Print 19 comment(s) - last by fox12789.. on Dec 30 at 9:38 AM

You may be entitled to $16 if you are a Comcast customer whose traffic was throttled

Over two years ago, in October 2007, Comcast was caught slowing down the connections of customers who were using popular P2P programs like Ares, BitTorrent, eDonkey, FastTrack or Gnutella P2P protocols.  Comcast didn't admit, at first, that it was doing this, but when it finally acknowledged the practice it argued that filesharers put an unequal strain on its network and it had every right to throttle their connections.

It wasn't long before the company was slapped with several class action lawsuits. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission also opened an investigation into the internet service provider's "data discrimination".  Comcast continued to defend its practices both in court and to the FCC.

Now Comcast has at last given up one of those court battle and agreed to settle to the tune of $16M USD payout.  Unsurprisingly, despite essentially losing the suit, Comcast won't say it did anything wrong -- it says it has every right to "manage" its traffic and says the settlement was because it wanted to "avoid a potentially lengthy and distracting legal dispute that would serve no useful purpose."

Nonetheless, the good news is that Comcast subscribers who "live in the United States or its Territories, have a current or former Comcast High-Speed Internet account, and either used or attempted to use Comcast service to use the Ares, BitTorrent, eDonkey, FastTrack or Gnutella P2P protocols at any time from April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008; and/or Lotus Notes to send emails any time from March 26, 2007 to October 3, 2007" are entitled to a $16 piece of the settlement pie.  The settlement should cover about a bit less than a million customers, the estimated size of the class.  While that may be a pittance, consumers who feel they were wronged should relish the chance to nickel and dime Comcast.

There are several other class action lawsuits that are still ongoing, surrounding the data discrimination.  They accuse Comcast of violating its own Terms of Service and breaking consumer protection laws by advertising its network as fast.

The settlement site can be found here.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By jonmcc33 on 12/24/2009 11:41:31 AM , Rating: 5
Comcast Pays $16M USD to Settle P2P Throttling Suit, But Won't Admit Wrongdoing

That's the benefit of a settlement. Nobody has to admit to anything. They just settle and go their separate ways.

RE: Title...
By TSS on 12/24/2009 12:55:07 PM , Rating: 1
I never understood a settlement. Whats the benifit to society?

You did or didn't commit a crime. You should pay the penalty society has set for that crime, for the crime was against society (as society determines the laws). Or you should go free and the people who wrongfully accused you, pick up the tab.

To me settlements are simply the rich man's way of getting out of trouble, only now their legalised instead of bribing under the table. And it seems comcast got away from this one for a pittence, too (they damn well made more, or saved if you will, then $16 million throtteling the biggest cause of traffic on the internet for 2 and 1/2 years).

I know how much money you have equals how much justice you'll be served, it's always been like that. But come on... atleast have the decency to let the common folk think the justice system is actually a justice system and not a elaborate roulette table.

RE: Title...
By Oregonian2 on 12/24/2009 2:14:14 PM , Rating: 4
Such lawsuits are NOT criminal prosecutions, nor are being done to benefit society.

They are civil lawsuits and are done so that those doing the suing can get money from those being sued.

RE: Title...
By jonmcc33 on 12/24/2009 2:29:59 PM , Rating: 3
Lawsuits aren't about a crime. Lawsuits are civil complaints regarding damages. They seek a court judgement in most cases. That court will decide a fault and award accordingly.

The process of the lawsuit, the litigation, is to determine whether or not someone was wronged and to find a judgment based upon the level of wrong doing.

In order to spare a civil trial, in which all skeletons are exposed to the public, and avoid any embarrassment most will seek a settlement instead.

So a settlement does not admit to any wrong doing. It just drops the civil case and awards the plaintiff with whatever makes them happy.

If there was any sort of crime committed then it wouldn't really be in the hands of the plaintiff to pursue charges. It would be in a criminal court and handled by the DA.

RE: Title...
By rcc on 12/28/2009 4:13:18 PM , Rating: 2
To me settlements are simply the rich man's way of getting out of trouble

Sometimes, perhaps. However, scam artists also take advantage of them on a regular basis. Cause enough trouble and the other party will settle rather than going through all the time and trouble to go to court.

RE: Title...
By fox12789 on 12/30/2009 9:38:39 AM , Rating: 2
sneaker: airmax 90, 95 etc $35-42 free shiping.
boots: UGG etc $60 free shiping.
Jeans : polo etc $35-49 free shipping
T-shirts : A&f etc $12-18 free shipping.
hoodies: 5ive etc $28-40 free shipping
handbags: Ed hardy etc $35-68 free shipping
Sunglasses: LV etc $17 free shipping
Belts: BOSS etc $15 free shipping
Caps: red bull etc $12-15 free shipping
Watches:rolex etc $80 free shipping

I wonder...
By DuctTapeAvenger on 12/24/2009 11:11:02 AM , Rating: 3
Does every check mailed out comes with a free Federal Agent?

If I were a paranoid crazy person, I'd say that it's much cheaper to offer $16 a person to get them to rat themselves out, instead of paying much more to have people perform investigations and track them down.

RE: I wonder...
By bigboxes on 12/25/2009 9:49:39 AM , Rating: 3
I don't know about you, but I was throttled downloading linux updates. :p

RE: I wonder...
By CommodoreVic20 on 12/28/2009 10:38:44 AM , Rating: 2
As an example, lots of games use P2P to distribute patches, World of Warcraft being one of them. You seem to be confused about the difference between the technology and how some people 'may' have misused it in some specific cases.

They only lie when their lips move ...
By pjs on 12/25/2009 3:08:09 AM , Rating: 2
Of course they didn't do anything wrong. They paid out a few million $$s (actually a very small sum for them) to be nice people. Like Intel paying AMD $1,250,000,000 to be nice, it is nice to be nice to the nice and be on the nice bandwagon.

Yeah, sure!!!

RE: They only lie when their lips move ...
By inperfectdarkness on 12/25/2009 7:20:30 PM , Rating: 2
it's a drop in the bucket.

comcast ftmfl

By Chernobyl68 on 12/28/2009 4:36:42 PM , Rating: 2
OK, that's a new one.

Won't admit wrongdoing!
By holymaniac on 12/24/2009 12:27:38 PM , Rating: 3
They won't admit wrongdoing as they have no moral conscience - like most all corporations. Watch the movie "The Corporation" and it explains how corporations have the mind of a sociopathic criminal.

RE: Won't admit wrongdoing!
By Headfoot on 12/26/09, Rating: 0
RE: Won't admit wrongdoing!
By NaughtyGeek on 12/29/2009 5:07:37 AM , Rating: 2
Unfortunately, corporations are mandated by law to act as "a sociopathic criminal."

Settlement was too small
By Bateluer on 12/24/2009 10:36:45 AM , Rating: 3
Sounds like their settlement money was a token sum. It should have been substantially higher, or they should have been forced to use that money to upgrade their hardware to handle higher speeds.

By BubbaJoe TBoneMalone on 12/24/2009 10:34:23 AM , Rating: 2
The administrators of the settlement have set up a website to deal with questions about the case which can be found at

By greylica on 12/24/2009 11:18:52 AM , Rating: 2
I hope this will teach a lesson to those ISPs here in Brazil that are wrongdoing using the corrupt Comcast Example of doing Business, and teach them that they have to expand their Networks. Better than be corrupts and scrocs.
DNS kidnapping is also happening here in some locations. But the consumers are already using other IP DNS's to avoid their '' Right to spy consumers''...
Sandvine, Laquoia and some Cisco routers are such a Gremlin inside their networks...

No more regional monopolies please.
By Motoman on 12/24/2009 12:44:38 PM , Rating: 2
...this kind of typical Comcastic behavior is encouraged by the fact that a given geographic area generally is served by only one cable provider. If you want such providers to behave in a civil manner, there has to be local competition in every market...i.e. more than one cable provider. Then you can take your business elsewhere.

When you have no other option for a product or service, the provider in question has no incentive to treat you well.

“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki