backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 76 comment(s) - last by ok630.. on Mar 26 at 1:47 PM

ISP claims FCC has no authority to regulate Comcast's "network management" practices

Comcast continued its resistance to FCC interference last week, with Vice President David L. Cohen firing a strongly-worded and thinly-veiled shot across the FCC’s bow.

“The congressional policy and agency practice of relying on the marketplace instead of regulation to maximize consumer welfare has been proven by experience (including the Comcast customer experience) to be enormously successful,” wrote Cohen in a letter (PDF) filed March 11. “Bearing these facts in mind should obviate the need for the Commission to test its legal authority.”

Cohen proceeded to pick apart the FCC’s authority, pointing out that the bureau’s own policies prohibit it from acting because they have “no force of law.” He cited the 2002 Cable Modem Declaratory Ruling, which classified cable modem service as an “information service” instead of a “common carrier,” therefore exempting Comcast from the FCC’s authority as codified in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 – a status upheld by the Supreme Court in the 2005 Brand X decision.

“Any attempt to justify an injunction on Comcast based on a statutory provision that is explicitly limited to common carriers would violate the Communications Act and be arbitrary and capricious,” wrote Cohen.

Cohen further argued that a sudden shift in FCC policy would violate the Administrative Procedures Act, noting that the FCC is not permitted to “switch abruptly from an explicit policy of relying on market forces” to a “new regime” where ISP decisions are “subject to governmental second-guessing and disruption.”

Comcast earned the FCC’s scrutiny in 2007 after it was discovered that the company took an intrusive, novel approach to controlling users’ BitTorrent usage, effectively cutting off users from using the service at reasonable speeds. Fouling up its attempts to explain itself, Comcast quickly earned a fierce public outcry and the attention of the FCC.

Comcast has since made it clear that it is not interested in the FCC’s interference, hiring seat warmers to sit in during an awkward meeting that saw the company grilled on its “reasonable” network policies.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin appears unfazed by Comcast’s responses. Referring to Comcast’s dodging-the-question when asked about its network policy, Martin attacked it directly: “A hallmark of what should be seen as a reasonable business practice is certainly whether or not the people engaging in that practice are willing to describe it publicly.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By PAPutzback on 3/20/2008 9:11:47 AM , Rating: 5
I have 2 choices 3MB DSL or 10MB cable. So I am going to pay the extra 10 bucks (30) for cable. But my ISP (Insight) just got bought out by Comcast and a month after the takeover I get a letter that they are going to jack up our prices to pay for Continued excellent service. I am no lawyer but I can't say a month as a provider is long enough to tell your customers they have given you excellent service. And definitely not a way to win customers. AS soon as I see that UVERSE serves my neighborhood I'll be ditchin COMCAST.




By MasterTemplar on 3/20/2008 9:16:12 AM , Rating: 5
...OMG, I've been waiting for "FIOS" like FOREVER!!!


By FITCamaro on 3/20/2008 9:46:27 AM , Rating: 5
Amen. Unfortunately Comcast, Time Warner, and Bellsouth are doing everything in their power to stop Verizon from rolling it out nationwide. But sadly cable is still normally way better than DSL.

I was outside of Dallas this past Christmas at a relatives who had FiOS TV and internet. It was amazing.


By mcnabney on 3/20/2008 3:16:50 PM , Rating: 2
No they aren't. FiOS costs a ton of money to deploy. Verizon hasn't even finished filling in the metro areas that it already covers. They might look to expand outside of their normal service areas, in a few years...


By SpaceRanger on 3/20/2008 9:54:24 AM , Rating: 5
It'll be a LONG while where I live before I see FIOS. It's all around my area, but not in the valley where I live. Won't be for a long while either. For now I have no choice but to have Comcast. :(


By Lazarus Dark on 3/20/2008 9:21:46 AM , Rating: 2
you're lucky, those choices aren't bad.
mine are 768dsl or 1mb-2mb cable.


By epsilonparadox on 3/20/2008 9:51:20 AM , Rating: 2
Uverse isn't as great you seem to think. I've had it for almost a year before I cancelled it and went to DirecTV and Roadrunner. I had FTTH with uverse and still had all sorts of internet and cable tv problems. Their on site techs seem to know less about the uverse tech than the common person.

The fact that I had FTTH and still only can record one HD channel AND lose the ability to watch HD while it records is beyond stupid. The M$ software they run is horrible and responds very slowly.

Oh and AT&T is going to do deep packet inspection and is about to be one of the first to do filtering at the ISP level.


By AntiM on 3/20/2008 10:04:16 AM , Rating: 2
Does anyone think that the upcoming use of the TV analog spectrum for WiFi broadband will help eliminate the cable industry's monopoly? I'm anxious to find out the results of the recent auction.


By PAPutzback on 3/20/2008 10:16:27 AM , Rating: 2
It's all about the bandwidth. More bandwidth = more services.

That is really disappointing that UVERSE isn't working out as good as I had hoped for some users.

The great thing about Cable is the speed and the analog channels for tvs without boxes. And cable card if you afford one of those boxes.

But depending on what Comcast jacks my price up to next month I'll probably go with Dish or DirectTV and suck up the price of internet thru COMCAST.


By AlphaVirus on 3/20/2008 1:26:03 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
But depending on what Comcast jacks my price up to next month I'll probably go with Dish or DirectTV and suck up the price of internet thru COMCAST.

Not sure if you have had satellite before but I would advise almost any person to switch from cable to satellite. Those commercials about satellite are a bit misleading as I only had 2 outages and thats when its about to be a hurricane or something drastic. Something small that made a big difference was the remote for the box, it is very user friendly for Dish Network.

Another thing I like about Dish is how the only stations that show up in the 'browser' screen are stations I paid for. With the cable providers I have used, I still have to click through all the junk I dont care for/dont pay for. This added hastle becomes annoying after a few weeks. There is, however, a button you can press if you would like all those stations to show up again.

In my area satellite is cheaper than cable so its a no-brainer, but if you live in an apartment the 'renters insurance' fee will hurt so it might not be such a great deal. If your apartment allows you to get it without insurance, get it and you will love it.


By eye smite on 3/20/2008 3:04:55 PM , Rating: 4
I realize DSL is not as fast, but it's worked fine for me for 5 yrs where I live now. If it's cheaper and works adequately enough for what you're doing, why not consider it til something better comes along?


By drebo on 3/20/2008 3:35:01 PM , Rating: 3
Indeed.

I had "5 megabit" cable from Charter that cost me $65/mo. Commonly, I'd see speeds at about 3.5 megabit with outages every 15 minutes. I had to go to my local Charter office, cable box in hand, and yell at the operations manager there before they'd even send someone to my house without charging me. Ended up getting 3 months of internet for free, but that still didn't excuse the abominable service I was getting for my money.

3 months later, I promptly canceled service and subscribed to 6 megabit DSL through SBC...low and behold, I get the full 6 megabits and have only had one outage in 6 months...and that outage happened when someone 100 miles away accidentally cut an OC192 with a back hoe and dropped virtually all phone and internet service in the area.

I wish I could switch from cable TV to Dish Network, but unfortunately, AT&T won't install a dish in an appartment complex. Oh well. In 2 months I'll be in a house, and it'll be Dish/DSL and a nice POTS line.


Comcast Customer Service SUCKS!
By Chosonman on 3/20/2008 9:51:49 AM , Rating: 3
Did I have a choice when I was using them? No... Now that I have FIOS I can't describe just how happy I am with their service. I want competition. And I don't want Verizon FIOS to be the only alternative. But Comcast has to die....




RE: Comcast Customer Service SUCKS!
By FITCamaro on 3/20/2008 9:55:15 AM , Rating: 3
Don't be absurd.

Personally I am begging to have Comcast where I live because the company I have is even worse. At my girlfriend's place they have Comcast and their selection of HD channels is way better than mine and their internet is way faster at a cheaper price.


By FITCamaro on 3/20/2008 9:58:59 AM , Rating: 2
Of course I'd rather have FiOS over Comcast but FiOS isn't even in any part of South Carolina yet.


RE: Comcast Customer Service SUCKS!
By novacthall on 3/20/2008 10:55:27 AM , Rating: 2
Sounds like a Charter customer. I've got Charter here in South Carolina and around these parts it's pretty much our only option. They've got us hard by the C.O. Jones and couldn't care any less what we think about it.


By Yawgm0th on 3/20/2008 11:49:23 AM , Rating: 3
I'm in MN and those who don't get Comcast have to use Charter for cable. Charter doesn't do any sort of packet filtering or any nonsense like that. There's no need to. You get about half the advertised bandwidth on a good day, and the service goes down every 3-5 weeks.


By FITCamaro on 3/20/2008 12:55:03 PM , Rating: 2
Knology. :(


RE: Comcast Customer Service SUCKS!
By walk2k on 3/20/08, Rating: -1
RE: Comcast Customer Service SUCKS!
By Chosonman on 3/20/2008 1:29:04 PM , Rating: 4
Or the county I live in could have negotiated a contract for exclusive rights to provide cable service with another company. Or they could have let several companies compete. Don't be a bone head. Living without internet or using dial up today is not an option to a lot of people including those of us in IT. Troll somewhere else.


RE: Comcast Customer Service SUCKS!
By walk2k on 3/20/08, Rating: -1