backtop


Print 81 comment(s) - last by Jackattak.. on May 19 at 4:13 PM

Craigslist folds under political pressure from attorneys general from several states

Craigslist is expected to drop its "erotic services" ads on the popular web site, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office said in a statement. The full removal of the ads is expected to take place sometime in the next week.

Craigslist officials recently met with the attorneys general from Illinois, Missouri and Connecticut, in a pre-arranged meeting to discuss the site's advertisements regarding illegal sexual activities.  

The site previously received weeks of pressure from politicians and law enforcement agencies, especially after Philip Markoff, 23, dubbed the "Craigslist killer," used the site to pick out people to rob.  The former medical student also was accused of murdering a masseuse he arranged to meet using Craigslist.

"Unsurprisingly, but completely contrary to some of the sensationalistic journalism we've seen these past few weeks, the record is clear that use of Craigslist classifieds is associated with far lower rates of violent crime than print classifieds," according to a statement by Craigslist, issued early to the Los Angeles Times.  "However, with respect to this new paid category for advertising by legal businesses, we will experiment with some of the methods traditionally employed in paid print classifieds."

Even though the erotic services ads will be removed, Craigslist will still keep something similar, though it will be closely monitored by employees, including a screening process before the ad is posted.

"New 'adult services' ads will be reviewed in the order received for compliance with posting guidelines and the Craigslist Terms of Use," a Craigslist note indicates.

Craigslist hopes by removing the erotic services ads, that politicians and law enforcement will cut the site a bit of slack.  However, the number of crime-related incidents tied directly to the site continues to pop up in the media, which continues to cause headaches for the Craigslist staff.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Ugh...
By Jackattak on 5/13/2009 1:45:57 PM , Rating: 5
Not that I care from a personal standpoint, but why is prostitution still illegal?

Oh wait that's right. The Religious Right. Stop forcing your stupid morals down everyone's throat. End the lobby.




RE: Ugh...
By dever on 5/13/2009 2:17:14 PM , Rating: 5
I have to say, when reading the phrase in the article "illegal sexual activities" when referring to adults, it made my stomach turn. Are we in the dark ages?


RE: Ugh...
By AnnihilatorX on 5/13/2009 2:46:06 PM , Rating: 5
Actually in dark ages prostitution was more open and people were more open minded with things like concubinages, courtesans.


RE: Ugh...
By Souka on 5/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By Samus on 5/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By FaceMaster on 5/14/2009 3:43:18 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
But first they'll make sex so unattractive we wont want anything to do with it anyway. The fast food and entertainment industries are already doing this by making people fat and stupid, so its only a matter of time...


Yeah, the entertainment industry is doing a good job of turning everybody into unattractive nerds who refer to computer games all the time.


RE: Ugh...
By amanojaku on 5/13/2009 2:22:11 PM , Rating: 2
That's right. I should be able to sell my body to supermodels, actresses, singers, dancers, strippers, porn stars, rich widows, MILFs and any other hottie I forgot to mention. That's the only reason I won't let them touch me right now.

Seriously.


RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By AntiM on 5/13/2009 3:16:54 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Nevermind that the country was founded on Christian principles.....


Do those Christian principles include slaughtering millions of innocent Native American men, women, and children, and taking their land? Not that they considered it to be their land, the concept of "land ownership" was an alien concept to them. How can you own something that owns you?


RE: Ugh...
By kattanna on 5/13/2009 3:26:24 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Do those Christian principles include slaughtering millions of innocent Native American men, women, and children, and taking their land?


if the crusades and the Inquisitions are anything to go by.. then yes!


RE: Ugh...
By mindless1 on 5/13/2009 5:10:54 PM , Rating: 5
Actually no, the majority of Christians were opposed to such things, religion has simply been one of many excuses leaders seeking power used to assemble masses, minority members of any group and let them act like the animals that people are.

More to the point, the Christian and other religious doctrines (Besides Scientology but they are a wildcard if you want to call them a religion at all) are not kept secret, we see clear contradiction in what they state.

Religion is one of those lines in the sand, but not the only larger groups. We also see modern day groups trying to leverage power like the Democrats, Scientologists, UAW. It's just that back then it was more acceptable for any of them to use violence than today.

Oh BTW, throughout history when one people took another people's land, how do you suppose that land was acquired in the first place? Certainly not by bartering animal skins or candy most of the time, even unused land was considered the property of the adjacent settlement.


RE: Ugh...
By InfantryRocks on 5/13/09, Rating: -1
RE: Ugh...
By Shuri on 5/13/2009 9:52:58 PM , Rating: 5
No offense bro, but you sounded like a complete idiot just now. If you don't agree with someone's opinion, there are better ways to express your views than acting like a child.


RE: Ugh...
By InfantryRocks on 5/14/2009 7:38:27 AM , Rating: 1
I render respect to opinions that deserve it. Trying to equate your lustful desire to want to bang hookers to the Indians losing a war is just pure idiocy.

And, judging by that guy's current rating, I can see there are many other fellow idiots that think he's right on target.

So I will ask this: if the Indians had won the war, would they have treated us any better?

And as a followup, what exactly does banging hookers have to do with dead Indians?


RE: Ugh...
By acase on 5/14/2009 9:24:09 AM , Rating: 2
To answer your final question, I guess it just depends on what kind of kinky stuff you are into.


RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/14/2009 8:22:10 AM , Rating: 2
When will this argument be tired enough to go away?

I said the country was FOUNDED on Christian principles. I didn't say no mistakes were made. And you're talking to someone who is one generation late on being eligible for benefits for those with Native American ancestry.

The fact still remains that the vast majority of the people in the US are Christian and believe prostitution to be wrong. But hey don't address that or anything. Just keep using your tired arguments on how America is so evil. Or how I even said that states can vote to legalize prostitution.

I guess you'd argue against our participation in any war we've fought since Christian principles teach that it's wrong to kill.


RE: Ugh...
By dever on 5/14/2009 12:27:53 PM , Rating: 2
Fit, I'm not with you on this one. The principals you are referring to are the principals of FREEDOM. Yes, many politicians of the day used religious rhetoric, just as they all do today.

What if 51% of Americans converted to some extreme religion (not mentioning names) and decided that a woman not wearing a burkha could be considered to be soliciting sex and should be subject to public stoning?

Whether or not a majority of the population has a certain position doesn't mean it should be forced on the rest of the population. In this case, slavery would still be acceptable.

The principals on which our country was founded and some principals found in certain religions overlap in places... so what.

What irks me to no end is religious people (I was raised in a VERY religious home) demanding religious freedom for themselves, but also demanding others follow their religious principals. Can you not see that these two things are incompatible?

You cannot have religious FREEDOM and expect others to follow the principals of one particular religion. That's not religious freedom!


RE: Ugh...
By MFK on 5/17/2009 1:33:05 AM , Rating: 2
Extreme religion?

Get your head out of your ass.
Thank you.


RE: Ugh...
By rdeegvainl on 5/13/2009 4:06:58 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
the vast majority of the country views prostitution to be wrong.

Got anything to support that?
Also, Though I believe it to be wrong, I also believe it wrong to have it illegal, as my personal views should not be used to deny others rights.


RE: Ugh...
By mindless1 on 5/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/14/2009 8:25:03 AM , Rating: 1
Sure. If people weren't against it, more states would have voted to legalize it as they have the ability to. But enough politicians know that the majority of people are against it so they don't bring it up in legislatures.


RE: Ugh...
By crleap on 5/14/2009 12:00:21 PM , Rating: 3
We were also against the bailouts. Did that stop them? Politicians are in it for themselves, we have long since lost our voices.


RE: Ugh...
By rdeegvainl on 5/15/2009 8:16:23 AM , Rating: 2
Do you realize that a large portion of people don't even vote.
http://elections.gmu.edu/Turnout%201980-2008.xls
Sure you get the majority that come for presidential election, but in 2006 only about 40% of eligible voters did so.
You also do realize that it is possible to win with out the majority vote? That an elected official can also not represent those they were elected by?


RE: Ugh...
By kattanna on 5/13/2009 2:33:51 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The Religious Right. Stop forcing your stupid morals down everyone's throat


whats interesting.. is that same group cries out how islamist countries like iran, should be more "open" like america .. all the while here at home, trying to make us as "closed" as they are over there.


RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/13/09, Rating: -1
RE: Ugh...
By kattanna on 5/13/2009 2:52:21 PM , Rating: 4

you said:

quote:
Nevermind that the country was founded on Christian principles and the vast majority of the country views prostitution to be wrong.


so let me change that to be pertinent in an islamist country

quote:
Nevermind that the country was founded on islamic principles and the vast majority of the country views women who are merely seen in public with a man to be wrong.


see.. by your own "logic" you yourself should be OK with them stoning woman, as their religious majority are ok with it.

you see.. thats what most of you religious people dont get. Your views are just that, yours. even if you are a "majority" in you area, that still doesnt give you the right to tell others who dont think like you how to act.

but clearly in your mind, it does.


RE: Ugh...
By omnicronx on 5/13/2009 3:08:25 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Your views are just that, yours. even if you are a "majority" in you area, that still doesnt give you the right to tell others who dont think like you how to act.
You are absolutely right, nobody has the right to tell you how to act. But that does not give you free reign to do as you please, there are many laws I do not agree with, but that does not mean I can disobey them at will. So once again, nobody has the right to tell you how to act, but you ARE responsible for your actions, and if such actions are illegal, prepare for the consequences.

At this point religion, or other peoples opinions have absolutely no baring on the matter.


RE: Ugh...
By kattanna on 5/13/2009 3:21:49 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
but you ARE responsible for your actions


i couldnt agree more!!

but from your post i must believe you do not live in a western country as its clearly the trend that no one is responsible for their own actions.. its always someones else fault, and the government is both your father and mother.

im hoping in another generation or 2, the trend will reverse itself.


RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/14/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/14/2009 8:40:09 AM , Rating: 1
Furthermore I can turn your argument right back on you.

Clearly the woman walking with a man who's not a member of her family didn't believe it to be wrong. So she should be able to because her beliefs don't agree with societies. So stoning her was wrong.

Where do the differences lie here? My argument doesn't prevent prostitution from becoming legal because I clearly state that the law can change. Your argument advocates killing someone who cared about someone else and merely wanted to spend time with them (assuming the two were together for a romantic interest) and there is no way to change it because anyone who speaks out against Islamic law in those countries is also imprisoned or killed.


RE: Ugh...
By MFK on 5/17/2009 1:47:01 AM , Rating: 2
How many islamist countries have you lived in?
I can name several islamist countries where 'women who are merely seen in public with a man' are NOT thought to be wrong.


RE: Ugh...
By DShadoW on 5/17/2009 1:51:43 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
The "Religious Right" advocates stoning women who are merely seen in public with a man who's not in their family or who wants to choose who they marry?


you got it whole wrong about stoning women issue ...
stoning women OR men are only for those who cheat there husband/wife ... and by cheating i mean having sex with another woman/men without marrying her(for men only) ... this is to avoid people from cheating there wife/husband...

and if stoning women in some of countries for them having sex with a strange man which the woman hasn't got married then this is only wrong ... cause they got the message wrong
about stoning issue ...


RE: Ugh...
By Screwballl on 5/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By Jackattak on 5/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Ugh...
By kattanna on 5/13/2009 3:43:11 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Without the religious right, this country would be like North Korea or Communist Russia or much worse...


yes.. cause NO ONE! wants to goto places like the Netherlands

please.. go get facts. now i know they will contradict what your local scaremongering pastor might tell you.. but they are what they are.. FACTS


RE: Ugh...
By theapparition on 5/13/2009 5:12:27 PM , Rating: 2
You do realize that prostitution is one of the only things that illegalizes otherwise legal activities.

It's quite legal to have sex. It's also legal to trade cash for services. However, if you trade cash for sex, that somehow becomes illegal.

Sounds pretty stupid, doesn't it?


RE: Ugh...
By g35fan on 5/13/2009 10:51:42 PM , Rating: 4
Ask for the sex or sex act to be videotaped and then it is not illegal. Isn't that even stupider?


RE: Ugh...
By JKflipflop98 on 5/14/2009 6:30:42 AM , Rating: 2
All you have to do is have them sign a "I'm over 18" form and film it. Then it's pornography and it's perfectly legal.


RE: Ugh...
By theapparition on 5/15/2009 12:38:50 AM , Rating: 2
Yep. I forgot to mention that.


RE: Ugh...
By invidious on 5/13/2009 3:32:49 PM , Rating: 2
Practically every aspect of law has roots in religion, from prostitution to murder. Get over it.

I don't see how you pin this law being maintained on the "right" either, I dont remember any pro prostitution rallies during Obama's campaign.


RE: Ugh...
By MrBungle123 on 5/14/2009 2:27:09 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Practically every aspect of law has roots in religion, from prostitution to murder. Get over it.


I think religions were just the first ones to write it down. Many morality issues that religion picks sides on people just know instinctively.

Humans being social animals must have some sense of "morality" otherwise the society would completely breakdown.

Are stealing, murder, arson, and rape wrong because [insert religious text here] says so or are they wrong because they hurt people? I tend to think it is the latter, and will use civilization pre-dating [insert religious text here] as the justification for my reasoning.


RE: Ugh...
By FITCamaro on 5/14/2009 8:32:33 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Are stealing, murder, arson, and rape wrong because [insert religious text here] says so or are they wrong because they hurt people


In some cases it is. In some Islamic countries if a man rapes a woman, the woman is the one prosecuted because she shouldn't have been outside without a male from her family or her husband. Then you also have "honor killings" that are becoming increasingly more frequent which some factions of Islam are perfectly ok with.

You call it what you want but its still rape and murder.


RE: Ugh...
By DShadoW on 5/18/2009 6:52:42 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
In some Islamic countries if a man rapes a woman, the woman is the one prosecuted because she shouldn't have been outside without a male from her family or her husband.


well as you said this is in some Islamic country BUT..
that not religion Islam cause in Islam if man rapes a woman the government will whipped the man 100 times and put in jail for 1 year if he isn't married or virgin ...but if he is then death is what he deserve for the cause that he did to the woman who being raped ... there is nothing for her only the man or the family of the man will give the woman money like an atone for the damage that causeed to the woman..

there are some wrong rules in some Islamic countries but that doesn't mean it's from religion itself ...the religion have a straight statements about this... so any wrong law in some of Islamic country doesn't mean the wrong is from the religion


RE: Ugh...
By arazok on 5/13/2009 3:50:09 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
The Religious Right. Stop forcing your stupid morals down everyone's throat. End the lobby.


quote:
Oh wait that's right. The Religious Right. Stop forcing your stupid morals down everyone's throat. End the lobby.


Serious. Haven’t they noticed it’s the environmental left’s turn to force their stupid morals down everyone’s throat?

Prostitution, gambling, drugs are so yesterday. It’s time to start banning lawn care products, plastic bags, big cars, and cigarettes.


RE: Ugh...
By Jackattak on 5/13/2009 4:12:46 PM , Rating: 2
LOL! Nice one. Certainly I'm no Democrat so I'm sorry if I came across as one.

I don't lean anywhere except toward true personal freedom (along with that, personal accountability).


RE: Ugh...
By kyleb2112 on 5/13/2009 5:44:04 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, please. There's at least as much pressure from the far left feminists groups against legalized prostitution. If you get nabbed a as a John and sentenced to one of those re-education classes, it won't be some Jerry Falwell preacher telling you you're going to hell. It'll be some Gloria Steinem feminist type telling you it's all men's fault and all prostitutes are victims.


RE: Ugh...
By Jackattak on 5/13/2009 5:54:03 PM , Rating: 2
Can't argue with that. +1


RE: Ugh...
By KCjoker on 5/13/2009 6:07:26 PM , Rating: 2
Oh please, give me the names of Dems that favor legalizing prostitution. Just like gay marriage, not even Obama is in favor of it.


RE: Ugh...
By SilthDraeth on 5/13/2009 10:32:42 PM , Rating: 2
I am religious right and I believe prostitution should be legal. So stop assuming it is us pushing our morals down your throat.


RE: Ugh...
By meepstone on 5/14/2009 5:20:51 PM , Rating: 2
Sex is legal
Selling is legal

Selling sex illegal

who knows.


RE: Ugh...
By ShaolinSoccer on 5/18/2009 2:59:34 AM , Rating: 3
You have obviously never had children. Especially a daughter.


RE: Ugh...
By Jackattak on 5/19/2009 4:13:43 PM , Rating: 2
No, I haven't. And I'm proud of that fact, actually. The world is populated enough and I'm happy to be happily married to a hot wife for 8 years at the age of 32, looking like I'm 24 (and yes I equate my happy marriage, hot wife, and young looks to *gasp* NOT HAVING CHILDREN).

Anyone who fears their daughter becoming a prostitute needs to look at two things:

1) The way their treating their daughter at home.

2) The fact that *gasp* your kids aren't you and might not become what you always dreamed they would.


Just a hypothetical question
By DOSGuy on 5/13/2009 1:44:40 PM , Rating: 2
But how are people supposed to find hookers now?




RE: Just a hypothetical question
By sapiens74 on 5/13/2009 2:02:46 PM , Rating: 2
Same place I find them

Church


RE: Just a hypothetical question
By FITCamaro on 5/13/2009 2:33:58 PM , Rating: 4
Please. You don't have to pay girls who go to church. You just tell them the devil is in their bra and panties. And your member is the device they must use to cure them of their evil.


By MrBungle123 on 5/14/2009 2:31:24 AM , Rating: 2
somebodys been watching just a little too much naughty church girl porn...


RE: Just a hypothetical question
By walk2k on 5/13/2009 2:06:41 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, clearly this move will be the end of prostitution as we know it.


RE: Just a hypothetical question
By nixoofta on 5/13/2009 2:15:48 PM , Rating: 2
"Hi boys!!1 Candi here,... preveusly from criagslist.

It sure is streesful out here in the reel world! 'Bet you could use a nice hot staemy massage,...and I give good massages.

I just post some hot nuw pics of me at www.#'d:'s'rus.cum

Hook me up, OK?"

:P


oh noes!
By FITCamaro on 5/13/2009 1:37:20 PM , Rating: 5
Whatever will lonely men, psychos, and pedophiles do?!?!!?

Oh wait. Right. Myspace.




RE: oh noes!
By Lifted on 5/13/09, Rating: -1
RE: oh noes!
By Bateluer on 5/13/2009 2:05:03 PM , Rating: 2
Uh, he's right about Myspace.


RE: oh noes!
By FITCamaro on 5/13/2009 2:24:00 PM , Rating: 2
Do you have the brain power to comprehend that I was making a joke?

But seriously, Myspace is plagued with all three.


RE: oh noes!
By AmazighQ on 5/13/2009 4:08:14 PM , Rating: 2
what you talking about I never go to Myspace


RE: oh noes!
By Kefner on 5/13/2009 3:53:19 PM , Rating: 2
Sounds like someone's jealous they didn't post first!


The real reason it's illegal
By karkas on 5/13/2009 8:23:42 PM , Rating: 3
While the banning of prostitution has religious connections, it is justifiably illegal on the negative implications associated with it. I assume most of you championing the legalization have in mind a perfectly sane and intelligent woman choosing this "profession" over something as equally prosperous like nursing or opening a business.

Historically however, it inevitably devolves into one of young, weak minded women easily seduced by the promise of fortune which instead becomes an existence of slavery by controlling forces (drugs, pimps, etc.). They then find themselves a 40-something addict, out of work, unmarried, uneducated, and zero prospects for the future.

This is the same reason polygamy is outlawed. Even though it is a religiously motivated lifestyle. On the surface you may say "Who cares, its a free country?" But if you look deeper, it becomes a tool of imprisonment in a non-physical sense.




RE: The real reason it's illegal
By corduroygt on 5/13/2009 11:54:44 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe they deserve to be a "40-something addict, out of work, unmarried, uneducated, and zero prospects for the future." because they were weak minded and seduced by the promise of fortune to begin with?

The best course of action isn't to make it illegal, but to improve education, by giving teachers more money, and rewarding hard work that requires a healthy, functioning brain instead of greed, lobbying and connections. Lobbying should be made punishable by death.


RE: The real reason it's illegal
By Belard on 5/14/2009 12:41:17 AM , Rating: 2
But as in the real world.... nothing is going to stop it.

If its legal and there is a "red light" district, it can reduce crime because its not a criminal element that is managing the business.

If the prositutes are paying taxes, getting a licence to charge for sex - they can run whore-houses in which if someone is a problem the police can be called, they have bouncers, etc. Look at places like the Bunny Ranch in which its a safe place for both the prositutes and johns.

I've NEVER paid for sex, but I'm not against it.

Its a Victimless crime, just like drug users.

Our prisons and legal system would be far more streamlined if were not throwing Joey into Prison for 10 years because he was caught with a few joints in his pockets while rapist and murders get out because of prison over-crowding.


RE: The real reason it's illegal
By karkas on 5/14/2009 1:47:50 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
If its legal and there is a "red light" district, it can reduce crime because its not a criminal element that is managing the business.

You don't think there is a lot of crime associated with the red light district? You have obviously never been there.

Regarding the criminal element managing the business... It will reduce some. Of course there will be an overall increase in johns, so crime may or may not incease overall. It's hard to say. There will still be plenty of the underground element. This is provable by the abundance of illegal prostitution everywhere it is legal and sanctioned.

quote:
Look at places like the Bunny Ranch in which its a safe place for both the prostitutes and johns.

You should watch some documentaries on these places. They aren't as perfect as normal conversation suggest.

quote:
Its a Victimless crime, just like drug users.
I don't get your statement... are you kidding? Surely you can't be serious...

quote:
Our prisons and legal system would be far more streamlined if were not throwing Joey into Prison for 10 years because he was caught with a few joints in his pockets while rapist and murders get out because of prison over-crowding.
For starters no one is throwing people in prison for a few joints, and they certainly haven't been letting out murderers and rapists due to overcrowding. But this is really more of a tangent than on topic.


Oh my!
By bigboxes on 5/13/2009 2:56:39 PM , Rating: 2
What will I do with my weekends now??




RE: Oh my!
By Spuke on 5/13/2009 6:16:50 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
What will I do with my weekends now??
There's always Rosie Palm and her five sisters.


this will solve things?
By ken8560 on 5/13/2009 2:20:21 PM , Rating: 2
just dropping a category from Craigslist is going to solve
it huh. Right. I think not.
If they had any idea of how many thousands of other sites
there are out there like this...and theyre starting here...theyve got a LONG way to go.




RE: this will solve things?
By karkas on 5/13/2009 8:26:13 PM , Rating: 2
I agree, they will find another site or simply post listings in a less obvious way.


Gotta Love It...
By cubdukat on 5/13/2009 3:24:27 PM , Rating: 1
Once again, we have the "one-asshole-ruins-it-for-everyone" theory in action.

As Yakov Smirnoff might have said, "What a country!"




RE: Gotta Love It...
By PascalT on 5/14/2009 2:05:11 PM , Rating: 2
It must be nice to live in the "Land of the Free".


By sapiens74 on 5/13/2009 1:34:55 PM , Rating: 2
Sad but true




There's a reason
By rsra13 on 5/13/2009 3:19:35 PM , Rating: 2
... to have an erotic services section in CL. So the other sections aren't full of prostitution ads.

So now I'll be browsing Computers and seeing ads to "exchange massages and have a little fun...". Great!




You know...
By thekdub on 5/13/2009 3:42:31 PM , Rating: 2
A killer could just post a listing for a car they are selling, and kill the people that come to look at the car.

Or really, any type of listing that involves human interaction could be fatal. They should just remove Craigslist as a whole.

On second thought, they should pass laws forbidding people to interact with each other. I mean, if nobody can interact with anyone else, that prevents murder, right? Everyone would be much happier.




Could be worse
By cenobite9 on 5/13/2009 6:18:52 PM , Rating: 2
My County's local government is trying to pass new ordinances to control the strip clubs around here. If the County has its way then our strip clubs will be more tame than a Victoria Secret's showing.




So what exactly changed?
By zixin on 5/14/2009 9:27:48 AM , Rating: 2
Does anybody notice the fact that Craigslist replaced "Erotic Services" with "Adult Services." So what exactly has changed?




By Puddleglum on 5/14/2009 9:51:02 AM , Rating: 2
http://ag.ca.gov/newsalerts/release.php?id=1736

quote:
"By taking steps to eliminate its so-called erotic services section, Craigslist has struck a blow against the exploitation of vulnerable teenagers."




...
By ActorMW on 5/18/2009 6:14:48 PM , Rating: 2
I live in Phoenix, AZ which just happens to be somewhere around number 3 for volume of kidnappings and forced rape for profit of children at least nationally if not in the world. (I can't remember, don't flame) CL happens to be a BIG way in which these people advertise. Phoenix police tracks lots of crimes of this sort through craigslist. I think many, not all but many, people argue for openness, legalization, etc. in these situations and yet don't completely know what the consequences are.

I also don't really see the difference between adult services and erotic services but I can't really do anything about that. What I can do is help the children and women who don't really choose this life of slavery but are caught in it none the less.




"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki