backtop


Print 5 comment(s) - last by omnicronx.. on Sep 4 at 4:56 PM

FTC wants Google to limit secondary personal data use for its books offering

Over the last year, digital books have become popular thanks to devices like the Amazon Kindle and Sony's line of eReaders. When these digital readers are coupled with electronic books, avid readers are able to carry an entire library of literary works with them wherever they go.

Google has been working on its plans to digitize a vast number of books and offer them to the public for a long time. The plan was criticized by many authors and privacy advocacy groups. The FTC has also criticized Google's plans and has issued a letter to the search giant on the FTC website this week urging Google to develop a privacy policy specific to Google books.

Reuters reports that the FTC letter asks Google to work on "limiting secondary uses of data collected through Google Books, including uses that would be contrary to reasonable consumer expectations." These secondary uses are reportedly methods that would allow Google to serve ads to readers based on the books they have previously read.

The FTC director of consumer Protection, David Vladeck wrote, "We also agree that it is important for Google to develop a new privacy policy, specific to Google Books, that will apply to the current product, set forth commitments for future related services and features, and preserve commitments made in the existing privacy policy."

FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz issued a separate statement reports Reuters that said, "The Google Books initiative could provide a wealth of benefits for consumers, yet it also raises serious privacy challenges because of the vast amount of user information that could be collected."

The settlement between Google and the plaintiffs in the copyright infringement case had Google paying $125 million to create a Book Rights Registry where authors and publishers could register works and receive compensation. The settlement and Google's plans to digitize literary works is being fought by Amazon, Microsoft, and Yahoo.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

i dont get this one
By kattanna on 9/4/2009 1:29:43 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
These secondary uses are reportedly methods that would allow Google to serve ads to readers based on the books they have previously read.


um.. you go to any store site, and they always serve up ads and suggestions for new things to buy BASED on what you have browsed and bought before on the site.

but now they want google to not be able to do this?

smells fishy.




RE: i dont get this one
By Oregonian2 on 9/4/2009 2:33:24 PM , Rating: 1
So along those lines, the federal government keeping track of all books one borrows in a library and assigning one's name to actions based upon those titles is a good thing?

Pretty much what's being talked about with Google and their library.


I hope Google wins.
By Shig on 9/4/2009 3:42:30 PM , Rating: 2
1) I'll always be in favor for the cheap / free sharing of information and knowledge.

2) Wouldn't the authors make more money through revenue that Google generates (authors take their % cut) vs. regular methods?




RE: I hope Google wins.
By omnicronx on 9/4/2009 4:56:57 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
1) I'll always be in favor for the cheap / free sharing of information and knowledge.
1)You do realize that this deal will raise the price of books online right? Googles plan is to sell books at sometimes two times the price that amazon currently sells its ebooks for. This would be fine and dandy if Google was not going to have the rights to sell 50-70% of the books released since the 20's.

2) Of course, at the expense of the consumer with no way for the competition to keep up. I would have no problem with Google selling books at higher prices if other services such as amazon have access to the same books and could reserve the right to sell at a lower price. With googles current deal, this won't be possible.


By maddoctor on 9/4/2009 12:45:24 PM , Rating: 2
Albeit, my personal information that have been changed and deleted don't appears in google search.




"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki