backtop


Print 97 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jul 13 at 5:25 PM


Buttocks implants are one place terrorists could hide a suicide bomb to attack an airline.  (Source: Dr. Elie Gharios)

Even "enhanced" pat downs may not detect bombs concealed in buttocks or breast implants, or directly inserted into the rectum.  (Source: Craig F. Walker, The Denver Post)

Trained dogs could detect explosives inserted into the rectum, if they got a good whiff of passengers anal regions.  (Source: AP Photo)
Let the cavity searches commence

These days the U.S. Transportation Safety Administration resorts to extreme lengths to ferret out possible terrorists.  They frisk the genital region of children during "enhanced searches" (though they use the back of their hands to avoid impropriety) and they've even required some elderly individuals to remove their adult diapers -- even a 95-year-old woman with leukemia.  And of course there's the ever present body scanners, which supposedly can't store pictures of you in the nude even though court documents say otherwise.

I. Anal, Breast, and Buttock Bombs Could Prove Deadly

But for all of those invasions of privacy, U.S. security officials say that it may not be enough.  According to U.S. security officials speaking anonymously to CNN, a top Al Qaeda leader may look to use body cavity and implanted bombs to attack U.S. aircraft in the near future.

Ibrahim Hasan al-Asiri, the top bomb maker for al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), already has carried out some audacious attack schemes.  One failed attack on December 25, 2009 saw a terrorist try to use an underwear bomb.

Now Mr. al-Asiri is reportedly plotting to equip militants with bombs either surgically implanted or inserted into body cavities.

Intelligence operatives recently learned of the plot and have briefed airlines, U.S. security agencies, and the U.S. Armed Forces.

The possibility of such devious devices is alarming, but not particularly surprising.  A skillful surgery could disguise a relatively large implanted bomb inside the gut of a man or woman or inside the breasts or buttocks of a woman.  Such bombs would be impossible to detect with body scanners, unless the bomb produced a noticeable contour under the skin.

Similarly, bombers could resort to a technique long used by drug smugglers -- inserting goods into their rectum.  Experts say that over a pound of explosives could be inserted into the rectum, without it being visible to body scanners or pat downs.

The TSA says the only hope against these kind of attacks is "overlapping layers of security", such as patrols by bomb sniffing dogs, intelligence that could detect plots in advance, or interactions with passengers.  The latter could prove particularly affective, as a bomber with a large quantity of explosive in his/her rectum might appear uncomfortable.  However, against implants or terrorists with experience inserting large objects into their rectum, these telltale signs could not be present.

TSA Administrator John Pistole says the agency is taking anal and implant bombs very seriously.  He states, "The information is that terrorists are aware of this type of technique and interested in using it, but there is no specific threat as to a date and time and a specific flight. All of those [extra] layers of security gives us the strongest defense and the best opportunity to detect and deter this from happening."

II. Terrorists Could Use Drugs to Dull the Pain

Security consultant Ron Rafi told CNN, though, that the TSA is now one step behind terrorists.  He states, "I think we have come to the point where our technology capabilities have been exhausted to the limit, and right now there's no further technology that can be applied to mitigate this kind of risk."

He notes that the TSA is not authorized to subject passengers to X-ray imaging, which would expose them to a higher level of radiation.

Washington Hospital Center specialist Dr. Jack Sava confirms that bombs in buttocks or breasts could be a real possibility, but that terrorists would have a narrow window to use them before they became terminally ill with side effects.

He remarks, "In many types of infections after surgery, there can be a kind of honeymoon period of a few days. But once you get several days after the operation, I think that's when you'd start to see signs that would begin with pain and fever. That would get worse and worse, and ultimately be fatal if nothing were done"

Mr. Rafi warns the TSA to watch for nervous behavior or symptoms indicative of drugs that could be used to disguise the discomfort of inserted anal cavity or implant bombs.  He comments, "One thing obviously is an elevated level of stress, and in (the case of a human bomb) it would probably be extreme. You may also see some influence of drugs to ease pain."


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

BLARG
By Motoman on 7/7/2011 3:16:35 PM , Rating: 5
First of all, as always, the TSA is a scam and deserves nothing but to be disbanded and publicly mocked.

Having said that, I volunteer to do the buttock, breast, and anal checks. But only on hot chicks. And with my penis.




RE: BLARG
By frobizzle on 7/7/2011 3:30:24 PM , Rating: 5
The TSA is just using the boogeyman (or as Mr. Burns calls it, the booger man) to further their self survival.

Watch out, there's a terrorist behind every bush and under every rock!

Complete and epic government fail!


RE: BLARG
By Pirks on 7/7/11, Rating: -1
RE: BLARG
By Flunk on 7/7/2011 4:23:30 PM , Rating: 5
When you call people "pussies" are you referring to the people who complain instead of sitting idly by while a government agency institutes insane policies that don't even work?

I humbly suggest that it's you who are the pussy for submitting to these ineffective scare tactics.


RE: BLARG
By paydirt on 7/7/2011 4:33:33 PM , Rating: 5
I love how they use scare tactics to award (B)million dollar contracts to the military-industrial complex. We cannot afford the Department of Homeland Security and the trillions it has wasted.

The terrorists won when they attacked us and we overreacted by attacking Iraq and Afghanistan, starting the Department of Homeland Security, and the gross expansion of TSA. It has cost us over $4 Trillion and threatens to economically end America's greatness.


RE: BLARG
By GulWestfale on 7/7/2011 5:19:17 PM , Rating: 1
so now religious nuts have more than just sticks up their asses??


RE: BLARG
By Omega215D on 7/7/2011 6:11:29 PM , Rating: 5
This is a quote from "The Siege" (movie about NYC terror attacks before 9/11):

Come on General, you've lost men, I've lost men, but you - you, you *can't* do this! What, what if they don't even want the sheik, have you considered that? What if what they really want is for us to herd our children into stadiums like we're doing? And put soldiers on the street and have Americans looking over their shoulders? Bend the law, shred the Constitution just a little bit? Because if we torture him, General, we do that and everything we have fought, and bled, and died for is over. And they've won. They've already won!


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/7/11, Rating: -1
RE: BLARG
By MrBlastman on 7/8/2011 10:52:57 AM , Rating: 3
Solve the problem easily. Allow carry permit holders to carry on planes. Let us police ourselves.

We don't need a nanny-state watching over us all the time. Time for America to stop living in fear.


RE: BLARG
By William Gaatjes on 7/8/2011 3:41:29 PM , Rating: 1
You are really dumb. Shooting guns on a flying airplane at high altitude. And even when the plane is not flying, more people will get hurt by ricochet bullets from trigger happy cowboys.

Terrorist : dead because of 2 bullets.
Innocent woman and child sitting behind the terrorist: Dead because of 3 bullets.


RE: BLARG
By MrBlastman on 7/8/2011 4:29:02 PM , Rating: 3
Dumb? What? You are failing to consider logic.

Logic dictates if more people carry guns then two things can occur:

a. Everyone gets pissed off and start shooting
--> This leads to everyone being dead
Not a good result.

b. Everyone realizes everyone else around them is armed and they form a mutual respect for oneanother.
--> This leads to reduced violence and when it does occur, typically occurs in a controlled environment or as a result of stopping a hostile situation.
Deterrent for Terrorists as they'll think twice about acting on an armed plane.

Are you seriously one of those wimps that would rather succumb to a Terrorist demands and do NOTHING--letting the whole plane die than to try and subdue them? With proper training, an individual will learn the merits of ammunition selection. Using things such as hollowpoints or subsonic bulletts will prevent the round from exiting its intended target.

BEST of all--with a weapon in hand--you think way harder about whether you will fire or not. Most instances of a drawn weapon lead to a peaceful conclusion as nobody wants to pull the trigger if they have to--and the one having the weapon pointed at them typically does not want to be shot.

Get educated on their safety and how to use them. Do this before you make another attempt to reply.

This article is all about the absurdity of how the TSA can't keep us safe. If they can't--who can? Who are you going to allow to handle your life? I'll say I'd rather let the people do it.


RE: BLARG
By ShaolinSoccer on 7/8/2011 8:32:52 PM , Rating: 2
What if everyone was armed with a stun gun on the plane instead of a handgun? You wouldn't have to worry about shooting any holes and stun guns could be used to subdue someone long enough to get restraints on them. Then again, I've seen people get shot by a stun gun and was quick enough to pull out the wires before falling to the ground... But still, it would be safer than handguns.

It's sad that I am even having this conversation. Makes me wish I could go back in time to the 80's...


RE: BLARG
By William Gaatjes on 7/9/2011 7:57:06 AM , Rating: 2
I use logic. You claim to use logic but you do not or only use your own ideal situation as input to your "logic". Something that seems to be common for a certain group of people.
The failure in your example is that you assume that if everybody has a gun, nobody will attack. Hello, think Blastman think. ? Suicide terrorists ? They are not afraid of dying. Your failure is assuming that these people play by the same rules as a sane person that has something to lose. These people are brainwashed and are usually already mentally ill and most of the time have nothing to lose. Thus easy to manipulate by psychopaths who claim to speak in the name of religion of any sort. It is no different then sects.

And no, i would not be someone who sit by idle. I do not mind getting hurt in a fight where only i get hurt and my attacker. But i have no desire in hurting innocent bystanders either. And that will happen.


RE: BLARG
By lyeoh on 7/9/2011 2:30:20 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah. Imagine guns being allowed on the plane so that all the Mr Blastmans on the plane can play "Blastman" in event of a suicidal terrorist or mentally unstable guy...

Whoopee.


RE: BLARG
By 91TTZ on 7/11/2011 5:46:18 PM , Rating: 3
Chances are that less people would get hurt that way rather than letting the suicidal terrorist take over and kill everyone onboard.


RE: BLARG
By RivuxGamma on 7/11/2011 2:11:37 PM , Rating: 2
cool story, bro


RE: BLARG
By frobizzle on 7/8/2011 2:51:32 PM , Rating: 2
Pirks is too busy worshiping his god, Steve Jobs, to be bothered with doing anything else.

Jobs used special magic powers to tell Pirks that as long as he is holding his iPhone the right way, he will be invulnerable to everything!


RE: BLARG
By chick0n on 7/8/2011 12:05:21 AM , Rating: 1
hmm yea they're so useful that there were so many times people got thru them without breaking a sweat.

Another case just happened recently, a dude kept on using fake IDs and fake boarding passes and flew around so many times. Guess what, the TSA didn't get him. it's the flight attendant who got him. imagine if he has some bomb ?

Talk about useless ?

TSA is nothing but a fucking joke. enough said.


RE: BLARG
By web2dot0 on 7/7/11, Rating: -1
RE: BLARG
By AEvangel on 7/7/2011 4:07:58 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Unless you have a better solution


Turn the security back over to the Airlines, make the company that has a real vested interest in catching them and keeping it's customer safe responsible.

Because if you think that GED graduate fondling or staring at naked pics all day of hot chicks on the scanner gives a hoot whether you live or die on that plane you have another thing coming.

Private security seems to work for a bunch of other industries(Power Plants, Banks, Armored Cars) not sure why Airlines get special treatment.


RE: BLARG
By Solandri on 7/7/2011 4:32:24 PM , Rating: 5
Because the purpose isn't real security, it's security theater. The number of people killed by terrorism aboard U.S. flights is minuscule. Just a hunch, but I suspect more people die of heart attacks aboard planes than from terrorism. Yet we don't require that there be a doctor aboard every flight.

The thing is, if the public starts to think planes are dangerous because of terrorists, they decide to drive instead of fly. And you are much, much more likely to die in a car accident than from a plane accident (much less a terrorist incident aboard a plane). So we've created all this security theater around airline travel in order to keep people in planes and out of their cars. It doesn't really do much of anything about terrorism, but if it keeps people happy to fly and out of their cars, then it saves lives. Turning security back over to the airlines would expose this lie and undermine its effectiveness.

Sometimes it's so hard to convince people of the truth (that terrorism is pretty much a non-issue), that it's better just to go along with the misconception and create an illusory "solution" to take care of the illusory "problem." Unfortunately, it seems TSA is being run by a bunch of people who didn't get this memo, and are taking their jobs a bit too seriously.


RE: BLARG
By Jeffk464 on 7/7/2011 11:23:19 PM , Rating: 4
Yup, like the security expert from El Al said. TSA security is an absolute joke, El Al looks for terrorists while TSA looks for weapons. El Al security has pretty much a perfect record since they got serious, while TSA is pretty much a joke.


RE: BLARG
By 91TTZ on 7/11/2011 5:44:21 PM , Rating: 1
We can't use the same tactics as El Al because they use racial profiling and that's unconstitutional here. Without a doubt such profiling works, because a 21 year old man from the Middle East is much more likely to bomb an aircraft as a 60 year old woman from China, but it's illegal regardless.


RE: BLARG
By Dorkyman on 7/11/2011 6:10:56 PM , Rating: 3
Unconstitutional? According to who? The ACLU?

Profiling is desperately needed in this country, and not a day too soon.


RE: BLARG
By GulWestfale on 7/7/2011 5:29:05 PM , Rating: 2
you want to make the same companies that routinely duct tape their planes together, cut back on maintenance, and make pilots work overtime to also be responsible for screening out terrorists, because they totally care about safety and not just the bottom line? please.


RE: BLARG
By someguy123 on 7/8/2011 12:47:03 AM , Rating: 2
Who's going to fly on your airline if you've got terrorists bombing your planes?

Where are the accidents being caused by negligence? I'm pretty sure flight is still the safest method of travel by far.


RE: BLARG
By bah12 on 7/7/2011 5:46:45 PM , Rating: 3
What happens when company A doesn't think it is as important and another plan hits a skyscraper. The cost of 9/11 wasn't the lost dollars of the airline it was the stuff it hit. Thus your logic is flawed, the ones that stand to lose the most have nothing to do with air travel at all.


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/7/2011 5:56:00 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Turn the security back over to the Airlines


Yeah cause they did so great on 911...


RE: BLARG
By wolrah on 7/7/2011 9:02:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Yeah cause they did so great on 911...
'

There are two things to keep in mind about the 9/11 attacks:

1. While hijacking and bombing of planes were well known threats, the idea of hijacking a plane to use it as a kamikaze weapon was practically absurd to even think about at the time, thus it's hard to fault someone for not stopping it.

2. Such an attack has about a zero percent chance of happening again, even if airport security hadn't changed one bit. Passengers now know it's a possibility, however remote, and odds are that any such attempt would rapidly result in a Flight 93 style response. Even if there were no air marshals or trained law enforcement/military personnel on board, the passengers will drastically outnumber any attackers.

Basically 9/11 was a one-shot hail mary where things worked better than planned. It's not something that we should be basing policy on.


RE: BLARG
By Jeffk464 on 7/7/2011 11:34:57 PM , Rating: 2
Nope Tom Clancy had the exact scenario in one of his books years before 911.


RE: BLARG
By KITH on 7/8/2011 3:02:00 PM , Rating: 2
In that scenario it was the pilot, not passengers/hijackers. If you had a terrorist airline pilot, you would not stop the attack with TSA body cavity checks.

Hijackers can no longer get in to the cockpit to overtake an airliner to use it as a weapon.


RE: BLARG
By Zoomer on 7/9/2011 11:08:53 AM , Rating: 2
The one that took out congress and the executives?

With all the hate people have around here, they might just give that pilot a medal.


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/8/2011 9:04:55 AM , Rating: 1
My point is that men were still allowed to board the planes with weapons and hijacked them. What they intended to use the plane for doesn't matter at that point, security still failed.

Now I'm not saying this means we needed a TSA. Just pointing out that the airlines aren't exactly blameless in all this.

quote:
Basically 9/11 was a one-shot hail mary where things worked better than planned. It's not something that we should be basing policy on.


We know that NOW. At the time, however, we could not know that 911 wasn't a prelude to more attacks. People were scared, they demanded action and safety and security, and we all turned to our elected officials to do their jobs and come up with a plan. There's no way that we would have accepted a "let the airlines security deal with it" approach when they just displayed their utter inability to deal with it the first three times.


RE: BLARG
By M4gery on 7/8/2011 9:50:16 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
My point is that men were still allowed to board the planes with weapons and hijacked them.


What weapons? boxcutters? Wow, what a terrifying instrument of death. No, what those terrorists did was use scare tactics against our pussified citizens and they completely fell for it. There were no bombs, no guns. Just loud-mouthed jackasses with packing tools.


RE: BLARG
By Cerin218 on 7/8/2011 10:08:20 AM , Rating: 3
As the hijackers on flight 93 quickly found out.


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/8/2011 10:12:52 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
What weapons? boxcutters? Wow, what a terrifying instrument of death.


So if it's not a gun you should be able to get it on a plane and threaten people with it? How were they able to smuggle them on board in the first place?

Airline security failed, utterly.


RE: BLARG
By Invane on 7/8/2011 1:01:45 PM , Rating: 1
Nearly anything can be used as a weapon in the right hands. The effectiveness in using that item to get what you want is limited by how effectively you portray being dangerous and push your victims into a state of fear.

Americans have become scared of anything, including standing up for themselves. Scared of terrorists, scared to discipline their children, scared of global warming, scared of nuclear power, scared of guns, scared of litigation.

We have a systemic problem that is propagated by a government that understands a fearful populace is easier to keep in line.


RE: BLARG
By Jeffk464 on 7/8/2011 6:34:22 PM , Rating: 2
The point of the box cutter is that it wasn't a serious weapon. When you think about it almost anything can be used as a weapon, I'm pretty sure you can still take a flashlight on to a plane. Passengers just have to overwhelm these guys, or in the case of the cavity bomb the passengers will just have to meet jesus.


RE: BLARG
By Omega215D on 7/8/2011 7:23:10 PM , Rating: 2
Jason Bourne and Krav Maga tought me how a pen can be a weapon...

Hell, I had a bunch of ballpoint and fountain pens in my luggage. My laptop bag had all these wires for various chargers and not really tied neatly together.

Was never selected to go through the x-ray scanner in all my 10 flights this year. Maybe the scanner picked up the forensics and police procedure books...


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/9/2011 12:36:05 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
The point of the box cutter is that it wasn't a serious weapon. When you think about it almost anything can be used as a weapon


Except passengers aren't allowed to bring defensive weapons onto a plane, right? I can't bring my legally registered firearm onto an aircraft despite my Constitutionally granted right to do so. So the airlines tell us that we don't need to protect ourselves, because they will protect us. And yet not a single employee was trained, or equipped, to defend the passengers and planes against ragheads with box cutters and plastic knives.

A freaking 15 year old could have drafted better procedures and tactics against those kind of hijackings than the airlines did. I'm not saying we need a TSA, but I damn sure think saying "let the airlines handle security" is about the most absurd thing that could possibly be suggested.


RE: BLARG
By myhipsi on 7/11/2011 10:12:23 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
A freaking 15 year old could have drafted better procedures and tactics against those kind of hijackings than the airlines did. I'm not saying we need a TSA, but I damn sure think saying "let the airlines handle security" is about the most absurd thing that could possibly be suggested.


The FAA adopted the armed pilot rule shortly after the Cuban missile crisis of 1961 to help prevent hijackings of American airliners. It remained in effect for four decades. In July 2001, just two months prior to the 9/11 attacks, the rule was rescinded.

You can thank your government for 9/11. Sure, airlines handled their own security before 9/11, but were restricted by the FAA. If the pilots in those hijacked planes had been carrying guns, the dipsh*ts with box cutters would have never been able to carry out their plans.


RE: BLARG
By Jeffk464 on 7/7/2011 11:30:13 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah that airline is El Al. Unfortunately they don't fly all over the world. Hell I say vacation in South America, not to profile but there are no crazy as* terrorists flying down there. Just because the government refuses to profile doesn't mean you can't.


RE: BLARG
By Samus on 7/8/2011 12:16:34 AM , Rating: 3
My girlfriend is a social worker, and one of the largest employers of the felons she works with is the TSA. That's a good/bad thing all in of itself. However, the problem with TSA isn't the employee's, but the initiatives of the organization and how it carries out such initiatives.

False sense of security. I just want to be able to get on a plane again without taking half of my cloths off.


RE: BLARG
By kattanna on 7/7/2011 5:17:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
So I guess if you went on the plane with a suicide bomber that could have been averted if TSA exists, you wouldn't have regretted it?


the problem with your logic is the simple fact that the TSA has NEVER averted a single thing. all they do is implement new rules AFTER something has happened.

and lets get right down to it.. just how do you protect yourself against someone who is willing to die to hurt you??


RE: BLARG
By tng on 7/7/2011 6:01:00 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry, can't agree with you there. How exactly do you know that the TSA has never averted a single thing? Just because you never read about it in the news or seen it on TV? It is my opinion (and maybe not a good one) that the successes of security against terrorists has been deliberately covered up to either keep the public from panic or keep the terrorist's bosses in the dark about what happened.

I will agree that some of the people that work the lines at the airports are morons. I have a friend that works for the TSA and she says that they are overworked, 14 and 16 hour days, 6 days a week for months on end. She worries that they will miss something that could be catastrophic.

As for someone who is willing to die just to get you, yeah, you can only do so much.


RE: BLARG
By chick0n on 7/8/2011 12:16:06 AM , Rating: 1
how do you know they actually caught something? like u said they didn't say anything about it. and consider how bad TSA name is. if they ever caught ANYTHING I'm sure they will tell every god damn living thing on earth about it, even my neighbor's dog that they're not completely useless.

but before then, yep, they're completely useless.

Watch just wait till something fucked up happen again, then you will know how useless they're (including your useless friend)


RE: BLARG
By mindless1 on 7/13/2011 5:25:31 PM , Rating: 2
What it boils down to is that people are only willing to put up with so much extra security when each additional layer proves far more intrusive and has diminishing returns.

When I get on a plane I accept the one in a billion chance there might be a terrorist on board. When I get into my automobile each day I accept there is less than one in a billion chance I might be in an accident and I sure as heck do not want to take a driving test, breathalyzer, or any other nonsense just to drive my car (unless it's court ordered if someone previously demonstrated that they can't follow laws).

The general idea is that American loves freedom and abhors a military state. To those who feel differently, I encourage them to move to a country more to their liking.


RE: BLARG
By TSS on 7/7/2011 5:43:05 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
but in this respect, the terrorists have won this round of battle.


Well i guess we then have to step up to the plate and add exploratory surgery to the security checks at the airports!

Lets see the terrorists foil that plan!


RE: BLARG
By quiksilvr on 7/7/2011 3:49:40 PM , Rating: 2
We appreciate your selfless volunteering pitch but we need people will tools that check hot chicks within satisfactory conditions. Suffice it to say, you are not qualified.


RE: BLARG
By rburnham on 7/7/2011 3:59:54 PM , Rating: 1
I like the way you think Motoman.

Kudos to whoever picked the Pamela Anderson photo.


RE: BLARG
By Pirks on 7/7/2011 4:06:31 PM , Rating: 2
That Anderson photo is way stupid, photo of Joker getting out of prison after surgically implanted bomb detonated would be much more appropriate here


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/7/11, Rating: -1
RE: BLARG
By Pirks on 7/7/2011 9:15:48 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
my Pamela!
no problem man, you can keep this walking silicone container to yourself, I just hope they'll stop posting pictures of her ugly mug in here, my eyes hurt awww


RE: BLARG
By 91TTZ on 7/11/2011 5:50:12 PM , Rating: 2
That's because you don't like women.


RE: BLARG
By jwdR1 on 7/7/2011 4:43:46 PM , Rating: 2
So what are you going to do if you find a bomb?

Or worse, set it off?

:)


RE: BLARG
By tng on 7/7/2011 6:05:24 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
So what are you going to do if you find a bomb?
quote:
Or worse, set it off?
Hand out clean towels to wipe off "debris"? Yuck


RE: BLARG
By Jeffk464 on 7/7/2011 11:32:43 PM , Rating: 2
I don't get the infection thing, if you encase the bomb in plastic or titanium the body doesn't react to it right?


RE: BLARG
By Motoman on 7/8/2011 1:03:10 AM , Rating: 1
...why exactly is a suicide bomber going to be worried about getting an infection?


RE: BLARG
By Reclaimer77 on 7/8/2011 9:10:26 AM , Rating: 2
Any time you cut into the human body, there's a risk of infection. I might be wrong, but I get the impression that this surgery isn't something you want to do in a hospital with a professional staff who will take all the proper precautions. Dr. House isn't going to hobble by and check on the progress of your ass bomb.

I would say the nature of this procedure alone would have a very high infection chance.


RE: BLARG
By Adonlude on 7/12/2011 11:34:14 AM , Rating: 3
Dude, NOT cool... Use the back of your penis.


=D
By rburnham on 7/7/2011 4:01:21 PM , Rating: 4
Kind of brings new meaning to "She has a banging body."




RE: =D
By n00bxqb on 7/7/2011 5:37:53 PM , Rating: 2
Nice ...

Porn stars just became a hotter commodity ...


RE: =D
By Omega215D on 7/8/2011 7:19:51 PM , Rating: 2
Careful! She's got junk in her trunk! Hit the deck!


RE: =D
By lyeoh on 7/9/2011 2:37:32 PM , Rating: 2
And bombshell looks :)


terrorists?
By Queonda on 7/7/2011 3:16:41 PM , Rating: 2
yes.. because the number of people trying to bring bombs onto airplanes has risen so rapidly...




RE: terrorists?
By ClownPuncher on 7/7/2011 3:43:55 PM , Rating: 5
If you want freedom, you better be prepared to give up your freedom for it. Err...


RE: terrorists?
By rburnham on 7/7/2011 4:00:41 PM , Rating: 2
And if you don't like it, you kin git out!


Get some perspective
By neogrin on 7/8/2011 12:49:38 PM , Rating: 3
The goal of Terrorism is to cause fear and America is afraid. So much so that Americans are willing to give up their liberty to Feel safe.

I said "Feel Safe" because TSA has nothing to do with Being safe. It's sole purpose is to give the illusion of safety.

And it's true, you are not safe, but terrorism should be the least of your worries: Between 1995 and 2005 the number of Americans that were killed through terrorism was 3147

But look at what has killed more Americans in that same time period:

-Died from a Hernia: 16,742

-Killed by Accidentally Drowning: 38,302

-Killed by Law Enforcement: 3,949

-Driving off the road: 254,419

-Accidental poisoning: 140,327

Get some perspective and stop destroying this country over something that has killed less people the Flu (19,415).

We have bigger problems to deal with.




RE: Get some perspective
By neogrin on 7/8/2011 12:53:08 PM , Rating: 2
RE: Get some perspective
By Invane on 7/8/2011 1:14:33 PM , Rating: 2
Bingo. The amount of money and liberties this is costing us is nothing short of ridiculous when you consider how much damage it has REALLY done. This is a political exploit being used to further personal, governmental, and corporate agendas.

I am not scared of terrorists. The odds of me stepping outside and dieing in a terrorist attack are orders of magnitude worse than winning the lottery. I have a greater chance of being struck by lightning and dieing. And I have a ridiculously larger chance of dieing in a car accident on my way home from work tonight due to some teen texting.

I AM scared of what terrorists are starting to cost me in the name of security. I AM scared of how much power this has been transferring from the citizens of this country to the government. And I am scared of the citizens that don't seem to realize this or understand the implications.


An old idea may be better
By darkpuppet on 7/7/2011 4:22:16 PM , Rating: 4
A bit of an old idea here, but it seems to work with the Israelis..

an article that appeared a few years ago explains...

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/744199--...

Basically, separate the layers of security and create buffers to minimize impact of security... it's a good read, and maybe something we should consider in an era where greater security is needed by all.

Of course, it might hurt the TSA as many techniques require trained screeners.




RE: An old idea may be better
By Invane on 7/8/2011 1:20:29 PM , Rating: 2
Excellent read. These are the things our government should be doing but is not.


Disection
By BladeVenom on 7/7/2011 3:23:24 PM , Rating: 2
Dissection, it's the only way to be sure.




RE: Disection
By Ticholo on 7/7/2011 4:01:33 PM , Rating: 3
But are our scalpels advanced enough to detect the explosives?
I say we should let trained dogs do the cutting.


Stop the PC bull!#$# and start profiling
By troysavary on 7/7/2011 8:08:33 PM , Rating: 1
There is one major group blowing up airplanes, and it isn't pre-schoolers or grannies. Every towel-head that wants to fly gets anal probed. Problem solved.




RE: Stop the PC bull!#$# and start profiling
By Pirks on 7/7/2011 9:19:47 PM , Rating: 2
real terrorists never wear any towels and they usually look like any other american, you idiot


RE: Stop the PC bull!#$# and start profiling
By troysavary on 7/8/11, Rating: 0
By Dr of crap on 7/8/2011 9:34:49 AM , Rating: 1
Of couse you know that that is not P C !!!

And that's the problem we have in this country. Hell France made them take off their face covering - I'm not going to use their word for it - to get a license and be in public. We can laugh at our selves if we let ourselves, rather than pick a fight with everyone that makes a joke about you.

Don't come to our country and then complain that you can't drive a sticking cab with CUSTOMERS that have liquor with them. Don't use our laws against us and then ask your employer for a special room so that you can do your 5 a day prayer. This is NOT how our country works. Everyone changes to be in the majority with the rest. We don't like the assholes on the extremes. You need to change to fit in with us, not the other way around.

I get so tired of hearing about the changes WE have to make to accomodate some new immigrants special "religious" wants.
Why is it that the these people are so religious? At most I'd guess there are 10-20% here that are SO religious that it runs their lives to that extreme. Most aren't that extreme. And our religions are more flexable than that.


Wish they would stop their BS and misdirection
By xyzCoder on 7/7/2011 11:40:12 PM , Rating: 2
The root cause of the terrorism we suffer from is our sick support of Apartheid Israel and our steadfast support for every crooked dictator under the sun (unless they have a pseudo-socialist stance like Gaddafi, who dared to get in the World Bank/IMF's twisted way by offering alternative sources of funding for things like independent satellites for Africans' telco needs).

Does anyone in America think that the Chechens who are terror bombing Moscow are motivated by religious jihad? The only reason we believe it for the terrorists coming from the Middle East is that our propaganda/media is focused on presenting the AIPAC/military-industrial-complex's message of false fear and on the need for us to protect ourselves from these 'unwarranted attacks' (and because the typical foreign Muslims are as brainwashed as we are into hating a false enemy). What a mystery, indeed, that we don't care about the root causes and only focus on dealing with the symptoms. As if anyone (including the very richest) can be reasonably safe in such conditions.

Anyhow, good thing for me that I don't care to travel much anymore, and hence that I don't need to worry about the real threat from these terrorists who more often than not don't even realize that their every action empowers their (our) actual opponents.

The real terrorists are the fat cats (+ minions) getting rich off of the lies, manipulation and BS. They are in charge in every single country I can think of.




By Jeffk464 on 7/8/2011 6:38:24 PM , Rating: 2
Wrong, Osama was mostly pissed off about the US presence in Saudi Arabia and then our humiliation of a powerful Arab state back in the early 90's. I'm sure he wasn't happy with Isreal but it didn't seem to be his main point of anger. Israel seems to be the main focus of Hamas and Iran.


We killed Bin Laden...
By Cerin218 on 7/8/2011 10:05:03 AM , Rating: 2
Can I have my freedom back now?




RE: We killed Bin Laden...
By Invane on 7/8/2011 3:50:38 PM , Rating: 2
Nice, wish I could mod you up.


Oh come on...
By MrTeal on 7/7/2011 3:16:46 PM , Rating: 2
Where does it end? At some point you have to accept that their are risks in life, and move on. Airline security is important, but it's getting ridiculous. Even before the security measures put in place after 9/11, not that many planes got blown up or hijacked despite the huge number of routes flown. Even with the previous level of security, flying on a plane was pretty damned safe. Now getting through security is a nightmare, and flying really isn't any safer than it was before.




Really TSA?
By carly on 7/7/2011 4:13:53 PM , Rating: 2
Now we have to worry about expolding breasts when we fly. It wasn't enough that the airlines are trying to kill traveling with their endless fees and kicking people off for the clothes they wear or for being diabled. Great that the TSA is warning about this. Now how about doing your job TSA and doing better screening and not letting people through security with expired boarding passes so they can blow us up. Traveling is an adventure. Found a great site to post about travel experiences at airlineslodgingetc.com




By Beenthere on 7/7/2011 5:59:09 PM , Rating: 2
Let's hope that any implanted explosive device detonates on a bumpy road to the airport and takes out a bunch of terrorists in one fell swoop.

Until someone is able to go to the airport and point out all of the terrorists for the authorities, the TSA is the best real time defense that we have. We already know of several attempts that were foiled. Without the worlds dedicated efforts to identify and stop these terrorists even more people will die. This is a never ending war that civilized society must deal with because terrorists are deranged martyrs.




Nature vs Tech
By Ramstark on 7/7/2011 6:19:16 PM , Rating: 2
Of course dogs sniffing asses around the airport is gonna be funny, and useful. But what about a large thick tunnel, where some kind of "microwave/scrambling signal" is always present? The cellphones/watches would travel though the usual automatic x-ray band and the people trough the tunnel, disabling any electronics on and under the humans...just a thought




Business is booming
By CalWorthing on 7/7/2011 6:31:56 PM , Rating: 2
The TSA exists to save the airlines. 9/12/01 no airliners were flying in the U.S. (OK, so two jumbo jets carrying the Bin Laden family left for Saudi Arabia).

The TSA show was designed to keep up the high flow-rate of people on to airliners.
An effective security screening system would have required a methodical process using well trained (expensive) staff's matched with pre-screening systems (well trained staff).
Slow, slow, slow, But safer.

Now the TSA is a big money maker. As is all the knee-jerk security infrastructure littering our nation, and sucking billions of dollars into the pockets of Erik Prince et al.

Otherwise, if you want to be safe, stay in the basement. O.K., not in radon, or earthquake, or flooding areas, or near coastal nuke plants, or near farms where they dump pesticides, or next door to someone with a meth lab.




casdf
By fdsafsda on 7/7/2011 8:09:05 PM , Rating: 2
http://www.benzlogo.com/

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




By Yaos on 7/8/2011 11:29:10 AM , Rating: 2
Terrorists that have struck a deal with with the seven moons of Arkon.

Terrorists that breed dogs that have been genetically engineered to explode on command.

Fat terrorists that have a bomb making factory in their gut staffed by two midgets.

Terrorists that think your a bad man, a very bad man, and wish you away.

Terrorists that use binary to create a new biological virus that is immune to everything.

Terrorists that wait on the top of houses and drop heavy items on you.

Terrorists that ring your door bell and run away, wasting energy.

Terrorists that call you and hang up when you answer.

Terrorists going to a public library and printing nothing but black pages.

Terrorists waiting until the last second to turn in their taxes, causing a backup in refunds and payments.

Terrorists making two trips when they could have made one trip.




They're having a laugh
By Danger D on 7/8/2011 4:38:42 PM , Rating: 2
Terrorism 2011: Come up with more and more degrading and inconvenient ways to hide stuff, then leak it and watch TSA submit passengers to inner-uterine searches and the like.




dsfvds
By nvnvlai3535 on 7/9/2011 8:33:15 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




fgjhgj
By juansm123 on 7/9/2011 8:10:00 PM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




ertrete
By zxcvb20 on 7/10/2011 7:28:27 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




dgfsdg
By ninainaidbuxing on 7/11/2011 7:20:18 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.ifancyshop.com

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




fdsa
By tangtangtan on 7/11/2011 9:59:35 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.benzlogo.com/

I tide fashion Good-looking, not expensive Free transport




No the stupid part is
By FITCamaro on 7/7/2011 7:52:51 PM , Rating: 1
None of the attempted attacks involving planes since 9/11 have originated in the US. They've all been flying into the US from other countries.




vxczvzx
By babanbang on 7/8/11, Rating: -1
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki