backtop


Print 13 comment(s) - last by jay401.. on Jul 7 at 7:47 AM


Kevin C. Chen, an FSU assistant professor of chemical and biomedical engineering, is leading the efforts to analyze new, more effective and less caustic cancer drugs via computation.  (Source: Bill Lax/FSU Photo Lab)

A vascular tumor visualized on varying scales. The new research simulated drug delivery to tumors and looked at the problem starting at a molecular scale.  (Source: Florida State University)
More chemo replacements may soon be on their way, thanks to one researcher's discovery of a unique chemical drug class

While laboratory experiments and creative synthesis processes have led to the discovery of many of the chemicals used in the modern pharmaceutical industry, human analysis is limited in time and visualization.  Computers on the other hand can process through thousands of compounds in the time it would take a human researcher to test one.  Each compound can be carefully viewed and assessed for chemical viability.

Cancer is one of the most deadly diseases afflicting mankind, with nearly one in three people suffering from cancer sometime in their life.  While chemotherapy and radiation therapies have allowed some people suffering from the disease to lead normal lives or even recover, they are extremely caustic and damage the body's organs.

Now Kevin C. Chen, an assistant professor of chemical and biomedical engineering at the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering, is leading a project to develop and evaluate less-damaging treatments, leveraging the power of modern computing and advanced computational techniques.

"Cancer is a disease of tremendous complexity, so the analysis and interpretation of data demands sophisticated, specialized computational methods," said Mr. Chen.

Mr. Chen is currently processing a group of drugs called recombinant immunotoxins.  The drugs, also currently being assessed in clinical trials consist of an unusual duo -- an antibody, bound to a toxin from natural sources such as bacteria, fungi, or plants. 

"Once injected into the body, the antibody portion of the immunotoxin targets specific proteins, called antigens, that are massively expressed on the surface of cancer cells,” explained Mr. Chen.  “These cells are subsequently killed by the accompanying toxins. Normal, healthy cells, meanwhile, are not recognized and thus are spared."

However a number of factors can decrease the new drugs' effectiveness.  Mr. Chen is hoping his research can pinpoint why these failures occur and help prevent them.

One common reason for failure is size -- often the molecules are too big to bond to cancer cells -- thus one line of research is to make them smaller.  Also the molecules need to be stable enough to circulate in the bloodstream and around in the tumor; work is being done to fine tune the stability.  Also bonding rates of the antigens is also a concern.  Too much bonding can deplete the drug levels, while too little can fall short of killing the cell.

All of these problems are being broken down by Mr. Chen in his tests.  By examining various member drugs, he can class them by their effectiveness.  He is also looking at possible modifications to aid in efficacy.

"Because the level of anticancer drug doses that can be given to any patient is limited by immunogenicity -- the immune response that results -- it is essential to explore how the efficacy of recombinant immunotoxins can be enhanced without resorting to escalating doses," he explained.  "Our computational research has enabled us to quantify and develop models describing many of the factors that influence immunotoxins' behavior in the body. This is essential knowledge that cancer researchers and doctors must have in order to take the next steps forward in developing immunotoxin drugs that might one day be approved as a standard treatment for cancer patients."

He is currently working with FSU postdoctoral researchers Junho Kim and Xinmei Li and molecular biologist Byungkook Lee of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Md.  They published a paper, "Modeling Recombinant Immunotoxin Efficacies in Solid Tumors", which appeared in the March 2008 issue of the peer-reviewed journal Annals of Biomedical Engineering.  



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Cancer in remission
By Indianapolis on 7/4/2008 10:17:08 AM , Rating: 2
I love how many cancer treatment breakthrough stories we've seen lately. I know it takes a long time for these things to come to market, and that not everything will fulfill its promise, but I can only imagine where cancer treatment will be ten or even twenty years from now.




RE: Cancer in remission
By ajfink on 7/4/2008 10:48:24 AM , Rating: 5
I agree. I've seen too many family members suffer from cancer and its current treatments (which are themselves far easier on the patients now than even ten years ago) to want to see it continue.

I'd like to take this spot to remind Dailytech readers that one of the best things you can do for yourselves is know what's going on in your own body, so that if something does pop up, you'll catch it early. Self-exams are a must and regular checkups are extremely helpful. Finding things early makes treatment far more successful and far less physically demanding.


RE: Cancer in remission
By barjebus on 7/4/2008 11:15:28 AM , Rating: 2
It's pretty much a foregone conclusion for me regarding cancer. Both my grandparents died on my fathers side (grandpa had colon cancer, grandma had breast cancer), and on my mothers side, my grandma died over a lung cancer I believe. On my dad's side, an auntie of mine died of blood cancer....you get the picture.

I'm just sad that this research will come at a time too late to save many that are dying right now of the disease.


RE: Cancer in remission
By porkpie on 7/4/2008 2:18:46 PM , Rating: 2
No such thing as a foregone conclusion where cancer is concerned. A family history increases your risk but it doesn't mean you're definitely going to get it.


RE: Cancer in remission
By oab on 7/4/2008 11:58:19 PM , Rating: 2
Better make sure you have enough Vitamin D, preliminary research indicates that it can reduce the mortality rates of colon and breast cancers by up to 75%.

Large-scale double-blind trails have not been done, but preliminary outcomes (there many of them) are quite promising.


RE: Cancer in remission
By mtdewcmu on 7/5/2008 1:24:29 AM , Rating: 2
If I had a nickel for every promising treatment that failed its double-blind, placebo-controlled study, I'd be a very rich man.


RE: Cancer in remission
By TheDoc9 on 7/5/2008 8:36:25 PM , Rating: 2
At least we have balance on this forum, the guy who posted above you gives us hope. And you take it away.


RE: Cancer in remission
By mtdewcmu on 7/4/2008 4:28:34 PM , Rating: 2
Not to rain on your parade, but the abundance of cancer breakthrough stories has more to do with the size of the market for such stories than to the actual pace of progress. What constitutes a breakthrough in cancer research is highly subjective and depends on where you set your expectations. In this particular story, there are no new treatment approaches to report; the greatest concrete achievement of this group to date has been publishing a paper in a peer-reviewed journal.


RE: Cancer in remission
By jay401 on 7/7/2008 7:47:19 AM , Rating: 2
Not to mention it also comes down to the drug companies and their willingness (or lack thereof) to produce a new product. Their selection of a new product entails determining the profit margin, which has contributing factors like, "Is this something the patient only has to take once or is there a way we can get them on a recurring schedule so we can keep them paying for years?" The latter being their ideal drug, the former being the one obviously better for the patient and the patient's pocketbook/insurance.


FSU :)
By pauldovi on 7/4/2008 1:25:37 PM , Rating: 2
Nice to here some academic news out of FSU for once. They are typically only know for their football. :)




RE: FSU :)
By Shawn on 7/4/2008 2:33:42 PM , Rating: 2
Go FSU!


By Diesel Donkey on 7/5/2008 10:01:14 PM , Rating: 2
Didn't Will Smith create a a cure for cancer that causes the cured to become deranged, flesh-eating vampire-zombies? Hopefully this approach will yield positive results without the zombies.




Cancer cure
By adnanbaloch on 7/6/2008 10:38:26 AM , Rating: 1
There is already an effective cancer cure out there. Details below:

http://adnanbaloch.googlepages.com/cancer_cure.doc

Pharmaceutical companies just don't want it to be used on a widescale coz the harsh reality is that cancer treatment is a huge cashcow for them.




"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki