backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 66 comment(s) - last by Seemonkeyscanf.. on Sep 9 at 6:29 PM


A visualization of the solvent/TATB mix. The red, white, blue and gray moleculese are the explosive, TATB, the green balls are the fluoride anions and the blue/gray regions are the organic cation portion of the solvent. The new solvent promises less toxic processing and safer nuclear weapons, among other potential benefits.  (Source: LLNL)

Commercial grade TATB is shown on the left. Performance is directly correlated to the crystal quality. The new organic solvent-produced TATB is on the right, and offers visibly superior crystals and the vastly superior performance.  (Source: LLNL)
Researchers are replacing toxic inorganic compounds, with "greener" organic compounds during processing

Explosives and green tech aren't two things you might always think of as going hand in hand.  However, new breakthrough research from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) not only promises to improve conventional explosives, but also make processing less toxic through the use of organic compounds.

The research focuses on a class of compounds known as molecular crystals.  Molecular crystals are extremely powerful compounds that are also surprisingly stable.  They are used in drugs, pigments, agrochemicals, dyes and optoelectronics, as well as in explosives.  Since many of these compounds in unusable disordered form are bound together by strong hydrogen bonds, processing via typical organic solvents in nearly impossible due to lack of solubility.

As a result, toxic inorganic solvents are typically used to partially dissolve and reform the material into useful crystals.  The process is inefficient and produces toxic byproducts, such as ammonium chloride.

Researchers at the LLNL, under the Transformational Materials Initiative (TMI) Laboratory Research and Development project, discovered a class of organic solvents that could be used and would process the material more efficiently.  They turned to ionic liquids – a special type of molten salt that becomes liquid under the boiling point of water (100 degrees Celsius).  This type of solvent is considered attractive due to its lack of vapor pressure and tendency not to evaporate even under high temperature (evaporation of solvents can yield toxic fumes and also limits the usable liquid).  Also, scientists can custom tailor the types of positive and negative ions they want to use.

Lead author Amitesh Maiti used quantum simulations to narrow the selection of ions to a class of solvents with fluoride ions, which is very good at dissolving hydrogen bonds.  He describes, "The design of custom solvents through first principles modeling opens up new possibilities for the dissolution of materials that are hard to dissolve."

After the theoretical work was complete, researchers led by Phil Pagoria tested dissolving and reforming molecular crystals with the solvent.  The result was large defect-free (97 percent pure) crystals, which were vastly superior to current commercial offerings.

The key crystal compound tested was a special type of explosive known as TATB (1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene).  This explosive is widely used for its exceptional stability by the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense and the mining industry.  The refined crystalline version is even more stable.  Larry Fried, the project’s principal investigator and a co-author of the paper states, "Improving crystal quality and purity leads to explosive materials that are safer (less likely to react violently) when subjected to mechanical impact or heat."

This is of particular interest to national security, as TATB is thought to be used in all of Britain's nuclear warheads, and the majority of the U.S.'s warheads as a detonator, due to its already favorable stability.  The purer crystals could provide detonators capable of surviving even more severe punishment without an accidental detonation.

Aside from TATB the technique could be used to process a broad array of other commercial substances containing molecular crystals, including polymers (plastics) and molecular solids (pharmaceuticals, paints, propellants, explosives).  For example, the same solvents were shown to break down cellulose into basic sugars.  This could prove a boon to efforts to create ethanol and other biofuels from cellulose, a typically energetically intensive process.

In the short term it means the ability to not only process higher quality, safer TATB, but to minimize the environmental impact from processing.

The research is reported in the Sept. 1 issue of the journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Other researchers on the project included Alex Gash, Yong Han, Christine Orme and Richard Gee.  



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Organic Bombs
By therealnickdanger on 9/2/2008 2:19:58 PM , Rating: 5
Stuff White People Like #132




RE: Organic Bombs
By FITCamaro on 9/2/2008 2:26:55 PM , Rating: 2
I think Arabs are much better at them than us though.


RE: Organic Bombs
By tehfire on 9/2/2008 2:48:34 PM , Rating: 2
Shame on you


RE: Organic Bombs
By therealnickdanger on 9/2/2008 3:37:36 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, go easy on him, it was obviously a typo: he meant to say "muslims". There are some white muslims out there too...

;-)


RE: Organic Bombs
By therealnickdanger on 9/2/2008 4:04:45 PM , Rating: 5
Oh whoops... I forgot that poking fun at muslims is still off limits. I was going to post an image of Muhammad wearing a bomb-hat too, but I wouldn't want to offend anyone's beliefs or way of life. I guess I'll just stick to making fun of George Bush, Jesus, white people, and christians.


RE: Organic Bombs
By 16nm on 9/2/2008 5:20:09 PM , Rating: 4
Yeah, stick to the non-color jokes. No one gets offended.

What do you call a thousand white guys jumping out of a plane?
snow

What do you call white guys sitting on a bench?
NBA

What does the family tree of a white guy look like?
straight line


RE: Organic Bombs
By Polynikes on 9/2/2008 6:14:17 PM , Rating: 2
Gotta love the double standards.


RE: Organic Bombs
By TMV192 on 9/2/2008 7:20:07 PM , Rating: 3
it's only double standard because white people don't take it as badly as muslims
still the religion is relatively new (of the major ones), christians back in the 1400s would have chop your head off for your blasphemy


RE: Organic Bombs
By FITCamaro on 9/2/2008 8:00:19 PM , Rating: 4
It doesn't matter. We don't live in the 15th century. Either everyone can be criticized and made fun of or no one can.


RE: Organic Bombs
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 9/3/2008 10:25:24 AM , Rating: 2
I don't remember reading on Christians cutting off heads for blasphemy...burning at the stake maybe, the rack, thumb screws, and some other nasty punishments.
Actually, I'd blame the Christian leaders of the day and not Christians. The leaders obtain their job, because their families had a lot of money and bought them a high powered job. So, many of the leaders of the Christian Church were Christian by name, but not by faith. This was a dark period of time for all Christians. It is also one of the reasons that lead to some many divisions of the Christian Church.


RE: Organic Bombs
By hadifa on 9/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: Organic Bombs
By JasonMick (blog) on 9/2/2008 3:12:26 PM , Rating: 3
Obviously you've never heard of Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing.

Crazy people are crazy people no matter what color or country of origin they come from. Don't buy into the Fox News kind of paranoid/racist garbage.


RE: Organic Bombs
By FITCamaro on 9/2/2008 4:09:31 PM , Rating: 3
I'm very well aware of this. I made the comment to make a point.


RE: Organic Bombs
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 9/2/2008 4:57:56 PM , Rating: 3
He said better job not they are the only ones.

9-11 did much more damage and kill more then Timothy McVeigh did.....

If Arabs do not wish to have a reputation for blowing up innocent people (anyone not military is an innocent person for this point). Then they need to stop celebrating suicide bombers by having parades for them and making them martyrs, stop backing High jackers by not shunning them in shame for the cowardly attack on innocent people going from point A to point B. As with most people with issues, we like to look outside of ourself for the problem and blame something other then ourselves. When the reality is you need to look into your own actions and fix those issues first.

P.S. Be fair, no media network is perfect or even close to perfect. I watch Fox and several other media outlets (CBS, NBC, CNN, WGN...). About the only one who does not use paranoid/racist garbage is Fox. The funny thing is, the only people who claim Fox is a bad new source are people who've never watched them and just believe the words of other networks trying to undermine Fox. The other networks hate Fox because they are unbiased as a station - some people on Fox favor Democrats and some Republicans. Fox also keeps winning the awards for honest, accurate reporting of the news. Something the other station fail to do....Think about it, you can fool all and some of the people some of the time, but you will not fool all the people all the time. The majority of the population have realized the misleading reports or the one sided reports given on most networks and have switch over to Fox because they have more accurate and balanced reporting. View their ratings compared to the other stations, you'll see they blow away all the other stations. Beside when was the last time your favorite station made an error in reporting then made it their number one priority to re-explain the story and correctly explain error they made, then apologize on the air for their mistake? It does not happen often on Fox, however when an error is made that is how they handle the issue and they are the only station that I've ever watch do that type of correction. Some station try to slip it in as as a quick announcement when they are going to commercial , most do nothing at all.

Let the haters begin.....


RE: Organic Bombs
By RIPPolaris on 9/2/2008 5:24:12 PM , Rating: 2
I agree with the first part of your reply (and consider myself more of a Republican than a Democrat), but come on. To say that Fox is unbiased is to ignore half of their programs.
Want an example? Watch the O'Reilly show.


RE: Organic Bombs
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 9/2/2008 6:07:27 PM , Rating: 1
“The other networks hate Fox because they are unbiased as a station - some people on Fox favor Democrats and some Republicans.”
Again, Fox as a station is unbiased. They have people working both sides. Most station do not, or the republican side will be very, very weakly covered at best. People that work for the station maybe bias maybe not, but the station does not lay down rules on what will or will not be reported based on bias beliefs. Right now most stations will not report anything good that President Bush does (been that way for years). He is not evil, not everything he does is bad, not all good too. Most station will only report the bad because the higher ups say to only report the bad things republicans do and only the good things democrats do. Thus, they are a bias station. Fox reports both good and bad for both sides.

As of Bill O'Reilly, well I'd say he is a very passionate man and gets easily up set when he brings someone on his show that does not answer the question he asks. This is not being unbiased, this is just a man trying to go after answers to the questions he would like to know the answers to. Yes, he at times guesses what the answer is and expresses his thoughts to the interviewee. However, he always gives them the chance to state their point of view on the subject. It's when they leave the subject that he is asking about that he seems mean because he trying to keep them on the same subject. It would be like if he asked George Foreman to come in and talk about his Boxing career. On the day of the interview George comes in but only talks about his grill and not his boxing career. Well this would set Bill off. So, I would not call him bias...though he is a republican that is for sure.


RE: Organic Bombs
By threepac3 on 9/2/2008 6:10:34 PM , Rating: 2
Bill O'Reilly is a Liberal compared to Sean Hannity.


RE: Organic Bombs
By threepac3 on 9/2/2008 6:13:01 PM , Rating: 2