backtop


Print 9 comment(s) - last by Suntan.. on Nov 2 at 1:06 PM


  (Source: Skrenta.com)
Blekko uses human input to guide search options and help weed out spam.

A search engine modeled after Wikipedia was launched today.  Instead of relying on fully-automated searches, Blekko will depend on human input to develop, modify and edit search options.   

Search results are divided into seven categories that represent the highest volume of search traffic: health, colleges, autos, personal finance, lyrics, recipes, and hotels, according to the Blekko website.

Under construction for the past three years and designed as an alternative to Bing and Google; Blekko.com, will take a turn at eliminating spam from search results on the internet with the open-search, user-based system.

"We realized we could make web tools that let users sign up and help make the search engine better," said Blekko chief executive Rich Skrenta . "If we opened up the process, we could not only get orders of magnitude more people involved than we could ever hope to employ, we could also create an open, accountable process around the search engine relevance data. "

Blekko will use live people to create slashtags, web pages generated into groups by specific topics.  The Blekko's website defines slashtags as tools that will search only the sites you want and cut out the spam sites.

"Bing and Google have hundreds of contractors that use web tools to refine this relevance data - classifying porn, spam, domain parks, e-commerce sites, fake 404's, markov-spam, official sites, and so on," Skrenta said.

Since its start in 2007, Blekko has secured $24 million to get the site up and running.  Their goal is to identify the 50 best sites on the internet in top search categories.  The site boasts 3,000 slashtags so far.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Oh joy.
By borismkv on 11/1/2010 2:34:34 PM , Rating: 2
Can't wait to see what happens when 4chan gets ahold of this :S




RE: Oh joy.
By foolsgambit11 on 11/1/2010 3:41:09 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Search results are divided into seven categories that represent the highest volume of search traffic: health, colleges, autos, personal finance, lyrics, recipes, and hotels, according to the Blekko website.
So are the porn sites are filed under colleges or health? Maybe under personal finance?


RE: Oh joy.
By pattycake0147 on 11/2/2010 8:06:48 AM , Rating: 2
Depends on the site.


Good idea, dont know if it will work though.
By Luticus on 11/1/2010 2:16:57 PM , Rating: 2
This looks like a really good idea on paper but I've got to wonder how nicely something like this can be done. I'm of the opinion that some/many things are best left to automation and searching the web and categorizing sites is probably one of them. Though a combination of the two systems would be nice, automated searching and categorizing and user based refining (maybe done by a vote or rating system)... now that would be a nice way of doing it!




By Da W on 11/1/2010 3:37:28 PM , Rating: 2
People use google because people use google. As long as you find stuff you were looking for, there ain't no reason to go nowhere else.


By PCAuthorityZara on 11/1/2010 4:12:57 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, that voting/rating system sounds neat. But rather than use votes, how about we measure it in how many times someone links to it? Yeah! Oh, wait, that sounds kinda familiar...

(Yeah, I know, I'm being glib. But there's a reason Google is so successful. I love including user metrics, but picking the right ones is key - and right now, Google's looks like the best method, still. Though I'm open to the idea of a more karma-based or whffie-based system...)


Interesting idea...
By mcnabney on 11/1/2010 3:10:17 PM , Rating: 3
Sounds fairly ineffiecient to require active human participation.

Do you know what might make it even better? Perhaps automate the whole process using computers. Those computers could send out little apps, something that acts like a spider, and it could cover the entire Internet and deliver the exact data a person is looking for. You could pay for the cost of this automation with a few small adds and maybe allow businesses to sponsor certain searches.




too bad
By Shadowmaster625 on 11/2/2010 8:32:57 AM , Rating: 2
I tested it out yesterday. I marked a domain as spam and then to my surprise that same domain showed up in my very next search. Also, when I used the /date tag, I still got results from up to 3 years ago in my top 5 search results. It is clearly broken and probably will never work the way they claim.




No thanks
By Suntan on 11/2/2010 1:06:23 PM , Rating: 2
Blekko – Powered by all the useless, jobless slobs that have nothing better to do than sit around all day and categorize webpages for free.

No thanks.

-Suntan




"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki