backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 205 comment(s) - last by jonmcc33.. on May 28 at 8:09 AM


  (Source: BusinessWeek)
GM becomes the latest big business customer to consider rejecting Vista

Microsoft, typically known for a self-confident business approach has been sending clearly mixed signals on the health of Windows Vista that are perhaps indicative of the problems the OS is experiencing.  The situation, rather uncharacteristic for Microsoft, which has had a long string of successes, is best summed up in the words of its own executives.

While Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates recently described that Vista was moving units at a "rapid sales rate", Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Ballmer told executives in a recent meeting that Vista was a "work in progress".  The Microsoft designers who made Vista's unpopular User Account Control (UAC) admitted that it was designed to "annoy" the standard user.  Perhaps even more revealing, Ballmer, while praising adoption rates at MIX 08 admitted to problems with the OS stating, "we did make the choice to kind of hurt compatibility, and our customers have let us know that has been very painful."

Vista has not received a much kinder reception with customers.  While much of the blame for poor initial compatibility and problems since rests with third party hardware and PC manufacturers, Vista has been getting blasted for its problems.  Market research firm Gartner said that Windows could collapse if the trends from Vista continue.  The OS has earned Microsoft a major lawsuit for its high hardware requirements, which the plaintiffs allege Microsoft glossed over in advertising.  And fair or not, many customers have turned back to the reliable Windows XP, abandoning Vista, to the chagrin of Microsoft.

Microsoft is also experiencing severe struggles in the business sector.  According to BusinessWeek, a growing number of business are adopting a "Just Say No" policy on Vista, and are waiting until Windows 7, which should be due in 2010.  These companies mostly use XP and a major factor for many of them is that Vista is simply not lean enough for their infrastructure.

Among the latest to jump on this bandwagon is General Motors.  The automobile giant has said that it has encountered so many problems getting Vista to work on its machines that it is likely to skip the OS and wait for Windows 7.  Says
GM's Chief Systems & Technology Officer Fred Killeen, "We're considering bypassing Vista and going straight to Windows 7."

Killeen says that the high hardware requirements are the nail in the coffin.  Many of the machines that have trouble running it won't be scheduled to be replaced until 2010 to 2011.  Says Killeen, "By the time we'd replace them, Windows 7 might be ready anyway."

GM, like many larger manufacturers, is also finding that many of its smaller supporting software vendors haven't guaranteed their programs to work in Vista. 

The GM situation is indicative of the market in general.  The end picture is that Vista can run well on only a smaller subset of machines at the average tech business, and much of the software that engineers and other professionals rely on is not Vista-compatible.

Microsoft has sold 140 million copies of Vista, but has failed to match XP's success.  Further, the majority of these copies were not sold individually, but included with new computers.  While customers could in some cases elect to downgrade to Windows XP, this would cost them time and effort, making Vista acceptance for some, more acceptance out of lack of options, as opposed to acceptance based on desirability.  Also, the number includes business customers whose deals with Microsoft automatically entitle them to copies of Vista.  While all these numbers count towards sales, some of these companies have not used their copies as they currently have declined to update.

Mike Nash, a corporate vice-president at Microsoft, disputes that Vista is struggling in business.  He points out that Bank of America, Continental Airlines, Cerner, and Royal Dutch Shell have all adopted the OS.  However, he acknowledges that the OS is selling the strongest among the consumer market.  He states, "We're seeing tremendous transition to Vista, particularly in the consumer space."

Some companies are opting to buy Vista merely to get XP licenses -- among these is Alaska Airlines.  Its 2,000 office workers will be using Windows XP machines, which will be replaced with XP downgraded Vista machines as necessary.  The company’s Senior Vice-President and CIO, Bob Reeder, states, "There's no business value in us continuing to chase that upgrade cycle."

In a recent market analysis it was found that at the end of last year Vista only held a 6.3 percent business sector OS market share, while competitor Apple's OS X held 4.2 percent.  This is not so much a comment on Apple's success as both shares are relatively trivial.  Rather it is more a comment on Vista's struggles in the business community.

The result has led to financial losses for Microsoft.  Sales of its desktop Windows group, its most profitable, slumped 2 percent in Q1 2008.  This led to an 11 percent fall in profits for the quarter.  This spells trouble for Microsoft, which has sustained many of its fledgling offerings, such as the Zune, MSN online offerings, and Xbox 360 through periods of lack of profitability with its Windows profits.

Analysts indicate that Microsoft has two options.  One is to try to improve its profitability in other market sectors, such as its online offerings.  This is tough challenge as Microsoft has struggled online to develop a good strategy.  While Microsoft has recently stated that it feels that it can achieve "independent" success, it has been left playing catch-up to Google for the last couple years.

The other big hope for Microsoft's continued success is for a turn-around with Windows 7.  Early reports on Windows 7 indicate that it's shaping up nicely.  It is supposed to be much leaner than Vista, which should win back some customers. 

While Microsoft is such a sales juggernaut that it can weather below average sales, it always strives for excellence, which has earned it its market position.  Thus it should be interesting to see how Microsoft reacts to the problems with Vista and the poor adoption in the business community.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

MS Neglects Businesses
By mmntech on 5/14/2008 12:04:03 PM , Rating: 5
Lets open the floor to the fanboys saying that this is FUD and Vista rox.

Microsoft made a major mistake by not releasing a lean version like they did with Windows 2000. The business community is not like consumers who buy new systems every two years. They need backwards compatibility and low overhead. They're not going to sped millions replacing thousands of computers every time a new OS comes out. The problem for Microsoft is that businesses still form the core of their market, and they chose to ignore their needs.




RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By virtuallyserved on 5/14/2008 12:29:58 PM , Rating: 2
The problem with these users is exactly as you state it- they're not like the business world. Vista is not even ideal for most end users/consumers as they don't have enough technical knowledge to be able to work through issues such as incompatible drivers, performance tuning for a specific class of system, etc.

Sure there's the idea that you won't "be on the cutting edge" and that Vista offers updated hardware compatibility (supposedly). But this is exactly why this OS should be left to power users and individuals who want to play DX10 games for the time being.

Right now Vista SP1 is just getting around to solving activation management issues for corporate IT infrastructures. But even with this solution, getting SP1 properly deployed can be a headache with the need to update drivers/uninstall drivers to comply with the availability conditions Microsoft has placed on SP1.

I'm not even impressed with XP SP3. Overall, it seems that the code that Microsoft has produced in the Vista era is very underwhelming.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By TheDoc9 on 5/14/2008 2:49:28 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps they can throw more skilled workers from overseas at the problem. As you can see, it's worked out well so far.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By Samus on 5/14/2008 7:00:10 PM , Rating: 2
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, but either meaning is actually funny


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By jonmcc33 on 5/14/2008 12:30:39 PM , Rating: 5
I don't see why this isn't a FUD type of article. Jason Mick pointed out every negative he could and not a single positive. That's a pessimistic view and designed to spread FUD.

Windows Vista doesn't really use up that many resources and it's not hard to upgrade if you really have that old of computer systems. If you have something that old anyway there's a good chance that it's no longer under any warranty. That means if your system dies it doesn't have Windows XP on it anymore anyway and you lose productivity.

In regards to "backwards compatibility" you need to understand that changes were made to make the OS more secure. If this breaks compatibility with older software then so be it.

The biggest need - with all the malware, viruses, trojans, spyware out there - is more security. Without moving totally to Linux I'd say Windows Vista is the best alternative. We already know that Mac sure isn't.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By 306maxi on 5/14/2008 1:53:56 PM , Rating: 5
I bet if OSX broke someone's old software that would be a feature that Supreme Overlord Jobs would advertise as being the best thing since sliced bread. But when it happens with Windows it's a bad thing.

Rule of thumb when Jason Mick reports on his bog.
Problem with OSX = Feature
Problem with Windows = Issue intentionally written into Windows so that Bill Gates can get more of your moneys and can devote it to evil monkey research which means Bill is even closer to setting off an unholy army of monkeys upon us to enslave us and force us to do Bill's bidding.

Or something like that.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By MonkeyPaw on 5/14/2008 8:18:13 PM , Rating: 5
My (medium-sized) company skipped Win2K completely and jumped from NT4 to WinXP. According to this article, that must make Win2k garbage. We also just upgraded to IE7 and Office 2003 last month, and those aren't exactly new.

The point is, major software migrations for large companies is a huge deal, and it costs lots of time and money (our migration to XP took 3 months to roll out). Big companies have old PCs, old software, and lots of idiot users who will immediately panic as soon as their start button changes. To just jump to the next OS like a home user does simply doesn't happen. Software has to be tested, hardware has to be qualified, and lots and lots of money has to be spent. Just think how much time and money this will cost a company that has 1,000-10,000 PCs. That's why it's not at all uncommon to skip a software generation whenever possible.

Anyone who thinks that decisions like these are made based on anything other than cost-benefit just don't know any better.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By borismkv on 5/14/2008 10:35:48 PM , Rating: 5
Mick wrote this? Oh...pfft *leaves and ignores everything he just read*


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By phusg on 5/15/08, Rating: -1
RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By William Gaatjes on 5/15/2008 6:53:48 AM , Rating: 2
The point is that Apple did a smarter job. They made a new api but still support the old api next to it. They serious promote the use of their new api and because it is faster better , new important features they have something to sell to their customers. Something the customers want to use cause the customers see possibilities to make money. The old api because of this will be less and less used.

Microsoft made a new api but it seems it is not stable enough and does not has features enough to justify. There is your problem. Companies want backward compatability cause their bussiness depends on it.

With home customers it is less of a problem using for example dual boot for a while to solve compatability problems.

Companies have no need for heavenly drm-ed operating systems. In Companies computers are used get the work done, not for entertainement.

But afcourse everybody knows that a hypothetical vista system with a lot less drm and without huge memory requirements would be faster and thus would find it's way very fast to the home user.

Backwards compatability is what made microsoft big.
And backwards compatability is what holding them back.

I am sure that if you gave them the chance to start with a clean os and with a clean api they would so today.
The whole win32 api is maybe too huge with too many quirks too emulate properly or they would have already done that.
Emulating also solves security problems if done properly.

There are many reason why vista is what vista is.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By phxfreddy on 5/14/08, Rating: -1
RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By SeanMI on 5/14/2008 2:35:27 PM , Rating: 5
What do you NEED? I don't know what YOU specifically need, but here are plenty of things other people/corporations need...

Bitlocker Drive Encryption

DirectX 10

Client Side Extensions for Group Policy Preferences (which are awesome BTW)

Client side caching (offline files) which utilizes bitmap differential transfers (MUCH faster client to server sync times)

A more secure crypto algorithm for the secure channel established with 2K8 servers.

MUCH improved event logging including CAPI2, group policy, winlogon, etc.

Now, minus DirectX 10, I've specifically mentioned items that would appeal to the corporate customer. I've also tried to stay away from controversial features like UAC. I can continue listing things if you'd like. Oh, and you can freakin disable AERO!!!


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By JAB on 5/15/2008 2:01:11 AM , Rating: 2
Good post. There are actually tons of good features on Vista that you never hear about. The cost vs benefit it a tough one for vista though. We just replaced some the computers with Pentium II and III CPU's in mission critical jobs. We still have some running because it can cost 60,000 dollars to replace each one due to all the validation and license fees.
The advanced features in XP are not properly used yet I dont see them being well used in out org before Vista is replaced.

The vast majority of our computers are Core 2 Duo with at least 2 GB of RAM bought this year but others cant be replaced for any reason no matter how old and overstretched.


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By robinthakur on 5/15/2008 8:35:38 AM , Rating: 2
Bitlocker Drive Encryption = third party tool can perform this on Xp

DirectX10 = You specifically don't mention this in the corporate space, but even in the consumer space its been a bit of a flop up to this point.

GPO Client extensions = Agreed important feature, but only really improves manageability, not a business driving feature.

differential caching = Only really noticeabcle if you work offline for extended period of time (i.e. executives) most have network connectivity most of the time.

More secure crypto Algorithm... = This can always be retrofitted and I can't think of anybody who would base their expansion plans on this. Server 2k8 and client pc's generally operate on a secured corporate network anyway with IDS's, firewalls and the whole shabang. This is unlikely to affect the godawful problem where accounts lose their secure channel in AD.

Event logging = Yes agreed this feature is much improved. Is it easy to sell this feature? No.

I'd also add, ease of deployment (on multiple DVD's for us when not using network install, sheesh!) and Office 2k7/SharePoint/Server08 integration to the list.

While these items do appeal to corporate environments, I wouldn't think that they are killer apps if their XP environment is working fine. They are very difficult to build a business case around unless its corporate policy that you have a set upgrade path. The incompatibilities with older apps is a very important stumbling block as very many orgs use older, maybe bespoke apps, and don't operate in the MS utopia. Many companies follow way behind the technology curve also and are displeased with MS's policy of having to reactivate every 180 days.

My company was in a fairly late phase of planning the Vista deployment then read all the recent hoohah about Windows 7 (Made worse by MS) and decided to shelve it permanently. We are rolling out Office 2k7 though. I wish I could say that this is an abberation, but actually I know a number of large co.s doing the same. Whilst people in general are no more likely now to serivously consider Linux or OSX (sorry fellow apple fans) for client machines, one of the most telling things is that MS looks a bit shaky in its resolve these days without Bill at the helm being highly visible like he used to be. This only engenders its clients to feel slightly uneasy and hesitant when it comes to upgrade...



RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By SeanMI on 5/15/2008 10:08:04 AM , Rating: 3
Bitlocker - A third party tool can do almost anything...That doesn't make Bitlocker any less of an important feature. The fact that it integrates with AD and allows you to delegate recovery permissions to members of a help desk is a huge selling feature.

GPO CSEs - Woah...improving manageability isn't a business driving feature? Huh? Isn't that what INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY is all about? Maintaining and managing information?

CSC - Scenario: You're an exec on an extended flight and you're accessing some 300MB of Excel files using the client side cache while you're not connected to the network. When you get to your destination, you VPN in, start to sync files, and realize CRAP! This is going to take forever! Not if you're using Vista! Only the edited bits will be copied to the server. You just saved your Exec 3 hours (oh, and you pay him $150 an hour...I think you just paid for his copy of Vista).

Event Logging - I'm no sales guy, but I'm glad you agree it's a much improved feature. Cause it is :)

And yes, you're correct about the integration with the products you mentioned. As a matter of fact, I was assuming Server 2K8 is in use because of the cryptographic algorithm I mentioned as well as the GPP. In the end, I think Server 2K8 will cause more companies to upgrade to Vista. It was like this with XP as well. As soon as 2K3 hit BAM, XP everywhere. 2K8 has been publicly available since what, March? Give it until the end of this year, and let's have this discussion again :)


RE: MS Neglects Businesses
By jonmcc33 on 5/14/08, Rating: -1