backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 76 comment(s) - last by rtrski.. on Sep 1 at 10:04 PM


The new recharger will be compact and will collect power every time your moving, which it will save to provide extended use of your electronics.  (Source: M2E)
A startup deploys a new kind of greentech -- kinetic rechargers

Alternative energy comes in many different guises.  From wind to nuclear to solar, there are many options when it comes to fossil fuel alternatives.  One other option, oft forgotten, has been here for many millennia -- human power.

An enterprising Boise, Idaho based startup, M2E Power is developing a commercial recharger that targets this energy source, which it plans to launch to market within the second to third quarter of next year.  The company's goal is to harvest kinetic energy.  On a small scale this can be used to harness manpower, while on a larger scale the startup hopes to recoup energy losses in hybrid cars and utility power generation.

The company launched a year ago with the help of $8M USD from OVP Venture Partners, @Ventures and Highway 12 Ventures.

Their first product will be the portable charger, which will be the size of a deck of playing cards.  It will allow cell phone users 30 to 60 minutes of extra talk time, when subjected to six hours of cumulative motion such as walking, jogging, or driving.  Energy efficient iPods can also be recharged to give hours of extra music.  The device will cost between $25 to $40.

Many are excited about the device.  CleanTechnica's Ariel Schwartz states, "Shouldn’t a strenuous run provide something more than a rush of endorphins? Something, perhaps, like power to charge your cell phone?"

M2E is also in talks with auto manufacturers to add its system to boost fuel economy.  Regan Warner-Rowe, director of business development at M2E, explains, "We are in discussions with some of the automotive manufacturers.  Right now, if you're running off of a battery, and a lot of times the batteries in the hybrids they weigh 275 pounds, they're six feet long, they're huge," she said. "When you're using the battery to power the car, if you can take any other system that also uses the battery off of that main source, then you can extend the range of the vehicle."

The startup hopes to power onboard devices such as windshield wipers, door locks, power seats, and sensors, says Warner-Rowe.

The company was born out of a project at the Idaho National Labs as part of research funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.  The project developed a system utilizing the Faraday Principle, which produces energy from the motions of a magnet within a coil.  Similar systems are found in flashlights today, but M2E's system adjusts magnets to each other, offering a boost in efficiency of 300 percent and 700 percent.

The company hopes to use the recharger as a test bed to develop and eventual battery replacement for cell phones and portable electronics.  Its also developing a "power pack" for the army.  Mr. Warner-Rowe describes, "We've done prototyping for a centralized power pack that would be on a vest on the back.  And we've also been working on decentralized approaches. So you would have individual M2E units that would be integrated into various devices like night scopes and night vision goggles and different communication devices."

He also thinks his company's technology can solve the problems of alternative energy sources such as wind power.  He describes, "We are in the process of building a small-scale generator that can just show how if you put this in, used it in a wind turbine, that you would help reduce some of the gearbox problems that they have.  You would get greater efficiency, which would then allow wind power and ocean wave to be more competitive with fossil fuel-based power."

As such efforts would be financially intensive, C2E hopes to ride the wave of publicity on its commercial recharger, auto, and military applications and use it to secure more funding for bigger projects.  The company plans to aggressively pursue investment in the near future, according to Mr. Warner-Rowe.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Imagine.....
By theapparition on 8/26/2008 9:20:25 AM , Rating: 5
If they could only harness the power of the average internet geeks' hand and a picture of 7of9.

We'd never be without power again. Although we'd then have a tissue shortage to deal with.




RE: Imagine.....
By uhgotnegum on 8/26/2008 9:36:08 AM , Rating: 3
Thank God I actually had to look up "7of9" to remember what she/it--ha that's funny...sheit--looks like.

On another note, something similar to this that I read about way back was harnessing "walking" energy by replacing sidewalks with these panels that converted footfalls into energy...I personally thought that idea sounded good.

I wonder how long it'll take before someone does a study to find that people who put these things in their pockets tend to develop cancer?

Hodgepodge commenting


RE: Imagine.....
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2008 10:54:37 AM , Rating: 1
I just finished watching the entire Voyager series so I remembered.


RE: Imagine.....
By johnsonx on 8/26/2008 12:17:31 PM , Rating: 2
they play that so much on SciFi channel you can watch the entire series in about 2 months. I'm sick to death of it at this point.


RE: Imagine.....
By ebakke on 8/26/2008 1:05:34 PM , Rating: 2
change the channel?


RE: Imagine.....
By Steve Stip on 8/26/2008 1:14:14 PM , Rating: 2
Bring back the "New Outer Limits". This new crap is so lame.


RE: Imagine.....
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2008 4:19:18 PM , Rating: 2
Actually it's on Spike. And I was watching it off DVDs.


RE: Imagine.....
By foolsgambit11 on 8/26/2008 1:39:28 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah.... I'm sure that's why you had to look up a picture of 7 of 9.... Forgot what she looked like... I'm going to have to remember that one.


RE: Imagine.....
By DeepBlue1975 on 8/26/2008 10:01:30 AM , Rating: 5
Or T'Pol.
Would love a picture of both of them "fighting for interspecies survival" while rolling and "catting" in a high tech... pool of mud? :D


RE: Imagine.....
By mezman on 8/26/2008 3:30:40 PM , Rating: 2
Holo-jello wrestling! Now there's a business opportunity for Quark.


RE: Imagine.....
By johnsonx on 8/26/2008 3:33:04 PM , Rating: 3
You gotta add Jadzia Daks to that fight:

"How far down to the spots go?"

"ALL the way."

Oh, baby....


RE: Imagine.....
By FITCamaro on 8/26/08, Rating: 0
RE: Imagine.....
By DeepBlue1975 on 8/27/2008 11:16:43 AM , Rating: 2
Of course!!

How could I have forgotten about Dax?

By far the prettiest of them all... And then people say that star trek series are just for nerds and geeks.

I'm no damn nerd!!!
I just happen to have a formula for counting the nanobots circulating 7of9 breasts that's also useful to know how many spots Jatzia has and when the angle in which T'Pol's nipples and T'Pol's pointy ears are in perfect concordance. (?)


RE: Imagine.....
By FITCamaro on 8/26/08, Rating: -1
RE: Imagine.....
By KillerInTheRye on 8/26/2008 11:27:44 AM , Rating: 5
All they really need to do is harness the power from 1 roundhouse kick by Chuck Norris.


RE: Imagine.....
By Clauzii on 8/26/2008 11:42:23 AM , Rating: 2
While they are at it, mount solar panels in front of him to catch that bright white light emerging from his teeth :D


RE: Imagine.....
By MrBlastman on 8/26/2008 12:40:52 PM , Rating: 2
Nobody can handle the power of 1 roundhouse kick by Chuck Norris! The world will explode from the overload of the power surge.


RE: Imagine.....
By phazers on 8/26/2008 12:49:58 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
Nobody can handle the power of 1 roundhouse kick by Chuck Norris! The world will explode from the overload of the power surge.


I hear his tears cure cancer, but that he never cries :)


RE: Imagine.....
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2008 4:21:12 PM , Rating: 2
He did once. When Walker, Texas Ranger was canceled.


RE: Imagine.....
By DeepBlue1975 on 8/27/2008 11:20:06 AM , Rating: 2
Chuck Norris doesn't cry for money.
He actually cries the money itself: His tears are exchangeable for 1 dollar each milliliter.


RE: Imagine.....
By Steve Stip on 8/26/2008 1:13:24 PM , Rating: 2
She is mighty mighty...


RE: Imagine.....
By johnsonx on 8/26/2008 3:29:12 PM , Rating: 2
Someone I used to know called her 'Double of D'.


RE: Imagine.....
By FaceMaster on 8/26/2008 4:59:49 PM , Rating: 1
If only they could have hooked it up to your Mum last night!

Now I know why they're called hookers...


Matrix
By xoomer on 8/26/2008 9:26:40 AM , Rating: 3
Forgive me if this isn't a useful comment, but do you ever get the feeling the idea behind the matrix is getting closer and closer. AI is getting more intelligent every year and we are finding ways to fuel ourselves, doesn't take a supercomuter to realize they can use us.




RE: Matrix
By AnnihilatorX on 8/26/2008 9:38:40 AM , Rating: 5
If the AI in matrix thinks human body can be used as a power source more efficient than a direct chemical process plant that breaks down sugar, the AI is as dumb as an insect :P


RE: Matrix
By Alexstarfire on 8/26/2008 9:47:29 AM , Rating: 2
Perhaps.... but using humans isn't a bad idea either. Not the most efficient energy source I'm sure... but vast in quantity and hard to break..... in relative terms.


RE: Matrix
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 8/26/2008 10:34:00 AM , Rating: 4
Soylent Green is People!!!


RE: Matrix
By masher2 (blog) on 8/26/2008 10:36:40 AM , Rating: 5
The plot of Matrix was laughable on a scientific basis. Humans -- or any animals -- aren't a source of energy. We *consume* it. The body heat we generate comes from the energy already present in the food we eat. . . and you'd get more energy just by burning that food directly, than you would from our bodies. The whole process is a net energy loser.


RE: Matrix
By johnsonx on 8/26/2008 12:19:32 PM , Rating: 2
Remember though that it was combined with a form of fusion. Not so laughable now, is it? Hmmm? Thought so.


RE: Matrix
By masher2 (blog) on 8/26/2008 1:03:02 PM , Rating: 3
Even more laughable in fact. if you have "a form of fusion", why do you need human body heat at all? And how would it help the process?


RE: Matrix
By foolsgambit11 on 8/26/2008 1:49:51 PM , Rating: 3
Exactly. I always loved that line. It's like, "so... you guys have mastered fusion? That must be why you have all the extra energy around to build these giant human crop growers, harvesters, energy pods, and power a computer to keep all of their brains entertained, plus power the sentinels to try to stop the ones that escape and fight a war against the human underground resistance. Yeah, you could do all that or you could just stick to fusion, especially since nothing will grow on the planet, so you'll have to use the current biomass to feed to the humans, then use the humans to feed to the humans, and with each successive generation, the inefficiencies of the process will eat away at the total number of people that can be kept alive.

"Stick to fusion."


RE: Matrix
By johnsonx on 8/26/2008 3:27:51 PM , Rating: 2
I hope you did get the tongue-in-cheek tone I was going for?


RE: Matrix
By teko on 8/26/2008 12:47:05 PM , Rating: 3
The original Matrix plot was the robots using humans' brains as a parallel supercomputer (kind of like a distributed computing network). The idea was rejected by the studio cause it was too difficult to comprehend for the average joe, thus it was changed to the "battery idea".


RE: Matrix
By masher2 (blog) on 8/26/2008 1:10:27 PM , Rating: 2
That's interesting; I didn't know that. That makes a lot more sense...and it's the plot of more than a few SF novels. I remember one in particular where an alien race gave us humans a free teleportation transport system...which would then 'borrow' our brain's computing power during the few seconds we were in transit.


RE: Matrix
By rtrski on 9/1/2008 10:04:53 PM , Rating: 2
Are you perhaps thinking "Hyperion", and "Fall of Hyperion", by Dan Simmons? Although there it wasn't exactly an alien race but essentially the ecology of AI's originally created by humans (and by then become independent) who granted the teleport network to humanity. And in order to maintain control over us, they were also working to enslave us all as semi-mindless, biologically immortal slaves via the cruciform parasite.

I remember thinking the same thing about the 'battery' concept in the Matrix; weak, very weak. The second movie sort of pulled the rug out from under many of the premises of the first: "Neo" wasn't any reincarnation of any wild-card mentality that was going to free them according to some oracular destiny-- wouldn't the AI's seek out and clip whatever genetic combination resulted in such a talent? where the heck did this "Oracle" come from? -- but instead was himself another layer of the control system to keep humanity in check, and the oracle herself an AI 'program' playing her part.

The second movie had the financial success of the first to be able to take the chance and be more daring, intellectually...I kept waiting for them to "fix" the original human battery concept and explain that humanity was not just 'enslaved' by the Matrix, the 90% or whatever of our cognitive power we don't use was actually the backbone OF the matrix, and the artificial reality we "lived" in (and the presence of our bodies as well, atrophied as they may have become, vs. just brains and spinal cords in a jar) were necessary for us to be (mentally) healthy enough to provide that underlying neural complexity on which they 'preyed'.

Think of the conflict that would set up - would you 'free' all of humanity knowing that you were subjecting the entire 'race' of AI entities to doom, some of whom by that point you realize have the same goals and feelings etc. as humanity, and no original culpability in the Matrix's creation? Do you unplug knowing that you're killing most of humanity, since certainly the artificial environment wouldn't survive the demise of the programs, and it was stated early on that "you can't awaken a mind beyond a certain age"? Do you doom the race of AI's who have also (secretly) provided the basis for your own survival (they created, and destroyed, Zion several times over, and were the original producers of the air refinery...)? But instead they threw it all away with a completely lame 3rd movie wrap-up, Keanu as Jeezus. They kind of touched briefly on the idea of codependence and coexistence, but only in the most candied-over of ways. Sigh....

Smith as a rogue program/virus was interesting, but got tiresome. I've long ago given up on Hollywood doing anything good in science fiction. I'm occasionally impressed for parts of movies both high and low budget (Sunshine, The Arrival, the original Alien, Blade Runner, Gattaca) but very few live up to expectations set in their own opening 30-45 minutes.


RE: Matrix
By johnsonx on 8/26/2008 4:15:49 PM , Rating: 2
The joke where they call Neo 'Coppertop' probably works a little better in the movie than calling him something CPU related like '386' or 'processor node'.

I have to give them credit for the 'combined with a form of fusion' line. Yes, of course, scientifically that's as much BS as the whole 'human body as power source' idea. But at least they're acknowledging it's BS and admitting the need for some sort of magic secret sauce to make it work. In many cases other filmmakers are either too stupid to realize the BS factor, or assume we're all too stupid to realize it.


RE: Matrix
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2008 4:23:53 PM , Rating: 2
I believe it. People didn't understand the plot of the Matrix the way it was.


RE: Matrix
By AnnihilatorX on 8/26/2008 1:04:52 PM , Rating: 2
Not only that, but also according to the law of thermal dynamics, the theorectical best thermal engine available: the Carnot cycle, shows that: With a human body temperature of only 37 degrees Celcius, extracting energy from such a low heat source would automatically result in absymal efficiency.

I remember my professor some time ago in a thermal dynamics introductory lecture had worked out such efficiency to be less than 20% assumming not so extraordinary heat sink (ambient) temperature.

20% of almost nothing is an even closer nothing :)


RE: Matrix
By DeepBlue1975 on 8/27/2008 11:28:36 AM , Rating: 2
Not only that, the idea of Matrix isn't even original.

The basis for the plot of the less than stellar movie (didn't like any of them, though the 1st one wasn't bad for me, just mediocre), has a lot of coincidence with William Gibson's Neuromancer, a title released in... 1985? (a title I din't actually quite like in all of its extension... could never finish reading it)


RE: Matrix
By Steve Stip on 8/26/2008 1:16:45 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, using humans as a power source is lame. The actual premise should have been that their brains were used as processors.


I have a better idea...
By MrBlastman on 8/26/2008 9:31:55 AM , Rating: 5
Sponsored by Bush's Baked Beans company and Mathis Dairy:

I present to you the one, the only, penultimate solution to your gas guzzling needs.

Beans!

Yes Beans folks! The wonderful wonderful bean. Take a hose and hook it right up to your behind. Have a seat unlike your friendly bovine. Sit in your car and don't eat that candy bar, eat some beans folks! Beans are the future!

With our patented 100% effective yeast active system, a pill a day will power your car all the way. Now you're making natural gas.

If you don't like the beans, don't fret! With our Gene-Oâ„¢ system, we'll genetically modify you. Lactose intoler-WHAT? No folks, why should the cows fart and have all the fun when we can too! Sit down, plug right in and have a tall frosty mug. Don't mind the passengers, they aren't ones that you'll bug. Take a huff, a puff and blow one right out!

That's wind power baby! Right down the 559.

*Bush's Beans and Mathis Dairies are not responsible for any starving school children. Please use products with discretion. Not responsible for nearby casualties if hose is not properly inserted.*




RE: I have a better idea...
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2008 10:53:34 AM , Rating: 3
Is this from something or did you just make it up?

Either way its genius.


RE: I have a better idea...
By MrBlastman on 8/26/2008 11:49:22 AM , Rating: 2
100% non-prefabricated rabble ;)


RE: I have a better idea...
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2008 4:27:01 PM , Rating: 2
Man it'd be scary to see you high.


RE: I have a better idea...
By PhoenixKnight on 8/26/2008 1:06:16 PM , Rating: 2
Give this man a 6!


RE: I have a better idea...
By LatinMessiah on 8/26/2008 1:22:31 PM , Rating: 2
Roll that beautiful bean footage.


RE: I have a better idea...
By Cullinaire on 8/26/2008 3:41:13 PM , Rating: 2
Beats the snot out of that soap opera crap.


RE: I have a better idea...
By MrBlastman on 8/26/2008 3:47:19 PM , Rating: 2
You mean it doesn't stink? (or does it? ;) )

Keep those hoses plugged in boys and girls!


RE: I have a better idea...
By Ajax9000 on 8/26/2008 8:15:32 PM , Rating: 2
RE: I have a better idea...
By MrBlastman on 8/27/2008 9:28:40 AM , Rating: 2
I think I saw him on HBO a long time ago, funny stuff. :)


great! Can't wait for the buy out.
By Integral9 on 8/26/2008 9:41:15 AM , Rating: 2
If a buyout comes with this old tech; remember kinetic watches? Anyways, between my phone, the BB I have to carry for work, and my badge I got enough crap on my belt. I certainly don't need more. This tech should be incorporated into the devices it's trying to improve, not stand alone.




By Master Kenobi (blog) on 8/26/2008 10:38:17 AM , Rating: 2
Your utility belt is starting to sound like mine. Sooner or later Batman will look like an amateur.


RE: great! Can't wait for the buy out.
By xti on 8/26/2008 10:42:08 AM , Rating: 2
1 step at a time. you have to preheat the oven before you stick in the turkey.


RE: great! Can't wait for the buy out.
By 67STANG on 8/26/2008 10:57:24 AM , Rating: 2
Seriously... my dad bought his first kinetic watch in the early 80's.... it finally died of some sort of other failure in 97 or 98 I think. He bought another one as soon as it died and it hasn't skipped a beat since...

Kind of hard to believe it took someone this long to come up with this.


RE: great! Can't wait for the buy out.
By glitchc on 8/27/2008 11:08:05 AM , Rating: 2
An analog watch is a very low current device requiring very short bursts of power, which is why they last much longer than digital equivalents in terms of battery life and also why you won't see any kinetic watches with digital displays in them.

Modern apparel-type electronics are high current devices (that CPU at 12V is consuming 2A to get to a 24W TDP). It is difficult to generate sufficient power from kinetic motion for these devices.


By Tesseract on 9/1/2008 3:12:05 PM , Rating: 2
A kinetic watch isn't electronic, or at least all the ones I know of aren't. The weight winds the mainspring of the watch.


Very good idea - when can I buy one
By bildan on 8/26/2008 9:45:53 AM , Rating: 2
The list of applications I can imagine for this technology just keeps getting longer. However, I need a bigger device that the pocketable one displayed here.

Most vehicles, bicycles, motorcycles, cars, small airplanes, gliders need power for gadgets and they bounce a lot. I need to keep a 7AH battery charged.




RE: Very good idea - when can I buy one
By Alexstarfire on 8/26/2008 9:52:50 AM , Rating: 2
True... but the laws of thermodynamics(?) says that this gadget can't produce more energy than what goes in it. I fail to see how adding this to a moving object is going to help it go farther. Wouldn't the weight alone cancel any benefit that it may have? Course... if this device recoups energy from things like braking then it's just saving wasted energy... but that's not what it sounds like it's designed to do.

To me this is the same as putting a wind turbine on your car to gather energy.


By Solandri on 8/26/2008 1:58:34 PM , Rating: 2
That's what I thought at first too. But the car's vibration dampening (the suspension) currently throws that energy away into heating up the dampening fluid in the shock absorbers. It is theoretically possible to add a device with a longer time constant, which would have a greater dampening effect than your shocks, and thus this energy would be predominantly directed into the device instead of the shocks.

However, the best solution would be for auto manufacturers to replace shock absorbers with a new device which converted the energy to electricity instead of heating up the dampening fluid. That way all the energy is directed into the device, and you're not messing with two control systems working in parallel.

It would actually not be very different from regenerative braking, it would just require more careful design since brakes have only one purpose (to slow you down), while a shock absorber's dampener needs to be tuned for the mass of the car and springiness of the shocks (you want it to be soft enough that you don't feel every bump on the road, but strong enough that the car doesn't keep bouncing and feel like mush). If you did it wrong, you could very well end up reducing the car's fuel efficiency.


By bildan on 8/26/2008 2:31:43 PM , Rating: 2
I said "powering gadgets" not powering the vehicle itself.

Most up-and-down bounciness gets lost as heat anyway. Recovering some of that as electricity is 'free'.


By s12033722 on 8/26/2008 11:07:00 AM , Rating: 2
Cell phones are not exactly energy hogs, and they are talking about 6 hours of activity providing energy for 30-60 minutes of talk time... That's not much power. I'd like to see mW/hour numbers on these things before we get too excited.

One other thing - serious runners, etc. are already spending lots of money to get rid of excess bulk and weight. They buy $50 ultra-light shirts with minimal wind resistance and wicking and spend $140 on shoes that cut weight by an ounce while retaining support. Now you are talking about adding something the size of a deck of cards to what they are going to run with? With the idea that it would add play time to their iPod? I can't think of a single time someone has complained about the battery in their iPod (usually a nano for runners) dying before the end of their run.

I don't even see this being viable for your average office worker/IT guy/engineer. Where are you going to wear this card-deck sized widget? People find the size of cell phones annoying enough already, how many are likely to start carrying something the size of a second blackberry to get another 30 minutes of operation?

I don't think this is going anywhere.




By masher2 (blog) on 8/26/2008 11:17:40 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
serious runners, etc. are already spending lots of money to get rid of excess bulk and weight. They buy $50 ultra-light shirts with minimal wind resistance and wicking and spend $140 on shoes that cut weight by an ounce
I doubt any serious runner carries their cell phone or iPod with them in an actual competition. . . and when they're not competing, I doubt any care about a few extra ounces.


By jimbojimbo on 8/26/2008 2:51:10 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
serious runners, etc. are already spending lots of money to get rid of excess bulk and weight. They buy $50 ultra-light shirts with minimal wind resistance and wicking and spend $140 on shoes that cut weight by an ounce while retaining support. Now you are talking about adding something the size of a deck of cards to what they are going to run with?

Are you talking about runners or people out to do sprints? Nobody that runs long distances would wear their $140 (and they don't usually cost that much - what shoes are you talking about?? Gold ones?) performance shoes for long distance runs. There are no shirts for "minimal wind resistance" and the fabric is solely for wicking moisture away from the body which helps you keep cooler. Many serious runners often just go shirtless.

I think you're talking about what you think serious runners do compared to what serious runners really do.

Personally I wouldn't mind carrying something a little smaller that could produce energy. Then again to maximize energy production you'd have to strap it to some place that moves a lot like your ankle or wrist. Depending on the weight that might not be too bad but time will tell how this develops.

It does piss me off when I'm out on a 3 hour run and my mp3 player dies.


By 7Enigma on 8/27/2008 1:28:57 PM , Rating: 2
"There are no shirts for "minimal wind resistance" and the fabric is solely for wicking moisture away from the body which helps you keep cooler."

I disagree. While the shirts that wick moisture are often the ones that reduce drag, they don't have to be. Any fabric that is tightly held to the body will offer less drag (and thus minimal wind resistance) than a typical t-shirt.

My buddies and I do speed work at a track on Saturdays. 100's, 200's, and 400's. We do this year-round, and there is a significant difference in the winter time when running with a bulky sweatshirt vs. an Underarmor or other tightly fitting covering, especially on the 200 and 400 where cardio is the limiting factor. It's not the couple ounces of weight that makes the difference, it's the drag when at speed.

I'm sure on long 3 hour runs it wouldn't be as noticeable since there is significantly less drag at low speeds of jogging, but I'd wager it is measurable.


Hm.
By nekobawt on 8/26/2008 11:43:57 AM , Rating: 2
Size would be an issue, obviously, but I'm wondering about the potential for using this technology for pacemakers and hearing aids.




RE: Hm.
By joemoedee on 8/26/2008 1:20:41 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Size would be an issue, obviously, but I'm wondering about the potential for using this technology for pacemakers and hearing aids.


Someone's already working on it... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6191245.stm


6 hours?
By RaisedinUS on 8/26/2008 9:35:24 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
It will allow cell phone users 30 to 60 minutes of extra talk time, when subjected to six hours of cumulative motion such as walking, jogging, or driving.


Not sure I could jog for 6 hours or have the time to walk it either. Now one could toss it in the car and drive for 6 hours but I have a DC converter in the car. Oh well, token gesture at best but maybe it will progress into more.
I do like the 7 of 9 idea though.




Exercise Bike
By acer905 on 8/26/2008 12:20:39 PM , Rating: 2
So, you could run around for a few hours and get enough to charge your cell phone a small amount... But how would this compare to having a generator hooked up to an exercise bicycle?




By jimpaka on 8/26/2008 12:27:21 PM , Rating: 2
...for god's sake, know the difference between your and you're




It would be cool if...
By Polynikes on 8/26/2008 12:34:18 PM , Rating: 2
We could find a way to implement this into laptops; Key presses and hard drive vibration could be converted into power. That would be awesome. Though I'm guessing it wouldn't provide much power at all.




Extremely skeptical
By Indianapolis on 8/26/2008 1:08:29 PM , Rating: 2
And we could all get better gas mileage by taping over the body seams of our cars, thus reducing drag. Of course, the increase in the real world would be almost negligible. Applying this technology to cars sounds similar to me. Sure it can probably provide a little electricity, but is it really worth the extra weight, complexity, and cost? I doubt it.

Might as well provide a hand crank that the driver and passengers could operate to generate electricity. Or better, have peddles for each of the passengers, and make them earn their keep.

Using it for personal gear, however, sounds promising.




By phxfreddy on 8/26/2008 4:51:18 PM , Rating: 2
We used to joke that some Jake off was winding his watch .......this is nothing new and certainly not worthy of the Daily T.




Power generating sidewalks.
By snownpaint on 8/26/2008 6:03:59 PM , Rating: 2
What about sidewalks that generate electricity with every step.. Especially with fat Americans we would get more power with each step.. The only things is, we would need more new people walking to offset the loss in power when the current walkers lose weight.

Or maybe

every time you push the remote button it charges the batteries in the remote.

or

if people take the steps up to the office in the morning, and ride the elevator down, we generate energy off the difference..

or

We hook all those "health nuts" in gyms and on a treadmill at 5am to our power grid to power all the rest of Americans' alarm clocks and coffee machines.

or

Streets that make electricity as big fat cars roll down them. We are using energy to move those massive, only one passenger, vehicles down the highway, why not try to get back that energy..





5 years out?
By ScottHardy on 8/27/2008 9:58:01 AM , Rating: 2
So this is interesting, but just like many of the people here who commented, I don't want to carry around one extra device to charge my cell phone. I think it would come in handy for those who enjoy the outdoors and camping or the military, but not for the average person. This will have the biggest boost once it's built into things like cars and devices we already use.
How about building it into the Toughbook line of laptops? They're constantly moving and could generate enough power to save you a few minutes before charging. I could also see these coming into play for police officers who are constantly driving around. If you built this device into their laptops it might help power the red and blue lights a few more minutes as they pull people over...

Should be interesting to watch over the next few years. If they can sign on with a major auto manufacturer or get a DoD contract for production they're golden.

Warm Regards,
Scott Hardy
http://www.topclassactions.com




they stole my idea again!!!
By deadrats on 8/27/2008 11:26:20 PM , Rating: 2
i could just scream!!! this is the second time that someone has stolen my idea, here was my proposal, posted on my blog and a half-assed google site i put up, for an alternative energy source:

http://deadrats.googlepages.com/unlimitedenergy

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog....

anyone else want to steal one of my ideas? just line up, i am really pissed off, i hope they end up in bankruptcy.

bastards.




New? I do not think so...
By Senju on 8/27/2008 12:00:33 AM , Rating: 1
This type of device has been out in Japan for a couple of years now. I used it to recharge my cell phone on the go many times. I guess there are some countries that are still out of date.




"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki