backtop


Print 25 comment(s) - last by Super Speed Tr.. on Aug 11 at 8:15 PM


HTV-2 rendering at hypersonic speed  (Source: DARPA)
First flight resulted in loss of the vehicle 9-minutes after launch

DARPA announced this week that it was ready to give the Falcon Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 or HTV-2 its next test flight. The HTV-2 is a prototype weapons platform that was created with the goal of making a weapon that could strike anywhere on Earth within an hour. The HTV-2 would travel at 13,000 mph and would need only 12 minutes to get from New York to LA.

The stresses during the test flight are intense. The outside of the HTV-2 would reach a temperature of 3,500F during the flight, which is hotter than a blast furnace used to melt steel. The second flight of the HTV-2 was scheduled for today with a launch window between 7am and 1pm PDT. However, the launch has been postponed until tomorrow. The craft will lift off from Vandenberg AFB in California aboard a USAF Minotaur IV rocket.

“Assumptions about Mach 20 hypersonic flight were made from physics-based computational models and simulations, wind tunnel testing, and data collected from HTV-2’s first test flight—the first real data available in this flight regime at Mach 20,” said Air Force Maj. Chris Schulz, HTV-2 program manager who holds a doctorate in aerospace engineering. “It’s time to conduct another flight test to validate our assumptions and gain further insight into extremely high Mach regimes that we cannot fully replicate on the ground.”

This is the second flight of the HTV-2 vehicle. The first test flight was considered a partial success after the HTV-2 was able to launch, reached its Mach 20 speed, and collected a bit of data before losing contact and being lost in the ocean roughly nine minutes after takeoff. The initial flight was long enough for the collection of some data on the performance characteristics of the aircraft.

“Wind tunnels capture valuable, relevant hypersonic data and can operate for relatively long durations up to around Mach 15. To replicate speeds above Mach 15 generally requires special wind tunnels, called impulse tunnels, which provide milliseconds or less of data per run,” Schulz said. “To have captured the equivalent aerodynamic data from flight one at only a scale representation on the ground would have required years, tens of millions of dollars, and several hundred impulse tunnel tests.” According to Schulz, impulse tunnel testing is required to create a portion of Mach 20 relevant physics on the ground."

For the test flight set for tomorrow, engineers changed the HTV-2 center of gravity, decreased the angle of attack flown, and will use an onboard reaction system to augment the flaps on the vehicle to maintain stable flight. The Minotaur launch rocket will take the HTV-2 to near orbital altitude and then release the HTV-2 to fly on a hypersonic glide trajectory.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What's the point of this thing?
By 91TTZ on 8/10/2011 1:24:27 PM , Rating: 2
It looks like it does what ICBMs have been able to do for the last 50 years. What's the breakthrough supposed to be?




By Spikesoldier on 8/10/2011 1:27:04 PM , Rating: 3
maybe fast delivery to provide 'first strike' capability, and to avoid counterattack and resulting M.A.D.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By NullSubroutine on 8/10/2011 1:34:03 PM , Rating: 3
The difference is both payload and the speed in which it reaches the target. ICBM space vehicles really don't go that fast once deployed from from the launch vehicle, it simply free falls to the target (though newer ones can maneuver a bit).

This basically turns the re-entry vehicle into a bullet rather than an odd shaped ball, I'm also assuming based on aerodynamic design it doesn't require as high of an altitude as an ICBM does, resulting in reduced cost to launch (smaller rocket vehicles).


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By 91TTZ on 8/10/2011 1:46:46 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The difference is both payload and the speed in which it reaches the target.


Yeah, that's what I don't get. This has both a smaller payload and is slower than ICBMs such as the Minuteman which have been out for the last 50 years

quote:

ICBM space vehicles really don't go that fast once deployed from from the launch vehicle, it simply free falls to the target (though newer ones can maneuver a bit).


The Minuteman ICBM goes 15,000 mph and uses MIRVs. This goes 13,000 mph.


By MrBlastman on 8/10/2011 2:16:13 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps it is intended to be a conventional, non-nuclear weapon capable of sanction strikes from afar--putting fear into our adversaries. If we can take out a single building on the other side of the world in a country we have no forces in within an hour, it gives us tremendous flexibility when we only have a moments notice about a target being on site.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By lennylim on 8/10/2011 4:23:44 PM , Rating: 2
The MIRV reaches 15,000 mph as its terminal velocity - the maximum speed when falling towards its target. I don't believe it travels at 15,000 mph on its way to the target. Information is rather lacking, as you can imagine, and I don't know how long it takes for a Minuteman to hit a target from launch.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By lennylim on 8/10/2011 4:32:32 PM , Rating: 2
OK, according to one wikipedia article, we're looking at 3-5 min launch, 25 minutes approx. suborbital flight time, 2 minutes reentry, and all hell breaks loose. Literally. Disadvantage, launch is highly visible, rockets are expensive to manufacture and maintain, and warheads are somewhat inaccurate - because they don't need to be surgical strikes.

Again, according to wikipedia, the only ICBMs in the US are Minuteman III with a range of 8100 miles.


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 8/10/2011 7:12:10 PM , Rating: 3
Right and each of those is a MIRV hitting 6 targets. The real threat is nuclear subs and carriers that provide mobile capability to deploy nukes against targets anywhere at anytime.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By Reclaimer77 on 8/10/2011 2:06:03 PM , Rating: 4
ICBM's are exclusively used to deliver "special" weapons though. Maybe we don't want to nuke something and have the whole world observe it? Using ICBM's are kind of a one way ticket to mutual assured destruction and all that.

Also forget weapons for a minute, what we learn from making stable and reusable Mach 20+ aircraft could be very beneficial to future air/space travel.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By 91TTZ on 8/10/2011 2:15:05 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Also forget weapons for a minute, what we learn from making stable and reusable Mach 20+ aircraft could be very beneficial to future air/space travel.


Sort of like the Space Shuttle?


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By MozeeToby on 8/10/2011 2:17:01 PM , Rating: 2
Two things (kinda three).

One: This could very easily be used to put small payloads into orbit. Just going into a free fall parabola at maximum speed, release the payload at max altitude, and all the payload will need is a relatively small rocket motor to reach low orbit. And the orbit can be adjusted almost down to the minute the payload is released, and no complicated rocket launch to schedule. Longer term, the plane itself could probably be adapted into a single stage to orbit spaceplane, which is very exciting.

Two: At 13000 MPH, is a lot of energy. There was some research into dropping tungsten rods from orbit as a kinetic weapon, I don't see any reason why you couldn't drop them from this plane just as easily. A 100 lb tungten rod would pack an amazing punch with great penetrating power. A dozen 20 lb rods could take out a whole tank column in seconds.

And Kinda 3: ICBMs are huge, expensive, and scare the willies out of allies and enemies alike. Launch an ICBM for any reason without warning and you'll have every major military in the world jump to high alert and start warming up their own. That's one of the reasons (besides cost) that ICBM's are used exclusively for nuclear weapons, so there's no temptation to light one off and risk starting WWIII.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By 91TTZ on 8/10/2011 3:24:27 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
And Kinda 3: ICBMs are huge, expensive, and scare the willies out of allies and enemies alike. Launch an ICBM for any reason without warning and you'll have every major military in the world jump to high alert and start warming up their own. That's one of the reasons (besides cost) that ICBM's are used exclusively for nuclear weapons, so there's no temptation to light one off and risk starting WWIII.


How will they be able to tell that this isn't an ICBM? It's being launched by a Minotaur IV rocket, which is just a decommissioned Peacekeeper ICBM.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minotaur_IV


By DanNeely on 8/10/2011 3:30:32 PM , Rating: 3
This is just an R&D platform for studying flight behavior. The end goal is a hypersonic aircraft. You wouldn't need an ICBM to launch it. A plane using something similar to the SR-71's turbojet/ramjet hybrid engine would be able to boost a scramjet vehicle fast enough to ignite its engines.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By ekv on 8/10/2011 10:40:46 PM , Rating: 2
I'm guessing your 2nd point has a high degree of truth to it 8)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-51

Think precision-bunker-buster. And check out the comments at

http://www.dailytech.com/US+Looks+to+Jump+Into+Hyp...

in particular the back-n-forth tween porkpie and yours truly. I still like ninja stars, but tungsten or DU rods may be more effective. [The GAU-8 already uses DU rounds ... quite nicely I might add].


By DanNeely on 8/10/2011 3:27:17 PM , Rating: 2
This is flyable; ICBMs are only minimally steerable after launch. Also, while this project is just studying flight characteristics of gliders. Others are working on air breathing scramjet engines in the mach 10-25 range. Because rockets have to carry combustibles and oxidizers, and spend most of their fuel transporting fuel to where it's burned there's room for a major decrease in size and/or increase in payload capacity by using an air breathing engine instead. IIRC from back of the envelope math last summer roughly 10x.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By ndizzle on 8/10/2011 3:41:23 PM , Rating: 5
Obviously the purpose is to deliver Chuck Norris to anywhere he's needed on the planet in under an hour. I'm just hoping its completed in time to save us all from impending doom.


RE: What's the point of this thing?
By chmilz on 8/10/11, Rating: -1
By DanNeely on 8/10/2011 4:04:24 PM , Rating: 3
Chuck Norris doesn't have to go around the world in a rocket to roundhouse kick bad guys into eternity. He just jumps and kicks the planet twice while airborne. Once to start it spinning; a second time to slow it back to normal when has target is in range.


By sorry dog on 8/11/2011 2:19:49 PM , Rating: 2
I think Chuck must have decided Mach 17 wasn't good enough because they just lost the thing.


By Bubbacub on 8/10/2011 6:01:29 PM , Rating: 2
this appears to be actually flying in a controlled manner using flight surfaces through the atmosphere.

an icbm warhead is essentially a blunt cone (i.e. a small apollo capsule shape!) with an ablative coating that vaporises off thereby preventing the steel capsule from evaporating. There is nothing very clever about this.

this tech demonstrator is shaped like a plane/lifting body. it actually flies at mach 20. to turn it will need to be able to deflect mach 20 airstreams in a controlled manner.

no one has done anything like this ever before.

even the space shuttle effectively dropped like a stone until it got very slow and close to the ground and was able to stop using the RCS thrusters to steer.

the technologies being demonstrated are for durable (?actively cooled) TPS (thermal protection system) and for modelling of a lifting body in a mach 20 airstream

in short this is really very very cool. if we ever want hypersonic transport (and i for one am sick of long plane journeys) then this kind of technology needs to be mastered.


By painlesspics on 8/11/2011 12:39:11 PM , Rating: 2
The difference is, ICBMs go 15,000 mph in space. This does Mach 20 within the atmosphere. Significant differeces in aerodynamics, technology, applications, and research potential between the two platforms.


And it failed again.
By 91TTZ on 8/11/2011 2:58:18 PM , Rating: 2
Lost contact again.




RE: And it failed again.
By hduser on 8/11/2011 3:15:45 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe it went so fast it traveled in time like Superman did. Now did it go with or against the rotation of the earth? This way we know if we should try to make contact with it yesterday or tomorrow.


Just one
By MaterKush on 8/10/2011 3:28:14 PM , Rating: 2
The W87 is an American thermonuclear missile warhead. It was created for use on the MX or Peacekeeper ICBM, 50 of which, with up to 12 warheads per missile, were deployed during the 1986-2005 period. Starting in 2007, 200 of the W87 warheads from now-retired MX/Peacekeeper missiles will be retrofitted onto much older Minuteman III missiles, with only one warhead on each missile.[1] The Minuteman carries 1 thermonuclear warhead. Just one




Super Gliders WTF?
By Super Speed Train on 8/11/2011 8:15:49 PM , Rating: 1
And we can not find the money to build Super Speed Trains in the USA? WTF http://superspeedtrain.com




"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki