backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 150 comment(s) - last by Justin Case.. on Oct 20 at 12:25 AM

Evidence that solar variations impact both temperature and rainfall.

The exact causes of climate change remain a mystery to science.  Many researchers link recent global warming to changes in the sun. Others remain skeptical, claiming that the sun varies only very slowly, over periods of millions of years. They say that no hard evidence exists for a solar effect on recent climate changes.

Now, new research may have provided just that evidence, with data demonstrating that solar variations have had major effects on the earth's climate as recent as 2,000 years ago. The research, conducted by a team of scientists from the Universities of Ohio, Minnesota, and Texas at Arlington, confirms that, during periods when the earth received less solar radiation, the Atlantic Ocean cooled, rainfall levels dropped, and North America experienced periods of intense drought. Some droughts lasted as long as a century.

Seven such events were detected, occurring once every 1,500 years, a period that matches the so-called "Bond Events" cycle of solar variation.

According to the study's lead author, Greg Springer, the correspondence provides "convincing evidence" of a solar effect on North American climate. "This really nails down the idea of solar influence on continental drought," said Springer.

The critical data was obtained from an 8-inch long stalagmite from a cave in West Virginia. As the stalagmite grew over a period of several thousand years, its composition precisely recorded fluctuations in the Earth's climate.

Data more recent than 2,000 years ago wasn't examined, as the authors feared the impact of Native Americans on nearby watersheds may have influenced the results. However, Springer tells DailyTech that analysis of river discharges around the area confirm that the region is still being impacted by such changes today.

The stalagmite was sampled at various points along its length, each point radiologically dated to precisely determine its age. Samples were analyzed to determine the ratio of strontium to calcium, along with levels of the isotopes carbon-13 and oxygen-18. Each of these acts as a proxy (indicator) for various climate parameters such as rainfall levels and land or sea-surface temperatures. The stalagmite therefore acts as a highly accurate record of climate variations over a period as little as a few years.

Spectral analysis of the data revealed cycles with periods corresponding to harmonics of the 1500-year Bond Events, a cycle triggered by weak solar activity which results in dramatic cooling and the occurrence of "IRD" events -- ice raft debris forming in the Atlantic.

Springer tells DailyTech that the results "certainly lends support" to global warming skeptics. However, he himself is not sure that the recent level of variance is enough to explain all the warming the Earth has undergone in the past 100 years.

Last year, scientist S. Fred Singer published the book, Unstoppable Global Warming (Every 1500 years), which tied current warming to an ongoing Bond Event.  Singer tells Daily Tech that this new study provides further evidence for a 1500-year Climate cycle, the evidence for which was first discovered in ice core data.

The research is appearing in an upcoming edition of Geophysical Research Letters

Article Update 8/29:  Email Response from Dr. Springer:

"I've gotten a number of emails asking if I was quoted correctly - people seemed put off because I said the solar-drought connection is consistent with the idea of solar variability being responsible for GW.  They don't seem to understand that saying it supports an IDEA is not the same as saying that it PROVES the idea...

I certainly feel like I was quoted correctly. Some people just need to pay closer attention to the verbiage.

Thanks for the opportunity to spread news of our research."


 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Really?
By Soccerman06 on 8/28/2008 12:20:30 PM , Rating: 5
I had no idea that the Sun's output effects our climate at all...




RE: Really?
By michal1980 on 8/28/2008 12:30:43 PM , Rating: 5
I was going to make that point.,

in fact that point is so simple and brilliant, it needs a six rating.


RE: Really?
By michael2k on 8/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Really?
By BAFrayd on 8/29/2008 3:22:47 PM , Rating: 1
Proving a negative?


RE: Really?
By michael2k on 8/29/2008 7:59:06 PM , Rating: 2
No, actually, proving that all the "changes" we have seen correlate with the changes in the sun (in other words, showing that the sun has powered 90% of the GCC, where the rest being split up among natural causes and men).

Even showing that 60% is the sun and 10% is volcanoes means 30% is man, which means our actions can have a measurable impact (if the sun, at 60%, is also measurable)


RE: Really?
By kbehrens on 8/30/2008 10:08:29 PM , Rating: 2
You just don't get it, do you? When you make a claim, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove it. Not on others to disprove it.

If I say Neil Diamond is a sleeper agent for the KGB, does that means its gospel truth, unless you show proof that he isn't? I don't think so.


RE: Really?
By hadifa on 8/28/2008 7:22:51 PM , Rating: 5
Read the title again.

You are getting it all wrong. We are affecting the climate and it's affecting the Sun. It's not global warming, it's UNIVERSAL warming.

We've doomed the universe !


RE: Really?
By daftrok on 8/29/2008 1:45:29 AM , Rating: 2
RE: Really?
By ThisSpaceForRent on 8/28/2008 12:31:44 PM , Rating: 5
Wait, wait, wait...so the source of all heating on Earth can affect the temperature via it's output?


RE: Really?
By michael2k on 8/28/2008 6:02:09 PM , Rating: 5
Does this disprove that man has an effect as well?

I mean, if solar radiation from the sun has an effect, then surely it is just as obvious that increases in greenhouse gases and particulates in the air also have an effect, right? The only question is what effect, how much of an effect, and if that effect is good or bad.

That is why science is hard.


RE: Really?
By cochy on 8/28/2008 6:49:38 PM , Rating: 2
That is not accurate. Geothermal heat created by radioactive decay is not caused by the Sun.


RE: Really?
By Ticholo on 8/28/2008 12:31:53 PM , Rating: 2
Indeed! How can the one indispensable condition for there being life on our planet dare to intrude on our climate?
I say we sue the Sun for all it's got!


RE: Really?
By nvalhalla on 8/28/2008 12:32:50 PM , Rating: 5
Yeah, I'm skeptical. I don't think the sun has any meaningful effect on the temperature of earth. Mad made CO2 emissions are way more powerful.

</sarcasm>


RE: Really?
By knowyourenemy on 8/28/2008 12:38:06 PM , Rating: 5
Crap. I cannot post a sarcastic comment now. :(


RE: Really?
By SiN on 8/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Really?
By MAIA on 8/28/2008 12:52:05 PM , Rating: 5
Dealing with extremes huh ?

Anyway, both are (or might be) powerful. And that's the problematic part: we just don't know how they (both aspects) affect us. All there is are theories ...

Nevertheless, it's easier to control CO2 emitions than to control the sun. I might be wrong though (/sarcasm)


RE: Really?
By exploderator on 8/28/2008 3:25:42 PM , Rating: 2
No no, the sun is easy. Pink Floyd did a song about it, "Set the controls for the heart of the sun". It was a long time back, but maybe one of them remembers how.


RE: Really?
By FoundationII on 8/28/2008 4:52:58 PM , Rating: 5
Or this?
"There is no such thing as global warming. Chuck Norris was cold, so he turned the sun up."


RE: Really?
By Sulphademus on 8/28/2008 4:38:36 PM , Rating: 2
So I am to understand that every 1500 years, man makes a profound change in lifestyle and method of transportation that alters the climate enough so that even the Sun is affected?

BTW: what were the dinosaurs driving?


RE: Really?
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/28/2008 4:49:11 PM , Rating: 2
BTW: what were the dinosaurs driving?

When your poop was as large as theirs, you do not have to drive anything to be an environmental hazard. :) Besides on the Flinstones it's shows they were environmental friendly – foot powered cars.

I would also ask in the year 500 what was man driving that caused the issues?


RE: Really?
By lennylim on 8/28/2008 5:57:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
would also ask in the year 500 what was man driving that caused the issues?


Must be flatulence from all those huge draft horses.