backtop


Print 48 comment(s) - last by Alpha4.. on Jan 29 at 5:58 PM

Micro-transactions and advertising will fund titles in EA's "Play 4 Free" family

Most gamers are used to the idea of downloadable content, as shown by the massively popular Guitar Hero and Rock Band titles. However, full-version downloadable games usually come with a "caveat emptor" byline -- be it monthly subscription fees for MMORPGs, in-game items that can only be purchased with real money, or the widely-disliked ad-supported flavor. 

EA is now trying out the latter business model with their variant dubbed "Play 4 Free" and is hoping that the Battlefield franchise will help them gain a foothold in the form of Battlefield Heroes.

Battlefield Heroes is a cartoon-styled game from DICE, best known for being the team behind Battlefield 1942 and Battlefield 2. Heavy emphasis is being placed on the "easy to learn" aspect of the game, but hardcore players worried that this will lead to a mediocre experience have been promised "robust character customization" and a "deep online meta-game" to hold long-term interest as well. As part of this system, the matching system in Battlefield Heroes will attempt to pair players of equal skill against each other.

EA is taking two of the three main caveats previously mentioned -- microtransactions and advertising -- and modifying each one slightly in an attempt to make them more palatable. The purchasable items will be cosmetic rather than functional; a player could pay a $1 fee to give their in-game avatar an outrageous hairstyle, but wouldn't be able to buy a more powerful weapon or improved armor. The advertising will be done on the "front end" of the game -- loading screens, lobbies, and other less-intrusive locations.

In addition to the piecemeal pricing structure set by EA, DICE is taking a similar approach to content. "With the new online model, we will continually add new content to keep the game fresh and keep players engaged, while integrating player feedback in real time," said EA DICE senior producer Ben Cousins.

Battlefield Heroes is scheduled for a summer 2008 release.

 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

BF:H vs TF2
By AmberClad on 1/22/2008 12:37:47 PM , Rating: 5
Given the cartoony art direction, this seems almost like EA's bid to make a BF version of a TF2 clone. Coincidentally or not, you can see the similarity in the art style between the cartoony BF guy on the cover, and the TF2 heavy weapons guy in the thumbnail image on that magazine cover...




RE: BF:H vs TF2
By doctat on 1/22/2008 12:46:29 PM , Rating: 3
that's -exactly- what it is. a blatant rip off of TF2.

i wish EA would go away.

they ruin every game property they purchase. only reason anyone will play this is because it will be free (the ad support will no doubt reach new levels of obnoxiousness), and it may have vehicles.

fuck EA. they suck.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By ninjaquick on 1/22/08, Rating: 0
RE: BF:H vs TF2
By omnicronx on 1/23/2008 9:26:39 AM , Rating: 1
God damn you people take advantage of the ratings system. I do not see any profanity or anything wrong with this post, and his points are valid. Beyond the likeness of the faces of the players, I really doubt this is going to be a TF2 clone, so i my opinion the op's post was BS and should have been the one rated down. I personally do not like the way EA does business or most of their games for that matter, but it seems the masses seem to and millions upon millions of people are addicted to countless EA games.

If you don't like EA games don't buy them, if you don't like this game, dont play it! Its going to be free, nobody is forcing you to pay for it or play it in general. It's beyond me that you think you can judge or complain about a game that has not been released yet, and when it does, will not cost you a cent.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By bighairycamel on 1/22/2008 2:14:44 PM , Rating: 3
I think Serious Sam beat both of them to the punch.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By TSS on 1/22/2008 3:09:59 PM , Rating: 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cel-shaded_animation

"The first 3D video game to feature true real-time cel-shading was Jet Set Radio (2000) for the Sega Dreamcast."

jet set radio looked very cartoony. it's the purpose of the whole technique.

honestly, if you're displaying a classic army grunt, there aren't alot of appearances to choose from. that's why it's called a stereotype. also the heavy weapons guy is alot more gruntish then that soldier on the cover.

i'm suprised the majority of the comments go towards BF vs TF. nobody here thinks that EA finally hit a bullseye after shooting with a blindfold for years concerning micro-payments and the ad model? heck i'm going to play this game purely to support the way their going. it might be the gamer's best chance yet to get rid of in-game ads (out game ads are still ads but cmon, by now ads are a fact of life. i still see more ads on the web and in real life then i've seen/noticed in games).

and if these micro payments work and they can make enough off the cosmetic stuff to ward off bought improvements... skill might actually one day make a comeback.

i'm not praising the lord for delivering the messiah, it's still EA where talking about. but if anything it's worth beeing optimistic about and not slandering it for "beeing like team fortress 2" while this probably has been in design since battlefield 2 came out. since dice didn't do BF 2142, they must've been doing something in the mean while and as far as i know they didn't have any "next-gen" cellshading engines lying around.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By Adonlude on 1/22/08, Rating: 0
RE: BF:H vs TF2
By noxipoo on 1/22/2008 4:28:41 PM , Rating: 5
and it would be the parents fault, not the games fault.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By omnicronx on 1/23/2008 9:37:09 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Personally I think we are teaching kids a bad lesson here. One day some kid is going to find daddys nice big gun and open fire on someone thinking that it would only hurt a little bit.
quote:
and it would be the parents fault, not the games fault.
If a 15-18 year old is dumb enough to shoot someone with a gun thinking 'oh this won't hurt you because the HW guy in TF can take 50 shots to the chest!' The only fault of the parent would be not putting down your idiot child down sooner.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By Rockjock51 on 1/23/2008 11:49:43 AM , Rating: 2
Or not teaching your kids that the guns in your house aren't like the guns in the video games.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By MFK on 1/23/2008 1:15:10 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
"The first 3D video game to feature true real-time cel-shading was Jet Set Radio (2000) for the Sega Dreamcast."


Holy crap, and I remember reading its review like it was a couple of weeks ago!!

Time and tide eh?


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By xti on 1/22/2008 2:20:51 PM , Rating: 2
freaking Madden is a ripoff of the NFL.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By dflynchimp on 1/22/2008 4:23:14 PM , Rating: 2
now now, EA has had their moments of clarity before this. Besides, if it's a "good" rip-off of TF2 (which I'm addicted to) it might be catchy.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By xubz on 1/22/2008 12:56:59 PM , Rating: 2
Funny thing that EA is (one of) Valve's Publishers. :-/


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By knowyourenemy on 1/22/2008 1:11:39 PM , Rating: 4
They're a distributor. They ship the game - they have no authority over Valve.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By omnicronx on 1/23/2008 9:29:31 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Funny thing that EA is (one of) Valve's Publishers. :-/
Who isnt? Valve buys the rights to many older games that have had a lot of success. Only a handful of titles on Steam are actually in house valve titles.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By murphyslabrat on 1/22/2008 1:01:43 PM , Rating: 3
Actually, they appear to be completely different styles. The TF2 style is more of an exaggerated-feature style, whereas the Battlefield Heroes looks more simplified.

In fact, if the Battlefield Heroes art style is a rip of anyone in particular, I see much more resemblance to the cartoony clip art in MS Office.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By akugami on 1/22/2008 1:19:45 PM , Rating: 2
No, this looks nothing like Microsoft Bob.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By nosfe on 1/22/2008 1:46:54 PM , Rating: 3
then how about clippy? :P


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By Polynikes on 1/22/2008 1:22:34 PM , Rating: 3
It reminds me of The Incredibles.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By helios220 on 1/22/2008 1:08:43 PM , Rating: 2
It's pretty obvious that the cartoon styling is similar between the two titles, whether or not this is a complete rip-off of TF2 is debatable although I'd be hard pressed to say that they weren't at the least 'inspired' by TF2's success.

I'm almost inclined to jump on the bandwagon and write this one off as dumb, but I do remember a lot of people originally having a somewhat negative response to TF2's styling, thinking it 'childish'.

There may be some hope for this title though; DICE is not a horrible studio by any means although there are a few factors that continue to make me skeptical. The 'payment' scheme is obviously somewhat alarming, but I'd have to wait and see on that one.

The other thing is that if I remember correctly DICE was already working on a new Battlefield game, with the main feature being a much greater use of dynamically destroyable environments. Not sure how far along that effort is, but if this is some half-baked side project then it may be something to avoid.

Eh but regardless, in the end even if this does blow you can always just go play TF2 instead.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By AntiM on 1/22/2008 1:15:45 PM , Rating: 2
I'm a huge fan of TF2. Given the fact that TF2 was in development for several years and has what I consider to be a perfect balance between classes, as well as expertly created maps, I predict that any attempt to copy it will fail. This seems to be a flash in the pan idea from EA. It's not the concept of ad supported games that bothers me as much as the idea of a TF2 clone. I think FPSs are a good vehicle for ad supported games as long as they are well executed, otherwise they'll never achieve the popularity that would make such an enterprise viable. I wish them luck.


RE: BF:H vs TF2
By TheDiceman on 1/22/2008 3:39:06 PM , Rating: 2
If anything, visually, it makes me think more of those olf Army Men video games than anything else.


EA strikes again
By Screwballl on 1/22/08, Rating: 0
RE: EA strikes again
By FITCamaro on 1/22/2008 1:56:16 PM , Rating: 2
Did you even read the article or just the headline?

It will be free and supported by ads. The ads will be in the lobbies and on game menus primarily. Some will likely be in the game as well. Provided the game doesn't install any annoying software on your computer, I see no reason to at least try it.

My stance on ingame ads remains that as long as it fits in the environment, I've got no problem with ads in a game. If I'm running around a city, I'd expect to see billboards for Coca Cola, Dell, etc. Now if I'm off on some distant world not related to Earth at all, then yes, they shouldn't be there. But otherwise, I'm cool with it as long as it isn't blatant product promotion (eg. "Drink Coke to replenish your life and get a boost of speed").


RE: EA strikes again
By Screwballl on 1/22/08, Rating: 0
RE: EA strikes again
By Vanilla Thunder on 1/22/2008 2:53:51 PM , Rating: 2
Your speculation is amazing. The game is free, and free to play. Bottom line. Now crawl back into your hole, and come up with some more paranoid delusions.

V


RE: EA strikes again
By Screwballl on 1/22/08, Rating: -1
RE: EA strikes again
By omnicronx on 1/23/2008 9:43:45 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
you know as well as I do that they will draw everyone in claiming a credit card is needed for age verification (or something equally as dumb) and then after 30 or 90 days they will start charging for this "free" service.... This is EA... The greediest of any software company out there.
You are absolutely right, what were we thinking. EA, the most biggest gaming company out there, is obviously willing to commit credit card fraud on a mass scale.

Where do you come up with this stuff? The back of a cereal box?


RE: EA strikes again
By Chris Peredun on 1/22/2008 2:57:00 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Play for free does not mean you do not have to buy it first. Counter Strike: Source is "play for free", but you still need to pay the $40-60 for the game. BF2 is play for free but you still need to purchase the game. Same concept.


Funny, I thought the headline: "EA to Release Free 'Battlefield Heroes' Multiplayer FPS" was fairly clear about this, but I'll break it down:

The game is free.
You download it for free.
You can play for free.
The cake is not a lie.
However, the icing and cherries on top will cost you an additional sum.


RE: EA strikes again
By ZimZum on 1/22/2008 6:35:33 PM , Rating: 2
Indeed cant argue with the price. The last GOOD free game I can remember was "Enemy Territory". Which was like heroin it was so addictive. I still remeber fondly my days as a Rambo Medic.


RE: EA strikes again
By cochy on 1/22/2008 3:04:08 PM , Rating: 2
Last I checked Couterstrike: Source was $20. But that's neither here nor there.


RE: EA strikes again
By cochy on 1/22/2008 3:02:15 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Now if I'm off on some distant world not related to Earth at all, then yes, they shouldn't be there.


lol but wouldn't that be funny. I could see it now...You're the "discoverer" of a new world and what's the first thing you see when you get down there? A Starbucks.

lol man for the humor value alone I'd accept that :P


RE: EA strikes again
By FITCamaro on 1/22/2008 3:30:11 PM , Rating: 2
It's a little known fact that on the 7th day, when God rested, he did so at a Starbucks.

So that would make sense.

It was on the subsequent caffeine high from a double espresso shot caramel latte that he made the mistake of giving man free will. He meant for us to be a giant live action puppet show. Things like death of the first born, the black plague, Hillary Clinton, and "reality television" are the best he's come up with since then.


RE: EA strikes again
By FITCamaro on 1/22/2008 3:31:31 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry best punishments.


RE: EA strikes again
By ninjaquick on 1/22/2008 2:03:56 PM , Rating: 1
you said it yourself, tons of players. Thats tons of ppl looking at ads. And ads are gold mines

EA can easily make millions of in game ads if the game is popular enough.


RE: EA strikes again
By michal1980 on 1/22/2008 3:31:06 PM , Rating: 1
i'm against in game ads when I pay for the game.

free game w/ad's. thats cool. Now they need to make it perfect. If I like it, and want to pay 20 bucks to get rid of the ad's, it should be possible.


WOO HOO, TF2 with Vehicles!
By dflynchimp on 1/22/08, Rating: 0
RE: WOO HOO, TF2 with Vehicles!
By microAmp on 1/22/2008 12:25:31 PM , Rating: 2
No need to, they copy and make it worse; just like their future TES: Oblivion title, which was announced shortly after Oblivion was released and became popular in sales.


RE: WOO HOO, TF2 with Vehicles!
By Rockjock51 on 1/23/2008 11:56:50 AM , Rating: 2
I'm sure they waited for Oblivion to become popular in sales before they decided to make another Elder Scrolls game. Oblivion is, after all, the first one, right?


my thoughts
By WileCoyote on 1/23/2008 12:42:41 AM , Rating: 2
I'm not a big fan of this pricing structure because it opens the door for buggier games. It gives developers a chance to be "lazy" (cutting cost and development time at the expense of quality) when it comes to polishing the game. If gamers complain the game is buggy, they can respond, "but the game is free. You didn't pay for it so we don't owe you anything."
Think about companies like AOL who have given up on monthly fees and have laid off their support staff. If the product is free, then you don't need to support it. It reduces their overhead but it doesn't make for a better quality product.




RE: my thoughts
By Alpha4 on 1/29/2008 5:58:58 PM , Rating: 2
You might be onto something, but EA charging $50 for Battlefield 2 didn't stop them from cutting off support to that bug ridden game.

Maybe a sustained income model like this will compell them to polish up their game.


Next Up:
By elpresidente2075 on 1/23/2008 2:39:59 AM , Rating: 2
John Madden's Battlefield 2008:

You'll get all this and more!
-New character names
-New character colors (now in mauve!!)
-Extra game-enhancing information collection
-Minimal tweaks in gameplay
-Redesigned menus!!!
-And much, much more!!

If you're a fan of FPS videogames, this one's for you. In fact, we're so sure you're gonna love this game, if you don't like it, we'll give* you a free** copy of John Madden's Battlefield 2009***, just for trying!

*You must purchase a licensed copy of the game from an official retailer
**$50 shipping and handling fees may apply
***May or may not actually release




RE: Next Up:
By RandallMoore on 1/23/2008 12:30:40 PM , Rating: 2
HaHa! you forgot to mention another feature of the game.

-New Global Ranking System (The more ads you visit, the higher your rank becomes!)


I'll give it a shot
By TheDiceman on 1/22/2008 12:35:34 PM , Rating: 3
After all, it is free. I see no good reason to not at least TRY the game. If they actaully keep the adds out of the game proper it could be an entertaining time killer. I will agree that it seems like EA wants to leech on the success of TF2 with the visuals though.




By RandallMoore on 1/22/2008 12:53:54 PM , Rating: 3
Can you imagine the amount of advertisements that you will see while trying to play this game? Haha! BF 2142 has ads, and its a $50 game. I'm scared to see what this "free" game brings.




I'm all for it
By akyp on 1/22/2008 11:14:19 PM , Rating: 2
I'm all for it as long as the download doesn't contain some spyware. Oh wait: http://www.dailytech.com/Battlefield+2142+Ingame+A...




Stealing sales...
By iFX on 1/22/2008 1:01:39 PM , Rating: 1
This game is just designed to steal sales from TF2. The idea is you can have a TF2 "like" game for free, and then spend your $50 on an EA title instead of TF2.




“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki