backtop


Print 35 comment(s) - last by SimonB.. on Nov 23 at 11:14 AM

A large group of companies and researchers is looking to revolutionize telecommunications with new light-controlling crystals

BASF, as the commercial says, is a name you might not know, but the company has worked on improving just about everything from surf boards to biodegradable plastics. The company is now looking to put its impressive research and development powers to work on a project that may not necessarily revolutionize optical transmission, but will sure do a heck of a lot of good for it.

NewTon, as the project is named, is a joint collaboration between BASF and several other research groups. The aim of the project is develop a functional three dimensional photonic crystal.

The major slowdown in telecommunications currently isn't the transport materials, which are largely optical fiber, but in the processing nodes where information is routed. There is presently no inexpensive and efficient means of making the entire process optical, and the signals must be converted to electrical so the routing hardware can deal with it.

While the speed of light is the speed of light, and electricity generally obeys the speed limit, the advantage to optical transmission is that one fiber can contain much more information than a strand of copper. This is done in the form of varying wavelengths. The idea behind NewTon is to make photonic crystals that can separate these different colors from the white light and route them in a generally productive and accurate manner while being cost efficient to produce.

They crystals are produced using aqueous dispersion, something BASF knows quite a bit about. A crystal lattice is formed using polymers, then the lattice is filled with silicon. The polymers are then burned out, producing a mirror image of the original crystal. Defects will then be created in the structure which act as the photoconducter, steering the separated wavelengths to where they are needed.

"A structured three-dimensional photonic crystal could be the key component for a compact optical semiconductor or even for an all-optical routing processor. Converting optical signals into electrical signals would then be superfluous," says Dr. Reinhold J. Leyrer, BASF's project leader in its Polymer Research division.

Eliminating the electrical part of the equation from traffic routing could be quite a boon for telecommunications companies, allowing much more efficient use of their available bandwidth. It could also lead to a faster, less congested internet for everyone, perhaps alleviating some of the need for providers to throttle or traffic shape data.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Superman?
By Mitch101 on 11/21/2007 2:30:03 PM , Rating: 4
Suddenly those superman crystals of information from Kryptons past dont seem so silly. In the time of silly lawsuits will DC comics sue for patent infringement?




RE: Superman?
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 11/21/2007 2:32:10 PM , Rating: 3
When you think about it, 3D storage is almost certainly going to be transparent/translucent structures arranged in the densest configuration possible. And when you consider the material (silica or the like), you're almost surely talking about a crystal!

The merits of science fiction are incredible :)


RE: Superman?
By Mitch101 on 11/21/2007 3:02:55 PM , Rating: 2
True. How long until the star trek fans claim it was thier idea originally? ;)


RE: Superman?
By Orbs on 11/21/2007 3:27:05 PM , Rating: 2
Dilithium crystals are transparent, aren't they :-P


RE: Superman?
By SoCalBoomer on 11/21/2007 3:31:50 PM , Rating: 2
You're thinking of isolinear optical chips - which weren't really crystals . . . but holographic storage medium.

And, yes, they were at least translucent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolinear_optical_chi...


RE: Superman?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 11/21/2007 5:26:09 PM , Rating: 3
Data Crystals. See Babylon 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon_5

This had so much correct about the future it wasn't funny :P


RE: Superman?
By Mitch101 on 11/21/2007 5:32:29 PM , Rating: 3
I wont be impressed with sci-fi fantasy influencing science until I can buy a working Light Saber.


RE: Superman?
By feraltoad on 11/21/2007 5:56:34 PM , Rating: 2
So you won't be happy until you're in the market for a prosthesis?


RE: Superman?
By MagnumMan on 11/21/2007 8:09:35 PM , Rating: 2
How do YOU know he's not the first Jedi? Hmm?


RE: Superman?
By rdeegvainl on 11/22/2007 4:44:11 AM , Rating: 5
Because star wars happened a LONG LONG time ago LOL


RE: Superman?
By oTAL on 11/23/2007 6:30:36 AM , Rating: 3
A cycle time is, young one.


RE: Superman?
By onereddog on 11/23/2007 12:01:09 AM , Rating: 2
I on the other hand am waiting for the day we consume mass amounts of spice and use druggy fishmen to travel distances.


RE: Superman?
By Ringold on 11/21/2007 10:35:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
This had so much correct about the future it wasn't funny :P


And yet some people deride such shows as almost fantasy.

In B5, Earth Force didn't use anything that doesn't exist in a limited form today at all, with only one exception. They used lasers, fusion or fission warhead missiles and mines. Their ships idea of gravity was rotating. True perhaps to reality, the bulk of their ships mass was dedicated to engines and, presumably, whatever they used for fuel. The Narn used rail guns, which isn't exactly impressive either.

That one exception would be, of course, jump drives that make magic little portals open to "an adjacent universe".

http://www.b5tech.com/earthalliance/earthalliances...

That place says "gelled deuterium" as fuel for its fission reactor, with a peak output of 101,408 terrawatts. That sounds like a big number, but, uh.. I do dollars, not watts and joules. 8 - 10 meter thick armor, so it's a heavy beast. Imagining current technology scaled and improved, I'd imagine such a ship would ultimately be possible (minus the "jumpdrive"), just expensive.


RE: Superman?
By TimberJon on 11/21/07, Rating: 0
RE: Superman?
By Souka on 11/21/2007 3:43:07 PM , Rating: 2
Actually I seem to recall reading an article years ago about IBM having a holographic storage cube....massive data capactity...

only obstacles they were trying to overcome were
horrendeous price
huge machines to write data
slow write speeds
expensive machines to read
slow reading
long term viability unknown

:)


RE: Superman?
By SimonB on 11/23/2007 11:14:44 AM , Rating: 1
That wasn't IBM, it was Sony. The technology you're thinking of is call Blu Ray.


households
By Screwballl on 11/21/2007 2:21:03 PM , Rating: 2
now when can we expect our Megabit or Gigabit network to be able to take full advantage of this not only on our home network but also throughout the entire internet rather than being stuck with 10Mb or slower broadband connections? I know the cable comes in through copper but would be nice to know when my FiberOp internet connection will be available (maybe by the time I retire in 40 years).




RE: households
By funks on 11/21/2007 2:35:57 PM , Rating: 2
This sure sounds like technology from the stargate show where they use crystals for control structures.


RE: households
By TSS on 11/21/2007 2:41:30 PM , Rating: 2
well, at the moment with hard drive technology anything above a gigabit (125MB/s) and it'll be faster then a regular 3"5 HDD, limits taken mildy. copper can achieve that, though it's nearing it's limits. there have been plans here to pull the fiber in the streets through to the houses but nothing has happened as of yet. i guess the costs are just too high versus the benefits. after all, my 8Mb connection allows me to download movies (read: youtube) faster then i can watch them.

if they'd connect fiber up to my harddrive i'd have to download a heck of alot of illigal stuff. it's the only way i'll be able to max out my connection again and claim higher speeds are necessary :P


RE: households
By TimberJon on 11/21/2007 3:44:52 PM , Rating: 2
Where do you live? I got fiber at my pad.


RE: households
By masher2 (blog) on 11/22/2007 12:33:19 PM , Rating: 1
> "copper can achieve [a gigabit], though it's nearing it's limits"

Actually, the CAT-7 standard is currently being developed, with plans to hit 100GB/s over 100-meter copper runs.


RE: households
By 3kliksphilip on 11/21/2007 6:17:15 PM , Rating: 2
Does this mean that I'll be able to play Counter Strike on American servers with out lag? (I'm from England)

Or does it just mean that the bandwidth increases?


RE: households
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 11/21/2007 7:42:50 PM , Rating: 2
This would almost certainly increase latency and bandwidth, as there is no electrical signalling and no optical-electrical-optical conversion either.


RE: households
By NullSubroutine on 11/22/2007 5:17:19 AM , Rating: 2
Do you mean decrease latency and increase bandwidth?


RE: households
By sheh on 11/22/2007 11:12:06 PM , Rating: 3
Faster connection usually means lower latency, too.

But there's no such thing as "no lag". The distance from (say) London to NYC is about 5,500km. Assuming a cable goes there in a straight line, with no routers in the middle, it's still going to take 18ms at the speed of light.


Speed of electric signals in copper
By Martin Blank on 11/21/2007 3:52:36 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
While the speed of light is the speed of light, and electricity generally obeys the speed limit, the advantage to optical transmission is that one fiber can contain much more information than a strand of copper.

Electric signals in copper are limited to about 2/3 the speed of light, much less than fiber signals. This doesn't mean anything for most copper runs, but long-distance signals can experience measurable lag decreases when replaced with fiber. A 10,000km copper relay would (not counting intermediate gear) have about a 50ms transmission time, while fiber decreases that to 33ms. It doesn't sound like a lot, but with increasing use of time-sensitive networked applications, those extra 17ms can mean the difference between a good connection and a useless one.




RE: Speed of electric signals in copper
By Treckin on 11/21/2007 5:57:22 PM , Rating: 2
who stretches a copper cable 1/3 of the way around the world?

At that distance, you would route through a massive satellite up-link.


By MetaDFF on 11/21/2007 10:29:56 PM , Rating: 2
To transmit data 1/3 of the way around the world you would use an oceanic single mode fiber link. A satellite uplink doesn't not have enough bandwidth compared to fiber.


By jettoblack2 on 11/22/2007 3:02:36 AM , Rating: 2
Umm, no.

The first trans-Atlantic copper cable was finished in 1866 and the trans-Pacific in 1903. Yes, more than 100 years ago there were copper cables stretching across more than 1/2 of the Earth. The same routes are still in use today, having been upgraded to fiber.

Satellites have horrible latency (600ms one way, 1200ms round trip ping) and not nearly enough bandwidth to satisfy current demand. Virtually all intercontinental data goes over undersea fiber.


By Hieyeck on 11/22/2007 12:56:29 PM , Rating: 2
The problem is not speed, it's signal degredation and bandwidth. Inherent resistance in copper leads to signals losing quality. The thickness of the wire also limits the initial broadcast frequency and amplitude. It's why Cat5/e is recommended at only 100m. Of course, you can lay thicker wires, but at a certain point, it ceases to become a wire and rather a copper pole :P


Angles
By ted61 on 11/21/2007 6:03:53 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder if they can send the signals in at different angles as well as different frequencies. That would put some serious capacity on a fiber.




RE: Angles
By Diesel Donkey on 11/21/2007 9:16:47 PM , Rating: 2
Surely the phase of the signal carrying wave would change over great distances, or maybe even small distances. I think phase coherence is a very difficult thing to achieve at any length scale.


Text error...
By PedroDaGr8 on 11/21/2007 6:13:42 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Defects will then be created in the structure which . The defects will cause the...


Umm, I think that something else was supposed to finish that sentence.




RE: Text error...
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 11/21/2007 7:43:13 PM , Rating: 2
Ah got it - thanks :)


Latency
By leidegre on 11/21/2007 5:26:33 PM , Rating: 2
I'll settle for lower latencies.




"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki