backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 182 comment(s) - last by dustwalker13.. on Mar 3 at 10:25 AM


EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes
Big corporations beware: the European Union is playing high stakes

Like a plentiful oil well, the European Union (EU) has found, since 2004, that Microsoft is a rich source of funds.  The EU allowed Microsoft to continue to operate in the region, but found it in violation of antitrust laws.  Its conclusion -- in order to stay Microsoft will have to pay some big fines.

The Microsoft fines began in March of 2004 when a European Commission high court found the company guilty of antitrust violations -- in particular, using underhanded tactics to freeze out its competitors in the media player and server software markets.  A massive fine of $690M (€497M) was charged against Microsoft. 

Microsoft refused to comply and was promptly fined an additional $375.4M USD.  In the end, Microsoft’s decision to fight the law turned out to be a futile one when the European Court of First Instance ruled to uphold European Commission's decision against Microsoft.  Microsoft agreed to finally comply with the ruling.

Now Microsoft has been hit with another massive fine by the European Union. The EU says that between July 2006, and October 2007, Microsoft's refused to comply during its legal fight against the EU, making it eligible for the increased rate of fines of approximately $3.83M a day, for each day of non-compliance.  The new fine announced by the EU for this period sums up to
$1.4B USD (€899M). 

The fine marks the largest antitrust fine in international history, and a record judgment against Microsoft.

Microsoft indicated it is willing to accept the fine, though, commenting that the fines were about past issues and that the company is now operating under revised principles that make its software more open.  Microsoft twice reduced its patent rate and information license rate, last May.  Finally in October it reduced its rates even further, offering
new license for interoperability information for a flat fee of $14,000 and an optional worldwide patent license for a reduced royalty of 0.4%.  The October reduction appears to be satisfactory in the EU's eyes, though the initial reduction was not.

The changes in licensing policy went into effect on October 22, 2007.  The changes help make it easier for smaller software firms to gain access to interoperability information, allowing them to interface with Microsoft products.  Microsoft had initially demanded a royalty rate totaling 3.87% of a licensee's product revenues and demanded an additional 2.98% of products' revenues from companies seeking access to communications information, which Microsoft deemed highly secret.

While the over $2.4B USD in fines reaped by the EU against Microsoft since 2004 have certainly hurt, Microsoft still has about $19.6B USD in cash reserves, when taking the most recent $1.4B USD fine into effect.  Unfortunately for Microsoft, this may soon be shrinking further as the European recently launched two new investigations into Microsoft.

The EU is also keeping busy trying to squeeze on Intel, which it also accused of antitrust violations.  Intel, like Microsoft, fought the EU's accusations.  Meanwhile the EU was hard at work, strengthening their case, by seizing documents in a raid of German Intel offices.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By Muirgheasa on 2/27/2008 4:06:12 PM , Rating: 5
...I'd like to make the point that this article is disappointingly biased. The phrase "seeking Microsoft gold" implies that Microsoft is fully within its rights to do what it's doing. Clearly this isn't the case; under US law, yes, it's probably fine. It's not just operating in the US though, and it has to comply with EU law too. In fact this latest fine is essentially for refusing to accept the ruling which was initially made.

The whys and wherefores of the case are past now - Microsoft lost and acted as if it was above the law by failing to fully comply with the rulings.

A clash of cultures is clearly in evidence here (or at least will be once a couple more posts come in): Europeans, for the most part, value the freedom of small companies to operate in a monopoly free environment, whereas those from the US prefer to give free markets free reign. Unfortunately for Microsoft it isn't free to choose its own set of rules.

Personally I think that this ruling is good for computer users on the whole, but that's almost beside the point of this news article - this is just about Microsoft failing to comply with the rules.




RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By RogueSpear on 2/27/08, Rating: -1
RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By dever on 2/28/08, Rating: -1
RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By Ammohunt on 2/27/2008 4:26:05 PM , Rating: 4
Read: We support the domestic unions and anti-capitalists.
i.e.
if you fart somewhere in Europe don't be surprised when the United Farters Union of Europe hauls your ass to the EC for unsanctioned flatulence.


RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By jarman on 2/28/08, Rating: -1
RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By Samus on 2/28/08, Rating: -1
By michael67 on 2/29/2008 8:59:56 AM , Rating: 2
Whats the purpose of getting a speeding ticket.

To correct unwanted behaviour.

And like whit speeding ticket if you don't pay(1) them they get higher and higher till you do pay them.

Every/most Americans here is talking like the EU wanted to give MS the fine just to take there money.
Seen a interview whit Commissioner Neelie Kroes, she was having a hard time whit it giving the fine and frustrated by the lack cooperation and arrogance of MS.

(read: opening up protocols and publish documentation and have reasonable licenses, so companies can make software to work proper whit windows)

BTW, Neelie Kroes use to be one of the most right wing member of the VVD a Dutch right wing party
CV Neelie Kroes http://www.europarl.europa.eu/hearings/commission/...


RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By P4blo on 2/29/2008 5:54:29 AM , Rating: 3
The US gov isn't going to spank Microsoft that hard because it's a US company and a very important one at that! They want MS to stay globally dominant. The EU on the other hand, doesn't hold it in such high regard - who can blame them? The EU is more concerned with the thousands of EU companies that would like to be able to work affordably and integrate closely with Microsoft products so they too can share the wealth.

I also think the guy who wrote this article should be a reporter for fox news! Classic example of displaying emotional involvement with the writing style. Otherwise the choice of words wouldn't be so inflamatory.

DailyTech needs to decide if it wants to be 'fun' reading or 'trustworthy, impartial' reading I think.


By SiliconJon on 3/2/2008 2:04:03 PM , Rating: 2
I call for a repeat of that last sentence, please: DailyTech needs to decide if it wants to be 'fun' reading or 'trustworthy, impartial' reading I think.

And I vote for the latter.


By michael67 on 2/29/2008 7:53:48 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Read: We support the domestic unions and anti-capitalists.
i.e.
if you fart somewhere in Europe don't be surprised when the United Farters Union of Europe hauls your ass to the EC for unsanctioned flatulence.

Man, you Americans have a narrow minded view of the world.

In thinking your way is the best and the only way of doing business.
There are 6.000.000.000 people that live not in the US and most of them think "the American way" is not there way.

If it works for you fine, live and do they way you like, but don't try to push it on to me.

And they are not all your enemy, but if you tread them that way and insult them all the time. they going to be.
Haven't seen any Europeans here call you "capitalistic pigs" ore "the new Nazi's of the world"

I am not going to say the EU is a utopia, far from that we got big problems, just like the US got them.

But if that "American way" means that i have to live in a country ware.

1. that ranks 45 in the world as far as life expectancy. (from spot 11, 20 years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_...
2. A third to half of all citizens lack even basic health care.
3. Roughly 12% of citizens live below the poverty line.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United...

And yes, poverty is high now also in the EU because of the new eastern members that joined the EU.
But unlike the US that's keeping Mexico and S and M-America down, we are trying to help out those countries to get the same standard of living as we have.

Then yes, you can keep you pure capitalism, i like mine whit a bit of socialism.

But you should watch this BBC documentary "the century of self", its how the masses getting brainwashed.
And NO, its not done by a lefty, because it's also pretty hard on the left parties.

Its a real eye opener and should be shown mandatory to all students around age 14~16 at school,
Its a long sit (4 x 60min) and its very interesting but also sometimes boring (what cant be helped).

But i dear you and all Right but also Left-wing to see it, and afterward saying you still see everything the same way.

Because after seeing this you will now when and how you are being manipulated, by so-well left and right and big corporations.

And maybe some have to see it 2 times to befor geting it all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Century_Of_The_Se...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/feature...
quote:
From Wikipedia:
Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, changed the perception of the human mind and its workings profoundly. His influence on the 20th century is widely regarded as massive. The documentary describes the impact of Freud's theories on the perception of the human mind, and the ways public relations agencies and politicians have used this during the last 100 years for their "engineering of consent".

part 1~4
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-263763536...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-678466363...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-611192272...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1122532358...

Ore do a Bit-Torrent search on "The Century Of The Self" and download the hole series


RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By FITCamaro on 2/27/2008 4:53:01 PM , Rating: 2
No this is an issue of the EU trying to dictate what companies can charge customers to make interoperable software with their product. And their dislike of American based companies having an advantage over their own.

Even at the original 3.87/2.93% of their revenues for patent info/communication info, that is hardly absurd. You sell your product that uses some interoperability information that Microsoft provides for $100, you give Microsoft at most $6.80 per copy. Seems fair to me.

Then they changed it to .7/.5%. So you need the info and sell your product for $100, you pay them at most $1.20 per copy. Still wasn't good enough for the EU. So they changed it to a flat $14,900 + optional worldwide patent license for .4% of revenues. Hardly unfair.

If they had revenues of $100 million for a year, they'd have only paid the original $14,900 fee and potentially only $400,000 in patent license fees which are good worldwide. Under half a percent of their revenues. Even if their profit was only 5%, they'd still have made over $4.5 million dollars. And the $14,900 fee isn't out of reach of smaller businesses either.

To me at some point there's going to be no point for Microsoft to do business in the EU. If they're constantly paying out hundreds of millions or billions of dollars in bogus fines, whats the point? Any profits will be eroded by those fees. Windows is a Microsoft product. They invested their time and money to develop it. If a company wants to make money off Microsoft's time and effort, they should have to compensate Microsoft for it.

To me Microsoft should just give the EU the middle finger and say "What are you going to do?" And what can they do? Not let them sell their product? I think businesses over in Europe would be pretty pissed. Fine with me too since then maybe they'll move their businesses over here to the states where we let companies make money on the products they work hard to develop and don't charge outrageous corporate taxes.

I'd love to know what kind of fees Apple charges for its proprietary info.


RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By Apoxie on 2/27/2008 5:15:15 PM , Rating: 5
Here is a list of all the 2007 antitrust cases in the EU:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/antitrust/cas...

Please show me that all of those companies are american. Oh surprise they are NOT!

Thats because the EU fines EVERYONE who does not obey the law. Its soft of a principle.


By Apoxie on 2/27/2008 5:15:48 PM , Rating: 1
soft = sort :)


RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By FITCamaro on 2/27/08, Rating: 0
RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By JoeBanana on 2/28/2008 2:45:59 AM , Rating: 3
1)Of course. All other complied with the law.
2)5 out of 20-30? American companies are above the EU law?


RE: Before the EU bashers come out in numbers...
By Adonlude on 2/28/2008 12:20:21 PM , Rating: 1
They seem to only go after the rich American companies. I think this is total BS. If they want to go after Microsoft, Intel, and Texas Instruments then why cant we just say "no more software or silicon for you EU"?

Ya I know it would cost the companies far more to do this but I really wish they would do it anyway. American companies should not be infusing the EU with billions of dollars.

Get out your sextant and dust off your abacus EU, no more computers for you!


By JoeBanana on 2/28/2008 12:36:05 PM , Rating: 1
The fact is that if MS withdrew from EU the biggest single market on the world would suddenly go for alternatives like Linux, MacOSX, BSD. With that market share MS would even more forced to play by international standards and protocols. Also the piracy rates of MS windows would go sky rocket.