backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 16 comment(s) - last by Raidin.. on Mar 4 at 4:15 PM


Illustration of DARPS Virtual Satellite Network  (Source: Networkworld)
Virtual satellites will use wireless networking to communicate between unconnected components

DARPA is not afraid to drop huge amounts of money on projects that sound pretty far out at times. DARPA’s most recent project has it spending $32M dollars to develop technology to allow for a virtual satellite network.

DARPA announced this week that it awarded contracts for the first phase of its Future, Fast, Flexible, Fractionated, Free-Flying Spacecraft United by Information Exchange (System F6) program (PDF). The contracts were awarded to Boeing in the amount of $12,891,049, Lockheed Martin Space Systems for $5,762,781, Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp for $6,159,866 and to Orbital Sciences Corp for $13,648,758.

DARPA says the program intends to show that large monolithic satellites can be replaced by a group of smaller, individually launched satellites connected by a wireless network in orbit and flown in a cluster. The stated ultimate goal for the System F6 project is to have a fractioned spacecraft system and demonstrate it in orbit in approximately four years.

Dr. Owen Brown, DARPA F6 Program Manager said in a statement, “We see many benefits to fractionation. Fractionation provides the flexibility to launch individual payloads when they are ready so that an otherwise complex, multi-payload program isn’t delayed. It diversifies risk during launch by not putting all of our eggs into one basket, greatly improves robustness to attack, and provides the capability to rapidly replace a failed component without needing complex in-orbit servicing.”

“And we have the potential to take advantage of Moore’s law by frequently upgrading on-orbit computing resources using relatively small modules, as opposed to waiting decades until we replace the entire spacecraft,” Brown continued. “The F6 architecture will demonstrate an approach that will enable us to do these types of crucial space activities in the future, and maybe even some incredible things we haven’t even begun to consider.”

The first phase of the project will allow contractors to develop key technologies to enable the fractionated approach along with the required robust wireless communications and fault-tolerant distributed computing. Contractors will choose a space system mission and develop a system to accomplish it. The contractors are also developing systems to test the designs as well among other things.

DARPA was in the news in January 2008 with the announcement of a nanotube anti-radiation pill under development.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

"Huge" amounts of money?
By Pauli on 2/29/2008 2:32:39 PM , Rating: 5
When talking defense projects, 32M dollars does not even come close to "huge". "Incredibly minuscule" is a more appropriate term. Considering a typical engineer in the US costs more than US$200,000 per year (including salary, office space, benefits, other overhead), this amounts to probably a 4-year, 30-person project. Pretty small potatoes compared to some of the huge projects DARPA runs.




RE: "Huge" amounts of money?
By eye smite on 2/29/2008 2:58:21 PM , Rating: 3
I agree when typically we hear about hundreds of millions or into the billions on projects these days.


RE: "Huge" amounts of money?
By wwwebsurfer on 2/29/2008 2:58:27 PM , Rating: 2
Well said. 'Huge' would have been 34 Billion, and for a defense project of this magnitude (including multiple satellite launches) it would have still been reasonable. $8M/year is pocket change to DARPA.


RE: "Huge" amounts of money?
By jbizzler on 3/1/2008 7:09:24 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I have family members who could pay for this. It sounds like it should be at least 320M, or 3.2Billion. One working virtual satellite should cost a few million. 32M just sounds like the money for research, and cheap research at that.


RE: "Huge" amounts of money?
By jbizzler on 3/1/2008 7:10:13 PM , Rating: 2
And is it 38M or 32M? The title and text conflict.


DARPA+Israel
By thomasxstewart on 3/1/2008 7:59:12 AM , Rating: 2
Darpa is located in arlington,va. Concept here is similar to page plus networks that offer LG phones that cost only for time used by buying cards, very GOOD system.

Here idea is similar in technology, array of small interdependent satelite balls then connecting to landlines below. 5 cents/minute nationwide service is result. However, here result is tracking vechiles & using drones to kill those unwanted. Something of waste, yet cell phone thing is done, so cell kill thing is next step. figures, find em',kill em. Just about any gu roo could tell us that. OOOMMMM.
omega.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.




RE: DARPA+Israel
By Cr0nJ0b on 3/1/2008 11:14:31 AM , Rating: 2
Ya think this has anything to do with China blasting satellites out of the sky?

My guess is that the spooks figured out that if there ever were a real big war with China, they would start shooting at our satellites like clay pigeons.

I would say it's a good good idea, but I can promise that it's the start of another arms race. This time in space.

We will be coming up with more and stronger defense and attack satellites. The system will be designed to get new ones up in the sky quicker and to allow us to replenish those that have been lost. Payloads will use more power and thus have a shorter lifespan, but will be replaced when they die...

Not that I mind spending billions on another arms race. I'm just happy that it's not for nukes and bombers.


RE: DARPA+Israel
By danrien on 3/2/2008 12:57:00 PM , Rating: 2
plus we have all those aegis cruise ships waiting around to blast chinese satellites out of the sky, so we have nothing to worry about.


Mmmm...
By Spartan Niner on 3/1/2008 2:07:13 PM , Rating: 2
One step closer to developing Skynet. The machine overlords drool (figuratively) in anticipation.




RE: Mmmm...
By brenatevi on 3/3/2008 12:00:19 AM , Rating: 3
Why is it any time there is an improvement in technology, especially communications between machines, that people invoke Skynet? I think an AI would commit suicide within seconds of accessing the internet. "LOLcats? OMG, 1 n33d 2 d13."


Huh....
By SiliconAddict on 3/1/2008 4:12:25 AM , Rating: 3
Imagine how much the Empire could have saved in construction costs with this tech...




Wardriving er flying
By Ashrac on 2/29/2008 4:19:34 PM , Rating: 2
One step closer to wireless internet access in space!




Incremental update
By tygrus on 3/2/2008 12:59:36 AM , Rating: 2
Phase 1 is mostly theoretical. They are not building the whole cluster of satelites but methods/designs for separating and inter-sat communications. The building, application and integration comes in later stages prior to the final launch project (which may actualy be someone elses sat's).
Sounds great for planned capacity upgrade just be adding a new sat to the cluster every year or two. Drop a few old ones out of orbit and replace with newer sats with added network bandwidth (to earth and each other). Tack on a few earth/space monitoring instruments in sister sat using another sat for coms with earth.




War Satelitin'
By whirabomber on 3/3/2008 7:49:45 AM , Rating: 2
I can't wait for another country to drop $3.8M on a virtual satellite that uses these wonderfully new satellites wireless interconnects to steal data and eventually SPAM from space. Of course, the less(more?) obtrusive use was to use the satellites for their own adhock satellite network.




Is this really useful?
By The Irish Patient on 3/3/2008 10:19:53 AM , Rating: 2
Of course, all of this assumes that the hardware on a large, expensive satellite can be divided between several smaller, cheaper satellites. But the satellites I tend to think of have one massive, indivisible component.

DARPA's involvement suggests that spy satellites are at issue. A spy satellite that images using visible light is essentially a Hubble space telescope pointed down. The satellite that holds the primary mirror is going to be big, heavy and extremely expensive. The same holds true for a spy satellite that images via synthetic aperture radar. So I'm not sure I see the point to this.




So...
By Raidin on 3/4/2008 4:15:15 PM , Rating: 2
Finally the government realizes that it's easier to upgrade the RAM in your PC then wait until it's obsolete then go shell out a ton for a new Dell. =P




"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki