 Apparently Twitter passes as a source among the kids these days...
TechCrunch blogger's scathing review of Firefox is unfounded
As a writer, it's natural to want to break a news story first,
especially when the news story is a bug found in a marquee product
that some sources are reporting to be major. However, in the
rush to break the news, you can often misreport it. I admit,
this happened to me with the chkdsk.exe
Windows 7 RTM bug, where InfoWorld's Randall Kennedy and
several bloggers exaggerated the impact and went as far as to suggest
Windows 7's launch might be delayed. My subsequent report was
full of unintentional hyperbole on the problem -- and I'm
sorry.
Having been recently burned, I've been eyeing these
kind of "the sky is falling" reports with a bit more
scrutiny. So I was intrigued to come across this jewel of a
headline "I Want To Love Firefox 3.5, But It Keeps Crashing On
Me" written by TechCrunch's Erick Schonfeld and reprinted
in The Washington Post. That's a potential blockbuster
piece, if it's true!
Except it really isn't. I've been
using Firefox extensively (4+ hours a day) since at least 2.0, on
both Fedora Linux (6-9 editions over the past few years), Windows XP,
Windows Vista, and most recently Windows 7. My experience
across a number of systems is that since 2.0 Firefox's stability has
been steadily increasing.
Up until the 2.5 release,
flash advertisements on my Fedora install would common pop up strange
phantom windows. If you attempted to close these windows,
without warning, it would exit all of Firefox. These problems
mostly disappeared with 2.5, and with 3.0 they've been long gone.
All around 3.5 is very stable. If anything, I love Firefox more
because it doesn't crash on me!
So that's just
my own personal experience. Let's look at other users.
Mr. Schonfield cites a Twitter
search for "firefox 3.5 crash" (is that a source?) --
of 14 posts, one is referencing his article. Great -- I can
find at least 30 (twice as many!) positive comments about Firefox 3.5
in my two
articles on it I wrote at launch
time (though I'd hardly call that a conclusive source).
In
such cases, the best option would be to launch into a complete and
exhaustive survey, along with thorough testing. But let's face
it -- for most news writers that's not feasible in terms of money and
time. Barring such an approach, the next best option is logic.
The logical conclusion would have been to note that one of the users
on the Twitter feed admitted that their incompatibility was due to a
add-on (and that the crashes were reproducible). With that in
mind I returned to launch articles and found this comment by user
slider169: "[Firefox] crashed right after the update because 50%
of my add-on aren't compatible."
A clue, Sherlock!
So there's your likely culprit -- if your Firefox is crashing, its
likely due the add-ons you have. With a wealth of add-ons on
most users installs its no wonder some such problems arise.
Mozilla could opt like Microsoft not to allow add-ons, but instead
they allow them and conscientiously work with add-on developers to
fix such problems when they're reported.
Mr. Schonfeld
however, failed to report what add-ons were installed on his
crash-prone install, and even what OS he was on, making it hard to
figure out why exactly his particular install was so glitchy (my bets
are on his add-ons).
Still that didn't stop him from
writing, "[T]here is one persistent bug that might push me to
another browser: it keeps crashing on me. This usually happens
when I have too many tabs open (like 15 or 20, which is not unusual
for me towards the end of the day). The whole thing will just freeze
and I'll have to force the browser to quit. When I relaunch I get a
message like the one above, sheepishly saying, 'Well, this is
embarrassing.' Yes, it is embarrassing. A modern browser should be
able to handle dozens of open tabs, and if there is a problem with
one, it should be able to isolate it and allow you to carry with your
business in the other tabs."
It's okay, Mr. Schonfeld,
I've been there before. You think that you have a big story on
your hands of a glaring problem in a marquee product. However,
you live and you learn -- when the problem turns out to be
exaggerated and your piece is criticized, you'll be a bit wiser next
time. For now, though, we can rest assured -- the sky isn't
falling and unless you have incompatible add-ons, your Firefox should
be nice and stable -- and ready for your love.
"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov
|
DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone?
14 Comments
Most Popular ArticlesSprint Gets Nexus One, Verizon Gears up for HTC Incredible March 17, 2010, 5:26 PM Google, Sony, Intel Working on "Google TV" March 18, 2010, 9:54 AM Why the Feds Believe Extraterrestrial Rays Could be Messing With Toyota Vehicles March 16, 2010, 4:03 PM Researchers Create Silicon that Pumps Water Vertically with no Moving Parts March 17, 2010, 10:10 AM Microsoft IE 9 Preview Airs; Embraces HTML5, but Ditches XP March 17, 2010, 9:00 AM
|