backtop


Print 8 comment(s) - last by Some1ne.. on May 15 at 5:47 PM

EarthLink offers to give Wi-Fi network to the city or a nonprofit organization for free

Municipal WiFi is one of those touchy subjects for many people with some believing that all users should have to pay for the service because Internet access is a luxury not a necessity. On the other hand some believe that municipal WiFi should be offered for free to low income families as a way to lessen the digital divide and improve education.

Philadelphia has for a few years been at the head of the municipal WiFi spear. Philadelphia announced in 2006 that EarthLink would be building and installing a WiFi network in the city that was scheduled to be fully deployed in Q3 2007.

DailyTech reported in March 2008 that EarthLink announced it was pulling out of the Philadelphia municipal WiFi network as well as similar networks that were in use in Portland, Oregon and Tempe, Arizona.

BusinessWeek reports that EarthLink is now closing the municipal WiFi network in Philadelphia and that its customers have been notified. EarthLink says that it is giving customers using the service in Philadelphia a 30-day notice and assisting them in transitioning to other EarthLink services.

Other cities that are in the same predicament as Philadelphia with EarthLink WiFi networks include Corpus Christi, Texas and Milpitas, California. Both these cities have taken over ownership of the networks EarthLink abandoned in the cities free of charge.

According to EarthLink, the closure of the Philadelphia network comes after months of talks with the city of Philadelphia and an unnamed nonprofit organization in the area. EarthLink has offered to transfer ownership of the WiFi network to the city or the organization for free.

The catch is that EarthLink is seeking to be allowed to remove its hardware from street lights in Philadelphia and has filed a court proceeding to allow the removal of the equipment and to limit its liability to no more than $1 million. The termination of the network is not expected to affect EarthLink’s financial outlook. However, BusinessWeek reports that EarthLink stock is down $0.17.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why Wi-Fi...
By blaster5k on 5/14/2008 11:38:32 AM , Rating: 4
I never understood the push for citywide Wi-Fi. It just doesn't seem like the right technology to do this. Wi-Max or something with more range would be probably work better and be more cost-effective.

And what's wrong with the free internet at libraries anyway? They've got computers there too for those who don't have one.




RE: Why Wi-Fi...
By chromal on 5/14/2008 12:07:24 PM , Rating: 2
Oh well. It was a nice idea on paper. Yeah, 802.11a/b/g/n just isn't designed for last-mile applications. Given the number of users, it might have been cheaper to subsidize broadband for low-income families and provide more/better resources at public libraries.


RE: Why Wi-Fi...
By kattanna on 5/14/2008 12:46:40 PM , Rating: 2
but being realistic and practical doesnt make for sexy headlines


RE: Why Wi-Fi...
By Some1ne on 5/15/2008 5:47:53 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I never understood the push for citywide Wi-Fi. It just doesn't seem like the right technology to do this. Wi-Max or something with more range would be probably work better and be more cost-effective.


You raise a good point, however the answer to your question is simple. Wi-fi was chosen because it is ubiquitous, and has been for several years now. Even on low-end devices it's a fairly common feature. The same is not true for the newer, longer-range technoligies, and it makes little sense to build a city-wide network primarily with the intent of delivering high-speed Internet access to people who can't afford their own dedicated broadband connections if you're going to force those same people to go out and buy all new hardware in order to get on to the network. To say that they should have used a newer, longer-range protocol ignores the intent behind building the network in the first place.

So perhaps the cities have jumped the gun here, and should have waited until support for long-range wireless connections becomes as common as support for Wi-Fi currently is.


Why did EL agree to this in the first place?
By mikefarinha on 5/14/2008 12:51:29 PM , Rating: 2
It's good to see that Earthlink is coming to its sense about the viability of free wifi.

But why did they do it in the first place? Maybe it's just the fact that hind-sight is 20/20 but I'm pretty sure most people with a clue would have never agreed to this type of business venture.




Nice idea, glad it's over
By akugami on 5/14/2008 5:41:21 PM , Rating: 2
While I am a bit sad to see this fail, there were some positives to the idea of this municipal wifi. First off, it would have provided a cheap net access that would blanket the whole city that wouldn't need to rely on the traditional lines from Comcast or Verizon. This would theoretically simplify access for public schools and other government run services. It would have also supposedly provided cheap internet access to the denizens of Philadelphia.

The reality was terrible. Shoddy service that connects on and off at random daily, spotty service area support that doesn't even cover the whole Center City (downtown) district, and all for $20 a month.

I for one would have been interested in this service as I can lug my laptop around town and not have to worry about whether there is a local hotspot open nearby. Sadly with the poor blanket coverage, the poor prices and the poor connections, it's a wonder they lasted this long.




Ha Ha
By Reclaimer77 on 5/14/2008 9:51:39 PM , Rating: 1
Serves those freeloaders right. Go cry me a river and pay for internet access like the rest of us.




"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki