backtop


Print 28 comment(s) - last by waynet2.. on Jan 25 at 5:02 PM

EU court concludes that thorough review of prior art narrows Apple's design rights, vindicates Samsung

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) has lost its latest round in its legal war against Android, as signs of a stalemate with Android continue to grow.

I. Android and Apple Reaching a Stalemate

All things considered, Apple should be pretty pleased at its recent results.  It's managed to charge back to a near tie in the U.S. market, driven by pent up demand for a new iPhone, which was finally fulfilled by the iPhone 4S.  Meanwhile Apple has successfully defended itself against arch-rival Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (KS:005930) counterclaims in the Netherlands and in Germany, among other regions.

But that success has been soured by Apple's failure to win the legal fight it started.

On Tuesday, a Dutch court rejected Apple's appeal of a relatively pro-Samsung lower court ruling.  The lower court ruled that the numerous visual differences between the iPad and Samsung's Galaxy Tab tablet line were compelling enough to rule out design infringement -- a key point Apple was trying to prove.

Apple did win on a single point in the lower court case -- European Patent 2,059,868 -- a patent which covers features within a photo gallery app, features that the court found were too similar in Samsung's Android Gallery (pictures) app.  This similarity was removed via a simple software update that overhauled the Gallery app, allowing Samsung to resume sales of its smartphones and tablets.

Lawyers for Apple filed an appeal, hoping a higher court might change their mind
about the design difference.  But Apple had no such luck.

II. Dutch Court Complains Germans Didn't Consider Enough Prior Art

The Dutch court found Apple's design patent to be perfectly valid, but ruled that given the existence of at least two similar devices at the time of its launch (prior art), its design scope was narrow, and hence was not eligible for a blanket patent on all rectangular slab tablets.

The Dutch court considered the following examples of prior art in reaching this decision, as noted in the online ruling:
By contrast, the Düsseldorf Regional Court -- who will rule next week on whether to grant Apple a new preliminary injunction against Samsung's new German-specific Galaxy Tab 10, complete with reworked case design -- only considered the Knight Ridder tablet at the TC1000 in its determination that Apple should be granted a broader injunction over all "minimalist" rectangular tablets.  In other words, the Dutch court says its German justice peers -- and perhaps Samsung's German lawyers --didn't do their homework very well.

But signs that the German court may be ready to change its mind as the preliminary ruling found that Samsung's redesign was sufficient to escape infringement claims.

III. Quick Peek: Do You Think These Products are the Same?

In the past we've highlighted the differences in design between the iPad, and the Galaxy Tab 10.  This seems an appropriate time for a refresher.  The difference include:
  1. PINK (1):
    Only Galaxy Tab 10.1 has a camera (compared to the original iPad).
  2. GOLD:
    The thickness in the design patent doesn't match the thickness of the iPad or Galaxy Tab (please measure this in an imaging software, in pixels, if you don't believe us).
  3. TEAL:
    Bezel sizes don't match between any of the three designs.
  4. GREEN:
    Connectors and buttons on the side are different.
  5. ORANGE:
    Screen sizes and aspect ratios are different.
  6. PINK (2):
    Only the iPad has a home button.
  7. PURPLE:
    All tablets are clearly and unambiguously branded.
  8. RED:
    The back color doesn't match.
Tablet comparison

IV. The Impact of the Prolonged Court Battle

The Dutch court has now rejected both Apple and Samsung's initial claims.  Apple continues to file new claims, but one has to wonder how long it will continue before it tires of wasting energy and effort in what is increasingly a losing battle.  The same goes for Samsung.  Expect the German ruling to be pivotal in the future of this legal war.  A win could embolden Apple, but a loss would make the lawsuit crusade look increasingly self-destructive for the American electronics firm.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (original design) [Images Source: 9to5Google]

In many ways the lawsuit crusade is part of late Apple CEO and co-founder Steven P. Jobs' final legacy.  But one has to wonder as these suits drag on, whether customers will slowly grow aware of these actions and tire of Apple's litigious ways.

Apple's desire to try to circumvent competition via the courts is puzzling, given that it seems to be doing alright already in terms of recent sales versus Android.  While its suits have helped to stifle the proliferation of Android tablets slightly, they have mostly just left the Cupertino, Calif. company with legal bills and negative publicity.  This stands in sharp contrast to Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFTfriendlier pro-licensing approach, which has earned fat payouts on the wave of Android phonemakers' -- including Samsung's -- sales successes.

Source: de Rechtspraak (Dutch Appeals Court)



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

HP should be suing Apple.
By retrospooty on 1/24/2012 12:49:42 PM , Rating: 5
Take a look at the icon layout of the 1996 Palm Pilot.

http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/8493/pilot-1000...

It looks like Apple directly copied Palm on this. Apple should be sued for such a blatant copy of an existing product. LOL




RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By Solandri on 1/24/2012 2:09:13 PM , Rating: 2
Apple's Newton Messagepad dates back to 1993.
http://www.thocp.net/hardware/pictures/pda/apple_n...

That said, most if not all of these claims of copying are bunk because all the "inventor" did was take something which has been common on one computing platform for decades (desktop), and put it on a different computing platform (portable). Icons in a grid on computer UIs have been around since the early 1980s, if not the late 1970s. It would be like Rio claiming they "invented" the mini-phono headphone jack on the MP3 player and suing all other MP3 players using the same jack, even though it's the same thing that had been in portable radios and cassette players for decades.


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By retrospooty on 1/24/2012 3:24:36 PM , Rating: 2
Ah, true, but the Treo was the first to put it an OS and apps on a phone and also to put in a color LCD. Surely Apple copied Palm when they made the iPhone. All Apple added to that was a multitouch LCD and UI.

http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/8493/pilot-1000...

I am not being serious that Palm should sue, just pointing out the ridiculousness of Apple's lawsuits. If roles were revered and Apple had Palms product history, there WOULD be lawsuits. All companies copy others. If it were not done and not allowed, then GM, Chrysler, Mercedes, Toyota, Honda, BMW and all other car companies would not be allowed to make cars because they all copy Ford.

Apple really needs to get over themselves. They behave like a bad 1980's high school movie douchebag popular jerkoff jock protagonist.

Apple = dis guy http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1443936768/nm0951420


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By Captain Orgazmo on 1/24/2012 8:27:52 PM , Rating: 2
You think Ford invented the automobile?! Your point is valid, but sheesh, remember America wasn't always a leader of industry... and isn't really one anymore :(


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By Reclaimer77 on 1/24/2012 8:31:55 PM , Rating: 2
No they didn't, but they were the first ones to bring one "to market" and able to produce enough to actually meet demand.

I think his point still stands. If Ford behaved back then like Apple does now, they could claim all other automotive companies were "stealing" from them.


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By Captain Orgazmo on 1/24/2012 8:41:39 PM , Rating: 2
Daimler was the first auto manufacturer, and produced thousands of cars yearly when Ford was making maybe a dozen. However, like Apple, Ford took an existing product and gave it mass market appeal through simplification and profitable manufacturing processes.


By Reclaimer77 on 1/24/2012 9:00:26 PM , Rating: 2
Daimler??? That was in England. As if that counts, pffft. :P


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By omnicronx on 1/25/2012 11:34:03 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
No they didn't, but they were the first ones to bring one "to market" and able to produce enough to actually meet demand.
Its a pretty well known fact that Ford revolutionized the assembly line, they were not the first to market, nor were they the first to reasonably meet demand.

Still very similar to Apple though when you consider that the advantages of the assembly line, are very similar to how Apple achieves its dominance with vertical integration.


By retrospooty on 1/24/2012 9:19:02 PM , Rating: 2
They basically invented the mass production automobile in the model t. That pretty much puts them as the industry founders but no they didn't invent first auto. Unlike apple who invented touchscreens the computer any product with the color black or white and the sky itself by the time its lawyers are done.


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By waynet2 on 1/25/2012 5:02:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Ah, true, but the Treo was the first to put it an OS and apps on a phone and also to put in a color LCD. Surely Apple copied Palm when they made the iPhone. All Apple added to that was a multitouch LCD and UI.


Sorry, but at least two products had color screens prior to the Treo. Handspring Visor Prism and the Palm Tungsten E2, both of which I have owned (and still do own the E2). And the Handspring Visor Prism has a phone adapter.


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By drycrust3 on 1/24/2012 6:42:09 PM , Rating: 2
However no Apple product predate's the world's first computer with a touchscreen! Yes, there was a company MANUFACTURING touchscreen computers before Apple existed:
http://www.elotouch.com/AboutElo/History/default.a...
You can see there are slight differences between the iPad and the Elographics product.
This photo was taken in 1973, 3 years prior to the founding of Apple as a company.


RE: HP should be suing Apple.
By Fritzr on 1/24/2012 9:06:39 PM , Rating: 2
They used touchscreens after 1977.
quote:
Finally, in January of 1977, we were able to hire Bill Gibson, who not only knew what to do to get the company off the ground, but how to do it. He had already been through the process once (Tennecomp). It was Bill who made the deal with Siemens, who would back us in the development of a curved glass sensor.

From then on, things seemed to look up. For the first time I felt the company would make it. It was so long in coming but at last we were not only selling a better product-we were actually making money! It wasn't overnight-it took time to make the dot pattern out of the right material for the new product to work the way they wanted. Bill (Colwell) and Sam spent many more nights and weekends in our basement trying this and that material, patiently waiting for it to cure and then measuring each dot to make sure it was exactly the right diameter and height and the spacing was right. I'm glad they did, as it resulted in the technology that so many of our competitors have tried to "borrow".

They displayed touchscreen TVs at Expo '82

So in the words of one of the Elo founders "I'm glad they did, as it resulted in the technology that so many of our competitors have tried to "borrow"."


Ouch
By Dorkyman on 1/24/2012 12:41:16 PM , Rating: 2
"...as Microsoft has rode along..."

Sister Terrence, my 4th grade teacher, would whack your knuckles with a ruler over that one.




RE: Ouch
By Helbore on 1/24/2012 1:05:21 PM , Rating: 3
I'd whack Sister Terrence with my ruler.


RE: Ouch
By mmatis on 1/25/2012 1:19:07 AM , Rating: 2
She would be jailed for doing that these days...


By Cheesew1z69 on 1/24/2012 12:26:20 PM , Rating: 2
They didn't look the same to start with...




By cfaalm on 1/24/2012 5:44:50 PM , Rating: 2
No no, you're only saying that because they're holding in wrong.


Prior art
By ProZach on 1/24/2012 3:30:12 PM , Rating: 2
So, it's pretty well known around here Picard had his ready-room tablet back when S:NG was produced in the early 1990's. And there was another tablet concept way before that in sci-fi that I can't recall. Since no one else mentioned it yet it looks like Harrison Ford's character is holding some type of mini-tablet in Blade Runner (for those who have The Final Cut version it's exactly at 00:16:00 - other versions should be fairly proximate, Deckard is sitting shotgun to Gaff as they ride towards Tyrell Corp). Or maybe it's supposed to be a memo pad, I think it's more fitting to have a tablet in the same camera shot of the hovercar interior ;)

I just can't figure out what Apple intends to do with the obvious arguments that were covered in another court case-- that being: human-beings have mostly similarly sized hands; we use hands to operate machines; and, the rectangle is not an invention that can be patented. Therefore, there will be very few differences in physical appearance (not to mention weight/mass) for a product in order to be used by an average consumer.

Apple needs to invent real stuff of its own instead of being such a bunch of ripoffs that turn into crybabies that tattle-tale to the courts with dubious arguments.




RE: Prior art
By ProZach on 1/24/2012 3:35:19 PM , Rating: 2
btw, Harrison Ford's character is holding the object with two-hands the same way a table is held and almost looks like he's playing tetris or space invaders
(dang it, no edit)


Cant copywrite size thats just stupid
By KOOLTIME on 1/25/2012 4:13:25 PM , Rating: 2
Anyone trying to copywrite a size ideal is just wrong. As even remotely allowing such an action to occur would make the entire world come to a stand still. No new inventions would ever be able to be done if such actions happen in the context apple implied with this device.

My toilet paper roll is same size as another brand they copywrite stole from me, I want to SUE APPLE STYLE lol. My 15" car tires are the same as billions of other cars with 15" rims of other brands SUE APPLE SUE THEM ALL - lol




By retrospooty on 1/25/2012 4:47:06 PM , Rating: 2
I'm just waiting for Apple to start to sue companies for using either black or white as teh color scheme. Apple invented both colors you know.


The long war
By Tony Swash on 1/24/12, Rating: -1
RE: The long war
By JasonMick (blog) on 1/24/2012 3:18:20 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Obviously the iPhone (which rendered all existing smart phones obsolete on it's launch) and the iPad (which created with a single product a new large tablet market) were both imitated. That was inevitable. But Apple seems to have been determined to try to deter the more blatant copying and cloning and that way is trying to do so is by wide spread attritional legal action. In the long run it cannot completely stop people imitating the look and feel of the iPhone, the iPad or iOS but it can make it more difficult, more fraught and more uncertain. If Apple can win enough legal engagements then it helps ensure that its products can compete based upon the companies core strategy which is one of product differentiation.

I'll bite... imitated in what way?

Multi-touch tablets were in the works at Microsoft before the iPad was officially announced... anyone with half a brain could see this was one possible direction the market could go in.

As for the iPhone, again, multi-touch devices had been played around with for years, Apple simply won the race to commercialize them.

In terms of form factor there's very little new or innovative about the iPad or iPhone -- again their form factor was dicated by the technology. The iPad, for example, liberally borrowed from portable bezelled displays (e.g. photo viewers, etc.) and simply shrunk the back face and stuck in netbook guts.

The innovation of these devices owes largely to companies like Samsung, Synaptic, and ARM who designed the actual hardware that made the iPad and similar devices possible.

As for iOS, have you ever heard of Palm OS? Virtually exact same idea and looks -- App SDK, "grid of apps" homepage, mixture of games, productivity, etc. The only difference was Apple nailed the digital distribution -- which again others (like Valve) did long before it did, just not as slickly.
quote:
Apple consider, with some justification, that back in the bad old 1990s when the company was being run by bozos that one aspect of the weakness of Apple's strategic conduct was it's failure to defend its IP . This meant, Apple's believes, that it's IP strategy back then was weak and ineffectual and that some aspects of what Apple created was copied and used to compete against it.

Whaaaa... "defend its IP"? We're talking about a company who founded its business by ripping off Xerox (Yes, I know Jobs paid Xerox a small fee for an extended tour, but clearly a foolish Xerox did not expect him to lift the ideas from PARC wholesale.)!

I'd be amazed if Apple didn't end up paying some big backroom royalties to Xerox. Apple has always been about taking other people's good ideas, refining them, and putting them out in a pretty package.

Its founder even said this, explicitly.


RE: The long war
By retrospooty on 1/24/2012 3:27:50 PM , Rating: 2
Not to mention how Apple totally ripped Palm off... The Treo was the first to put an OS and apps on a phone and also to put in a color LCD. Apple copied both ideas. What about that Tony? Thats OK, when Apple does it huh?


RE: The long war
By Cheesew1z69 on 1/24/2012 4:56:38 PM , Rating: 2
Tony is blind to these things, and it's painfully obvious at this point. His opinion, is fact for him. No matter what evidence is given to him, he just ignores it. It truly is sad.


RE: The long war
By x10Unit1 on 1/24/2012 5:13:11 PM , Rating: 2
"The best way to understand any particular legal case involving Apple suing anyone is to set it into a context, in particular a strategic context."

So true Tony!

First, steal others ideas and package them into a product
Second, patent those ideas and claim you created the idea and that is it brand new/magical.
Third, abuse the patent system/sue people that infringe on a patent of an idea that you stole and then claim/cry that everyone is stealing your ideas.

You are right, when you look at it like that, Apple is smart!!!

Hopefully, so smart that US Patent Office starts making changes to stop this kind of blatant abuse.


RE: The long war
By retrospooty on 1/24/2012 5:26:28 PM , Rating: 2
"First, steal others ideas and package them into a product
Second, patent those ideas and claim you created the idea and that is it brand new/magical.
Third, abuse the patent system/sue people that infringe on a patent of an idea that you stole and then claim/cry that everyone is stealing your ideas."


You better patent that sentence before Apple sues you!...

I love how Apple can patent re-inventing things. LOL


RE: The long war
By spread on 1/25/2012 3:12:41 PM , Rating: 2
Jobs is dead. You can take that mummified cock out of your ass now.

Crazy old man. Nothing better to do with his time.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki