backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 45 comment(s) - last by peteryang84.. on May 27 at 10:12 PM


Chinese censorship icon Jingjing.  (Source: China.org.cn)

Jingjing and Chacha pop up when debates become heated, gently reminding users to "advance harmony."  (Source: Wired/Committee to Protect Journalists)
Surge in traffic from earthquake creates a short-lived gap in Chinese censor coverage

Freedom groups everywhere breathed a sigh of relief when, earlier this week, Chinese censors were reported to be buckling under the weight of a country eager to talk about its devastating 7.9 earthquake. Now, it appears, those groups may have been incorrect: China’s censors never went anywhere, and the country’s “Golden Shield” project appears to be back to normal.

Previous reporting on the topic revealed that Chinese news sources were “surprisingly frank” with their reporting, revealing an uncommon level of honesty for a government that, characteristically, heavily regulates the flow of negative information. Chinese bloggers were able to communicate freely in all but the most extreme of circumstances, and Chinese message boards were littered with a variety of thoughts on the earthquake, both good and bad.

While many were hoping that the censors’ visibly relaxed controls would be permanent, the Chinese government quickly rebounded to the old status quo as activity died down. Even worse; it appears that the government propaganda machine was in effect all along.

United States-based Committee to Protect Journalists’ Asia program coordinator, Robert Dietz, noted that journalists “rushed to the scene,” and described a “general feeling that the government had lifted the restrictions on reporters.”

Instead, said Dietz, “the central propaganda department never stopped handing down directives, never stopped telling people how much to report.”

On the public front, Chinese netizens are gently reminded to “self-regulate” by the country’s cartoon censorship icons, Jingjing and Chacha. One example, provided to Wired’s Threat Level by the Committee to Protect Journalists, the line-drawn duo orders users to “advance harmony,” by popping up at the bottom of the user’s screen if they posted a comment considered inflammatory.

However small and short-lived it may have been, the gap in Chinese censorship coverage reveals an interesting gap in the regime’s armor: like most everything else, the “Golden Shield” project is not invincible. Chinese users have long known that they can circumvent government blacklists with proxy servers – something the government actively cracks down on, creating a game of cat and mouse – but now, apparently, they can flat-out overwhelm it too.

With the country reportedly encouraging up to 500 million of its rural citizens to migrate to urban population centers – putting each of those migrants all the closer to computers and cellphones – can internet censors keep up?



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Jingjing and Chacha
By HotdogIT on 5/25/2008 10:17:46 AM , Rating: 5
I wish US-based forums had Jingjing and Chacha. That'd be awesome.




RE: Jingjing and Chacha
By icrf on 5/25/2008 11:00:38 AM , Rating: 2
Seems like they'd make a good tongue-in-cheek T-shirt chain, too.


RE: Jingjing and Chacha
By OAKside24 on 5/25/2008 11:56:16 AM , Rating: 5
Now someone just needs to invent the Web Asshat Determination System (WADS!) so only the deserving trolls and kiddies are honored with their presence.


RE: Jingjing and Chacha
By Alexstarfire on 5/26/2008 8:02:32 AM , Rating: 2
LMAO. Now that's funny.


RE: Jingjing and Chacha
By MrTeal on 5/25/2008 3:21:07 PM , Rating: 5
Maybe MS can port them to XBox Live.

Chacha says "Stop being a douchebag"


RE: Jingjing and Chacha
By daInvincibleGama on 5/25/2008 4:24:04 PM , Rating: 5
LOL. Maybe even "Come back when you're atleast 10 years old. That's 6 years from now."


Realistically,
By Emily on 5/25/2008 12:27:54 PM , Rating: 2
I did not expect a permanent change as a result of recent events (as far as I know, the 'Great Firewall' was relaxed since the Olympic Torch Relay even before the earthquake).

I reckon that the Chinese government is just experimenting to see the impact of relaxing the rules and it will take years (or longer) before they even consider dismantling the project.

But I am curious about the comment about overwhelming the use of proxy servers. It's the first time I've heard of it, as far as I know, proxies still worked fine not long ago.




RE: Realistically,
By daInvincibleGama on 5/25/2008 4:28:52 PM , Rating: 2
The "overwhelming" refers to overwhelming the traffic inspection devices(that probably use DPI) that are part of the Golden Shield. Apparently, when the Chinese people became eager to talk about the disaster and went to the forums all at once, the inspection hardware could not keep up, resulting in a temporary break in censorship. Apparently, the Great Firewall is back online. This is probably the first time it has been brute-forced through though.

It's probably because the hardware picks only the amount of traffic it can scan to do the inspections on. The rest passes through.

And yeah, proxies will work fine.


I've been blocked
By Azndude51 on 5/26/2008 1:12:05 PM , Rating: 2
I'm currently visiting in China from the US. I knew that China had many websites blocked, but I haven't really encountered any blocked sites. That is until I read this article, I didn't know there was a term for the censoring, the "Great Firewall."

I decide to Google the term and clicked on the first link which was to the Wikipedia article on censorship in China. The page starts to load for a spit second, then BAM, consider myself censored. It's as if the page doesn't even exist.




RE: I've been blocked
By eion on 5/27/2008 1:54:53 AM , Rating: 2
Wikipedia has been fine for me since they unblocked it, even the 'sensitive' pages, and the "Internet Censorship in China" page just loaded without any issues. It could just be the lousy Internet access you get in China (something I suspect is not unrelated to the Great Firewall).


Coming soon to Office 2010!
By rtrski on 5/26/2008 9:02:37 PM , Rating: 2
I never thought I'd see something that scared me more than "Clippy" the helpful paperclip.




RE: Coming soon to Office 2010!
By Adonlude on 5/27/2008 8:33:05 PM , Rating: 2
I can think of an amusing nick name for this Chinese police pop up. I'll give you a hint, it rhymes with Clippy... ;-)


The WWW is free!!!
By bongsi21 on 5/26/2008 10:49:01 PM , Rating: 3
The World Wide Web was created by Sir Tim Berners-Lee for a military project. When the military decided to let go of the project. Tim Berner lee donated the technology for free to the world.

These events revolutionize our way of life.
And now the world is conspiring to control the net by using the term "piracy" and confidentiality as a means to govern and rule the internet.

Everything is utterly wrong.
If people does not create any actions...




Censorship
By 325hhee on 5/27/2008 12:03:47 PM , Rating: 2
While everybody is harping on China and it's web censorship, the Freeworld isn't any better, they just rename it and call it government cover ups. Let's just take the Roswell incident, did a UFO crash? Are there really aliens? Did the govt cover it up? How is that any different than censorship, it's the same thing, you take some information and only release to the public what you want them to hear.

Though personally, I don't believe there were any aliens in Roswell, but that's not the topic of discussion. On to more recent events. The war in Iraq, were there WMDs? They were never found, or where they? Was the govt trying to cover something up? If so what was the agenda? Better yet, when our soldiers were being beheaded, should the news show the beheading? Absolutely not, it's barbaric, we do not need to see soldier's heads lopped off.

Censorship isn't the best thing in the world, but some times you just need to use judgement on what should be seen and what shouldn't. Would you let a 10 yr old watch porno? Would you want to use profanity around kids? Morally the answer should be no, but I've seen the people out there and they are no holds bar on their kids, which is why the youth in today's time are horrendous, disrespectful, lack manners, lack discipline.

I may not agree with China's internet policy, but to govern billions, some extreme measures needs to be taken sometimes. Comparing to the US with only 300 mil, this country needs a shakedown within, racism still exists, bigotry, sexism, ignorance is the biggest thing of all. No country is perfect, and no country ever will be. Democracy failed in Russia, it doesn't work for everybody. Democracy doesn't even work in the US, in some aspects, hence recession.




Mixed feeling about this.
By pugster on 5/25/08, Rating: -1
RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By Nihility on 5/25/2008 10:47:40 AM , Rating: 5
ohai propaganda machine


RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By rs2 on 5/25/2008 5:28:25 PM , Rating: 5
Advance harmony.


RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By Jiggs1337 on 5/25/2008 10:55:06 AM , Rating: 5
Instead, why not have a government you can trust that releases statements disproving the false rumors/alarms?
Censorship imho is never the right thing.


RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By CSMR on 5/25/08, Rating: -1
RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By Emily on 5/25/2008 2:48:35 PM , Rating: 3
However, suspicion can increase if people find out about the censorship: they may wonder if the government trying to cover up anything.

I doubt that the Chinese government have that much more trust than the US/UK government. I reckon it is more a case that the economy in China has done very well in the past decade, and a lot of people are leading better life than they used to ago, and that matters more than knowing that there is a lot of information manipulation going on (made possible with selective censorship).

And while I am sure the Chinese government did evaluate their options, the system was probably put in place for their own benefits more than to stop false rumours.


RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By CSMR on 5/25/2008 3:55:54 PM , Rating: 1
Suspicion depends on the amount of censorship and when it is observed. If you do a lot of censorship, and it isn't public exactly what you're censoring, then it will not create much suspicion about particular issues.
By trust I meant that statements made by the government would be trusted more than statements made by the US, UK governments.
What I am saying is that even with quite a lot of trust, and even (hypothetical situation) if the motivation is clearing up misinformation, censorship can be an effective option.


RE: Mixed feeling about this.
By Spuke on 5/25/2008 7:27:38 PM , Rating: 3
Wow! I didn't realize that ANYONE believed in censorship in any form. On the other hand, I guess I shouldn't be so surprised given the types of laws that have been passed (and supported) in the recent past.