backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 259 comment(s) - last by Trisped.. on Oct 12 at 8:57 PM


2007 Highlander Hybrid, 2007 Camry Hybrid, 2007 Prius  (Source: Toyota)

The Tundra's sales are rising which could affect Toyota's fuel economy average  (Source: Toyota)

2008 Toyota Land Cruiser  (Source: Toyota)

2008 Lexus LX 570  (Source: Toyota)
Toyota's free ride on the Green Train may be over

Toyota has been riding high on a green cloud of eco-friendliness with the American public since 2000. It was that year that Toyota introduced the first generation Prius. The tiny Echo-based compact sedan brought gasoline-electric hybrids to the mainstream.

Over the past few years, Toyota has expanded its hybrid portfolio and has seen its "green" image explode. Following the release of the first generation Prius, Toyota introduced a larger, mid-sized Prius hatchback in late 2003. Later, Toyota released a Highlander Hybrid SUV and a Camry Hybrid.

While the Toyota brand has focused on using hybrids to improve fuel economy, the Japanese auto giant's Lexus luxury division has been using the Hybrid Synergy Drive to boost performance. Increased fuel economy is still a benefit of Lexus hybrids, but the RX 400h, GS 450h and LS 600h L market the performance aspects of the additional electric motors.

Now, however, it appears that Toyota's honeymoon with environmentalists may be coming to an end. In a move that has angered the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Toyota decided to side with General Motors, Ford and Chrysler in opposing a proposed Senate bill that would require a corporate average of 35 MPG by 2020.

"Why is Toyota, a company that can make a car that gets 55 miles per gallon today, fighting a 35 mpg standard? If Toyota's "Moving Forward" motto is more than just empty words, the company must support a sensible increase in fuel economy to 35 mpg by 2020," said the NRDC in a statement on its website.

Instead, Toyota is putting its support behind a bill proposed by the House that would mandate targets of 32 MPG to 35 MPG by the year 2022.

“They have a green halo, justifiably, and yet unbeknownst to their customers they’ve joined forces with the Detroit Three to argue against greener standards,” said NRDC vehicles campaign director Deron Lovaas.

Toyota contends that the Senate bill is too harsh on auto manufacturers and will be tough to implement. “For the first time, the industry has actually come together for a fuel economy increase, and everyone is pulling together in the same direction,” said Toyota spokeswoman Martha Voss. “Toyota is working very hard behind the scenes to achieve the best standards possible, not only for the whole industry, but to meet the energy and environmental goals that we all share.”

Considering that Toyota's lineup of cars already average more than 32 MPG by federal regulations, many may wonder why Toyota would be opposed to a measly 3 MPG increase by 2020. Toyota's concern comes from the fact that the Senate bill would require a 35 MPG average from Toyota's entire vehicle lineup -- that includes gas-guzzling pickups and SUVs.

Toyota's apprehension becomes even clearer when the new Tundra full-size pickup truck comes into the picture. Toyota's Tundra has always played second fiddle to the biggest and baddest from Detroit, but Toyota's third attempt at the full-size market is starting to gain some traction.

The new Tundra packs a 381 HP V8 engine on its options sheet and records fuel economy numbers of 14 MPG/18 MPG city/highway in 4x4 guise. The problem is compounded by the fact that the previous generation moved a meager 124,508 units – Toyota is on track to break the 200,000 units sold mark for 2007 with the redesigned Tundra.

Toyota also announced cheaper trim levels for the 2008 Tundra which will further drive sales and lower the company’s fuel economy average. In addition, Toyota is looking to drive its truck sales even further with a redesigned Land Cruiser, Lexus LX 570 and Sequoia – all of which use the potent  5.7 liter V8 engine paired with a six-speed automatic transmission.

“They market every night the Prius and the Toyota Camry — we’re the green car, huh,” remarked Representative Edward Markey (Democrat-Massachusetts) who also happens to own a Camry Hybrid.  “Then watch the football games, and they’re marketing the Toyota Tundra — like the biggest vehicle ever made.”

“We’re actually going to name the vehicle the Tundra, after the thing that’s being destroyed in Alaska. How ironic,” Markey continued.

There is still room for improvement on Toyota’s end, however. The company is hard at work on a diesel engine for the supersized Tundra and the company plans to implement hybrid technology into all of its vehicles by 2020.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I would love a 35MPG truck
By rdeegvainl on 10/5/2007 2:11:03 AM , Rating: 3
I think the main reason would be that then the Toyota wouldn't have as large of an advantage if everyone was required to have 35 average. Sure they SHOULD be able to keep ahead, but if it's not required, they don't have to put down the money.




RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By Gul Westfale on 10/5/2007 2:36:41 AM , Rating: 2
wouldn't it be better to charge a fuel surtax to the consumer? the higher the consumptoin, the higher the extra tax.

this would lead to consumers buying more efficient vehicles, and would force manufacturers to compete with one another for the efficiency crown (and thus higher sales).

if the government simply mandates that manufacturers have to get a 35mpg average, then manufacturers will find ways to cheat and manipulate the EPA results. they will do simply what is "enough", but they won't actually get off their asses and make real improvements.


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By rogard on 10/5/2007 5:34:22 AM , Rating: 2
Nice to read that there *are* people that care about efficiency.

Well, how about you increase the taxes on fuel until it reaches the price level we have in Europe? I guarantee you, you will feel different if you've just poured 150-200$ worth into the fuel tank of your car. That is helping a lot with thinking about fuel efficient cars, believe me. I don't like it really, but I have to admit it is the right thing.

Bad thing is, there is a moronic "subculture" evolving that takes pride in driving cars that are guzzling as much fuel as possible. That way they can show off how wealthy they are. They've "made it to the top". Nice.

I know a reason why in the US taxes on fuel are rather low in comparison to many other countries: fuel consumption of the US vehicles is by far the highest worldwide. In total there are more than 230 million vehicles on US roads. Fuel consumption reaches a staggering 2.000.000.000.000 (2 trillion?) liters per year. That is around half of the world's consumption. Fuel tax is less than 20 cents per liter (compared to Europe where it's above 1 dollar per liter) What I want to say is, if you raised the price of fuel to that level, it simply would not work and destroy the economy (which only works that way because of the comparatively cheap fuel) Funny thing is, economies in Europe work, too. Even with higher fuel prices. And people are forced to have a look at their energy consumption that way. This goes for electricity, gas for cooking, heating and water as well. It's simply the best reason to get people's attention...and the only thing that really works.

interesting statistical data about worldwide fuel prices and consumption:

www.international-fuel-prices.com

I still don't get it anyway: in the US there are over 90 million commercial diesel vehicles. AFAIK you have special regulations that exempt light trucks from the passenger car (safety, emission and other) requirements. Is there a real reason why diesel engines are not in wide use?


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By mdogs444 on 10/5/07, Rating: -1
RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 10/5/2007 7:13:07 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
The automakers are developing cars that get better gas mileage every year.


Auto industry

1987: 22.0 MPG
2007: 20.2 MPG


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By mdogs444 on 10/5/07, Rating: -1
RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 10/5/2007 7:27:42 AM , Rating: 5
For every Prius and Civic Hybrid you point out, there is another Expedition XL, Hummer H2, Ram 1500, Jeep Commander and Ford F-250 there to drag the numbers down.

It's easy to pick out a few select cars to say that the fuel economy has improved, but WHAT DOES IT MATTER if improvements aren't made across the entire industry?

That's why the fuel economy numbers have stagnated. We traded sedans, wagons and minivans for pickups, SUVs and crossovers which get worse fuel economy.


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By mdogs444 on 10/5/07, Rating: -1
RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By mdogs444 on 10/5/07, Rating: 0
RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By masher2 (blog) on 10/5/2007 9:52:21 AM , Rating: 1
> "For every Prius and Civic Hybrid you point out, there is another Expedition XL, Hummer H2, Ram 1500, Jeep Commander and Ford F-250 there to drag the numbers down"

So why blame the automakers? Sounds like solid proof the issue is with the consumers, who refuse to buy those tiny cars, even when they're made available.

What you're seeing in fleet averages is just the reflection of a simple principle. Most people spend their entire income. If you make a more efficient auto, they'll used the money saved to:

a) buy a larger vehicle
b) drive further, burning more gas
c) buy some other goods or services, which themselves consume energy in their manufacture.

Or some combination of all three. Its extremely difficult to reduce a person's overall energy consumption without reducing their income.


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By sxr7171 on 10/5/2007 10:20:47 AM , Rating: 3
No you can make gas more expensive genius.


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By Spuke on 10/5/2007 11:37:07 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
No you can make gas more expensive genius.
Nope genius. Gas has been getting more expensive every year and it does NOT deter us from buying less fuel efficient cars. I know for sure that, even though my wife and I complain about gas prices, we could still afford gas at our present consumption rate even at $6 a gallon and more (gas is already $3 for regular and I pay $3.27 for high octane - sports car). And there are tons more people that could afford gas at virtually any price.

The poor and the lower middle class would hurt the most as raising gas prices affects other industries as well (anything that ships by truck like food, furniture, contact lens, etc.). And those industries WILL (they're doing it now) pass the "savings" onto the customer meaning YOU and I will pay more for goods and services.

If it gets even too high for us, we'll just park my wife's truck and get her a more fuel efficient car to commute with. Currently, gas is not nearly expensive enough to justify buying a third vehicle, new or used. BTW, we have horses and the truck is used for towing and other house projects. Otherwise, she would have a car.


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By ZmaxDP on 10/5/2007 3:14:47 PM , Rating: 2
Well, who needs a third car? You can ride your horse to work!
(Just having a little fun...)


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By dever on 10/5/07, Rating: -1
RE: I would love a 35MPG truck
By Nfarce on 10/5/2007 2:40:48 PM , Rating: 1
Very well stated. Reading some of these comments here makes me wonder: exactly what are they teaching in our schools these days? It sure isn't the same civics I learned in high school.


RE: I would love a 35MPG truck