backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 16 comment(s) - last by UNCjigga.. on Feb 14 at 2:27 PM

Jack Lacy writes a letter to Steve Jobs about DRM

Founded by the likes of HP, Philips, Matsushita, Sony, Samsung and Fox, the Coral Consortium Corporation focuses on creating an open technology framework that facilitates interoperability among content distribution channels that use different Digital Rights Management (DRM) technologies.

In response to Steve Jobs’ open letter on DRM, Jack Lacy, the president of Coral, published an open letter of his own to the iPod man. The letter invites Apple to use Coral’s Interoperability Framework, which would allow iPods to “interoperate immediately with Microsoft based Janus devices and services, and with OMA (Open Mobile Alliance) based devices and services.”

“We think that your engineers will find it very straightforward to integrate this framework into your iTunes service,” Jack Lacy wrote to Steve Jobs.

Lacy also addressed Jobs’ issue of security concerns should FairPlay be opened by saying, “Of course the secrets in FairPlay remain safe - adopting the Coral technology does not require you to share them with anyone else.”

Furthermore, to set aside any of Jobs’ concerns over what he calls the “big four” lords of music, Lacy lists EMI, Universal, Sony BMG and Warner all as members of the Coral Consortium who support the organization’s efforts.

It appears now that Apple has been given several different avenues to explore in its battles with DRM. Which route the iPod maker will take, however, remains to be seen.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

lol
By thebrown13 on 2/12/2007 10:45:51 PM , Rating: 1
Apple will try to get as far as it can with their current strategy, then when finally legislation forces them, they'll license FairPlay.

Of course, it'd be much easier for EVERYONE if he used PlaysForSure, but Steve Jobs has a stick shoved wayyyy too far up his ass for that.




RE: lol
By ForumMaster on 2/12/2007 11:28:20 PM , Rating: 2
apple won't license PlayForSure as it will cost them too much money and is only supported in WMA format that ipods don't play. they will probablly license FairPlay. they have no other choice. Switching now would cause a lot of problems.


RE: lol
By ckilner on 2/13/2007 1:12:57 PM , Rating: 2
I've actually heard that the PortalPlayer electronics used in iPods can handle WMA, so Apple would only need to update the firmware to use it.


RE: lol
By ckilner on 2/13/2007 1:08:19 PM , Rating: 2
Even Micro$oft is smart enought ot stay away from PlaysForSure - their Zune doesn't even play that crap.


RE: lol
By dever on 2/13/2007 1:23:17 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
when finally legislation forces them


You say this as if it's a good thing. People are not forced to purchase iPods or music from iTunes and niether should Apple be forced to provide them with more than what they initially agreed upon.

I would never buy music with Apple's DRM attached. But, neither do I believe dismantling the principals of free market, the basis of our great civilization, for a few whining morons who bought for immediate gratification. They now want to exchange their half empty milk carton for a gallon of ice cream. Put your money where your mouth is and only buy DRM free music... the market will follow.


What about CDs & what about the customer
By ralith on 2/13/2007 10:08:42 AM , Rating: 2
Its also funny how none of the people responding seem to want to address the fact that you can currently go out and buy a CD without DRM and rip it. So why would anyone prefer to have DRM in the way of enjoying their music however and on whatever device they want. Personally, I hate having to buy 10 songs I don't like with the 2-5 I do, but I hate DRM even more so I will continue buying CDs until they decide to DRM them to. If iTunes or someone else went DRMless I'd be a dam good customer. If you think about it I'm really paying the $10-$15 dollars for just those few songs I want so they could even jack the price to $3 I'd still come out ahead in most cases.




RE: What about CDs & what about the customer
By glennpratt on 2/13/2007 10:56:23 AM , Rating: 2
Off topic, but I really don't understand this thing about buying just the songs you like.

If you like an artist get thier album and listen to it a few times and you'll probably begin to appreciate the whole thing, heck you might not even like the radio tracks as much as you did when you picked it up. If you can only stand 2 songs by an artist, then why buy any of it. Leave them to the radio and hip TV show soundtracks where they belong.

I'm not a music snob, but cherry picking music doesn't broaden you tastes or let you take in the whole mood of an album. Now if you were talking about getting 2 tracks off the last Fergie CD, then umm I guess I don't care.


By gramboh on 2/13/2007 12:42:46 PM , Rating: 2
Who buys single tracks besides 14 year old girls? Must be the same people listening to the awful top 40 stuff on the radio/MTV. As said above, buy the album and discover a new artist and their entire work, this way you can rip it lossless to your PC with no stupid DRM as well.


By Oregonian2 on 2/13/2007 2:50:39 PM , Rating: 2
That can be very true. I've bought album-disks for a hit on it only to find after a number of listenings that I liked the other songs even better than the hit. On the other hand, I remember from a long long time ago (I'm ooooooooooold!), there were some John Lennon CD's that I bought where every other song was his, and the in-between songs were by Yoko Ono. Every other song was really good with ones in-between were horrible. I'll let one figure out which were which....



Consumer Electronics Association
By crystal clear on 2/13/2007 1:43:48 AM , Rating: 4
Gary Shapiro is the president of the Consumer Electronics Association in his 2007 CES keynote address - Shapiro talked about the "New Convergence," and the promises and pitfalls facing the industry.

http://www.cesweb.org/docs/2007OpeningKeynote_Shap...

Quote-

#Shapiro said that the "biggest area of contention" in consumer technology is intellectual property. Shapiro argued that it is not piracy that is the problem, but reactions to piracy.

#What is sorely lacking, is differentiation between real commercial "pirates" and home users who are just trying to make use of technology and digital content. "We agree that content creators must be compensated. We understand and share the aversion to those that steal content without authorization and resell it. Commercial piracy is wrong. But we draw a different line on what is acceptable in the home," he noted.

# The real "pirates" (if we're going to use that term at all) are the commercial pirates who are reselling content without authorization. Yet in recent years, the fury and the rhetoric from both the RIAA/MPAA and from certain members of Congress have been focused squarely on the public, at times sinking to shocking lows (suing dead people, claiming that ripping CDs could be illegal). Shapiro's focus isn't really RIAA lawsuits, however. His main concern is the health of the consumer electronics industry, and Shapiro is again highlighting how the current legal climate is stifling innovation by constantly placing users in jeopardy.

"We believe consumers should not be in legal jeopardy if they do something with lawfully acquired

# "Piracy is wrong. But ordinary consumers are not pirates, and private conduct may be unauthorized—but that does not mean it is piracy. Consumers have the right to use technology, to benefit from innovation and to access entertainment while making sure that artists are properly compensated," he said.

Source-
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070109-8578...

http://www.ce.org/default.asp




By kattanna on 2/13/2007 11:11:53 AM , Rating: 2
yes..lets go after the home users..

instead of these guys

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37...



too many idiots
By winegirl on 2/14/2007 10:06:15 AM , Rating: 2
What is wrong with you people. The iPod can play nearly any audio format avaialable. BTW any iTune purchased song can be played on any other player, it just takes two steps.
Burn a CD of your iTunes (which removes the DRM) and import it into you Zune or Creative Zen or SanDisk. However the iPod is the only player that supports multiple formats including mp3, aiff, flac, ogg, AAC, Apple lossless.
So which company is really restricting the playability of songs on their devices, it ain't Apple.




RE: too many idiots
By UNCjigga on 2/14/2007 2:27:02 PM , Rating: 2
Ipods support .flac and .ogg? This is with standard firmware? News to me...


here is an even easier way!!
By sprockkets on 2/12/07, Rating: 0
RE: here is an even easier way!!
By amdndtech on 2/13/2007 12:55:19 AM , Rating: 2
I'll get right on that.


By ckilner on 2/13/2007 1:04:50 PM , Rating: 2
Steve Jobs wrote the anti-DRM letter in response to an idiotic move by a Norwegian consumer group that is complaining that iTunes songs don't play on other devices. If they have another device, they can buy music from another source or on CD. What about all the other DRM'd music in WMP that won't play on iPods? iTunes purchases, like other DRM'd music, include the right to burn CDs, but apparently nobody in Norway has figured this out. If someone wants to move from an iPod to another player, all they need to do is burn the iTunes music to CD and re-rip it...but the DMCA prevents people from saying the obvious.
I think Steve Jobs is right...the music companies sell most of their music on unprotected CDs, but treat honest people who purchase music online like pirates.




"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki