAC on 6/17/2008 4:59:00 PM , Rating: 3
This download day has gone up about as well as a kid with a three stage model rocket who put a single A-size engine in it. It barely made it off the pad and up the launch rod ...

Mozilla got DOSed and when they recovered it is impossible to find the link to D/L 3.0.

Pffffttt.......... download day stinks like an omelet fart.




On that note..
By just4U on 6/17/2008 1:43:43 PM , Rating: 2
While I prefer IE7 over Firefox2.0 I'd love to help them break the record and at the same time check the browser out so definitely going to try downloading it.

Hitting Mozilla site's appears to be a little slow going tho.. (I wonder why?)




in 24 hour (wrong day)
By chhimp on 6/17/2008 2:07:45 PM , Rating: 2
Today you'll make history with Firefox

Are you ready to make history? Are you ready to set a World Record? Today is Download Day. To become part of the official Guinness World Record you must download Firefox 3 by 17:00 UTC on June 18, 2008, or roughly 24 hours from now.
Pledge Map

If you prefer to no longer receive emails from Mozilla concerning Download Day, you may unsubscribe here

The sender of this email is Mozilla Corporation, 1981 Landings Drive, Bldg. K, Mountain View, CA 94043-0801.




Alright
By benx009 on 6/17/2008 4:31:04 PM , Rating: 2
The Mozilla Addons page works now. It was down earlier...




Firefox And Clint Eastwood
By alphadog on 6/18/2008 10:13:29 AM , Rating: 2
Does Clint Eastwood know about the newest Firefox?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/26254575@N06/25876794...

:)




For Pirks...
By juliendonkeyboy on 6/18/2008 9:53:44 PM , Rating: 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAdU3nAesNs

i totally found a youtube video of pirks talking about football. this is rich.




(=
By HrilL on 6/20/2008 7:10:43 PM , Rating: 2
That firefox girl sure is a FOX




Slow download rate...
By FaceMaster on 6/17/08, Rating: -1
RE: Slow download rate...
By amanojaku on 6/17/2008 4:06:11 PM , Rating: 2
That joke was so funny I forgot to laugh.


RE: Slow download rate...
By FaceMaster on 6/17/08, Rating: -1
RE: Slow download rate...
By JCY on 6/18/2008 4:08:50 PM , Rating: 1
Perhaps i lack the perspective, but i didnt consider Steve Jobs keynote from WWDC 2008 porn.

(sorry couldnt help it)


"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki