backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 18 comment(s) - last by masher2.. on Apr 2 at 12:46 PM

Former Dell CEO Kevin Rollins flew away from the nest just before the storm

DailyTech originally reported on the unplanned resignation of former Dell CEO Kevin Rollins earlier this year. Rollins announced his resignation to the surprise of many, including those inside Dell. The company had been doing fairly well over the last several years and only recently lost some market share to rival HP. However, the day after Rollins' announcement, Dell received a class action lawsuit from its investors accusing the company of receiving secret kickbacks from long-time partner Intel.

Today, Dell announced that it will delay its 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission due to accounting inconsistencies. The company is not confirming whether or not the account misconduct is in relation to the Dell-Intel scandal or if it is a completely separate incident.


While Dell had a long history of partnership with Intel, the company only recently started to officially support AMD-based products. Intel received industry flak when it was revealed that it had either bullied or bribed a number of system integrators and stores to sell only Intel brand products.

According to Dell, an internal investigation has been launched and is looking into "certain accounting and financial reporting matters." While this usually means that there have actions committed along the lines of stock-options backdating or fibbed financial results, Dell remained ambiguous about its investigation. Dell's press release stated:

The Audit Committee’s investigation has identified a number of accounting errors, evidence of misconduct, and deficiencies in the financial control environment. The Audit Committee is working with management and the company’s independent auditors to determine whether the accounting errors necessitate any restatements of prior period financial statements, and to assess whether the control deficiencies constitute a material weakness in Dell’s internal control over financial reporting.

Industry analysts say that there is a definite link between the Rollins resignation and the complaint that was filed about Dell's partnership with Intel. According to the complaint, Dell received more than $1 billion on an annual basis so that it would continue to sell Intel-based products exclusively. Despite the news, both Dell and Intel remained quiet about their partnership.

Dell said that it will delay its filing even after the April 18th extension and indicated that the investigation will require significant time. "As we move toward the conclusion of our investigation, we are committing the time and resources required to ensure a thorough and comprehensive review and resolution of all identified issues and the implementation of appropriate remedial measures," said Thomas W. Luce III, chairman of Dell's audit committee.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

One meeeeiiillion dollars.
By Legenic on 3/30/2007 10:05:35 PM , Rating: 3
Seriously.. is that Dr. Evil in that picture?




RE: One meeeeiiillion dollars.
By Bladen on 3/31/2007 8:57:36 PM , Rating: 3
All I want is fricken accountants, with fricken laser beams attached to their heads!


RE: One meeeeiiillion dollars.
By apriest on 4/2/2007 7:06:59 AM , Rating: 2
Throw me a fricken bone here! I'm tha boss... need tha info!


By Seemonkeyscanfly on 4/2/2007 12:12:16 PM , Rating: 2
didn't Dr. Evil die in space? I think that's his twin brother. Dr. Moore Evil.


Error?
By df96817 on 3/30/2007 7:18:07 PM , Rating: 1
"According to the complaint, Dell received more than $1 billion on an annual basis so that it would continue to sell Intel-based products exclusively."

Don't you mean $1 millllllion dollars?




RE: Error?
By AQFP on 3/31/2007 10:49:58 AM , Rating: 2
Actually, $1 billion is probably about right. That is likely spot on from mid-2005 to mid-2006.


RE: Error?
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 4/2/2007 11:52:16 AM , Rating: 2
I think he was still quoting Austin Powers. As one million dollars could not buy you a day of Dell's time.


The story line should read accounting FRAUD
By cornfedone on 3/30/07, Rating: -1
By AstroCreep on 3/30/2007 5:34:23 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Anyone with a clue knew five years ago that DULL's Biz model went tits-up.

Hmmm...
Me being in the camp of 'anyone without a clue', can you elaborate on this one for the sake of me and my brethren? I'm figuring that with such an eloquent statement you must have some interesting insight here.


RE: The story line should read accounting FRAUD
By rcc on 3/30/2007 5:40:04 PM , Rating: 2
Curious, as they appeared to have made good money over those 5 years. Still are as I recall. A few accounting issues don't change that. Granted, the profit margins were probably reported high. But it was still a successful business.

Not that I have any desire to purchase a computer from them tho.

I think there are 2 issues in this case. One being whether they should have accepted the money from Intel. The other is the accounting issue. Whether it was reported as lower material cost (which is what it was), or dumped straight on the profit line (which is what I believe they did).


RE: The story line should read accounting FRAUD
By HaZaRd2K6 on 3/31/2007 1:15:45 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
whether they should have accepted the money from Intel.


Ever heard the only goal a corporation has? "To maximize profit." If taking secret kickbacks from a HUGE company like Intel will help them do that, why not? Sure, it's immoral and illegal, but money always wins over anything else (especially in the case of a corporation).


RE: The story line should read accounting FRAUD
By TomZ on 3/31/2007 2:49:27 PM , Rating: 2
Who said it was illegal? The only problem is that it wasn't accounted for properly, AFAIK.

Who said it is immoral? If Dell wants to get paid a rebate/refund/marketing resources/"kickback" by Intel to exclusively use their processors, what is the problem with that? That is common business practice in many industries.


RE: The story line should read accounting FRAUD
By phusg on 4/2/2007 4:52:49 AM , Rating: 2
Oh c'mon; because it's blatantly anti-competitive. Compete on price to ensure that Dell buys as many of your chips as you can sell, but don't blackmail them by making a kickback that is dependent on not buying any of your competitor's chips.

Something being common practice doesn't make it right.


By masher2 (blog) on 4/2/2007 12:46:00 PM , Rating: 2
A lower cost structure for an exclusive-only contract is not a "kickback", nor is it anti-competitive. Its illuminating to note that, during the period in question, AMD's market share increased , and sharply.

A nonexclusive arrangement meant customers could not buy AMD-based systems from Dell, true. But it meant they could buy Intel-based systems cheaper...and they could buy AMD-based systems from other vendors. Furthermore, Dell saved additional monies by having to support only a single platform, further reducing their costs to the customer.

Its a business decision about whether those reduced costs were worth the cost to Dell of offering their customers less choice. But its certainly not illegal nor immoral...though failing to properly report the terms to their shareholders may well be.


By lwright84 on 3/30/2007 9:00:01 PM , Rating: 2
you mean the "biz model" that nearly every other computer manufacturer has tried to imitate?


RE: The story line should read accounting FRAUD
By TomZ on 3/30/2007 10:19:51 PM , Rating: 3
I think the DT web site might need some extra code to check if user name name equals confederone, so that it can automatically downrate your posts to -1, to save the rest of us the trouble.

I mean seriously, do you ever post a reasonable or insightful comment? It's always the same thing - only the "company you hate" is different sometimes.


By crystal clear on 3/31/2007 3:22:21 AM , Rating: 2
Hey Tom this for you-(no reference to your comment)

Dell division will design Web 2.0 datacenters

San Francisco (IDGNS) - Dell on Tuesday announced it has launched a division to design customized datacenters for companies that rely on servers to run their businesses, such as Web 2.0 firms or Internet search engines.

The company famous for direct sales to customers is looking for salvation in a new corner of the market -- the world's largest corporations. Dell is struggling to regain its footing after poor financial results and accounting investigations led founder Michael Dell to dismiss Kevin Rollins in January and return as CEO.

Dell's new DCS (Data Center Solutions) division will extend the company's build-to-order business model from individual PCs to large-scale server farms. The division will optimize entire datacenters with the best power and cooling, networking, motherboards, form factors, and packaging, said Forrest Norrod, vice president and general manager of DCS.

Dell hopes to sell the service to only the largest Web-based companies, the top dozen or two dozen hyper-scale datacenters of the business world, Norrod said. Potential customers include finance firms, online retailers, government and academic agencies, petroleum producers, and major Internet players, such as Amazon.com, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo

http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20070327/tc_info...


By Zelvek on 3/31/2007 2:56:48 PM , Rating: 3
I don't think I have ever seen him make a post past his initial posts either. At the least he could try to defend is blindly hateful comments.


"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan






Most Popular ArticlesGoogle's IPhone App Sets Trend Rebelling Against Apple's Rules
November 27, 2008, 9:04 PM
Michelin Reinvents the Wheel
December 1, 2008, 2:39 PM
Tom's Holiday Gift Guide
November 28, 2008, 2:21 PM
The Same Chip With Fewer Transistors; HP's Memristor Changes Everything
November 26, 2008, 11:23 AM
Xbox 360 Jasper Revision Available Now
November 28, 2008, 10:22 AM







botimage