backtop


Print 31 comment(s) - last by tarpon.. on Apr 3 at 8:21 AM

FCC heralds competition of auctioned frequencies a "third-pipe" inevitability

The FCC auction for the 700 MHz frequencies vacated by TV broadcaster in early 2009 has ended. The auction, dubbed Auction 73 by the FCC, raised a record amount of money and the FCC says the auction created new opportunities for new entrants and small businesses in nationwide and rural markets.

The FCC says that the auction raised a total of $19.592 billion (PDF) and it points out that a bidder other than a nationwide incumbent won a license in every market, paving the way for an additional wireless “third-pipe” in every market across the nation. The FCC also mentioned that 99 bidders other than nationwide incumbents like AT&T and Verizon won 754 licenses in total. That figure represents 69% of the 1090 licenses the FCC sold in the 700 MHz auction.

The newest entrant into the wireless services field and the biggest new winner of spectrum was Frontier Wireless LLC (EchoStar), which won 168 licenses in the E block establishing a nationwide presence for its services.

The FCC says that the rules of the 700 MHz auction ensured that rural areas where broadband access is traditionally scarce were served. 75 new entrants into the market won a total of 305 licenses to serve rural areas. These new license will allow companies to roll out broadband data services to rural consumers.

As you might expect the biggest spectrum winner according to the FCC was a nationwide incumbent carrier — Verizon. Verizon was the major winner in the coveted C block acquiring the six CONUS REAGs plus Hawaii.

While the winners are still tight lipped on plans and talking up the spectrum they won thanks to a FCC embargo on information relating to the auction, some statements by the big winners have been made.

AT&T president and CEO of its wireless unit said in a statement, “AT&T's strong spectrum holdings position the company to further enhance the quality and reliability of existing wireless broadband and voice services, and to set the foundation for new-generation wireless broadband technologies and services.”

AT&T can now boast that its spectrum winnings in the 700 MHz auction allow it to cover 100% of the top 200 markets nationwide. When combing AT&T’s new spectrum wins with spectrum it purchased in the AWS auction last year AT&T now covers 95% of the U.S. population.

Verizon is understandable happy with its winnings and issued a statement saying, “We are very pleased with our auction results. Specifically, we were successful in achieving the spectrum depth we need to continue to grow our business and data revenues, to preserve our reputation as the nation’s most reliable wireless network, and to continue to lead in data services and help us satisfy the next wave of services and consumer electronics devices.”

The bids Verizon says it won include nationwide spectrum covering 289 million Pops and an additional 102 licenses for individual markets covering 171 million Pops.

While Google didn’t actually win any spectrum in the auction, it did win by losing the auction as DailyTech previously reported. A blog post on Google’s public Policy Blog said, “We congratulate the winners and look forward to a more open wireless world. As a result of the auction, consumers whose devices use the C-block of spectrum soon will be able to use any wireless device they wish, and download to their devices any applications and content they wish. Consumers soon should begin enjoying new, Internet-like freedom to get the most out of their mobile phones and other wireless devices.”

With the auction over, the spectrum will be available to the winners in 2009. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Verizon...
By Fusible on 3/21/2008 2:33:03 PM , Rating: 1
has by far a better network. I've had AT&T, Sprint, and Nextel and by far I've always had the best coverage with them. And their broadband is pretty darn good. Well I hope I can now use any phone I want with them after Feb. of next year, because I want the Nokia N95




RE: Verizon...
By FITCamaro on 3/21/2008 2:40:29 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think this means that you can use any phone you wish with any carrier. Just that Verizon has to allow other, smaller companies to license their part of the spectrum.


RE: Verizon...
By Cygni on 3/21/2008 3:52:50 PM , Rating: 2
"As a result of the auction, consumers whose devices use the C-block of spectrum soon will be able to use any wireless device they wish"


RE: Verizon...
By JSK on 3/21/2008 5:23:14 PM , Rating: 2
Actually that was one of four expectations google had for bidding.

http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2007/07/pro...

However open services and open networks were not ok'd by the FCC. Just open devices and open applications.

So Verizon doesn't have to allow anyone to license their part of the spectrum.


RE: Verizon...
By SlipDizzy on 3/21/2008 3:09:51 PM , Rating: 2
I have used many different carriers as well in my area, and Verizon is the best. However, I wish I could surf the net like people do on their IPhones and such. The Verizon Wireless Mobile Web isn't very useful. Also I wish they didn't throw their custom UI on every phone. Although, it does make upgrading to a new phone easier to learn.


RE: Verizon...
By SanLC504 on 3/21/2008 3:58:26 PM , Rating: 2
Well, just because Verizon opened up their network doesn't mean you can hop networks.

Nokia N95 is a quad-band GSM device, whereas Verizon uses CDMA for its networks. There would have to be a brand new N95 made specifically for Verizon.

Sorry to dash your hopes.


RE: Verizon...
By Goty on 3/21/2008 9:33:33 PM , Rating: 4
It all really depends on location. Around my hometown and at school, AT&T offers significantly better coverage than Verizon.


RE: Verizon...
By darkpaw on 3/21/2008 10:22:35 PM , Rating: 4
Verizon does tend to have good coverage, but only if you want to put up with their insanely high rate plans and locking down every feature on the phone you buy.

Verizon: Can we control you now? Good.


Echostar
By Lazarus Dark on 3/21/2008 2:39:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The newest entrant into the wireless services field and the biggest new winner of spectrum was Frontier Wireless LLC (EchoStar), which won 168 licenses in the E block establishing a nationwide presence for its services.


Echostar owns Dish network, right?
Sweet, so not only will they have a ton of HD channels available (provided they get that new satellite back in proper orbit), but in a few years they'll be able to bundle a highspeed wireless internet with it too? Very nice. Maybe in a couple years I can drop cable and dsl! Yay for competition!




RE: Echostar
By Doormat on 3/21/2008 4:26:12 PM , Rating: 2
Sorta. I think because E* got the E block, they may have won a bunch of auctions, but in terms of spectrum, they only got 6MHz. How many active devices per carrier does GSM or CDMA support?

Also my cable company (Cox) also won a bunch of licenses in block A. So who knows they may be trying to enter the wireless fray as well.


RE: Echostar
By herrdoktor330 on 3/21/2008 9:24:20 PM , Rating: 2
That's a very good question. If Echostar won enough spectrum to offer enough bandwidth to satelite customers, they could really change the face of current satelite providers. While you get alot of value from satelite services, they can't hold a candle to land-line (fios,coax) interactive features like VOD. Maybe this will help them bridge the gap?


RE: Echostar
By rudy on 3/22/2008 4:02:36 AM , Rating: 2
I don't think wireless will ever hold a candle to land lines. In fact that actually scares me about this. I hope that these companies will not slow or stop running fiber cause it is cheaper to just make everyone go wireless because it is cheaper to implement.


RE: Echostar
By Zoomer on 3/22/2008 1:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
Wireless is more suited for rural areas (no need for expensive capital investment), while fiber would be far better for high density areas like nyc.


where does that money go??
By kattanna on 3/21/2008 5:30:32 PM , Rating: 2
i have yet to see a single article talk about where that money that will be raised goes to?




RE: where does that money go??
By BruceLeet on 3/21/2008 8:10:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The proceeds generated from this auction will be transferred to the U.S. Treasury by June 30, 2008, and will be used to support public safety and digital television transition (DTV) initiatives.


Ah, there it is, going to your Government.


RE: where does that money go??
By BruceLeet on 3/21/2008 8:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The results of this single spectrum auction surpass the $19.1 billion combined total raised by the FCC in 68 other auctions over the last 15 years. The proceeds will be transferred to the U.S. Treasury by June 30, earmarked to support public safety and digital television transition initiatives.


http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/FCC-C...

2nd Paragraph down.


RE: where does that money go??
By Maria on 3/21/2008 11:11:30 PM , Rating: 2
Support digital TV?

Yesterday I bought a digital converter box and hooked it up. Without the marvelous new technology I am receiving 5 channels clearly and another 4 so-so.

With the new technology I receive ONE channel and that digital signal is so weak it continually gets dropped. Yea Team, lets here it for the advances in technology. Is any of jack pot money going to help pay for cable?


RE: where does that money go??
By BruceLeet on 3/22/2008 1:16:40 AM , Rating: 2
Digital TV isn't in full integration yet, the FCC has set a deadline for companies like News Corp to implement Digital TV programming starting Feb. 2009.

So return your converter box and buy a vib-, save up.


Google made a big mistake not winning
By phxfreddy on 3/21/2008 3:55:00 PM , Rating: 2
These antique wireless companies run their little monopolies like fiefdoms. They have already filed lawsuits against opening up the networks. I doubt any of their spectrum properties will EVER be as open as google had asked for. In addition they will fight tooth and nail in court and delay anything that does occur as much as they can. That of course can be decades. All I wanted was to be able to have a cell phone where I had unlimited data for internet browsing in the field. As it currently stands you go above some rediculously low amount of data and they start charging by the kilobyte. ( at least so far as I have researched....I looked at ATT's plan and gave up any idea of bothering with getting the service the terms were so oppressive. ) .......So google will someday wish the followed through. I think they are going to get stymied and flumoxed.




RE: Google made a big mistake not winning
By nvalhalla on 3/21/2008 4:20:27 PM , Rating: 2
I use GBs of data every day on my Sprint phone, have for years, and they've never made a peep. I have a $30 plan with 500 minutes, unlimited web, free nights and weekends, unlimited Sprint to Sprint, no long distance charges, no roaming charges, all that stuff. I've never had a dropped call that wasn't because I entered a tunnel or something either. I know people like to bash Sprint, but I'll never change. Guess I'm just lucky.


RE: Google made a big mistake not winning
By DFranch on 3/21/2008 8:50:01 PM , Rating: 2
What plan do you have, because the only $30 plan I see on their web site has 200 minutes. Also the cheapest plan I see with internet access is $70.


By darkpaw on 3/21/2008 10:25:38 PM , Rating: 2
Must be sero, (http://www.sprint.com/sero) its the same plan I have. Even though the plan is great, sprint's service in DC blows so bad I'll probably switch after my contract is up.

Sprint's customer service is also beyond piss poor. Sure the plan is great, but I've really been getting what I pay for as far as service goes (jack squat).


What does this mean?
By loomis2 on 3/21/2008 3:45:04 PM , Rating: 2
What does this mean in the end for normal users? And when does this all take effect? It's nice these big companies that have provided crappy service for years are happy with their purchases, but what exactly will I have to look forward to? I seem to see differing opinions on the matter.




By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 3/21/2008 3:55:47 PM , Rating: 3
The big thing is that we'll soon have an alternative to the cable and phone/fiber infrastructure. Or so they say.

I sort of think instead of having 5 carriers for mobile communication, we're going to get dozens at first -- and eventually just a few like the good old days of Ma Bell.


By ultimatebob on 3/21/2008 7:02:01 PM , Rating: 3
When it's owned by the same companies that own the other two "pipes". This bandwidth "auction" will do little more than allow the big telcos like Verizon and AT&T to continue to expand on their existing monopolies, and keep wireless access prices high for consumers.

I wish that the FCC would have created another "public" bandwidth slot like they did for CB radio or 802.11 wireless networking. THAT would have spurred some real innovations from new startups and smaller telecom players.




By darkpaw on 3/21/2008 10:28:11 PM , Rating: 2
I'm in complete agreement here. Personally, I wished they wouldn't have allowed an existing broadband player to bid on this segment at all.

What business motive does Verizon have for providing wireless high speed internet access at affordable rates when they've been spending millions on FIOS?


Third Pipe
By James Holden on 3/21/2008 2:27:16 PM , Rating: 2
Melty, crunchy, spicy ... wireless?




FCC Transitions
By andrewkfromaz on 3/21/2008 6:04:04 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder if the FCC got lower bids than it otherwise might have b/c of the fiasco surrounding the transition of T-Mobile's (it is T-Mo's, they bought and paid for it) 1700 MHz spectrum to T-Mo. The FCC is years behind the promised time to deliver the spectrum to T-Mobile, which is missing out on billions of dollars in 3G revenue as a result. What makes ATT and Verizon so sure that the 700 MHz transition, which could easily be much more complicated, will be any smoother?




Wireless for dummies
By tarpon on 4/3/2008 8:21:59 AM , Rating: 2
There simply is not enough bandwidth available over wireless for mass communications use. And what there is will always cost dearly -- which is why everyone wants to provide it for you. See iPhone bills to take the steam out of the enthusiasm.

Wired is the only way, with the exception of very local wireless nets with few users -- Then the connectivity and performce reaches acceptable levels.

But for the real fast stuff, you want fiber.




The FCC is Delusional
By SiliconAddict on 3/23/2008 10:02:33 PM , Rating: 1
if they think ATT or Verizon is going to make a third pipe that everyone will be willing to use. My money is that if they build it, it will cost a metric shit ton to use.

Thanks FCC for once again fucking over the consumer and this country.




Monopolies Rule!
By fri2219 on 3/21/08, Rating: -1
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki