backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 78 comment(s) - last by pauluskc.. on Feb 22 at 5:19 PM


Map approximating cable cuts over the last two weeks and the immediate regions affected (red) Click to enlarge.  (Source: DailyTech)
Over five tons of loose metal crushes errant conspiracy theories

The cause for at least one of the many failures that occurred recently in the undersea fiber optic cables providing Internet connectivity to the Middle East has finally been determined. The "FALCON" cable failure is being blamed on an abandoned ship's anchor.

According to the owners of the cable, FLAG Telecom, one end of the cut FALCON cable was recovered in the Persian Gulf approximately 35 miles north of Dubai. While the repair ship was searching the area, the 5-6 ton ship's anchor was also discovered and hauled to the surface. An additional repair ship is working on the cuts in the Europe-Asia cable -- repairs are expected to be completed by Sunday, despite rough weather conditions in the area.

FLAG Telecom is also planning to run an additional cable, called the "Mediterranean Cable," through a different route, which will be "fully resilient" to cuts.

While a ship's anchor may be a less exciting cause for the damaged cables than some of the more entertaining and paranoid alternatives proposed online -- the cut cables are shaping up to be no more than an unfortunate coincidence.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Come again?
By HaZaRd2K6 on 2/8/2008 12:50:16 PM , Rating: 4
What, did the anchor, get up, walk over, and plonk itself down on top of the cable?

I don't believe this for a second. I'm not blaming anyone because I honestly have no idea how all these cables were cut, but I seriously doubt it was cut by an abandoned anchor.




RE: Come again?
By amanojaku on 2/8/2008 1:02:11 PM , Rating: 3
It's possible that an anchor DID cut the cables, but there's something being left out here. For one thing, the previous articles imply that the cuts occurred over several days. Not to mention the fact that they seem to have occurred over a somewhat wide area. Ocean currents are strong, but are they strong enough to move a 5 ton anchor so far and so quickly with so much force? We need more info...


RE: Come again?
By Mitch101 on 2/8/2008 4:55:04 PM , Rating: 4
Your right the Government recently changed its statement of it being an boat anchor. That was incorrect. What cut the undersea cable was a weather balloon. Picture to follow soon for all the news papers.


RE: Come again?
By Mitch101 on 2/8/2008 4:57:19 PM , Rating: 4
Sorry correct that statement the boat anchor was tied to a weather balloon that was launch from the grassy knoll. There were no other boat anchors just the one.


RE: Come again?
By Ajax9000 on 2/10/2008 7:26:47 PM , Rating: 2
"Single Boat Anchor Theory" to follow soon.


RE: Come again?
By Mitch101 on 2/11/2008 9:33:57 AM , Rating: 2
You mean a multi million dollar commission/report proving the single anchor theory and only the one anchor could have done it.


RE: Come again?
By Souka on 2/8/2008 1:04:30 PM , Rating: 4
Only one cable cut with the anchor...not all.

but... as everyone is asking... how did an abandond anchor cut a cable? I can't imagine sea currents being strong enough to move an anchor or the cable...

Maybe the achor was "abandonded" after it snagged the cable...the ship cut n' run....

Anyone read if they can determine what ship the anchor came from? or HOW LONG it had been down there?


RE: Come again?
By JonnyDough on 2/9/2008 12:52:16 PM , Rating: 3
In certain parts of the world (as previously read about here or maybe it was Popular Science Mag), large ships are abandoned or run aground rather than sold for scrap. Toxic chemicals often find their way into the oceans because of it, and sometimes these ships end up causing a lot of problems for other ships, reefs, etc. There was a big story on it, I thought it was on DT. Anyone have a link? Perhaps someone from DT?


RE: Come again?
By MeTaedet on 2/8/2008 1:07:54 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
What, did the anchor, get up, walk over, and plonk itself down on top of the cable?


No, no, no. You've got it all wrong. The anchor got up, walked over, plonked itself down on top of a cable, got up, walked over, plonked itself down on top of another cable, got up, walked over, plonked itself down on top of yet another cable, got up, walked over, plonked itself down on top of still another cable, and finally, now breaking with tradition, got up, walked over, and plonked itself on top of a fifth cable. That's how it happened. It's obvious to anyone with a brain...


RE: Come again?
By BladeVenom on 2/8/2008 4:36:13 PM , Rating: 5
Sure it's easy to blame the anchor, but I think it was really suicidal cables throwing themselves under the anchor.


RE: Come again?
By CollegeTechGuy on 2/8/2008 5:04:06 PM , Rating: 2
I have a feeling that who ever dropped this anchor was also the same person who shot JFK.


RE: Come again?
By Belard on 2/9/2008 5:28:48 PM , Rating: 2
I think it'll be easier to prove that Nemo's father - the Clown fish Marlin did it.... running away from sharks.


RE: Come again?
By BruceLeet on 2/8/08, Rating: -1
RE: Come again?
By HaZaRd2K6 on 2/8/2008 2:56:27 PM , Rating: 1
Excuse me? Was I waxing poetic and not realising it?

I made no mention of conspiracies. I just find it slightly weird that it can now be claimed that at least one cable was cut by the anchor of an abandoned boat.

I'm not making any assumptions about any of this because I honestly don't know, as I said in my original post.


RE: Come again?
By RobberBaron on 2/8/2008 1:48:08 PM , Rating: 3
There was an Earthquake. So...abandon anchor + earthquake = the hokey pokey underwater.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Qu...


RE: Come again?
By AlphaVirus on 2/8/2008 2:21:09 PM , Rating: 1
So...1 earthquake + 1 abandoned anchor = 5 cut lines that are territories apart. Might I remind you to look at the picture

http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/7187_large_cabl...

Notice how the cuts are pretty far apart from each other. You can believe the eathquake story if you want but its pretty easy to see something else is going on.

Also notice the Falcon line has been cut 3 out of 5 times in "random" locations. You keep blaming your earthquake if you want.


RE: Come again?
By AntiM on 2/8/2008 3:33:47 PM , Rating: 3
True. The very concept of an anchor is that IT STAYS PUT. I never knew there were so many nuances to an anchor until I looked up the word on Wikipedia


RE: Come again?
By Clauzii on 2/8/2008 4:35:51 PM , Rating: 2
Three cuts on a Falcon cable.

Smells fishy.


RE: Come again?
By audiomaniaca on 2/8/2008 11:58:46 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, let's ask the fishes who did it!


RE: Come again?
By VahnTitrio on 2/8/2008 4:51:52 PM , Rating: 2
The best I can come up with is that the anchor originally did some damage upon it's initial decent, and perhaps corrosion as well as other environmental factors led to an eventual failure. It doesn't explain the rest of the cables though.

I would put my money on a decoy set out by someone doing this maliciously. It seems more practical considering the far-fetched nature of this all being coincidence.


RE: Come again?
By MrPoletski on 2/9/2008 1:57:32 AM , Rating: 2
Or, the cable got up and washed back and forth from strong currents and caught on the anchor, shearing it.


RE: Come again?
By imaheadcase on 2/9/08, Rating: 0