backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 14 comment(s) - last by Diesel Donkey.. on Oct 5 at 7:51 PM

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report slammed the EPA on its procedures to safely retire e-waste

Last month, the Government Accountability Office sent Congress a report indicating the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) isn't doing enough to ensure electronic waste is disposed of in a proper manner.

In 2006, more than 300 million pieces of e-waste were disposed of, with 80 percent to 85 percent ultimately going to U.S. landfills.  The remaining 15 percent to 20 percent are sent overseas for reuse or disposal.  The e-waste problem will likely grow in the future as the lifespan of many products remains short, and companies continue to push out the next-generation of technology.

Current U.S. law mandates that it's legal to export e-waste to developing nations for disposal, but EPA critics claim there isn't enough being done to protect the workers disassembling the electronics.

"The EPA regulates the export of cathode ray tubes (CRTs) and CRT glass," an EPA spokesperson told DailyTech.  "This rule requires exporters of CRTs for reuse to file a one-time notification with EPA starting that they plan to export CRTs for reuse, as well as keep records demonstrating that each shipment of exported CRTs will be reused."

There is a strong debate as to how damaging the e-waste shipped overseas is for workers and citizens in nearby towns.  

"Most e-waste that is exported results in little or no adverse environmental or health impacts," the EPA said during the interview.  "To the contrary, most exported e-waste results in significant benefits in terms of sustainable development."

Moving forward, the "EPA is working with stakeholders (i.e., states, e-manufacturers, e-recyclers, trade associations and public interest groups) to develop a set of practices that can be used in a voluntary certification program to ensure the adequate environmental performance of those handing electronics, including recyclers of electronics."

The program will be operated by the companies working with the electronics, along with recyclers of electronics.  Hewlett-Packard, IBM and other companies have internal recycling procedures in place, and many cities and communities across the United States have organized e-waste recycling programs to reduce the number of hazardous materials going into U.S. landfills.

As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) begins to phase out analog television in favor of digital televisions next year, as many as 20 million analog TVs could be sent overseas for disassembly.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Durable cases
By InvertMe on 10/3/2008 10:41:31 AM , Rating: 4
I always thought a good way to cut down on this waste would be to make more durable cases for most electronic devices. That way when it's time to upgrade your system you just pull the pcb out and replace it with the updated one.

I have a 3 year old Optiplex GX260 here at work and while the system is "ancient" (p4 :( ) the case is in great condition as is my keyboard and mouse. All that would need to happen is for the motherboard to be replaced with an updated core 2 setup and I would be good to go. That's a ton less waste than tossing the whole system into a landfill.

You could do this with cell phone, laptops, desktops, routers... the list goes on an on.

For my home PC I have had the same case for almost 7 years now and it's just as good as when I bought it. I will use for another good many years I am sure.

At my previous company there was a 3 year rotation on all hardware. So regardless if the device was any good or not the unit would be tossed in a landfill after all the serial number information was changed to a dummy corporation. Such a waste. This applied to mice, keyboard, power cords and another other peripherals. All just tossed despite some items being 100% new in their original packages. Just because people are too lazy to take a proper inventory and use existing stock.




RE: Durable cases
By murphyslabrat on 10/3/2008 11:36:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
All just tossed despite some items being 100% new in their original packages.

Now, you know what would make more sense than recycling? selling those used goods to another corporation or, better yet, offer the goods for sale through eBay or Amazon. People like my parents, who home-schooled us K-12, would snap them up in a minute....assuming they didn't try to sell them at Like-New prices.

You could pay college-kids $9 an hour to do the inventory, and have an automated script list the items. Worst case scenario is that you barely come out even, and that is really worst case: 1$ for a mouse or keyboard, $5 for a speaker or headset, $50 for a monitor, $100 for the computer.


RE: Durable cases
By overzealot on 10/3/2008 12:34:55 PM , Rating: 2
I think the OP meant something along those lines. What a waste.
I picked up a p4, mobo case and PSU off the side of the road through a local recycling setup. All it needed was a BIOS update.
Still running strong today.


Why should we care ?
By Reclaimer77 on 10/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Why should we care ?
By Diesel Donkey on 10/4/2008 12:32:58 AM , Rating: 2
There are these little things called accountability, responsibility, and morality. The United States has a prominent place in this world, and all eyes are trained on how this country conducts itself. Besides, what is done now can have long-term effects, political, environmental, or otherwise.


RE: Why should we care ?
By Reclaimer77 on 10/5/2008 4:29:47 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
There are these little things called accountability, responsibility, and morality.


Nice emotionally based platitudes until you actually look at the facts of the matter.

1. A country OFFERS to take the e-waste off our hands because THEY in turn make a profit out of it by removing precious and semi-precious metals from the trash. So basically, its a private business agreement, perfect legal, between two parties. Nobody is getting screwed here or shafted. This isn't the 'big bad United States' bullying somebody.

2. We're the ones actually bringing up the concerns. NOT the other party.

So, where again, does morality and accountability play into this exactly ? And how are we conducting ourselves poorly ?


RE: Why should we care ?
By Diesel Donkey on 10/5/2008 7:51:31 PM , Rating: 2
1. The people handling the e-waste in the foreign country may be getting screwed or shafted in the same way that sweat shop workers get screwed or shafted. Their working conditions may not be safe. It's a human rights issue. That's where morality comes into play. You can take the NIMBI approach and simply dismiss such issues or you can concern yourself with such issues (yes, perhaps "wasting" your taxes). From a business standpoint you're correct: the most advantageous position is to ignore the potential plight of the foreign workers, at least until other business partners hear about it and call us out on ignoring human rights violations.

2. We're also bringing up the concerns because if the waste is not properly disposed of it could find its way into the ocean, and perhaps the approach of giving our waste to someone else will come back to bite us later in one of many possible forms.

Sometimes you have to look beyond the simple exchange of money and look at who is actually getting the money, how exactly they are getting the money, and perhaps even where the money is going after that.


RE: Why should we care ?
By CurtOien on 10/4/2008 7:45:07 AM , Rating: 2
On many days, much of the air pollution on the west coast is coming from China. Some pollutants may get here in small quantities but they become more concentrated as they move up the food chain. (Bioaccumulation)

Some day your grandchild may get cancer from a fish caught in Alaska that was contaminated by our e-waste that was shipped to China for disposal because it was cheaper.


There are so much solutions...
By greylica on 10/3/2008 6:55:50 PM , Rating: 2
I am using an Older P3 1GHz,512Mb,ATI 9200SE-128Mb (with 2 monitors),40Gb HDD in my work for one year. Win 2000 and without any Anti-Virus Installed.

I am very happy with him and Installed a bunch of free software as follows:
Gimp, Inkscape, VLC, AMSN, Blender, Open Office 2.4, CDBurnerXP, 7-Zip, CCleaner, JKdefrag(there is a great "kit" in the Net),Notepad ++, Python, Adobe 9, Firefox 3, BullZip (PDF Printer), FDM and Apache.

I am very proud of being sometimes more productive than a person with an X2 4800 in my enterprise, with this older P3 I can Burn DVDs in 2X without any buffer underruns, but people here is hard to believe that this older guy can do great things, well, they ask for a ferrari but didn´t know how to drive ...

But the most interesting thing, Is that I have found this computer (the major parts) in a Junkyard, and the only problem with him was some capacitors. (Intel 815)

I am very proud of myself to recycle every single piece of hardware I have found in a Junkyard with conditions of being fixed.

Some of you can think, this guy don´t have or don´t spend money to buy better things. But it´s not the case, since I have some opterons in My render Farm. The case is that when I know what the machines can do, I use the resources they could give.

And then I have modded down down down, but no flames...

:)




RE: There are so much solutions...
By Reclaimer77 on 10/4/2008 1:00:06 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
But the most interesting thing, Is that I have found this computer (the major parts) in a Junkyard, and the only problem with him was some capacitors. (Intel 815)


You make that seem so trivial. Oh its was " only " some motherboard capacitors ! How dare those wasteful people for not learning how to solder capacitors onto a motherboard !


RE: There are so much solutions...
By greylica on 10/5/2008 8:45:44 AM , Rating: 2
It´s a proposition, and a provocation.

For me, it´s trivial to do this, but for all of us, it´s trivial to separate the junk to recycle, it´s trivial to do not waste water and food, it´s trivial to not waste electrical power, it´s trivial to not make pollution.

The time is here, everyone has it´s own responsibility. My one it´s trivial for me, but I have faith that you will find out what´s trivial for you. :)

Interesting, people give more attention to Microsoft new Vista problems than our planet problems...


not lasting along time
By leexgx on 10/3/2008 11:49:19 AM , Rating: 2
thay realy need to make them so thay do not fail after 3-4 years as alot of things just are not lasting as long as thay used to (thay are been made to Brake after short time)

thay should be able to last 10 years + like older products used to, even if its no longer of any use to your self if it still works it be usefull to some one els




RE: not lasting along time
By Murloc on 10/3/2008 12:14:36 PM , Rating: 2
after 4 years they are old.
The problem of e-waste is not hardware failure or such things, it's people buying new products.
Italians (they are the most mobile phone dependant maniac ppl) change their mobile phone every 6 months (calculated with some statistics), and many of them have 2-9 mobile phones (9 only for criminal activity).


RE: not lasting along time
By axias41 on 10/5/2008 5:39:35 AM , Rating: 2
I'm from Italy. Have you ever been to Italy?


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer













botimage
Copyright 2008 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki